VS

Peugeot 3008 vs Volvo EX60 comparison

Compare performance (325 HP vs 680 HP), boot space and price (36,500 £ vs 54,000 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Peugeot 3008 or Volvo EX60?

Peugeot 3008 vs Volvo EX60: Key differences

Peugeot 3008

3 (6 Reviews)
rate
  • considerably cheaper
  • clearly lighter
details

Volvo EX60

  • clearly more power
  • a bit more efficient
  • a bit more electric range
  • significantly quicker 0–100 km/h
  • very slightly more trunk space
details

All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.

By Achim Sedelmaier

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

3008

Costs and Efficiency:

When it comes to price and running costs, the biggest differences usually appear. This is often where you see which car fits your budget better in the long run.

Peugeot 3008 is considerably cheaper – starting at 36,500 £ , while the Volvo EX60 costs 54,000 £ . That’s a price difference of around 17,477 £.

In terms of energy consumption, the Volvo EX60 is a bit more efficient: consuming 14.7 kWh/100km compared to 16.9 kWh/100km for the Peugeot 3008. That’s a difference of about 2.2 kWh/100km.

As for electric range, the Volvo EX60 offers a bit more range – reaching up to 810 km, about 112 km more than the Peugeot 3008.

EX60

Engine and Performance:

Under the bonnet, it becomes clear which model is tuned for sportiness and which one takes the lead when you hit the accelerator.

When it comes to engine power, the Volvo EX60 offers clearly more power – delivering 680 HP compared to 325 HP. That’s roughly 355 HP more horsepower.

When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Volvo EX60 is significantly quicker – completing the sprint in 3.9 s, while the Peugeot 3008 takes 6 s. That’s about 2.1 s quicker.

There’s also a difference in torque: the Volvo EX60 delivers visibly more torque with 790 Nm compared to 511 Nm. That’s about 279 Nm more.

3008

Space and Everyday Use:

Beyond pure performance, interior space and usability matter most in daily life. This is where you see which car is more practical and versatile.

Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.

In terms of curb weight, Peugeot 3008 is clearly lighter – 1,648 kg compared to 2,190 kg. The difference is around 542 kg.

Looking at boot space, the Volvo EX60 offers very slightly more boot space – 523 L compared to 520 L. That’s a difference of about 3 L.

When it comes to payload, the Peugeot 3008 carries barely more – 467 kg compared to 460 kg. That’s a difference of about 7 kg.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The Volvo EX60 holds a decisive overall lead in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

from £54,000
EX60

Volvo EX60

  • Engine Type : Electric
  • Transmission : Automatic
  • Drive Type : Rear-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP : 374 - 680 HP
  • Consumption kWh/100km : 14.7 - 16.2 kWh/100km
  • Electric Range : 620 - 810 km
Peugeot 3008
Volvo EX60

Costs and Consumption

View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance

View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body

View detailed analysis

Peugeot 3008

The Peugeot 3008 blends bold French styling with a surprisingly grown-up interior that makes even dull commutes feel a little bit special. Practical enough for family life yet lively to drive, it’s a clever all‑rounder that stands out from the crossover crowd without shouting for attention.

details

Volvo EX60

The Volvo EX60 arrives as a sleek, family-friendly electric SUV that blends Scandinavian restraint with a surprising dash of personality, wrapping a calm, premium cabin around practical everyday usability. It’s aimed at buyers who prize safety and comfort but still want a car that rewards an enthusiastic drive, proving that sensible can be quietly fun.

details
Peugeot 3008
Volvo EX60

Costs and Consumption

Price
36,500 - 52,000 £
Price
54,000 - 70,100 £
Consumption L/100km
2.4 - 5.3 L/100km
Consumption L/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
16.9 - 17.6 kWh/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
14.7 - 16.2 kWh/100km
Electric Range
81 - 698 km
Electric Range
620 - 810 km
Battery Capacity
0.4 - 96.9 kWh
Battery Capacity
-
co2
0 - 121 g/km
co2
0 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
55 L
Fuel tank capacity
-

Dimensions and Body

Body Type
SUV
Body Type
SUV
Seats
5
Seats
5
Doors
5
Doors
-
Curb weight
1,648 - 2,266 kg
Curb weight
2,190 - 2,425 kg
Trunk capacity
470 - 520 L
Trunk capacity
523 L
Length
4,542 mm
Length
-
Width
1,895 mm
Width
1,899 mm
Height
1,641 mm
Height
-
Max trunk capacity
1,430 - 1,480 L
Max trunk capacity
-
Payload
432 - 467 kg
Payload
435 - 460 kg

Engine and Performance

Engine Type
Electric, Petrol MHEV, Plugin Hybrid
Engine Type
Electric
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
Rear-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
Power HP
145 - 325 HP
Power HP
374 - 680 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
6 - 10.2 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
3.9 - 5.9 s
Max Speed
170 - 201 km/h
Max Speed
-
Torque
230 - 511 Nm
Torque
480 - 790 Nm
Number of Cylinders
3 - 4
Number of Cylinders
-
Power kW
107 - 239 kW
Power kW
275 - 500 kW
Engine capacity
1,199 - 1,598 cm3
Engine capacity
-

General

Model Year
2,024 - 2,026
Model Year
2,026 - 2,027
CO2 Efficiency Class
A, D, B
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
Brand
Peugeot
Brand
Volvo
DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved. The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.