VS

Omoda 5 vs Mazda CX-30 comparison

Compare performance (224 HP vs 186 HP), boot space and price (24,800 £ vs 25,700 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Omoda 5 or Mazda CX-30?

Omoda 5 vs Mazda CX-30: Key differences

Omoda 5

4.9 (5 Reviews)
rate
  • marginally cheaper
  • slightly more power
  • very slightly more efficient
  • marginally quicker 0–100 km/h
details

Mazda CX-30

4.5 (11 Reviews)
rate
  • moderately lighter
  • somewhat more trunk space
details

All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.

By Achim Sedelmaier

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

5

Costs and Efficiency:

Looking at overall running costs, both models reveal some interesting differences in everyday economy.

Omoda 5 is marginally cheaper – starting at 24,800 £ , while the Mazda CX-30 costs 25,700 £ . That’s a price difference of around 934 £.

Fuel consumption also shows a difference: the Omoda 5 uses 5.3 L/100km and is very slightly more efficient than the Mazda CX-30 with 5.7 L/100km. The difference is about 0.4 L/100km.

CX-30

Engine and Performance:

Power, torque and acceleration say a lot about how a car feels on the road. This is where you see which model delivers more driving dynamics.

When it comes to engine power, the Omoda 5 offers slightly more power – delivering 224 HP compared to 186 HP. That’s roughly 38 HP more horsepower.

When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Omoda 5 is marginally quicker – completing the sprint in 7.6 s, while the Mazda CX-30 takes 8.3 s. That’s about 0.7 s quicker.

There’s also a difference in torque: the Omoda 5 delivers clearly more torque with 340 Nm compared to 240 Nm. That’s about 100 Nm more.

Space and Everyday Use:

Whether family car or daily driver – which one offers more room, flexibility and comfort?

Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.

In terms of curb weight, Mazda CX-30 is moderately lighter – 1,455 kg compared to 1,621 kg. The difference is around 166 kg.

Looking at boot space, the Mazda CX-30 offers somewhat more boot space – 430 L compared to 350 L. That’s a difference of about 80 L.

When it comes to payload, the Omoda 5 carries barely more – 536 kg compared to 496 kg. That’s a difference of about 40 kg.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The Omoda 5 is clearly superior overall in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

from £24,800
5

Omoda 5

  • Engine Type Electric, Full Hybrid
  • Transmission Automatic
  • Drive Type Front-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP 204 - 224 HP
  • Consumption L/100km 5.3 L/100km
  • Consumption kWh/100km 15.9 kWh/100km
  • Electric Range 430 km
details

Frequently compared as well

MG ZS
Omoda 5
VS
The MG ZS and Omoda 5 are two popular compact SUVs that target value-conscious buyers with generous equipment and modern styling. This comparison cuts through the marketing to show how they differ in interior space, build quality, driving dynamics and running costs so you can pick the one that fits …
Omoda 5
BYD Atto 2
VS
The Omoda 5 and BYD Atto 2 are eye-catching compact crossovers that compete on modern styling, tech-packed cabins and strong value for money. This quick comparison will show how they differ in space, equipment, driving character and running costs so you can pick the one that fits your priorities.
Omoda 5
Mazda CX-30

Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis

Omoda 5

The Omoda 5 is a stylish compact crossover that catches the eye with a bold, contemporary look and a tech-forward cabin. It offers a comfortable ride and a surprisingly spacious interior, making it a practical yet distinctive choice for buyers who want modern features and solid value.

details
IMG_2691

Reviews Omoda 5

4.9 (5 Reviews)
rate
Pablo
8 May 2026, 07:59:00

Fantastic. It would be great to have a bit more battery capacity and a higher DC charging speed.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Commuter (short/medium distance)
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money
maurizio
22 Nov 2025, 17:34:12

Depending on your needs: better for safety, comfort, boot space, trim and performance — downside: higher fuel consumption.

Mazda CX-30

The Mazda CX-30 blends Mazda’s upscale styling with a compact crossover body, offering a refined interior and engaging driving dynamics. It’s a practical choice for buyers who want a premium feel and agile handling in a city-friendly package.

details
2022_mazda_cx-30_src_spain_act_44
2022_mazda_cx-30_src_spain_act_42
2022_mazda_cx-30_src_spain_act_27
2022_mazda_cx-30_src_spain_int_3

Reviews Mazda CX-30

4.5 (11 Reviews)
rate
Carlos
18 Jul 2026, 09:40:54

The Mazda is a more elegant car, less cumbersome and, even though it’s also an SUV, it feels less like an SUV and more like a regular car. Besides having an interior that feels more "like a real car" and less "smartphone," the finishes are also superior and the dynamic behavior is better. The lower power is made up for by being about 100 kg lighter, a lower vehicle height (more aerodynamic efficiency), and a smoother drive thanks to a high-displacement, non-turbo engine. The equipment is very similar but the Mazda just has more "class." Prices are comparable with equal equipment, and the difference is size: the Tucson being 11 cm longer is noticeable, especially in the boot — the Mazda’s is fine, but the Tucson’s is cavernous. If you don’t actually need something that big, I recommend the Mazda.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Long-distance driver
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Value for Money
Jarek
4 Jun 2026, 09:16:53

