Deutschland
France
Nederland
Great Britain
Sverige
Norge
Danmark
Suomi
Italia
Polska
EspañaVS
Mazda CX-30 vs Renault Austral – Which one offers the better deal?
Everyday use, family trips or long-distance drives – here’s where the differences show.
Discover whether Mazda CX-30 or Renault Austral fits your lifestyle better.
CX-30
@ Mazda Motor Corporation
Costs and Efficiency:
Price and efficiency are often the first things buyers look at. Here it becomes clear which model has the long-term edge – whether at the pump, the plug, or in purchase price.
Mazda CX-30 has a slightly advantage in terms of price – it starts at 25200 £, while the Renault Austral costs 29700 £. That’s a price difference of around 4508 £.
Fuel consumption also shows a difference: Renault Austral manages with 4.80 L and is therefore slightly more efficient than the Mazda CX-30 with 5.70 L. The difference is about 0.90 L per 100 km.
Austral
@ Renault Group Media
Engine and Performance:
Under the bonnet, it becomes clear which model is tuned for sportiness and which one takes the lead when you hit the accelerator.
When it comes to engine power, the Renault Austral has a hardly perceptible edge – offering 200 HP compared to 186 HP. That’s roughly 14 HP more horsepower.
In acceleration from 0 to 100 km/h, the Mazda CX-30 is hardly perceptible quicker – completing the sprint in 8.30 s, while the Renault Austral takes 8.40 s. That’s about 0.10 s faster.
In terms of top speed, the Mazda CX-30 performs slightly better – reaching 204 km/h, while the Renault Austral tops out at 180 km/h. The difference is around 24 km/h.
There’s also a difference in torque: Renault Austral pulls slightly stronger with 270 Nm compared to 240 Nm. That’s about 30 Nm difference.
CX-30
@ Mazda Motor Corporation
Space and Everyday Use:
Whether family car or daily driver – which one offers more room, flexibility and comfort?
Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.
In curb weight, Mazda CX-30 is slight lighter – 1455 kg compared to 1539 kg. The difference is around 84 kg.
In terms of boot space, the Renault Austral offers clearly perceptible more room – 555 L compared to 430 L. That’s a difference of about 125 L.
In maximum load capacity, the Renault Austral performs evident better – up to 1761 L, which is about 355 L more than the Mazda CX-30.
When it comes to payload, Mazda CX-30 barely noticeable takes the win – 496 kg compared to 477 kg. That’s a difference of about 19 kg.
Who wins the race?
The Renault Austral proves to be wins by a narrow margin and therefore becomes our DriveDuel Champion!
Renault Austral is the better all-rounder in this comparison.
from about £29,700
@ Renault Group Media
Renault Austral
Mazda CX-30
The Mazda CX-30 blends sleek coupe-like lines with the practicality of a compact crossover, feeling more premium than its price tag suggests. It’s a joy to drive for anyone who likes a taut chassis and an interior that treats daily commutes like a small luxury escape.
details
@ Mazda Motor Corporation
@ Mazda Motor Corporation
@ Mazda Motor Corporation
@ Mazda Motor Corporation
Renault Austral
The Renault Austral dresses the family SUV in elegant modern looks and a surprisingly grown-up cabin that feels thoughtful and livable. It balances comfort and clever technology with a relaxed road presence—an appealing choice for buyers who want style and everyday sense without fuss.
details
@ Renault Group Media
@ Renault Group Media
@ Renault Group Media
@ Renault Group Media
@ Renault Group Media
@ Renault Group Media
Mazda CX-30
Renault Austral
|
@ Mazda Motor Corporation
|
@ Renault Group Media
|
|
|
|
Costs and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
25200 - 36800 £
|
Price
29700 - 37800 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
5.7 - 6.6 L
|
Consumption L/100km
4.8 - 6.5 L
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
|
Electric Range
-
|
Electric Range
-
|
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
|
co2
129 - 148 g/km
|
co2
109 - 148 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
48 - 51 L
|
Fuel tank capacity
55 L
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
SUV
|
Body Type
SUV
|
|
Seats
5
|
Seats
5
|
|
Doors
5
|
Doors
5
|
|
Curb weight
1455 - 1587 kg
|
Curb weight
1539 - 1613 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
422 - 430 L
|
Trunk capacity
527 - 555 L
|
|
Length
4395 mm
|
Length
4533 mm
|
|
Width
1795 mm
|
Width
1825 mm
|
|
Height
1540 mm
|
Height
1645 mm
|
|
Max trunk capacity
1398 - 1406 L
|
Max trunk capacity
1736 - 1761 L
|
|
Payload
458 - 496 kg
|
Payload
464 - 477 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Petrol MHEV
|
Engine Type
Petrol MHEV, Full Hybrid
|
|
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Automatic Gearbox
|
Transmission Detail
CVT, Automatic Gearbox
|
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
140 - 186 HP
|
Power HP
158 - 200 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
8.3 - 10.3 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
8.4 - 9.7 s
|
|
Max Speed
191 - 204 km/h
|
Max Speed
180 km/h
|
|
Torque
238 - 240 Nm
|
Torque
270 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
4
|
Number of Cylinders
3 - 4
|
|
Power kW
103 - 137 kW
|
Power kW
116 - 147 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
1998 - 2488 cm3
|
Engine capacity
1199 - 1332 cm3
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2025
|
Model Year
2025
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
D, E
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
E, C
|
|
Brand
Mazda
|
Brand
Renault
|
What drive types are available for the Mazda CX-30?
The Mazda CX-30 is offered with Front-Wheel Drive or All-Wheel Drive.
The prices and data displayed are estimates based on German list prices and may vary by country. This information is not legally binding.