Deutschland
France
Nederland
Great Britain
Sverige
Danmark
Suomi
Italia
Polska
Česko
EspañaVS
Mitsubishi Space Star vs Ford Puma comparison
Compare performance (71 HP vs 168 HP), boot space and price (11,600 £ vs 23,900 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Mitsubishi Space Star or Ford Puma?
Mitsubishi Space Star vs Ford Puma: Key differences
All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.
Space Star
Costs and Efficiency:
Price and efficiency are often the first things buyers look at. Here it becomes clear which model has the long-term edge – whether at the pump, the plug, or in purchase price.
Mitsubishi Space Star is substantially cheaper – starting at 11,600 £ , while the Ford Puma costs 23,900 £ . That’s a price difference of around 12,266 £.
Fuel consumption also shows a difference: the Mitsubishi Space Star uses 4.9 L/100km and is somewhat more efficient than the Ford Puma with 5.4 L/100km. The difference is about 0.5 L/100km.
Puma
Engine and Performance:
Power, torque and acceleration are the classic benchmarks for car enthusiasts – and here, some clear differences start to show.
When it comes to engine power, the Ford Puma offers significantly more power – delivering 168 HP compared to 71 HP. That’s roughly 97 HP more horsepower.
When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Ford Puma is considerably quicker – completing the sprint in 7.4 s, while the Mitsubishi Space Star takes 14.1 s. That’s about 6.7 s quicker.
There’s also a difference in torque: the Ford Puma delivers considerably more torque with 290 Nm compared to 102 Nm. That’s about 188 Nm more.
Space Star
Space and Everyday Use:
Cabin size, boot volume and payload all play a role in everyday practicality. Here, comfort and flexibility make the difference.
Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.
In terms of curb weight, Mitsubishi Space Star is noticeably lighter – 940 kg compared to 1,316 kg. The difference is around 376 kg.
Looking at boot space, the Ford Puma offers considerably more boot space – 523 L compared to 235 L. That’s a difference of about 288 L.
When it comes to payload, the Ford Puma carries a bit more – 469 kg compared to 400 kg. That’s a difference of about 69 kg.
Who wins the race in the data check?
The Ford Puma is far ahead overall in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.
from £23,900
Ford Puma
Mitsubishi Space Star
Ford Puma
Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Mitsubishi Space Star
The Mitsubishi Space Star is a tidy, no-nonsense city car that squeezes surprising interior space into a compact, easy-to-park package. It's not a thrill-seeker's toy, but for buyers after low running costs, fuss-free reliability and sensible day-to-day practicality, it's a clever and cheerful choice that keeps your wallet and nerves happy.
details
Ford Puma
The Ford Puma blends sporty styling with practical everyday usability, making it a smart choice for drivers who want flair without sacrificing versatility. Its engaging driving character and clever interior packaging give it a more dynamic and useful feel than many rivals.
details
Mitsubishi Space Star
Ford Puma
Costs and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
11,600 - 18,700 £
|
Price
23,900 - 36,300 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
4.9 - 5.5 L/100km
|
Consumption L/100km
5.4 - 5.9 L/100km
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
Consumption kWh/100km
13 - 13.9 kWh/100km
|
|
Electric Range
-
|
Electric Range
404 - 417 km
|
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
|
co2
112 - 125 g/km
|
co2
0 - 135 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
35 L
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
Hatchback
|
Body Type
SUV
|
|
Seats
5
|
Seats
5
|
|
Doors
5
|
Doors
-
|
|
Curb weight
940 - 1,011 kg
|
Curb weight
1,316 - 1,563 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
209 - 235 L
|
Trunk capacity
456 - 523 L
|
|
Length
3,845 mm
|
Length
-
|
|
Width
1,665 mm
|
Width
1,805 mm
|
|
Height
1,505 mm
|
Height
-
|
|
Max trunk capacity
881 - 912 L
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
|
Payload
359 - 400 kg
|
Payload
367 - 469 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Petrol
|
Engine Type
Petrol MHEV, Electric
|
|
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
|
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, CVT
|
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic, Reduction Gearbox
|
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
71 HP
|
Power HP
125 - 168 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
14.1 - 15.8 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
7.4 - 9.8 s
|
|
Max Speed
163 - 167 km/h
|
Max Speed
-
|
|
Torque
102 Nm
|
Torque
170 - 290 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
3
|
Number of Cylinders
3
|
|
Power kW
52 kW
|
Power kW
92 - 124 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
1,193 cm3
|
Engine capacity
999 cm3
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2,020 - 2,022
|
Model Year
2,025 - 2,026
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
C, D
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
D, A
|
|
Brand
Mitsubishi
|
Brand
Ford
|
DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved.
The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.