VS

Mazda MX-5 Coupe vs VW T-Roc comparison

Compare performance (132 HP vs 150 HP), boot space and price (30,800 £ vs 26,400 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Mazda MX-5 Coupe or VW T-Roc?

Mazda MX-5 Coupe vs VW T-Roc: Key differences

Mazda MX-5 Coupe

  • only slightly quicker 0–100 km/h
  • clearly lighter
details

VW T-Roc

4.8 (6 Reviews)
rate
  • moderately cheaper
  • somewhat more power
  • somewhat more efficient
  • significantly more trunk space
details

All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.

By Achim Sedelmaier

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

MX-5 Coupe

Costs and Efficiency:

Looking at overall running costs, both models reveal some interesting differences in everyday economy.

VW T-Roc is moderately cheaper – starting at 26,400 £ , while the Mazda MX-5 Coupe costs 30,800 £ . That’s a price difference of around 4,410 £.

Fuel consumption also shows a difference: the VW T-Roc uses 5.5 L/100km and is somewhat more efficient than the Mazda MX-5 Coupe with 6.2 L/100km. The difference is about 0.7 L/100km.

T-Roc

Engine and Performance:

Under the bonnet, it becomes clear which model is tuned for sportiness and which one takes the lead when you hit the accelerator.

When it comes to engine power, the VW T-Roc offers somewhat more power – delivering 150 HP compared to 132 HP. That’s roughly 18 HP more horsepower.

When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Mazda MX-5 Coupe is only slightly quicker – completing the sprint in 8.6 s, while the VW T-Roc takes 8.9 s. That’s about 0.3 s quicker.

There’s also a difference in torque: the VW T-Roc delivers clearly more torque with 250 Nm compared to 152 Nm. That’s about 98 Nm more.

MX-5 Coupe

Space and Everyday Use:

Beyond pure performance, interior space and usability matter most in daily life. This is where you see which car is more practical and versatile.

Seats: VW T-Roc offers more seats – 5 vs 2.

In terms of curb weight, Mazda MX-5 Coupe is clearly lighter – 1,114 kg compared to 1,465 kg. The difference is around 351 kg.

Looking at boot space, the VW T-Roc offers significantly more boot space – 284 L compared to 127 L. That’s a difference of about 157 L.

When it comes to payload, the VW T-Roc carries significantly more – 515 kg compared to 166 kg. That’s a difference of about 349 kg.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The VW T-Roc holds a decisive overall lead in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

from £26,400
T-Roc

VW T-Roc

  • Engine Type : Petrol, Petrol MHEV
  • Transmission : Manuel, Automatic
  • Drive Type : Front-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP : 115 - 150 HP
  • Consumption L/100km : 5.5 - 6.3 L/100km
details

Frequently compared as well

Lexus LBX
VW T-Roc
VS
The Lexus LBX feels like a posh city cocoon — whisper-quiet, well-stitched and leaning into hybrid efficiency and premium touches — while the VW T‑Roc is a cheeky, practical all-rounder that drives with more snap, offers more space and gives better value for the money. Choose the LBX if you want …
Skoda Kamiq
VW T-Roc
VS
Skoda Kamiq is the sensible choice — clever packaging, a surprisingly big boot and a friendlier price tag make it the practical everyman’s crossover. If you crave sharper styling, a firmer, more engaging drive and a touch more tech polish, the VW T‑Roc feels more premium, but expect to pay a little …
Mazda MX-5 Coupe
VW T-Roc

Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis

Mazda MX-5 Coupe

The Mazda MX-5 is a delightfully pure driver's car, wrapped in a compact package and tuned to make steering inputs feel like a conversation rather than a chore. It won’t overwhelm you with gadgetry, but what it delivers—nimble handling, instant feedback and an honest grin every time you drive—makes it a brilliant choice for anyone who values fun over flash.

details
2023_mazda_mx-5_portugal_act_003_highres
2023_mazda_mx-5_portugal_act_001_highres

Reviews Mazda MX-5 Coupe

No reviews yet. Share your experience and help others decide.

VW T-Roc

The VW T‑Roc feels noticeably more grown‑up than before, with a much nicer cabin, sensible physical controls and a calm, well‑insulated ride that makes long trips comfortable. It’s compact and city‑friendly with practical rear seating, but the sloping roofline reduces rear headroom and tempting options can quickly push the price up, so buyers after maximum space or a sporty feel may want to consider alternatives.

details
DB2025AU01832_medium
DB2025AU01833_medium
DB2025AU01840_medium
DB2025AU01844_medium
DB2025AU01835_medium
DB2025AU01866_medium
DB2025AU01834_medium
DB2025AU01852_medium

Reviews VW T-Roc

4.8 (6 Reviews)
rate
Ester
17 Sept 2025, 14:29:41

I've been driving the VW T‑Roc for a few months now and I'm totally satisfied. 🚗 The higher seating position gives me a great feeling of security and the visibility in city traffic is excellent. I especially like the modern infotainment system — everything works intuitively and quickly. On the motorway it feels very calm and stable, even at higher speeds. Overall a great car that's a lot of fun and still economical.

