VS

Peugeot 408 vs Skoda Enyaq comparison

Compare performance (240 HP vs 340 HP), boot space and price (35,100 £ vs 36,800 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Peugeot 408 or Skoda Enyaq?

Peugeot 408 vs Skoda Enyaq: Key differences

Peugeot 408

4.9 (1 Reviews)
rate
  • only slightly cheaper
  • marginally more efficient
  • markedly lighter
details

Skoda Enyaq

4.5 (4 Reviews)
rate
  • visibly more power
  • clearly more electric range
  • clearly quicker 0–100 km/h
details

All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.

By Achim Sedelmaier

Video - Skoda Enyaq

Video Thumbnail

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

408

Costs and Efficiency:

Price and efficiency are key factors when choosing a car – and this is often where the real differences emerge.

Peugeot 408 is only slightly cheaper – starting at 35,100 £ , while the Skoda Enyaq costs 36,800 £ . That’s a price difference of around 1,731 £.

In terms of energy consumption, the Peugeot 408 is marginally more efficient: consuming 14.7 kWh/100km compared to 14.9 kWh/100km for the Skoda Enyaq. That’s a difference of about 0.2 kWh/100km.

As for electric range, the Skoda Enyaq offers clearly more range – reaching up to 589 km, about 133 km more than the Peugeot 408.

Enyaq

Engine and Performance:

Power, torque and acceleration are the classic benchmarks for car enthusiasts – and here, some clear differences start to show.

When it comes to engine power, the Skoda Enyaq offers visibly more power – delivering 340 HP compared to 240 HP. That’s roughly 100 HP more horsepower.

When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Skoda Enyaq is clearly quicker – completing the sprint in 5.4 s, while the Peugeot 408 takes 7.2 s. That’s about 1.8 s quicker.

There’s also a difference in torque: the Skoda Enyaq delivers clearly more torque with 679 Nm compared to 360 Nm. That’s about 319 Nm more.

408

Space and Everyday Use:

Cabin size, boot volume and payload all play a role in everyday practicality. Here, comfort and flexibility make the difference.

Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.

In terms of curb weight, Peugeot 408 is markedly lighter – 1,544 kg compared to 2,074 kg. The difference is around 530 kg.

When it comes to payload, the Skoda Enyaq carries somewhat more – 526 kg compared to 456 kg. That’s a difference of about 70 kg.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The Skoda Enyaq holds a decisive overall lead in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

from £36,800
Enyaq

Skoda Enyaq

  • Engine Type : Electric
  • Transmission : Automatic
  • Drive Type : Rear-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP : 190 - 340 HP
  • Consumption kWh/100km : 14.9 - 15.9 kWh/100km
  • Electric Range : 449 - 589 km
Peugeot 408
Skoda Enyaq

Costs and Consumption

View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance

View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body

View detailed analysis

Peugeot 408

The Peugeot 408 blends a coupe-like roofline with practical sensibility, delivering striking looks and a surprisingly airy, premium-feeling cabin. On the road it prefers comfort and poise over manic thrills, making it a smart, stylish choice for buyers who want something a bit different from the usual family hatchback.

details

Skoda Enyaq

The Skoda Enyaq is a practical and well-appointed electric SUV that blends a roomy interior and everyday usability with clean, understated design. It’s a comfortable, efficient choice for buyers who want a sensible electric family car without flash, backed by solid build quality and clever practicality.

details
Peugeot 408
Skoda Enyaq

Costs and Consumption

Price
35,100 - 48,000 £
Price
36,800 - 52,800 £
Consumption L/100km
2.6 - 5 L/100km
Consumption L/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
14.7 kWh/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
14.9 - 15.9 kWh/100km
Electric Range
79 - 456 km
Electric Range
449 - 589 km
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
-
co2
0 - 114 g/km
co2
0 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
-
Fuel tank capacity
-

Dimensions and Body

Body Type
SUV
Body Type
SUV
Seats
5
Seats
5
Doors
-
Doors
-
Curb weight
1,544 - 1,879 kg
Curb weight
2,074 - 2,284 kg
Trunk capacity
-
Trunk capacity
570 - 585 L
Length
-
Length
-
Width
1,848 mm
Width
1,879 mm
Height
-
Height
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Payload
371 - 456 kg
Payload
449 - 526 kg

Engine and Performance

Engine Type
Petrol MHEV, Plugin Hybrid, Electric
Engine Type
Electric
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission Detail
Dual-Clutch Automatic, Reduction Gearbox
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
Rear-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
Power HP
145 - 240 HP
Power HP
190 - 340 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
7.2 - 9.4 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
5.4 - 8.6 s
Max Speed
-
Max Speed
-
Torque
230 - 360 Nm
Torque
350 - 679 Nm
Number of Cylinders
3 - 4
Number of Cylinders
-
Power kW
107 - 176 kW
Power kW
140 - 250 kW
Engine capacity
1,199 - 1,598 cm3
Engine capacity
-

General

Model Year
2026
Model Year
2026
CO2 Efficiency Class
C, B, A
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
Brand
Peugeot
Brand
Skoda
DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved. The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.