VS

Omoda 5 vs Volvo EX60 comparison

Compare performance (224 HP vs 680 HP), boot space and price (24,800 £ vs 54,000 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Omoda 5 or Volvo EX60?

Omoda 5 vs Volvo EX60: Key differences

Omoda 5

4.9 (5 Reviews)
rate
  • clearly cheaper
  • markedly lighter
details

Volvo EX60

4.7 (1 Reviews)
rate
  • significantly more power
  • barely more efficient
  • clearly more electric range
  • considerably quicker 0–100 km/h
  • markedly more trunk space
details

All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.

By Achim Sedelmaier

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

5

Costs and Efficiency:

Looking at overall running costs, both models reveal some interesting differences in everyday economy.

Omoda 5 is clearly cheaper – starting at 24,800 £ , while the Volvo EX60 costs 54,000 £ . That’s a price difference of around 29,220 £.

In terms of energy consumption, the Volvo EX60 is barely more efficient: consuming 14.9 kWh/100km compared to 15.9 kWh/100km for the Omoda 5. That’s a difference of about 1 kWh/100km.

As for electric range, the Volvo EX60 offers clearly more range – reaching up to 810 km, about 380 km more than the Omoda 5.

EX60

Engine and Performance:

Under the bonnet, it becomes clear which model is tuned for sportiness and which one takes the lead when you hit the accelerator.

When it comes to engine power, the Volvo EX60 offers significantly more power – delivering 680 HP compared to 224 HP. That’s roughly 456 HP more horsepower.

When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Volvo EX60 is considerably quicker – completing the sprint in 3.9 s, while the Omoda 5 takes 7.6 s. That’s about 3.7 s quicker.

There’s also a difference in torque: the Volvo EX60 delivers clearly more torque with 790 Nm compared to 340 Nm. That’s about 450 Nm more.

Space and Everyday Use:

Beyond pure performance, interior space and usability matter most in daily life. This is where you see which car is more practical and versatile.

Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.

In terms of curb weight, Omoda 5 is markedly lighter – 1,621 kg compared to 2,189 kg. The difference is around 568 kg.

Looking at boot space, the Volvo EX60 offers markedly more boot space – 523 L compared to 350 L. That’s a difference of about 173 L.

When it comes to payload, the Omoda 5 carries a bit more – 536 kg compared to 461 kg. That’s a difference of about 75 kg.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The Volvo EX60 is decisively ahead in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

from £54,000
EX60

Volvo EX60

  • Engine Type Electric
  • Transmission Automatic
  • Drive Type Rear-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP 374 - 680 HP
  • Consumption kWh/100km 14.9 - 16.2 kWh/100km
  • Electric Range 611 - 810 km
details

Frequently compared as well

BMW iX3
Volvo EX60
VS
The BMW iX3 and Volvo EX60 represent two different takes on the compact electric SUV: BMW focuses on driving dynamics and efficiency, while Volvo emphasizes safety, interior comfort and tech. This short comparison will show where each model shines so you can choose which suits your priorities.
Volvo XC60
Volvo EX60
VS
Comparing the Volvo XC60 and the Volvo EX60 pits a familiar midsize premium SUV against Volvo’s new all-electric contender: the XC60 offers refined petrol and hybrid options while the EX60 focuses on pure-electric range, sharper tech and lower running costs. If you’re choosing between established …
Omoda 5
Volvo EX60

Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis

Omoda 5

The Omoda 5 is a stylish compact crossover that catches the eye with a bold, contemporary look and a tech-forward cabin. It offers a comfortable ride and a surprisingly spacious interior, making it a practical yet distinctive choice for buyers who want modern features and solid value.

details
IMG_2691

Reviews Omoda 5

4.9 (5 Reviews)
rate
Pablo
8 May 2026, 07:59:00

Fantastic. It would be great to have a bit more battery capacity and a higher DC charging speed.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Commuter (short/medium distance)
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money
maurizio
22 Nov 2025, 17:34:12

Depending on your needs: better for safety, comfort, boot space, trim and performance — downside: higher fuel consumption.

