VS

Mitsubishi Outlander vs Toyota C-HR+ comparison

Compare performance (306 HP vs 343 HP), boot space and price (42,800 £ vs 36,000 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Mitsubishi Outlander or Toyota C-HR+?

Mitsubishi Outlander vs Toyota C-HR+: Key differences

Mitsubishi Outlander

4.7 (5 Reviews)
rate
  • moderately more trunk space
details

Toyota C-HR+

  • slightly cheaper
  • somewhat more power
  • considerably more electric range
  • considerably quicker 0–100 km/h
  • slightly lighter
details

All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.

By Achim Sedelmaier

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

Outlander

Costs and Efficiency:

Looking at overall running costs, both models reveal some interesting differences in everyday economy.

Toyota C-HR+ is slightly cheaper – starting at 36,000 £ , while the Mitsubishi Outlander costs 42,800 £ . That’s a price difference of around 6,857 £.

As for electric range, the Toyota C-HR+ offers considerably more range – reaching up to 607 km, about 522 km more than the Mitsubishi Outlander.

C-HR+

Engine and Performance:

Under the bonnet, it becomes clear which model is tuned for sportiness and which one takes the lead when you hit the accelerator.

When it comes to engine power, the Toyota C-HR+ offers somewhat more power – delivering 343 HP compared to 306 HP. That’s roughly 37 HP more horsepower.

When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Toyota C-HR+ is considerably quicker – completing the sprint in 5.2 s, while the Mitsubishi Outlander takes 7.9 s. That’s about 2.7 s quicker.

Outlander

Space and Everyday Use:

Whether family car or daily driver – which one offers more room, flexibility and comfort?

Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.

In terms of curb weight, Toyota C-HR+ is slightly lighter – 1,810 kg compared to 2,156 kg. The difference is around 346 kg.

Looking at boot space, the Mitsubishi Outlander offers moderately more boot space – 498 L compared to 416 L. That’s a difference of about 82 L.

When it comes to payload, the Toyota C-HR+ carries somewhat more – 655 kg compared to 529 kg. That’s a difference of about 126 kg.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The Toyota C-HR+ is far ahead overall in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

from £36,000
C-HR+

Toyota C-HR+

  • Engine Type Electric
  • Transmission Automatic
  • Drive Type Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP 167 - 343 HP
  • Consumption kWh/100km 13.4 - 15.5 kWh/100km
  • Electric Range 458 - 607 km
details

Frequently compared as well

Kia EV3
Toyota C-HR+
VS
The all-electric Kia EV3 feels like the sensible future in a city-friendly SUV shell — roomy, tech-rich and cheaper to run than the Toyota C‑HR+, which still trades on sharp styling and familiar hybrid/petrol simplicity rather than pure EV brilliance. Choose the EV3 for modern gadgets, punchy …
Toyota bZ4X
Toyota C-HR+
VS
This comparison looks at the Toyota bZ4X versus the Toyota C‑HR: both are compact crossovers but take very different approaches — the bZ4X is a purpose‑built all‑electric SUV while the C‑HR is Toyota’s stylish, efficient petrol/hybrid crossover. I’ll run through the key differences in driving range …
Mitsubishi Outlander
Toyota C-HR+

Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis

Mitsubishi Outlander

The Mitsubishi Outlander is a sensible family SUV that blends roomy practicality with a calm, assured ride—ideal for school runs and weekend getaways. It won’t set pulses racing, but its tidy interior, straightforward equipment and low-stress ownership make it a smart, unfussy pick for buyers who prefer reliability over flash.

details
VIC01568-HDR-Edit-Edit-2
25_Outlander_DSC05046
25_Outlander_DSC05200

Reviews Mitsubishi Outlander

4.7 (5 Reviews)
rate
Vinces
3 Jun 2026, 11:34:17

It's better to choose the modes yourself (electric/internal-combustion) than to let the car decide.
Plenty of storage, but small.
Good handling, reasonable fuel consumption off the highway, but penalizing on the highway.
Lots of annoying "driver-assistance" features, fortunately deactivatable, but you have to do it at every start.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Long-distance driver
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money
Mónica Tobón
8 May 2026, 17:25:26

Me gusta un carro más potente y la marca de fabricación Japonesa me gusta mucho

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Family car
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money
Mark Joe
4 May 2026, 06:33:44

Best Outlander

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Long-distance driver
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money

Toyota C-HR+

The Toyota C‑HR is a distinctive crossover that pairs bold, coupe‑like styling with a comfortable, composed ride suited to daily city and suburban driving. It appeals to buyers who value standout design, practical cabin packaging and a refined, easy‑to‑use experience rather than outright performance or rugged off‑road ability.

details
20250312_01_01_s
20250312_01_04_s
20250312_01_15_s
20250312_01_12_s
20250312_01_05_s

Reviews Toyota C-HR+

No reviews yet. Share your experience and help others decide.

