VS

Mercedes EQT vs Volvo EX60 comparison

Compare performance (122 HP vs 680 HP), boot space and price (27,800 £ vs 54,000 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Mercedes EQT or Volvo EX60?

Mercedes EQT vs Volvo EX60: Key differences

Mercedes EQT

5 (1 Reviews)
rate
  • considerably cheaper
  • somewhat lighter
  • very slightly more trunk space
details

Volvo EX60

  • significantly more power
  • markedly more efficient
  • considerably more electric range
  • considerably quicker 0–100 km/h
details

By Achim Sedelmaier

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

EQT

Costs and Efficiency:

Price and efficiency are often the first things buyers look at. Here it becomes clear which model has the long-term edge – whether at the pump, the plug, or in purchase price.

Mercedes EQT is considerably cheaper – starting at 27,800 £ , while the Volvo EX60 costs 54,000 £ . That’s a price difference of around 26,217 £.

In terms of energy consumption, the Volvo EX60 is markedly more efficient: consuming 14.7 kWh/100km compared to 19.5 kWh/100km for the Mercedes EQT. That’s a difference of about 4.8 kWh/100km.

As for electric range, the Volvo EX60 offers considerably more range – reaching up to 810 km, about 532 km more than the Mercedes EQT.

EX60

Engine and Performance:

Power, torque and acceleration say a lot about how a car feels on the road. This is where you see which model delivers more driving dynamics.

When it comes to engine power, the Volvo EX60 offers significantly more power – delivering 680 HP compared to 122 HP. That’s roughly 558 HP more horsepower.

When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Volvo EX60 is considerably quicker – completing the sprint in 3.9 s, while the Mercedes EQT takes 12.6 s. That’s about 8.7 s quicker.

There’s also a difference in torque: the Volvo EX60 delivers considerably more torque with 790 Nm compared to 245 Nm. That’s about 545 Nm more.

EQT

Space and Everyday Use:

Beyond pure performance, interior space and usability matter most in daily life. This is where you see which car is more practical and versatile.

Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.

In terms of curb weight, Mercedes EQT is somewhat lighter – 1,925 kg compared to 2,190 kg. The difference is around 265 kg.

Looking at boot space, the Mercedes EQT offers very slightly more boot space – 551 L compared to 523 L. That’s a difference of about 28 L.

When it comes to payload, the Mercedes EQT carries slightly more – 531 kg compared to 460 kg. That’s a difference of about 71 kg.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The Volvo EX60 is far ahead overall in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

from £54,000
EX60

Volvo EX60

  • Engine Type : Electric
  • Transmission : Automatic
  • Drive Type : Rear-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP : 374 - 680 HP
  • Consumption kWh/100km : 14.7 - 16.2 kWh/100km
  • Electric Range : 620 - 810 km
Mercedes EQT
Volvo EX60

Costs and Consumption

View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance

View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body

View detailed analysis

Mercedes EQT

The Mercedes EQT is Mercedes‑Benz’s compact electric people carrier that grafts the brand’s usual refinement onto a practical, family‑friendly van body. It makes school runs feel a little more upscale — quietly electric, sensibly packaged and unexpectedly pleasant to live with, especially if you like your practicality with a touch of luxury.

details

Volvo EX60

The Volvo EX60 arrives as a sleek, family-friendly electric SUV that blends Scandinavian restraint with a surprising dash of personality, wrapping a calm, premium cabin around practical everyday usability. It’s aimed at buyers who prize safety and comfort but still want a car that rewards an enthusiastic drive, proving that sensible can be quietly fun.

details
Mercedes EQT
Volvo EX60

Costs and Consumption

Price
27,800 - 32,100 £
Price
54,000 - 70,100 £
Consumption L/100km
-
Consumption L/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
19.5 - 20.8 kWh/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
14.7 - 16.2 kWh/100km
Electric Range
265 - 278 km
Electric Range
620 - 810 km
Battery Capacity
45 kWh
Battery Capacity
-
co2
0 g/km
co2
0 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
-
Fuel tank capacity
-

Dimensions and Body

Body Type
High Roof Estate
Body Type
SUV
Seats
5
Seats
5
Doors
5
Doors
-
Curb weight
1,925 - 2,023 kg
Curb weight
2,190 - 2,425 kg
Trunk capacity
242 - 551 L
Trunk capacity
523 L
Length
4,498 - 4,922 mm
Length
-
Width
1,859 mm
Width
1,899 mm
Height
1,819 - 1,830 mm
Height
-
Max trunk capacity
1,979 L
Max trunk capacity
-
Payload
457 - 531 kg
Payload
435 - 460 kg

Engine and Performance

Engine Type
Electric
Engine Type
Electric
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
Rear-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
Power HP
122 HP
Power HP
374 - 680 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
12.6 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
3.9 - 5.9 s
Max Speed
132 km/h
Max Speed
-
Torque
245 Nm
Torque
480 - 790 Nm
Number of Cylinders
-
Number of Cylinders
-
Power kW
90 kW
Power kW
275 - 500 kW
Engine capacity
-
Engine capacity
-

General

Model Year
2,023 - 2,024
Model Year
2,026 - 2,027
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
Brand
Mercedes-Benz
Brand
Volvo
DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved. The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.