Frequently compared as well

VW Golf
VW T-Roc
VS
The VW Golf still sets the benchmark in the compact class — a composed, all‑round hatch that rewards drivers with precise steering, efficient engines and sensible practicality for daily life. The VW T‑Roc trades a bit of that pinch‑perfect poise for SUV style, a higher seating position and a …
SEAT Ateca
VW T-Roc
VS
The SEAT Ateca is the sensible, roomy sibling that prioritises practicality and comfort, while the VW T‑Roc plays the cooler, more characterful role with sharper styling and a slightly cheekier drive — both share the VW Group's solid underpinnings and similar engines. Choose the Ateca if you need …
SEAT Arona
VW T-Roc
VS
Sibling rivalry in compact-SUV clothing: the SEAT Arona and VW T‑Roc go head-to-head — one brings Spanish spice and value, the other German polish and refinement. We’ll compare driving feel, practicality, tech and running costs so you can pick the compact crossover that deserves a spot in your …
Nissan Qashqai
VW T-Roc
VS
The Nissan Qashqai is the sensible, family-friendly compact SUV — roomy, quietly comfortable and packed with practical tech for long motorway miles. The VW T-Roc swaps a little rear-seat space for cheeky styling and sharper handling, so if you want personality and a bit more driver engagement it’s …
Audi Q3
VW T-Roc
VS
The Audi Q3 plays the compact‑premium role perfectly — a hushed, well‑built cabin, polished manners and a level of refinement that makes the higher price feel like an investment in peace of mind. The VW T‑Roc, meanwhile, is the cheekier, better‑value sibling: bolder styling, sprightlier handling …
Toyota C-HR
VW T-Roc
VS
In the competitive subcompact SUV market, the Toyota C-HR stands out with its striking design and hybrid efficiency, appealing to eco-conscious drivers. In contrast, the VW T-Roc offers a more traditional, yet stylish approach with a focus on practicality and customizable features, catering to …
Skoda Karoq
VW T-Roc
VS
The Skoda Karoq is the sensible family hero — roomy boot, comfortable seats and clever practicality — while the VW T‑Roc swaps some of that pragmatism for sharper styling and a livelier, more involving drive. Choose the Karoq for space and value, the T‑Roc if you want personality and a bit more fun …
Opel Mokka
VW T-Roc
VS
In the ongoing rivalry between Opel and Volkswagen, the Astra and Golf stand out as two of the most popular compact cars in Europe. While the Astra offers a rewarding driving experience and impressive technology at a competitive price, the Golf remains a benchmark for quality, versatility, and …
Mazda MX-5 Coupe
VW T-Roc

Costs and Consumption
Price
30,800 - 36,200 £
Price
26,400 - 38,600 £
Consumption L/100km
6.2 L/100km
Consumption L/100km
5.5 - 6.3 L/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Electric Range
-
Electric Range
-
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
-
co2
140 g/km
co2
126 - 143 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
-
Fuel tank capacity
-

Dimensions and Body
Body Type
Coupe
Body Type
SUV
Seats
2
Seats
4 - 5
Doors
-
Doors
-
Curb weight
1,114 kg
Curb weight
1,465 - 1,539 kg
Trunk capacity
127 L
Trunk capacity
284 L
Length
-
Length
-
Width
1,735 mm
Width
1,811 - 1,828 mm
Height
-
Height
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Payload
166 kg
Payload
368 - 515 kg

Engine and Performance
Engine Type
Petrol
Engine Type
Petrol, Petrol MHEV
Transmission
Manuel
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic
Drive Type
Rear-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
Power HP
132 HP
Power HP
115 - 150 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
8.6 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
8.9 - 12.3 s
Max Speed
-
Max Speed
-
Torque
152 Nm
Torque
200 - 250 Nm
Number of Cylinders
4
Number of Cylinders
3 - 4
Power kW
97 kW
Power kW
85 - 110 kW
Engine capacity
1,496 cm3
Engine capacity
999 - 1,498 cm3

General
Model Year
2025
Model Year
2,024 - 2,025
CO2 Efficiency Class
E
CO2 Efficiency Class
E, D
Brand
Mazda
Brand
VW
Is the Mazda MX-5 Coupe offered with different drivetrains?

The Mazda MX-5 Coupe is offered with Rear-Wheel Drive.

DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved. The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.