Deutschland
France
Nederland
Great Britain
Sverige
Danmark
Suomi
Italia
Polska
Česko
EspañaVS
Mercedes EQT vs Volvo EX60 comparison
Compare performance (122 HP vs 680 HP), boot space and price (27,800 £ vs 54,000 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Mercedes EQT or Volvo EX60?
Mercedes EQT vs Volvo EX60: Key differences
All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.
EQT
Costs and Efficiency:
Price and efficiency are often the first things buyers look at. Here it becomes clear which model has the long-term edge – whether at the pump, the plug, or in purchase price.
Mercedes EQT is considerably cheaper – starting at 27,800 £ , while the Volvo EX60 costs 54,000 £ . That’s a price difference of around 26,217 £.
In terms of energy consumption, the Volvo EX60 is markedly more efficient: consuming 14.9 kWh/100km compared to 19.5 kWh/100km for the Mercedes EQT. That’s a difference of about 4.6 kWh/100km.
As for electric range, the Volvo EX60 offers considerably more range – reaching up to 810 km, about 532 km more than the Mercedes EQT.
EX60
Engine and Performance:
Power, torque and acceleration say a lot about how a car feels on the road. This is where you see which model delivers more driving dynamics.
When it comes to engine power, the Volvo EX60 offers significantly more power – delivering 680 HP compared to 122 HP. That’s roughly 558 HP more horsepower.
When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Volvo EX60 is considerably quicker – completing the sprint in 3.9 s, while the Mercedes EQT takes 12.6 s. That’s about 8.7 s quicker.
There’s also a difference in torque: the Volvo EX60 delivers considerably more torque with 790 Nm compared to 245 Nm. That’s about 545 Nm more.
EQT
Space and Everyday Use:
Beyond pure performance, interior space and usability matter most in daily life. This is where you see which car is more practical and versatile.
Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.
In terms of curb weight, Mercedes EQT is somewhat lighter – 1,925 kg compared to 2,189 kg. The difference is around 264 kg.
Looking at boot space, the Mercedes EQT offers very slightly more boot space – 551 L compared to 523 L. That’s a difference of about 28 L.
When it comes to payload, the Mercedes EQT carries slightly more – 531 kg compared to 461 kg. That’s a difference of about 70 kg.
Who wins the race in the data check?
The Volvo EX60 is far ahead overall in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.
from £54,000
Volvo EX60
Mercedes EQT
Volvo EX60
Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Mercedes EQT
The Mercedes EQT is Mercedes‑Benz’s compact electric people carrier that grafts the brand’s usual refinement onto a practical, family‑friendly van body. It makes school runs feel a little more upscale — quietly electric, sensibly packaged and unexpectedly pleasant to live with, especially if you like your practicality with a touch of luxury.
details
Volvo EX60
The Volvo EX60 is a stylish electric SUV that pairs Scandinavian minimalism with a high-quality, comfortable cabin and an intuitive infotainment experience. It delivers a composed, refined ride with advanced safety and driver-assist systems that make daily driving relaxed and confident.
details
Mercedes EQT
Volvo EX60
Costs and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
27,800 - 32,100 £
|
Price
54,000 - 67,500 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
-
|
Consumption L/100km
-
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
19.5 - 20.8 kWh/100km
|
Consumption kWh/100km
14.9 - 16.2 kWh/100km
|
|
Electric Range
265 - 278 km
|
Electric Range
611 - 810 km
|
|
Battery Capacity
45 kWh
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
|
co2
0 g/km
|
co2
0 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
High Roof Estate
|
Body Type
SUV
|
|
Seats
5
|
Seats
5
|
|
Doors
5
|
Doors
-
|
|
Curb weight
1,925 - 2,023 kg
|
Curb weight
2,189 - 2,405 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
242 - 551 L
|
Trunk capacity
523 L
|
|
Length
4,498 - 4,922 mm
|
Length
-
|
|
Width
1,859 mm
|
Width
1,899 mm
|
|
Height
1,819 - 1,830 mm
|
Height
-
|
|
Max trunk capacity
1,979 L
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
|
Payload
457 - 531 kg
|
Payload
455 - 461 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Electric
|
Engine Type
Electric
|
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
|
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
|
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
Rear-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
122 HP
|
Power HP
374 - 680 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
12.6 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
3.9 - 5.9 s
|
|
Max Speed
132 km/h
|
Max Speed
-
|
|
Torque
245 Nm
|
Torque
480 - 790 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
-
|
Number of Cylinders
-
|
|
Power kW
90 kW
|
Power kW
275 - 500 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
-
|
Engine capacity
-
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2,023 - 2,024
|
Model Year
2,026 - 2,027
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
|
|
Brand
Mercedes-Benz
|
Brand
Volvo
|
DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved.
The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.