VS

Mazda CX-30 vs Toyota Hilux – Performance, range & efficiency compared

Compare performance, boot capacity, efficiency and price at a glance.
Find out which car is the better choice for you – Mazda CX-30 or Toyota Hilux?

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

CX-30 @ de.mazda-press.com

Costs and Efficiency:

Price and efficiency are often the first things buyers look at. Here it becomes clear which model has the long-term edge – whether at the pump, the plug, or in purchase price.

Mazda CX-30 has a clearly advantage in terms of price – it starts at 25200 £, while the Toyota Hilux costs 39800 £. That’s a price difference of around 14525 £.

Fuel consumption also shows a difference: Mazda CX-30 manages with 5.70 L and is therefore convincingly more efficient than the Toyota Hilux with 9.70 L. The difference is about 4 L per 100 km.

Hilux @ toyota-media.de

Engine and Performance:

Power, torque and acceleration are the classic benchmarks for car enthusiasts – and here, some clear differences start to show.

When it comes to engine power, the Toyota Hilux has a slight edge – offering 204 HP compared to 186 HP. That’s roughly 18 HP more horsepower.

In terms of top speed, the Mazda CX-30 performs somewhat better – reaching 204 km/h, while the Toyota Hilux tops out at 175 km/h. The difference is around 29 km/h.

There’s also a difference in torque: Toyota Hilux pulls significantly stronger with 500 Nm compared to 240 Nm. That’s about 260 Nm difference.

CX-30 @ de.mazda-press.com

Space and Everyday Use:

Cabin size, boot volume and payload all play a role in everyday practicality. Here, comfort and flexibility make the difference.

Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.

In curb weight, Mazda CX-30 is decisively lighter – 1455 kg compared to 2085 kg. The difference is around 630 kg.

When it comes to payload, Toyota Hilux decisively takes the win – 1125 kg compared to 496 kg. That’s a difference of about 629 kg.

Who wins the race?

The Mazda CX-30 proves to be is largely superior and therefore becomes our DriveDuel Champion!
Mazda CX-30 is the better all-rounder in this comparison.

from about £25,200
2022_mazda_cx-30_src_spain_act_44

Mazda CX-30

  • Engine Type : Petrol MHEV
  • Transmission : Manuel, Automatic
  • Drive Type : Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP : 140 - 186 HP
  • Consumption L/100km : 5.7 - 6.6 L
details

Mazda CX-30

5 (1)
rate

The Mazda CX-30 effortlessly combines sleek design with a sense of adventure, making it an appealing choice for urban explorers and countryside enthusiasts alike. Inside, the cabin is thoughtfully designed, offering both comfort and cutting-edge technology to enhance the driving experience. Its performance on the road is agile, providing a smooth and engaging journey for drivers and passengers.

details
2022_mazda_cx-30_src_spain_act_44 @ de.mazda-press.com
2022_mazda_cx-30_src_spain_act_42 @ de.mazda-press.com
2022_mazda_cx-30_src_spain_act_27 @ de.mazda-press.com
2022_mazda_cx-30_src_spain_int_3 @ de.mazda-press.com

Toyota Hilux

The Toyota Hilux has long been celebrated for its remarkable durability and reliability, making it a favourite among those needing a robust vehicle for rugged terrains. Known for its unyielding performance, the Hilux combines practicality with a surprisingly comfortable driving experience, both on and off the road. With its distinctive design and advanced safety features, it continues to be a versatile choice for adventurers and professionals alike.

details
84229-2023hiluxhybrid48vmain01 @ toyota-media.de
84230-2023hiluxhybrid48vmain02 @ toyota-media.de

Similar Comparisons

Mazda CX-30
Skoda Kamiq
VS
The Mazda CX-30 is the stylish, driver's compact SUV that blends near-premium looks and crisp handling, while the Škoda Kamiq plays the sensible card with clever packaging, a roomier boot and lower running costs. Pick the CX-30 if you want a more emotional, fun-to-drive compact with a nicer interior; choose the Kamiq for everyday practicality, brilliant space use and better value for families and commuters.
Ford Puma
Mazda CX-30
VS
In the competitive subcompact crossover segment, the Ford Puma and Mazda CX-30 stand out with their distinctive designs and engaging driving dynamics. The Puma impresses with its sporty handling and practicality, making it a favorite for those seeking a fun urban ride. Meanwhile, the CX-30 captivates with its premium interior and refined performance, appealing to buyers looking for a more upscale experience in this class.
Mazda CX-30
Toyota Hilux
CX-30
Hilux

Costs and Consumption
Price
25200 - 36800 £
Price
39800 - 56200 £
Consumption L/100km
5.7 - 6.6 L
Consumption L/100km
9.7 - 10 L
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Electric Range
-
Electric Range
-
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
-
co2
129 - 148 g/km
co2
253 - 264 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
48 - 51 L
Fuel tank capacity
80 L

