VS

Nissan Interstar vs Volvo EX40 comparison

Compare performance (170 HP vs 442 HP), boot space and price (36,000 £ vs 45,200 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Nissan Interstar or Volvo EX40?

Nissan Interstar vs Volvo EX40: Key differences

Nissan Interstar

  • clearly cheaper
details

Volvo EX40

4.5 (2 Reviews)
rate
  • substantially more power
  • markedly more electric range
  • marginally lighter
details

All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.

By Achim Sedelmaier

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

Interstar

Costs and Efficiency:

When it comes to price and running costs, the biggest differences usually appear. This is often where you see which car fits your budget better in the long run.

Nissan Interstar is clearly cheaper – starting at 36,000 £ , while the Volvo EX40 costs 45,200 £ . That’s a price difference of around 9,293 £.

As for electric range, the Volvo EX40 offers markedly more range – reaching up to 576 km, about 166 km more than the Nissan Interstar.

EX40

Engine and Performance:

Power, torque and acceleration say a lot about how a car feels on the road. This is where you see which model delivers more driving dynamics.

When it comes to engine power, the Volvo EX40 offers substantially more power – delivering 442 HP compared to 170 HP. That’s roughly 272 HP more horsepower.

There’s also a difference in torque: the Volvo EX40 delivers significantly more torque with 670 Nm compared to 380 Nm. That’s about 290 Nm more.

Space and Everyday Use:

Cabin size, boot volume and payload all play a role in everyday practicality. Here, comfort and flexibility make the difference.

Seats: Nissan Interstar offers more seats – 7 vs 5.

In terms of curb weight, Volvo EX40 is marginally lighter – 2,040 kg compared to 2,053 kg. The difference is around 13 kg.

When it comes to payload, the Nissan Interstar carries significantly more – 1,447 kg compared to 480 kg. That’s a difference of about 967 kg.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The Volvo EX40 stands well ahead of its rival in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

from £45,200
EX40

Volvo EX40

  • Engine Type : Electric
  • Transmission : Automatic
  • Drive Type : Rear-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP : 238 - 442 HP
  • Consumption kWh/100km : 16.6 - 17.6 kWh/100km
  • Electric Range : 477 - 576 km
details

Frequently compared as well

Audi Q4 e-tron
Volvo EX40
VS
The Audi Q4 e-tron serves up German poise, refined finishes and a composed highway ride that says "premium" without shouting, while the Volvo EX40 counters with Scandinavian simplicity, clever safety tech and a sprightlier city demeanour. Choose the Q4 for serene comfort and perceived luxury, or …
Volvo EX40
Volvo EX60
VS
Volvo’s EX40 and EX60 lock horns in a neatly staged duel: the nimble EX40 is a city-savvy, efficiency-first EV built for tight streets and savvy budgets, while the larger EX60 brings more space, stronger performance and longer range for family life and weekend escapes. Pick this showdown for a …
Nissan Interstar
Volvo EX40

Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis

Nissan Interstar

The Nissan Interstar is a sensible, no-nonsense panel van that puts practicality front and center, with a cavernous load area and a durable feel built for daily work. It drives with surprising composure for its size, keeps running costs modest, and feels like the kind of professional tool that prefers reliable service over flashy showboating.

details
serpimg_9dGXeC

Reviews Nissan Interstar

No reviews yet. Share your experience and help others decide.

Volvo EX40

The Volvo EX40 wraps Scandinavian calm and clever practicality into a compact electric package that feels both premium and refreshingly uncomplicated. It's the grown-up answer to flashier rivals — a safe, comfy, and city-friendly EV with thoughtful tech that makes everyday driving quietly satisfying.

details
311247_XC40_Recharge
311246_XC40_Recharge
308521_Rear-wheel_drive_more_range_and_faster_charging_for_fully_electric_Volvo

Reviews Volvo EX40

4.5 (2 Reviews)
rate
Bent
16 May 2026, 19:14:01

Stable car and generally good build quality — but I hate the Google and infotainment systems, which both seem designed to irritate the user as much as possible.
I'm looking at a Toyota B4ZX AWD when the lease on my EX40 expires. I need to be able to tow 1,500 kg, but without going broke.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Family car
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money