The pleasure of driving and everything we call premium sensations.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Long-distance driver
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money
Danny
31 May 2026, 17:14:00

Nice luxury car, although I'm not sure I find the oversized rims that attractive. On the other hand, I like the Mazda 3 better.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Leisure / Weekend driver
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money
Paul
27 May 2026, 05:17:55

Better soundproofed, more powerful, and feels more like a continuation of my hands and feet when driving — in other words, you feel like a single unit during the driving experience — but cramped for me at 6 ft 1 in to get in and out…

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Commuter (short/medium distance)
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money
Michele
8 May 2026, 17:46:44

Quiet; well finished, predominantly analog dashboard; excellent value for money

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Family car
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money

Frequently compared as well

Omoda 5
Leapmotor B10
VS
The Omoda 5 and the Leapmotor B10 both promise modern design and advanced tech, but they take different approaches to powertrain, packaging and driving character. This comparison cuts through the marketing to show where each model wins — in comfort, range/efficiency, equipment and overall value — …
Mazda CX-30
VW Golf
VS
Mazda CX-30 vs Golf — two compact, sensible choices that target slightly different needs: the CX-30 brings SUV styling and a premium-feel cabin, while the Golf is the benchmark compact hatch for everyday practicality and versatility. Below I’ll run through the strengths and trade‑offs so you can …
Ford Puma
Mazda CX-30
VS
In the tussle between the cheeky Ford Puma and the stylish Mazda CX-30, the Puma serves up playful handling, clever practicality and sharper value, while the CX-30 rewards you with a more premium cabin and composed, grown-up refinement. Choose the Puma for everyday fun and sensible running costs; …
Hyundai Tucson
Omoda 5
VS
The Hyundai Tucson and the Omoda 5 are two compact SUVs that appeal to buyers seeking practicality with distinct personalities — Tucson for proven dependability, Omoda 5 for sharp styling and tech-focused features. This comparison will pinpoint how they differ in space, equipment, driving feel and …
Omoda 5
Peugeot 3008
VS
Comparing the Omoda 5 and the Peugeot 3008 pits a bold, value-focused newcomer against a more established, refined compact SUV with a stronger brand pedigree. I’ll walk you through the key differences in design, driving dynamics, practicality and features so you can decide which suits your needs …
Omoda 5
VW T-Roc
VS
Choosing between the Omoda 5 and the VW T‑Roc pits a stylish, tech-rich newcomer against a proven, versatile compact SUV from Volkswagen. I’ll compare their design, interiors, driving dynamics, practicality and running costs so you can clearly see which one suits your priorities.
Mazda CX-30
Nissan Qashqai
VS
The Mazda CX‑30 feels like a premium compact with sharp handling, a beautifully finished interior and a focus on driver enjoyment, while the Nissan Qashqai answers with roomy practicality, comfort and sensible tech for everyday family life. Choose the CX‑30 if you want style and engagement; pick …
Mazda CX-30
Suzuki S-Cross
VS
If you want a small SUV that actually feels like a car, the Mazda CX‑30 wins hearts with taut handling, upscale interior materials and a sharper, more rewarding drive. The Suzuki S‑Cross is the sensible sibling — roomier, cheaper to run and easier on the wallet, making it the smarter pick for …
Omoda 5
Mazda CX-30

Costs and Consumption
Price
24,800 - 31,600 £
Price
25,700 - 37,200 £
Consumption L/100km
5.3 L/100km
Consumption L/100km
5.7 - 6.6 L/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
15.9 kWh/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Electric Range
430 km
Electric Range
-
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
-
co2
0 - 120 g/km
co2
129 - 148 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
-
Fuel tank capacity
-

Dimensions and Body
Body Type
SUV
Body Type
SUV
Seats
5
Seats
5
Doors
-
Doors
-
Curb weight
1,621 - 1,710 kg
Curb weight
1,455 - 1,587 kg
Trunk capacity
300 - 350 L
Trunk capacity
422 - 430 L
Length
-
Length
-
Width
1,824 - 1,830 mm
Width
1,795 mm
Height
-
Height
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Payload
431 - 536 kg
Payload
458 - 496 kg

Engine and Performance
Engine Type
Electric, Full Hybrid
Engine Type
Petrol MHEV
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox, Automatic Gearbox
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Automatic Gearbox
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
Power HP
204 - 224 HP
Power HP
140 - 186 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
7.6 - 7.9 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
8.3 - 10.3 s
Max Speed
-
Max Speed
-
Torque
295 - 340 Nm
Torque
238 - 240 Nm
Number of Cylinders
4
Number of Cylinders
4
Power kW
150 - 165 kW
Power kW
103 - 137 kW
Engine capacity
1,499 cm3
Engine capacity
1,998 - 2,488 cm3

General
Model Year
2026
Model Year
2025
CO2 Efficiency Class
A, D
CO2 Efficiency Class
D, E
Brand
Omoda
Brand
Mazda
What drive types are available for the Omoda 5?

Available configurations include Front-Wheel Drive.

DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved. The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.