Deutschland
France
Nederland
Great Britain
Sverige
Danmark
Suomi
Italia
Polska
EspañaVS
Peugeot 408 vs Skoda Enyaq - Differences and prices compared
Compare performance (225 HP vs 340 HP), boot space and price (35100 £ vs 41900 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Peugeot 408 or Skoda Enyaq?
408
Costs and Efficiency:
Looking at overall running costs, both models reveal some interesting differences in everyday economy.
Peugeot 408 has a a bit advantage in terms of price – it starts at 35100 £ , while the Skoda Enyaq costs 41900 £ . That’s a price difference of around 6797 £.
When it comes to electricity consumption, both models perform equally – each averaging 14.80 kWh per 100 km.
As for electric range, the Skoda Enyaq performs evident better – achieving up to 587 km, about 132 km more than the Peugeot 408.
Enyaq
Engine and Performance:
Power, torque and acceleration say a lot about how a car feels on the road. This is where you see which model delivers more driving dynamics.
When it comes to engine power, the Skoda Enyaq has a distinct edge – offering 340 HP compared to 225 HP. That’s roughly 115 HP more horsepower.
In acceleration from 0 to 100 km/h, the Skoda Enyaq is clearly perceptible quicker – completing the sprint in 5.40 s, while the Peugeot 408 takes 7.20 s. That’s about 1.80 s faster.
In terms of top speed, the Peugeot 408 performs noticeable better – reaching 233 km/h, while the Skoda Enyaq tops out at 180 km/h. The difference is around 53 km/h.
There’s also a difference in torque: Skoda Enyaq pulls clearly stronger with 679 Nm compared to 360 Nm. That’s about 319 Nm difference.
408
Space and Everyday Use:
Cabin size, boot volume and payload all play a role in everyday practicality. Here, comfort and flexibility make the difference.
Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.
In curb weight, Peugeot 408 is significantly lighter – 1544 kg compared to 2179 kg. The difference is around 635 kg.
In terms of boot space, the Skoda Enyaq offers slight more room – 585 L compared to 536 L. That’s a difference of about 49 L.
In maximum load capacity, the Skoda Enyaq performs barely noticeable better – up to 1710 L, which is about 127 L more than the Peugeot 408.
When it comes to payload, Skoda Enyaq slight takes the win – 489 kg compared to 456 kg. That’s a difference of about 33 kg.
Who wins the race in the data check?
The Skoda Enyaq holds a decisive overall lead in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.
Peugeot 408
Skoda Enyaq
Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
from about £41,900
Skoda Enyaq
Peugeot 408
4.9 (1 Reviews)
The Peugeot 408 blends a coupe-like roofline with practical sensibility, delivering striking looks and a surprisingly airy, premium-feeling cabin. On the road it prefers comfort and poise over manic thrills, making it a smart, stylish choice for buyers who want something a bit different from the usual family hatchback.
details
Skoda Enyaq
5 (3 Reviews)
The Skoda Enyaq is a cleverly packaged electric SUV that blends roomy, pragmatic family space with clean, Czech design and sensible value. On the road it’s unshowy but composed, offering serene electric performance and easy-to-use tech — the kind of car that makes daily life smoother without trying too hard.
details
Peugeot 408
Skoda Enyaq
Costs and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
35100 - 48000 £
|
Price
41900 - 52200 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
2.7 - 5.1 L
|
Consumption L/100km
-
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
14.80 kWh
|
Consumption kWh/100km
14.8 - 16.2 kWh
|
|
Electric Range
79 - 455 km
|
Electric Range
538 - 587 km
|
|
Battery Capacity
58.20 kWh
|
Battery Capacity
77 kWh
|
|
co2
0 - 114 g/km
|
co2
0 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
42 - 52 L
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
SUV
|
Body Type
SUV
|
|
Seats
5
|
Seats
5
|
|
Doors
5
|
Doors
5
|
|
Curb weight
1544 - 1879 kg
|
Curb weight
2179 - 2293 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
471 - 536 L
|
Trunk capacity
570 - 585 L
|
|
Length
4687 mm
|
Length
4658 mm
|
|
Width
1848 mm
|
Width
1879 mm
|
|
Height
1478 mm
|
Height
1620 - 1621 mm
|
|
Max trunk capacity
1528 - 1583 L
|
Max trunk capacity
1610 - 1710 L
|
|
Payload
371 - 456 kg
|
Payload
443 - 489 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Electric, Petrol MHEV, Plugin Hybrid
|
Engine Type
Electric
|
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic
|
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
|
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
Rear-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
145 - 225 HP
|
Power HP
286 - 340 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
7.2 - 9.4 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
5.4 - 6.7 s
|
|
Max Speed
160 - 233 km/h
|
Max Speed
180 km/h
|
|
Torque
230 - 360 Nm
|
Torque
545 - 679 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
4
|
Number of Cylinders
-
|
|
Power kW
107 - 165 kW
|
Power kW
210 - 250 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
1199 - 1598 cm3
|
Engine capacity
-
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2024 - 2025
|
Model Year
2025
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
A, C, B
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
|
|
Brand
Peugeot
|
Brand
Skoda
|
What drivetrain options does the Peugeot 408 have?
The Peugeot 408 is offered with Front-Wheel Drive.
The prices shown are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted for local VAT. Local registration taxes (e.g. NoVA, BPM or CO2 malus) are not included. This information is not legally binding.