Deutschland
France
Nederland
Great Britain
Sverige
Danmark
Suomi
Italia
Polska
Česko
EspañaVS
NIO ET5 Wagon vs Ford Puma comparison
Compare performance (490 HP vs 168 HP), boot space and price (40,700 £ vs 23,900 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – NIO ET5 Wagon or Ford Puma?
NIO ET5 Wagon vs Ford Puma: Key differences
All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.
ET5 Wagon
Costs and Efficiency:
Looking at overall running costs, both models reveal some interesting differences in everyday economy.
Ford Puma is substantially cheaper – starting at 23,900 £ , while the NIO ET5 Wagon costs 40,700 £ . That’s a price difference of around 16,800 £.
In terms of energy consumption, the Ford Puma is significantly more efficient: consuming 13 kWh/100km compared to 19.3 kWh/100km for the NIO ET5 Wagon. That’s a difference of about 6.3 kWh/100km.
As for electric range, the NIO ET5 Wagon offers clearly more range – reaching up to 560 km, about 143 km more than the Ford Puma.
Puma
Engine and Performance:
Power, torque and acceleration are the classic benchmarks for car enthusiasts – and here, some clear differences start to show.
When it comes to engine power, the NIO ET5 Wagon offers considerably more power – delivering 490 HP compared to 168 HP. That’s roughly 322 HP more horsepower.
When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the NIO ET5 Wagon is clearly quicker – completing the sprint in 4 s, while the Ford Puma takes 7.4 s. That’s about 3.4 s quicker.
There’s also a difference in torque: the NIO ET5 Wagon delivers significantly more torque with 700 Nm compared to 290 Nm. That’s about 410 Nm more.
Space and Everyday Use:
Beyond pure performance, interior space and usability matter most in daily life. This is where you see which car is more practical and versatile.
Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.
In terms of curb weight, Ford Puma is clearly lighter – 1,316 kg compared to 2,265 kg. The difference is around 949 kg.
Looking at boot space, the Ford Puma offers a bit more boot space – 523 L compared to 450 L. That’s a difference of about 73 L.
When it comes to payload, the Ford Puma carries marginally more – 469 kg compared to 465 kg. That’s a difference of about 4 kg.
Who wins the race in the data check?
The NIO ET5 Wagon is far ahead overall in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.
from £40,700
NIO ET5 Wagon
NIO ET5 Wagon
Ford Puma
Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
NIO ET5 Wagon
The NIO ET5 Wagon blends sleek fastback styling with the sensible practicality of a wagon, delivering a premium-feeling cabin and clever cargo space that keeps life neatly packed. For buyers who want electric refinement without sacrificing family-hauler utility, the ET5 Wagon offers quiet, eager performance and smart packaging that makes weekend escapes and daily commutes equally enjoyable — yes, even with the dog and the golf clubs.
details
Ford Puma
The Ford Puma blends sporty styling with practical everyday usability, making it a smart choice for drivers who want flair without sacrificing versatility. Its engaging driving character and clever interior packaging give it a more dynamic and useful feel than many rivals.
details
NIO ET5 Wagon
Ford Puma
Costs and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
40,700 - 58,700 £
|
Price
23,900 - 36,300 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
-
|
Consumption L/100km
5.4 - 5.9 L/100km
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
19.3 - 19.8 kWh/100km
|
Consumption kWh/100km
13 - 13.9 kWh/100km
|
|
Electric Range
435 - 560 km
|
Electric Range
404 - 417 km
|
|
Battery Capacity
73.5 - 90 kWh
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
|
co2
0 g/km
|
co2
0 - 135 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
Estate
|
Body Type
SUV
|
|
Seats
5
|
Seats
5
|
|
Doors
5
|
Doors
-
|
|
Curb weight
2,265 - 2,285 kg
|
Curb weight
1,316 - 1,563 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
450 L
|
Trunk capacity
456 - 523 L
|
|
Length
4,790 mm
|
Length
-
|
|
Width
1,960 mm
|
Width
1,805 mm
|
|
Height
1,499 mm
|
Height
-
|
|
Max trunk capacity
1,300 L
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
|
Payload
445 - 465 kg
|
Payload
367 - 469 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Electric
|
Engine Type
Petrol MHEV, Electric
|
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
|
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic, Reduction Gearbox
|
|
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
490 HP
|
Power HP
125 - 168 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
4 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
7.4 - 9.8 s
|
|
Max Speed
200 km/h
|
Max Speed
-
|
|
Torque
700 Nm
|
Torque
170 - 290 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
-
|
Number of Cylinders
3
|
|
Power kW
360 kW
|
Power kW
92 - 124 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
-
|
Engine capacity
999 cm3
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2023
|
Model Year
2,025 - 2,026
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
D, A
|
|
Brand
NIO
|
Brand
Ford
|
DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved.
The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.