Frequently compared as well

Volvo EX40
Skoda Elroq
VS
Think of the Volvo EX40 as the cool, safety-obsessed Swede — minimalist cabin, clever tech and a calm, premium feel — while the Skoda Elroq is all about everyday practicality: roomy, sensible and great value for money. Want Scandinavian refinement and understated luxury? Pick the EX40; want space, …
Volvo EX40
Volvo XC40
VS
Choosing between the Volvo EX40 and XC40 is basically a choice between new‑school electric chic and old‑school SUV versatility: the EX40 is the fresh, all‑electric, city‑savvy compact with the latest tech and low running costs, while the XC40 is the tougher, more familiar compact that still offers …
Ford Explorer EV
Volvo EX40
VS
In one corner the burly, tech-heavy Ford Explorer EV tries to translate American SUV swagger into electric range and cargo-flex practicality, while the polished Volvo EX40 delivers Scandinavian poise, efficient packaging and a safety-first, city-friendly footprint. If you crave roomy presence and …
BMW iX1
Volvo EX40
VS
The BMW iX1 drives like a compact thriller—sporty, agile and bristling with tech—whereas the Volvo EX40 is pure Scandinavian calm, prioritising safety, space and a serene electric ride. Choose the iX1 if you want sharper handling and more driver engagement; pick the EX40 if you’d rather have peace …
Mercedes EQA
Volvo EX40
VS
The Mercedes EQA wraps premium Mercedes poise and MBUX polish into a compact EV that feels cosseting and refined, while the Volvo EX40 trades a bit of showroom gloss for Scandi practicality, airy space and a more efficient, no‑nonsense driving character. If you want badge and cabin glamour, go EQA; …
Skoda Enyaq
Volvo EX40
VS
The Skoda Enyaq bundles generous space, sensible packaging and impressive range into a down‑to‑earth package that undercuts rivals on price and practicality. The Volvo EX40, by contrast, offers sharper styling, a posher interior and tauter handling — Scandi calm and high‑tech polish for buyers who …
Mercedes GLB
Volvo EX40
VS
Comparing the Mercedes GLB and the Volvo EX40 pairs the boxy, family-friendly GLB — a compact luxury SUV that can even offer an optional third row — against the EX40, Volvo’s compact all-electric crossover focused on efficiency, safety and modern tech. Pick the GLB if you need versatile interior …
Volvo EX40
Toyota C-HR+
VS
This comparison pits the Volvo EX40 against the Toyota C-HR to help you decide whether a compact premium electric SUV or a stylish, efficient compact crossover better fits your needs. I'll focus on driving range and performance, interior quality and tech, running costs and practicality so you can …
Nissan Interstar
Volvo EX40

Costs and Consumption
Price
36,000 - 54,600 £
Price
45,200 - 58,200 £
Consumption L/100km
7.5 L/100km
Consumption L/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
16.6 - 17.6 kWh/100km
Electric Range
410 km
Electric Range
477 - 576 km
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
-
co2
0 - 195 g/km
co2
0 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
-
Fuel tank capacity
-

Dimensions and Body
Body Type
Cargo Van
Body Type
SUV
Seats
3 - 7
Seats
5
Doors
-
Doors
-
Curb weight
2,053 - 2,455 kg
Curb weight
2,040 - 2,170 kg
Trunk capacity
-
Trunk capacity
410 L
Length
-
Length
-
Width
2,080 mm
Width
1,863 mm
Height
-
Height
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Payload
1,045 - 1,447 kg
Payload
430 - 480 kg

Engine and Performance
Engine Type
Diesel, Electric
Engine Type
Electric
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Automatic Gearbox, Reduction Gearbox
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
Rear-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
Power HP
130 - 170 HP
Power HP
238 - 442 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
-
Acceleration 0-100km/h
4.6 - 7.3 s
Max Speed
-
Max Speed
-
Torque
300 - 380 Nm
Torque
420 - 670 Nm
Number of Cylinders
4
Number of Cylinders
-
Power kW
96 - 125 kW
Power kW
175 - 325 kW
Engine capacity
1,997 cm3
Engine capacity
-

General
Model Year
2024
Model Year
2,024 - 2,026
CO2 Efficiency Class
G, A
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
Brand
Nissan
Brand
Volvo
Is the Nissan Interstar offered with different drivetrains?

Available configurations include Front-Wheel Drive.

DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved. The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.