Frequently compared as well

Skoda Elroq
Toyota C-HR+
VS
Choosing between the Skoda Elroq and the Toyota C‑HR comes down to practicality versus personality in the compact crossover class. The Elroq emphasises roomy, clever packaging and value, while the C‑HR focuses on bold styling and efficient drivetrains—pick the Elroq for everyday versatility or the …
Toyota C-HR
Toyota C-HR+
VS
Deciding between the Toyota C‑HR and the C‑HR+ is about whether you prefer the C‑HR’s balanced efficiency and bold styling or the C‑HR+’s higher trim level with extra equipment and refinement. I’ll compare performance, comfort, features and running costs to help you pick the one that best matches …
Tesla Model Y
Toyota C-HR+
VS
The Tesla Model Y and Toyota C-HR represent two different approaches to compact crossovers: the Model Y emphasizes electric range, advanced tech and spacious practicality, while the C-HR focuses on bold styling, efficient combustion options and affordability. This comparison cuts through specs and …
Lexus RZ
Toyota C-HR+
VS
The Lexus RZ and Toyota C‑HR+ go head-to-head in a neat showdown of plush electric luxury versus quirky, efficient practicality — one aims for serene, tech-laden refinement, the other hustles value with style. Deciding between them comes down to taste and wallet: do you crave silent sophistication …
CUPRA Tavascan
Toyota C-HR+
VS
The CUPRA Tavascan storms into the compact crossover arena as an electric firebrand with sharp looks and sporty intent, while the Toyota C-HR+ plays the clever, comfort-first contrarian with hybrid thrift and quirky flair. Which one earns your driveway space — the bold, battery-powered Tavascan or …
Ford Explorer EV
Toyota C-HR+
VS
Big, bold and fully electric, the Ford Explorer EV aims to be the long‑range road trip hero, while the Toyota C‑HR+ packs quirky styling and city‑friendly agility into a compact crossover. Choose Explorer for space and presence, C‑HR+ for economy and personality — and yes, we’ll tell you which one …
VW ID.4
Toyota C-HR+
VS
Comparing the VW ID.4 and the Toyota C-HR+ sets an electric compact SUV against a fuel-efficient compact crossover, so your decision comes down to whether you want a pure-EV experience or practical economy and distinctive styling. This quick comparison highlights the ID.4’s electric range, charging …
Toyota Corolla Cross
Toyota C-HR+
VS
Choosing between the Corolla Cross and the C‑HR can be confusing—both are compact crossovers but they target different buyers. This comparison cuts through the marketing to show how the Corolla Cross's practical, roomy approach stacks up against the C‑HR's sharp styling and driving focus, so you …
Mitsubishi Outlander
Toyota C-HR+

Costs and Consumption
Price
42,800 - 54,600 £
Price
36,000 - 46,300 £
Consumption L/100km
2.6 - 2.7 L/100km
Consumption L/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
13.4 - 15.5 kWh/100km
Electric Range
83 - 85 km
Electric Range
458 - 607 km
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
-
co2
60 g/km
co2
0 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
-
Fuel tank capacity
-

Dimensions and Body
Body Type
SUV
Body Type
SUV
Seats
5
Seats
5
Doors
-
Doors
-
Curb weight
2,156 - 2,232 kg
Curb weight
1,810 - 2,010 kg
Trunk capacity
498 L
Trunk capacity
416 L
Length
-
Length
-
Width
1,862 mm
Width
1,870 mm
Height
-
Height
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Payload
453 - 529 kg
Payload
550 - 655 kg

Engine and Performance
Engine Type
Plugin Hybrid
Engine Type
Electric
Transmission
-
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission Detail
-
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
Power HP
306 HP
Power HP
167 - 343 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
7.9 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
5.2 - 8.4 s
Max Speed
-
Max Speed
-
Torque
-
Torque
268 - 338 Nm
Number of Cylinders
4
Number of Cylinders
-
Power kW
225 kW
Power kW
123 - 252 kW
Engine capacity
2,360 cm3
Engine capacity
-

General
Model Year
2,025 - 2,026
Model Year
2026
CO2 Efficiency Class
B
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
Brand
Mitsubishi
Brand
Toyota
Is the Mitsubishi Outlander offered with different drivetrains?

The Mitsubishi Outlander is offered with All-Wheel Drive.

DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved. The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.