Deutschland
France
Nederland
Great Britain
Sverige
Danmark
Suomi
Italia
Polska
EspañaVS
MINI Aceman vs Volvo EX40 comparison
Compare performance (258 HP vs 442 HP), boot space and price (25,500 £ vs 42,800 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – MINI Aceman or Volvo EX40?
MINI Aceman vs Volvo EX40: Key differences
All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.
Aceman
Costs and Efficiency:
Price and efficiency are key factors when choosing a car – and this is often where the real differences emerge.
MINI Aceman is clearly cheaper – starting at 25,500 £ , while the Volvo EX40 costs 42,800 £ . That’s a price difference of around 17,391 £.
In terms of energy consumption, the MINI Aceman is somewhat more efficient: consuming 14 kWh/100km compared to 16.6 kWh/100km for the Volvo EX40. That’s a difference of about 2.6 kWh/100km.
As for electric range, the Volvo EX40 offers noticeably more range – reaching up to 576 km, about 171 km more than the MINI Aceman.
EX40
Engine and Performance:
Power, torque and acceleration say a lot about how a car feels on the road. This is where you see which model delivers more driving dynamics.
When it comes to engine power, the Volvo EX40 offers significantly more power – delivering 442 HP compared to 258 HP. That’s roughly 184 HP more horsepower.
When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Volvo EX40 is markedly quicker – completing the sprint in 4.6 s, while the MINI Aceman takes 6.4 s. That’s about 1.8 s quicker.
Looking at top speed, the MINI Aceman is barely faster – reaching 200 km/h, while the Volvo EX40 tops out at 180 km/h. The difference is around 20 km/h.
There’s also a difference in torque: the Volvo EX40 delivers substantially more torque with 670 Nm compared to 350 Nm. That’s about 320 Nm more.
Aceman
Space and Everyday Use:
Whether family car or daily driver – which one offers more room, flexibility and comfort?
Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.
In terms of curb weight, MINI Aceman is slightly lighter – 1,720 kg compared to 2,040 kg. The difference is around 320 kg.
Looking at boot space, the Volvo EX40 offers clearly more boot space – 410 L compared to 300 L. That’s a difference of about 110 L.
For maximum load capacity, the Volvo EX40 offers markedly more capacity – up to 1,400 L, about 395 L more than the MINI Aceman.
When it comes to payload, the MINI Aceman carries only slightly more – 530 kg compared to 480 kg. That’s a difference of about 50 kg.
Who wins the race in the data check?
The Volvo EX40 is far ahead overall in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.
from £42,800
Volvo EX40
MINI Aceman
Volvo EX40
Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
MINI Aceman
The MINI Aceman squeezes classic MINI charm into a sharper, more crossover-ready shape, trading some of the old curves for grown-up practicality while keeping the wink-and-grin personality buyers crave. Inside it's a surprisingly premium, customizable cabin that feels clever rather than cluttered, and on the road the Aceman is eager and nimble — ideal for city dwellers who want an SUV silhouette with proper fun behind the wheel.
details
Volvo EX40
The Volvo EX40 wraps Scandinavian calm and clever practicality into a compact electric package that feels both premium and refreshingly uncomplicated. It's the grown-up answer to flashier rivals — a safe, comfy, and city-friendly EV with thoughtful tech that makes everyday driving quietly satisfying.
details
MINI Aceman
Volvo EX40
Costs and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
25,500 - 36,200 £
|
Price
42,800 - 58,200 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
-
|
Consumption L/100km
-
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
14 - 16 kWh/100km
|
Consumption kWh/100km
16.6 - 17.6 kWh/100km
|
|
Electric Range
303 - 405 km
|
Electric Range
480 - 576 km
|
|
Battery Capacity
38.5 - 49.2 kWh
|
Battery Capacity
67 - 79 kWh
|
|
co2
0 g/km
|
co2
0 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
SUV
|
Body Type
SUV
|
|
Seats
5
|
Seats
5
|
|
Doors
5
|
Doors
5
|
|
Curb weight
1,720 - 1,825 kg
|
Curb weight
2,040 - 2,170 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
300 L
|
Trunk capacity
410 L
|
|
Length
4,079 mm
|
Length
4,440 mm
|
|
Width
1,754 mm
|
Width
1,863 mm
|
|
Height
1,514 mm
|
Height
1,647 mm
|
|
Max trunk capacity
1,005 L
|
Max trunk capacity
1,400 L
|
|
Payload
450 - 530 kg
|
Payload
430 - 480 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Electric
|
Engine Type
Electric
|
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
|
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
|
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
Rear-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
184 - 258 HP
|
Power HP
238 - 442 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
6.4 - 7.9 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
4.6 - 7.3 s
|
|
Max Speed
160 - 200 km/h
|
Max Speed
180 km/h
|
|
Torque
290 - 350 Nm
|
Torque
420 - 670 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
-
|
Number of Cylinders
-
|
|
Power kW
135 - 190 kW
|
Power kW
175 - 325 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
-
|
Engine capacity
-
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2,024 - 2,026
|
Model Year
2024
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
|
|
Brand
MINI
|
Brand
Volvo
|
DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved.
The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.