Deutschland
France
Nederland
Great Britain
Sverige
Danmark
Suomi
Italia
Polska
EspañaVS
Mercedes EQT vs Volvo EX60 comparison
Compare performance (122 HP vs 680 HP), boot space and price (27800 £ vs 54000 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Mercedes EQT or Volvo EX60?
EQT
Costs and Efficiency:
When it comes to price and running costs, the biggest differences usually appear. This is often where you see which car fits your budget better in the long run.
Mercedes EQT has a clearly advantage in terms of price – it starts at 27800 £ , while the Volvo EX60 costs 54000 £ . That’s a price difference of around 26217 £.
In terms of energy consumption, the advantage goes to the Volvo EX60: with 14.70 kWh per 100 km, it’s noticeable more efficient than the Mercedes EQT with 19.50 kWh. That’s a difference of about 4.80 kWh.
As for electric range, the Volvo EX60 performs clearly better – achieving up to 810 km, about 532 km more than the Mercedes EQT.
EX60
Engine and Performance:
Power, torque and acceleration say a lot about how a car feels on the road. This is where you see which model delivers more driving dynamics.
When it comes to engine power, the Volvo EX60 has a decisively edge – offering 680 HP compared to 122 HP. That’s roughly 558 HP more horsepower.
In acceleration from 0 to 100 km/h, the Volvo EX60 is clearly quicker – completing the sprint in 3.90 s, while the Mercedes EQT takes 12.60 s. That’s about 8.70 s faster.
There’s also a difference in torque: Volvo EX60 pulls clearly stronger with 790 Nm compared to 245 Nm. That’s about 545 Nm difference.
EQT
Space and Everyday Use:
Cabin size, boot volume and payload all play a role in everyday practicality. Here, comfort and flexibility make the difference.
Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.
In curb weight, Mercedes EQT is a bit lighter – 1925 kg compared to 2190 kg. The difference is around 265 kg.
In terms of boot space, the Mercedes EQT offers minimal more room – 551 L compared to 523 L. That’s a difference of about 28 L.
When it comes to payload, Mercedes EQT a bit takes the win – 531 kg compared to 460 kg. That’s a difference of about 71 kg.
Who wins the race in the data check?
The Volvo EX60 holds a decisive overall lead in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.
Mercedes EQT
Volvo EX60
Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
from about £54,000
Volvo EX60
Mercedes EQT
5 (1 Reviews)
The Mercedes EQT is Mercedes‑Benz’s compact electric people carrier that grafts the brand’s usual refinement onto a practical, family‑friendly van body. It makes school runs feel a little more upscale — quietly electric, sensibly packaged and unexpectedly pleasant to live with, especially if you like your practicality with a touch of luxury.
details
Volvo EX60
The Volvo EX60 arrives as a sleek, family-friendly electric SUV that blends Scandinavian restraint with a surprising dash of personality, wrapping a calm, premium cabin around practical everyday usability. It’s aimed at buyers who prize safety and comfort but still want a car that rewards an enthusiastic drive, proving that sensible can be quietly fun.
details
Mercedes EQT
Volvo EX60
Costs and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
27800 - 32100 £
|
Price
54000 - 70100 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
-
|
Consumption L/100km
-
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
19.5 - 20.8 kWh
|
Consumption kWh/100km
14.7 - 16.2 kWh
|
|
Electric Range
265 - 278 km
|
Electric Range
620 - 810 km
|
|
Battery Capacity
45 kWh
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
|
co2
0 g/km
|
co2
0 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
High Roof Estate
|
Body Type
SUV
|
|
Seats
5
|
Seats
5
|
|
Doors
5
|
Doors
-
|
|
Curb weight
1925 - 2023 kg
|
Curb weight
2190 - 2425 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
242 - 551 L
|
Trunk capacity
523 L
|
|
Length
4498 - 4922 mm
|
Length
-
|
|
Width
1859 mm
|
Width
1899 mm
|
|
Height
1819 - 1830 mm
|
Height
-
|
|
Max trunk capacity
1979 L
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
|
Payload
457 - 531 kg
|
Payload
435 - 460 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Electric
|
Engine Type
Electric
|
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
|
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
|
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
Rear-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
122 HP
|
Power HP
374 - 680 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
12.60 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
3.9 - 5.9 s
|
|
Max Speed
132 km/h
|
Max Speed
-
|
|
Torque
245 Nm
|
Torque
480 - 790 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
-
|
Number of Cylinders
-
|
|
Power kW
90 kW
|
Power kW
275 - 500 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
-
|
Engine capacity
-
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2023 - 2024
|
Model Year
2026 - 2027
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
|
|
Brand
Mercedes-Benz
|
Brand
Volvo
|
What drivetrain options does the Mercedes EQT have?
Available configurations include Front-Wheel Drive.
The prices shown are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted for local VAT. Local registration taxes (e.g. NoVA, BPM or CO2 malus) are not included. This information is not legally binding.