Dimensions and Body
Body Type
SUV
Body Type
Pickup
Seats
5
Seats
4 - 5
Doors
5
Doors
2 - 4
Curb weight
1455 - 1587 kg
Curb weight
2085 - 2295 kg
Trunk capacity
422 - 430 L
Trunk capacity
-
Length
4395 mm
Length
5325 mm
Width
1795 mm
Width
1855 mm
Height
1540 mm
Height
1810 - 1815 mm
Max trunk capacity
1398 - 1406 L
Max trunk capacity
-
Payload
458 - 496 kg
Payload
915 - 1125 kg

Engine and Performance
Engine Type
Petrol MHEV
Engine Type
Diesel MHEV, Diesel
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
Transmission
Automatic, Manuel
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Automatic Gearbox
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox, Manual Gearbox
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive
Power HP
140 - 186 HP
Power HP
150 - 204 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
8.3 - 10.3 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
-
Max Speed
191 - 204 km/h
Max Speed
170 - 175 km/h
Torque
238 - 240 Nm
Torque
400 - 500 Nm
Number of Cylinders
4
Number of Cylinders
4
Power kW
103 - 137 kW
Power kW
110 - 150 kW
Engine capacity
1998 - 2488 cm3
Engine capacity
2393 - 2755 cm3

General
Model Year
2025
Model Year
2024 - 2025
CO2 Efficiency Class
D, E
CO2 Efficiency Class
G
Brand
Mazda
Brand
Toyota

Similar Comparisons

Mazda CX-30
SEAT Arona
VS
In the competitive subcompact SUV segment, the Mazda CX-30 and SEAT Arona stand out with their unique design philosophies and driving dynamics. The CX-30 impresses with its upscale interior and smooth handling, while the Arona offers agile performance and a sporty character. Ultimately, both models cater to different preferences, making them strong contenders for buyers seeking style and functionality.
Mazda CX-30
Toyota Yaris Cross
VS
In the battle between the Mazda CX-30 and the Toyota Yaris Cross, both vehicles showcase their unique strengths in the subcompact SUV segment. The CX-30 stands out with its premium interior and engaging driving dynamics, making it a top choice for those who prioritize comfort and performance. Meanwhile, the Yaris Cross impresses with its impressive fuel efficiency and practicality, catering well to urban drivers seeking versatility in a compact form.
Lexus LBX
Mazda CX-30
VS
The Lexus LBX and Mazda CX-30 both epitomize the blend of luxury and practicality in the compact SUV segment. While the LBX offers a more upscale interior with advanced technology and refined design, the CX-30 impresses with its sporty handling and distinctive styling. Ultimately, the choice between these two stands as a reflection of personal preference, whether one prioritizes luxury or driving dynamics.
Mazda CX-30
Vauxhall Mokka
VS
Mazda CX-30
Nissan Qashqai
VS
In the compact SUV segment, the Mazda CX-30 and Nissan Qashqai stand out with their distinctive qualities. The Mazda CX-30 impresses with its sporty styling and superior driving dynamics, making it a joy for those who value performance and aesthetics. In contrast, the Nissan Qashqai offers practicality and comfort, boasting advanced safety features and a spacious interior, ideal for family-oriented drivers.
Mazda CX-30
Suzuki S-Cross
VS
In the competitive compact SUV segment, the Mazda CX-30 stands out with its premium interior and engaging driving dynamics, appealing to those who prioritize style and performance. In contrast, the Suzuki S-Cross offers a more practical approach with its spacious cabin and impressive fuel efficiency, making it a great choice for families and commuters alike. Ultimately, the decision between these two versatile SUVs will depend on whether buyers value sporty flair or functional reliability in their daily drives.
Mazda CX-30
Nissan Juke
VS
When comparing the Mazda CX-30 and the Nissan Juke, the CX-30 stands out with its refined interior and superior driving dynamics, making it a prime choice for those seeking a more sophisticated and sporty driving experience. Meanwhile, the Nissan Juke offers a bold design and innovative features, appealing to drivers who prioritize unique styling and urban maneuverability. Both models deliver on fuel efficiency and compact versatility, but the choice ultimately hinges on whether you value Mazda's craftsmanship or Nissan's quirky charm.
Isuzu D-Max
Toyota Hilux
VS
In the battle of the brawny pickups, the Isuzu D-Max and Toyota Hilux continue to set the standard for durability and performance. While the D-Max impresses with its robust towing capacity and rugged design, the Hilux is renowned for its reliability and off-road capability. Ultimately, the choice between these two heavyweights will depend on the buyer's specific needs—whether prioritizing cargo versatility or a well-rounded driving experience.
What drive types are available for the Mazda CX-30?

The Mazda CX-30 is offered with Front-Wheel Drive or All-Wheel Drive.

The prices and data displayed are estimates based on German list prices and may vary by country. This information is not legally binding.