VS

Omoda 5 vs Renault Clio comparison

Compare performance (204 HP vs 158 HP), boot space and price (23,100 £ vs 17,100 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Omoda 5 or Renault Clio?

Omoda 5 vs Renault Clio: Key differences

Omoda 5

5 (4 Reviews)
rate
  • markedly more power
  • barely quicker 0–100 km/h
details

Renault Clio

4.7 (1 Reviews)
rate
  • markedly cheaper
  • significantly more efficient
  • significantly more trunk space
details

All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.

By Achim Sedelmaier

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

5

Costs and Efficiency:

Looking at overall running costs, both models reveal some interesting differences in everyday economy.

Renault Clio is markedly cheaper – starting at 17,100 £ , while the Omoda 5 costs 23,100 £ . That’s a price difference of around 6,085 £.

Fuel consumption also shows a difference: the Renault Clio uses 4.1 L/100km and is significantly more efficient than the Omoda 5 with 7.5 L/100km. The difference is about 3.4 L/100km.

Clio

Engine and Performance:

Under the bonnet, it becomes clear which model is tuned for sportiness and which one takes the lead when you hit the accelerator.

When it comes to engine power, the Omoda 5 offers markedly more power – delivering 204 HP compared to 158 HP. That’s roughly 46 HP more horsepower.

When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Omoda 5 is barely quicker – completing the sprint in 7.8 s, while the Renault Clio takes 8.3 s. That’s about 0.5 s quicker.

Looking at top speed, the Omoda 5 is somewhat faster – reaching 220 km/h, while the Renault Clio tops out at 180 km/h. The difference is around 40 km/h.

There’s also a difference in torque: the Omoda 5 delivers markedly more torque with 290 Nm compared to 190 Nm. That’s about 100 Nm more.

Space and Everyday Use:

Cabin size, boot volume and payload all play a role in everyday practicality. Here, comfort and flexibility make the difference.

Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.

Looking at boot space, the Renault Clio offers significantly more boot space – 327 L compared to 0 L. That’s a difference of about 327 L.

For maximum load capacity, the Renault Clio offers only slightly more capacity – up to 1,176 L, about 101 L more than the Omoda 5.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The Renault Clio stands well ahead of its rival in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

from £17,100
Clio

Renault Clio

  • Engine Type : Petrol, Full Hybrid
  • Transmission : Manuel, Automatic
  • Drive Type : Front-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP : 115 - 158 HP
  • Consumption L/100km : 4.1 - 5.1 L/100km
details

Frequently compared as well

MG ZS
Omoda 5
VS
The MG ZS plays the sensible family card with roomy practicality and a wallet-friendly price, while the Omoda 5 arrives like the showy new kid on the block, sporting sharper styling and richer tech. Pick the ZS for straightforward comfort and low running costs; choose the Omoda 5 if you want …
Citroen C3
Renault Clio
VS
City supermini buyers face a tasty dilemma: the Citroën C3 charms with cosy ride comfort, playful looks and practical flair, while the Renault Clio answers with sharper handling, a more premium cabin and smarter tech. Choose the C3 if you prioritise comfort and personality; pick the Clio if you …
Omoda 5
Renault Clio

Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis

Omoda 5

The Omoda 5 arrives as a stylish, tech-forward compact crossover that punches above its class with bold design and a surprisingly premium cabin. It’s an attractive choice for buyers who want modern gadgets, confident road manners and value without the usual showroom drama.

details
IMG_2691

Reviews Omoda 5

5 (4 Reviews)
rate
maurizio
22 Nov 2025, 17:34:12

Depending on your needs: better for safety, comfort, boot space, trim and performance — downside: higher fuel consumption.

Renault Clio

The Clio punches above its weight with chic French styling and a surprisingly grown-up cabin that makes city driving feel effortlessly stylish. It's an easy-to-live-with choice that keeps ownership simple and even manages to put a grin on your face when the traffic gets dull.

details
r212202p
r212188p
r212211p

Reviews Renault Clio

4.7 (1 Reviews)
rate
technoman
31 Mar 2026, 08:36:27

Having owned a clio now for the last 8 years we have found the 0.9ltr engine to work well both around town and on motorways . Averaging around 45mpg on mixed driving. The 3 cylinder engine has no cambelt to worry about . Interior has worked and worn well . No defects at all during owner ship BUT the striking red paintwork (metallic) is showing deterioration and is expensive to put right and this would be the only reason for dropping a star off the rating . There are two main services on the car an A and a B service. All they do on the A service is change the cabin filter and do the usual safety checks which costa around £120 the second B service is oil and filter change around £230 but at 36000 miles need air filter and brake fluid change which can add another £120

