Deutschland
France
Nederland
Great Britain
Sverige
Norge
Danmark
Suomi
Italia
Polska
EspañaVS
Mazda CX-30 vs Renault Austral - Differences and prices compared
Compare performance (186 HP vs 200 HP), boot space and price (25200 £ vs 29700 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Mazda CX-30 or Renault Austral?
CX-30
Costs and Efficiency:
Price and efficiency are often the first things buyers look at. Here it becomes clear which model has the long-term edge – whether at the pump, the plug, or in purchase price.
Mazda CX-30 has a slightly advantage in terms of price – it starts at 25200 £ , while the Renault Austral costs 29700 £ . That’s a price difference of around 4508 £.
Fuel consumption also shows a difference: Renault Austral manages with 4.80 L and is therefore slightly more efficient than the Mazda CX-30 with 5.70 L. The difference is about 0.90 L per 100 km.
Austral
Engine and Performance:
Under the bonnet, it becomes clear which model is tuned for sportiness and which one takes the lead when you hit the accelerator.
When it comes to engine power, the Renault Austral has a hardly perceptible edge – offering 200 HP compared to 186 HP. That’s roughly 14 HP more horsepower.
In acceleration from 0 to 100 km/h, the Mazda CX-30 is hardly perceptible quicker – completing the sprint in 8.30 s, while the Renault Austral takes 8.40 s. That’s about 0.10 s faster.
There’s also a difference in torque: Renault Austral pulls slightly stronger with 270 Nm compared to 240 Nm. That’s about 30 Nm difference.
Ad · Affiliate
As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.
CX-30
Space and Everyday Use:
Whether family car or daily driver – which one offers more room, flexibility and comfort?
Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.
In curb weight, Mazda CX-30 is slight lighter – 1455 kg compared to 1539 kg. The difference is around 84 kg.
In terms of boot space, the Renault Austral offers clearly perceptible more room – 555 L compared to 430 L. That’s a difference of about 125 L.
When it comes to payload, Mazda CX-30 barely noticeable takes the win – 496 kg compared to 477 kg. That’s a difference of about 19 kg.
Who wins the race in the data check?
The Renault Austral holds a very small edge in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.
Mazda CX-30
Renault Austral
Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
from about £29,700
Renault Austral
Mazda CX-30
5 (1 Reviews)
The Mazda CX-30 blends sleek coupe-like lines with the practicality of a compact crossover, feeling more premium than its price tag suggests. It’s a joy to drive for anyone who likes a taut chassis and an interior that treats daily commutes like a small luxury escape.
details
Renault Austral
4.9 (3 Reviews)
The Renault Austral dresses the family SUV in elegant modern looks and a surprisingly grown-up cabin that feels thoughtful and livable. It balances comfort and clever technology with a relaxed road presence—an appealing choice for buyers who want style and everyday sense without fuss.
details
Mazda CX-30
Renault Austral
Costs and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
25200 - 36800 £
|
Price
29700 - 37800 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
5.7 - 6.6 L
|
Consumption L/100km
4.8 - 6.5 L
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
|
Electric Range
-
|
Electric Range
-
|
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
|
co2
129 - 148 g/km
|
co2
109 - 148 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Fuel tank capacity
55 L
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
SUV
|
Body Type
SUV
|
|
Seats
5
|
Seats
5
|
|
Doors
-
|
Doors
5
|
|
Curb weight
1455 - 1587 kg
|
Curb weight
1539 - 1613 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
422 - 430 L
|
Trunk capacity
527 - 555 L
|
|
Length
-
|
Length
4533 mm
|
|
Width
1795 mm
|
Width
1825 mm
|
|
Height
-
|
Height
1645 mm
|
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
Max trunk capacity
1736 - 1761 L
|
|
Payload
458 - 496 kg
|
Payload
464 - 477 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Petrol MHEV
|
Engine Type
Petrol MHEV, Full Hybrid
|
|
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Automatic Gearbox
|
Transmission Detail
CVT, Automatic Gearbox
|
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
140 - 186 HP
|
Power HP
158 - 200 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
8.3 - 10.3 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
8.4 - 9.7 s
|
|
Max Speed
-
|
Max Speed
180 km/h
|
|
Torque
238 - 240 Nm
|
Torque
270 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
4
|
Number of Cylinders
3 - 4
|
|
Power kW
103 - 137 kW
|
Power kW
116 - 147 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
1998 - 2488 cm3
|
Engine capacity
1199 - 1332 cm3
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2025
|
Model Year
2025
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
D, E
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
E, C
|
|
Brand
Mazda
|
Brand
Renault
|
What drive types are available for the Mazda CX-30?
The Mazda CX-30 is offered with Front-Wheel Drive or All-Wheel Drive.
The prices shown are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted for local VAT. Local registration taxes (e.g. NoVA, BPM or CO2 malus) are not included. This information is not legally binding.