Volvo EX60

The Volvo EX60 is a stylish electric SUV that pairs Scandinavian minimalism with a high-quality, comfortable cabin and an intuitive infotainment experience. It delivers a composed, refined ride with advanced safety and driver-assist systems that make daily driving relaxed and confident.

details
Volvo-EX60
serpimg_XMUALo

Reviews Volvo EX60

4.7 (1 Reviews)
rate
Willem
16 Jun 2026, 18:00:20

Volvo turns out to be premium compared with KIA. By the way, it's also a fine car.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Leisure / Weekend driver
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money

Frequently compared as well

Volvo EX90
Volvo EX60
VS
The Volvo EX90 and Volvo EX60 are Volvo's all-electric SUVs aimed at different buyers: the EX90 is the flagship full-size model focused on maximum space, safety and cutting-edge tech, while the EX60 is a mid-size alternative that prioritizes efficiency, agility and value. This comparison cuts …
MG ZS
Omoda 5
VS
The MG ZS and Omoda 5 are two popular compact SUVs that target value-conscious buyers with generous equipment and modern styling. This comparison cuts through the marketing to show how they differ in interior space, build quality, driving dynamics and running costs so you can pick the one that fits …
Skoda Enyaq
Volvo EX60
VS
Practical Czech engineering goes up against Swedish style in our showdown between the Skoda Enyaq and the Volvo EX60. The Enyaq focuses on roomy practicality and sensible value, while the EX60 answers with sharper design, richer tech and a more premium feel — choose based on whether you want …
Polestar 4
Volvo EX60
VS
Polestar 4 and Volvo EX60 go head-to-head in a clash of Scandinavian design, tech and electric muscle — one is a sporty provocateur, the other a polished family flagship. Time to find out which brings the sharper drive, smarter cabin and better real-world value for buyers who want style with …
Volvo EX40
Volvo EX60
VS
Volvo’s EX40 and EX60 lock horns in a neatly staged duel: the nimble EX40 is a city-savvy, efficiency-first EV built for tight streets and savvy budgets, while the larger EX60 brings more space, stronger performance and longer range for family life and weekend escapes. Pick this showdown for a …
Omoda 5
BYD Atto 2
VS
The Omoda 5 and BYD Atto 2 are eye-catching compact crossovers that compete on modern styling, tech-packed cabins and strong value for money. This quick comparison will show how they differ in space, equipment, driving character and running costs so you can pick the one that fits your priorities.
Mercedes GLC
Volvo EX60
VS
The Mercedes GLC and the Volvo EX60 take different approaches to the premium compact SUV segment: the GLC leans on refined ride, traditional luxury and a choice of petrol, mild-hybrid or plug-in options, while the EX60 emphasizes all-electric power, minimalist Scandinavian design and advanced …
ZEEKR 7X
Volvo EX60
VS
The Zeekr 7X and Volvo EX60 go head-to-head in our compact-luxury EV showdown, pitting China’s tech-forward bravado against Sweden’s calm, safety-first pedigree. We drive them back-to-back to find which delivers more range, refinement and real-world value — and which one you'll actually enjoy …
Omoda 5
Volvo EX60

Costs and Consumption
Price
24,800 - 31,600 £
Price
54,000 - 67,500 £
Consumption L/100km
5.3 L/100km
Consumption L/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
15.9 kWh/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
14.9 - 16.2 kWh/100km
Electric Range
430 km
Electric Range
611 - 810 km
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
-
co2
0 - 120 g/km
co2
0 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
-
Fuel tank capacity
-

Dimensions and Body
Body Type
SUV
Body Type
SUV
Seats
5
Seats
5
Doors
-
Doors
-
Curb weight
1,621 - 1,710 kg
Curb weight
2,189 - 2,405 kg
Trunk capacity
300 - 350 L
Trunk capacity
523 L
Length
-
Length
-
Width
1,824 - 1,830 mm
Width
1,899 mm
Height
-
Height
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Payload
431 - 536 kg
Payload
455 - 461 kg

Engine and Performance
Engine Type
Electric, Full Hybrid
Engine Type
Electric
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox, Automatic Gearbox
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
Rear-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
Power HP
204 - 224 HP
Power HP
374 - 680 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
7.6 - 7.9 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
3.9 - 5.9 s
Max Speed
-
Max Speed
-
Torque
295 - 340 Nm
Torque
480 - 790 Nm
Number of Cylinders
4
Number of Cylinders
-
Power kW
150 - 165 kW
Power kW
275 - 500 kW
Engine capacity
1,499 cm3
Engine capacity
-

General
Model Year
2026
Model Year
2,026 - 2,027
CO2 Efficiency Class
A, D
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
Brand
Omoda
Brand
Volvo
What drive types are available for the Omoda 5?

Available configurations include Front-Wheel Drive.

DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved. The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.