VS

Omoda 5 vs XPeng P7+ comparison

Compare performance (204 HP vs 503 HP), boot space and price (31,600 £ vs 39,900 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Omoda 5 or XPeng P7+?

Omoda 5 vs XPeng P7+: Key differences

Omoda 5

4.9 (5 Reviews)
rate
  • markedly cheaper
  • moderately lighter
details

XPeng P7+

4.9 (1 Reviews)
rate
  • substantially more power
  • very slightly more efficient
  • a bit more electric range
  • clearly quicker 0–100 km/h
  • noticeably more trunk space
details

All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.

By Achim Sedelmaier

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

5

Costs and Efficiency:

Looking at overall running costs, both models reveal some interesting differences in everyday economy.

Omoda 5 is markedly cheaper – starting at 31,600 £ , while the XPeng P7+ costs 39,900 £ . That’s a price difference of around 8,314 £.

In terms of energy consumption, the XPeng P7+ is very slightly more efficient: consuming 15.2 kWh/100km compared to 15.9 kWh/100km for the Omoda 5. That’s a difference of about 0.7 kWh/100km.

As for electric range, the XPeng P7+ offers a bit more range – reaching up to 530 km, about 100 km more than the Omoda 5.

P7+

Engine and Performance:

Power, torque and acceleration are the classic benchmarks for car enthusiasts – and here, some clear differences start to show.

When it comes to engine power, the XPeng P7+ offers substantially more power – delivering 503 HP compared to 204 HP. That’s roughly 299 HP more horsepower.

When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the XPeng P7+ is clearly quicker – completing the sprint in 4.3 s, while the Omoda 5 takes 7.6 s. That’s about 3.3 s quicker.

There’s also a difference in torque: the XPeng P7+ delivers considerably more torque with 670 Nm compared to 340 Nm. That’s about 330 Nm more.

Space and Everyday Use:

Whether family car or daily driver – which one offers more room, flexibility and comfort?

Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.

In terms of curb weight, Omoda 5 is moderately lighter – 1,710 kg compared to 1,999 kg. The difference is around 289 kg.

Looking at boot space, the XPeng P7+ offers noticeably more boot space – 573 L compared to 350 L. That’s a difference of about 223 L.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The XPeng P7+ stands well ahead of its rival in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

from £39,900
P7+

XPeng P7+

  • Engine Type : Electric
  • Transmission : Automatic
  • Drive Type : Rear-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP : 245 - 503 HP
  • Consumption kWh/100km : 15.2 - 17.4 kWh/100km
  • Electric Range : 455 - 530 km
details

Frequently compared as well

XPeng P7
XPeng P7+
VS
XPeng P7 vs XPeng P7+: two close cousins from Xpeng that promise sleek EV performance and clever tech — but one is the nimble all-rounder and the other is the luxury-minded long‑distance specialist. We'll slice through the spec sheets, show which upgrades actually matter, and help you decide if the …
MG ZS
Omoda 5
VS
The MG ZS plays the sensible family card with roomy practicality and a wallet-friendly price, while the Omoda 5 arrives like the showy new kid on the block, sporting sharper styling and richer tech. Pick the ZS for straightforward comfort and low running costs; choose the Omoda 5 if you want …
Omoda 5
XPeng P7+

Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis

Omoda 5

The Omoda 5 arrives as a stylish, tech-forward compact crossover that punches above its class with bold design and a surprisingly premium cabin. It’s an attractive choice for buyers who want modern gadgets, confident road manners and value without the usual showroom drama.

details
IMG_2691

Reviews Omoda 5

4.9 (5 Reviews)
rate
Pablo
8 May 2026, 07:59:00

Fantastic. It would be great to have a bit more battery capacity and a higher DC charging speed.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Commuter (short/medium distance)
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money
maurizio
22 Nov 2025, 17:34:12

Depending on your needs: better for safety, comfort, boot space, trim and performance — downside: higher fuel consumption.