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): City / Short distance
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money

Frequently compared as well

Renault Captur
Renault Clio
VS
The Renault Captur and Renault Clio share Renault’s DNA but pursue different lifestyles: the Captur lifts you above traffic with compact-SUV presence, while the Clio stays low, nimble and city-savvy. In this quick duel we’ll compare space, economy and driving feel to help you choose between …
Omoda 5
MG HS
VS
Unsure whether the Omoda 5 or the MG HS is the better match? Compare both models directly and discover differences in power, efficiency, comfort and value for money — all summarized in one easy view to support your decision.
Omoda 5
MG MGS5 EV
VS
Unsure whether the Omoda 5 or the MG MGS5 EV is the better match? Compare both models directly and discover differences in power, efficiency, comfort and value for money — all summarized in one easy view to support your decision.
Renault Clio
Renault R5
VS
The Clio is the sensible, all-weather hatch — efficient, tech-rich and practical for families and commuters who want a solid everyday car. The R5 is a cheeky retro reboot with electric city credentials and heaps of character — pick the Clio for logic and space, the R5 for style and smile-inducing …
Kia Sportage
Omoda 5
VS
Unsure whether the Kia Sportage or the Omoda 5 is the better match? Compare both models directly and discover differences in power, efficiency, comfort and value for money — all summarized in one easy view to support your decision.
Hyundai i10
Renault Clio
VS
The Hyundai i10 is a pocket-sized urban pro — cheeky on fuel, effortless to park and surprisingly roomy for its class, ideal if your daily grind is dodging bollards and squeezing into parallel spaces. The Renault Clio, by contrast, plays the grown-up card with sharper styling, a nicer interior and …
MG MG3
Renault Clio
VS
In the battle of budget-friendly hatchbacks, the MG3 takes on the Renault Clio, offering an impressive mix of practicality and style for the price-conscious consumer. While the Clio boasts a more refined interior and a well-established reputation, the MG3 stands out with its generous warranty and …
Ford Puma
Renault Clio
VS
In the competitive subcompact crossover market, the Ford Puma stands out with its sporty design and engaging driving dynamics, appealing to those who crave a more dynamic experience. Meanwhile, the Renault Clio impresses with its sleek aesthetics and practicality, offering a more refined ride and …
Omoda 5
Renault Clio

Costs and Consumption
Price
23,100 £
Price
17,100 - 23,700 £
Consumption L/100km
7.5 L/100km
Consumption L/100km
4.1 - 5.1 L/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Electric Range
-
Electric Range
-
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
-
co2
-
co2
92 - 115 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
51 L
Fuel tank capacity
39 - 42 L

Dimensions and Body
Body Type
SUV
Body Type
Hatchback
Seats
5
Seats
5
Doors
5
Doors
5
Curb weight
-
Curb weight
1,202 - 1,316 kg
Trunk capacity
0 L
Trunk capacity
301 - 327 L
Length
4,424 mm
Length
4,116 mm
Width
1,830 mm
Width
1,768 mm
Height
1,588 mm
Height
1,451 mm
Max trunk capacity
1,075 L
Max trunk capacity
1,094 - 1,176 L
Payload
-
Payload
453 - 463 kg

Engine and Performance
Engine Type
Petrol
Engine Type
Petrol, Full Hybrid
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
Transmission Detail
Dual-Clutch Automatic
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic, Automatic Gearbox
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
Power HP
204 HP
Power HP
115 - 158 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
7.8 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
8.3 - 10.1 s
Max Speed
220 km/h
Max Speed
180 km/h
Torque
290 Nm
Torque
190 Nm
Number of Cylinders
4
Number of Cylinders
3 - 4
Power kW
145 kW
Power kW
84 - 116 kW
Engine capacity
1,598 cm3
Engine capacity
1,199 - 1,789 cm3

General
Model Year
2024
Model Year
2026
CO2 Efficiency Class
-
CO2 Efficiency Class
C, B
Brand
Omoda
Brand
Renault
What drive types are available for the Omoda 5?

Available configurations include Front-Wheel Drive.

DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved. The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.