Deutschland
France
Nederland
Great Britain
Sverige
Danmark
Suomi
Italia
Polska
Česko
EspañaVS
NIO EL7 vs Ford Puma comparison
Compare performance (653 HP vs 168 HP), boot space and price (63,300 £ vs 23,900 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – NIO EL7 or Ford Puma?
NIO EL7 vs Ford Puma: Key differences
All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.
EL7
Costs and Efficiency:
Price and efficiency are often the first things buyers look at. Here it becomes clear which model has the long-term edge – whether at the pump, the plug, or in purchase price.
Ford Puma is substantially cheaper – starting at 23,900 £ , while the NIO EL7 costs 63,300 £ . That’s a price difference of around 39,428 £.
In terms of energy consumption, the Ford Puma is clearly more efficient: consuming 13 kWh/100km compared to 22.1 kWh/100km for the NIO EL7. That’s a difference of about 9.1 kWh/100km.
As for electric range, the NIO EL7 offers a bit more range – reaching up to 501 km, about 84 km more than the Ford Puma.
Puma
Engine and Performance:
Power, torque and acceleration say a lot about how a car feels on the road. This is where you see which model delivers more driving dynamics.
When it comes to engine power, the NIO EL7 offers substantially more power – delivering 653 HP compared to 168 HP. That’s roughly 485 HP more horsepower.
When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the NIO EL7 is substantially quicker – completing the sprint in 3.9 s, while the Ford Puma takes 7.4 s. That’s about 3.5 s quicker.
There’s also a difference in torque: the NIO EL7 delivers substantially more torque with 850 Nm compared to 290 Nm. That’s about 560 Nm more.
EL7
Space and Everyday Use:
Beyond pure performance, interior space and usability matter most in daily life. This is where you see which car is more practical and versatile.
Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.
In terms of curb weight, Ford Puma is significantly lighter – 1,316 kg compared to 2,421 kg. The difference is around 1,105 kg.
Looking at boot space, the NIO EL7 offers very slightly more boot space – 570 L compared to 523 L. That’s a difference of about 47 L.
Maximum payload is identical – both can carry up to 469 kg.
Who wins the race in the data check?
The NIO EL7 holds a slight edge in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.
from £63,300
NIO EL7
NIO EL7
Ford Puma
Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
NIO EL7
The NIO EL7 arrives as a roomy electric SUV that pairs restrained elegance with bold design cues, and its interior feels like a calm, tech-forward lounge rather than a gadget parade. For buyers who crave effortless cruising, spirited performance and a tastefully premium experience — with just the right amount of showmanship for the driveway — the EL7 is an enticing, slightly theatrical choice.
details
Ford Puma
The Ford Puma blends sporty styling with practical everyday usability, making it a smart choice for drivers who want flair without sacrificing versatility. Its engaging driving character and clever interior packaging give it a more dynamic and useful feel than many rivals.
details
NIO EL7
Ford Puma
Costs and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
63,300 - 81,300 £
|
Price
23,900 - 36,300 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
-
|
Consumption L/100km
5.4 - 5.9 L/100km
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
22.1 - 22.4 kWh/100km
|
Consumption kWh/100km
13 - 13.9 kWh/100km
|
|
Electric Range
384 - 501 km
|
Electric Range
404 - 417 km
|
|
Battery Capacity
73.5 - 90 kWh
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
|
co2
0 g/km
|
co2
0 - 135 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
SUV
|
Body Type
SUV
|
|
Seats
5
|
Seats
5
|
|
Doors
5
|
Doors
-
|
|
Curb weight
2,421 - 2,441 kg
|
Curb weight
1,316 - 1,563 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
570 L
|
Trunk capacity
456 - 523 L
|
|
Length
4,912 mm
|
Length
-
|
|
Width
1,987 mm
|
Width
1,805 mm
|
|
Height
1,720 mm
|
Height
-
|
|
Max trunk capacity
1,545 L
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
|
Payload
449 - 469 kg
|
Payload
367 - 469 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Electric
|
Engine Type
Petrol MHEV, Electric
|
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
|
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic, Reduction Gearbox
|
|
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
653 HP
|
Power HP
125 - 168 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
3.9 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
7.4 - 9.8 s
|
|
Max Speed
200 km/h
|
Max Speed
-
|
|
Torque
850 Nm
|
Torque
170 - 290 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
-
|
Number of Cylinders
3
|
|
Power kW
480 kW
|
Power kW
92 - 124 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
-
|
Engine capacity
999 cm3
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2023
|
Model Year
2,025 - 2,026
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
D, A
|
|
Brand
NIO
|
Brand
Ford
|
DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved.
The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.