XPeng P7+

The XPeng P7+ is a sleek, coupe-like electric sedan that pairs a spacious, tech-forward cabin with an easygoing yet poised driving character — think premium feel without premium smugness. Packed with clever driver aids and a refined ride that earns the odd grin on twisty roads, it’s a compelling, modern alternative to the usual premium suspects.

details
serpimg_tW3Swn

Reviews XPeng P7+

4.9 (1 Reviews)
rate

No reviews yet. Share your experience and help others decide.

Frequently compared as well

BYD Seal
XPeng P7+
VS
The BYD Seal and the XPeng P7+ are two sharp electric sedans from Chinese brands that deliver long range, sporty design and advanced technology at competitive prices. This comparison examines how the Seal’s efficient powertrain and rich feature set stack up against the P7+’s driver-assist …
XPeng P7+
ZEEKR 7GT
VS
Comparing the XPeng P7+ and the Zeekr 7 GT puts two sporty, tech‑heavy Chinese electric sedans head-to-head, each aiming to blend performance with premium features. I’ll break down range, driving dynamics, interior quality and tech so you can decide which one fits your priorities.
Omoda 5
MG MGS5 EV
VS
The Omoda 5 and the MG 5 EV pit two different takes on compact family motoring against each other: the Omoda 5 delivers crossover styling, tech and a choice of powertrains, while the MG 5 EV is a practical, battery-electric estate focused on value and efficiency. If you favour bold design and a …
XPeng G6
XPeng P7+
VS
XPeng’s G6 and the P7+ go head-to-head in a neat battle of priorities: roomy, tech-forward practicality versus sleek, low-drag efficiency and sportier poise. For buyers it boils down to lifestyle — the G6 promises everyday versatility and family-friendly space, while the P7+ sells a more …
Omoda 5
BYD Atto 2
VS
The Omoda 5 and BYD Atto 2 are eye-catching compact crossovers that compete on modern styling, tech-packed cabins and strong value for money. This quick comparison will show how they differ in space, equipment, driving character and running costs so you can pick the one that fits your priorities.
Omoda 5
MG HS
VS
Choosing between the Omoda 5 and the MG HS comes down to whether you want a compact crossover that prioritises bold styling and tech, or a more traditionally sized SUV that leans on space and refinement. Below is a clear, experience-based comparison to help match each model to your driving …
Kia Sportage
Omoda 5
VS
The Kia Sportage and the Omoda 5 go head-to-head in the compact SUV class, offering very different takes on style, technology and everyday practicality. This comparison will help you choose between the Sportage's proven comfort, refinement and broad dealer support and the Omoda 5's striking design, …
Tesla Model Y
XPeng P7+
VS
Deciding between the Tesla Model Y and the XPeng P7+ means weighing the practicality and ecosystem advantages of a bestselling electric crossover against the aerodynamic efficiency and tech-rich character of a modern electric sedan. The Model Y shines for space, charging network and intuitive …
Omoda 5
XPeng P7+

Costs and Consumption
Price
31,600 £
Price
39,900 - 45,900 £
Consumption L/100km
-
Consumption L/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
15.9 kWh/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
15.2 - 17.4 kWh/100km
Electric Range
430 km
Electric Range
455 - 530 km
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
-
co2
0 g/km
co2
0 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
-
Fuel tank capacity
-

Dimensions and Body
Body Type
SUV
Body Type
Hatchback
Seats
5
Seats
5
Doors
-
Doors
-
Curb weight
1,710 kg
Curb weight
1,999 - 2,200 kg
Trunk capacity
350 L
Trunk capacity
573 L
Length
-
Length
-
Width
1,830 mm
Width
1,937 mm
Height
-
Height
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Payload
536 kg
Payload
-

Engine and Performance
Engine Type
Electric
Engine Type
Electric
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
Rear-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
Power HP
204 HP
Power HP
245 - 503 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
7.6 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
4.3 - 6.9 s
Max Speed
-
Max Speed
-
Torque
340 Nm
Torque
450 - 670 Nm
Number of Cylinders
-
Number of Cylinders
-
Power kW
150 kW
Power kW
180 - 370 kW
Engine capacity
-
Engine capacity
-

General
Model Year
2026
Model Year
2026
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
Brand
Omoda
Brand
XPeng
What drive types are available for the Omoda 5?

Available configurations include Front-Wheel Drive.

DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved. The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.