VS

Peugeot Rifter vs Skoda Enyaq comparison

Compare performance (130 HP vs 340 HP), boot space and price (22,900 £ vs 36,800 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Peugeot Rifter or Skoda Enyaq?

Peugeot Rifter vs Skoda Enyaq: Key differences

Peugeot Rifter

4.6 (2 Reviews)
rate
  • significantly cheaper
  • markedly lighter
  • considerably more trunk space
details

Skoda Enyaq

4.4 (6 Reviews)
rate
  • considerably more power
  • significantly quicker 0–100 km/h
details

All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.

By Achim Sedelmaier

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

Rifter

Costs and Efficiency:

Price and efficiency are often the first things buyers look at. Here it becomes clear which model has the long-term edge – whether at the pump, the plug, or in purchase price.

Peugeot Rifter is significantly cheaper – starting at 22,900 £ , while the Skoda Enyaq costs 36,800 £ . That’s a price difference of around 13,988 £.

Enyaq

Engine and Performance:

Power, torque and acceleration say a lot about how a car feels on the road. This is where you see which model delivers more driving dynamics.

When it comes to engine power, the Skoda Enyaq offers considerably more power – delivering 340 HP compared to 130 HP. That’s roughly 210 HP more horsepower.

When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Skoda Enyaq is significantly quicker – completing the sprint in 5.4 s, while the Peugeot Rifter takes 11.3 s. That’s about 5.9 s quicker.

There’s also a difference in torque: the Skoda Enyaq delivers considerably more torque with 679 Nm compared to 300 Nm. That’s about 379 Nm more.

Rifter

Space and Everyday Use:

Cabin size, boot volume and payload all play a role in everyday practicality. Here, comfort and flexibility make the difference.

Seats: Peugeot Rifter offers more seats – 7 vs 5.

In terms of curb weight, Peugeot Rifter is markedly lighter – 1,498 kg compared to 2,074 kg. The difference is around 576 kg.

Looking at boot space, the Peugeot Rifter offers considerably more boot space – 1,050 L compared to 585 L. That’s a difference of about 465 L.

When it comes to payload, the Peugeot Rifter carries visibly more – 814 kg compared to 526 kg. That’s a difference of about 288 kg.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The Skoda Enyaq stands well ahead of its rival in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

from £36,800
Enyaq

Skoda Enyaq

  • Engine Type Electric
  • Transmission Automatic
  • Drive Type Rear-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP 190 - 340 HP
  • Consumption kWh/100km 14.9 - 15.9 kWh/100km
  • Electric Range 449 - 589 km
details

Frequently compared as well

Skoda Enyaq
Skoda Elroq
VS
Choosing between the Skoda Enyaq and the Skoda Elroq comes down to whether you want a spacious, all-electric family SUV or a more compact, conventionally powered crossover focused on practicality. I’ll highlight the real-world differences — range and running costs, interior space and usability, …
Skoda Enyaq
VW ID.7
VS
The Skoda Enyaq and the VW ID.7 share the VW Group’s MEB electric platform, but they’re aimed at different buyers. The Enyaq is a practical, family-focused SUV that emphasizes interior space, usability and value, while the ID.7 is a sleek, aerodynamic saloon tuned for long-range efficiency and …
Peugeot Rifter
Skoda Enyaq

Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis

Peugeot Rifter

The Peugeot Rifter is a practical, family-friendly people carrier that makes everyday errands and weekend escapes feel effortless thanks to its airy cabin and clever, flexible interior. With chunky, purposeful styling and storage solutions everywhere, the Rifter manages to be both unashamedly useful and unexpectedly likeable.

details
PEUGEOT_RIFTER_2102STYP003_Aufhaenger
PEUGEOT_RIFTER_2102STYP100
PEUGEOT_RIFTER_2102STYP101
PEUGEOT_RIFTER_2102STYP207

Reviews Peugeot Rifter

4.6 (2 Reviews)
rate
retrovill13@gmail.com
5 May 2026, 18:40:42

Citroen Berlingo -ПО дизайну напоминает ,те летающее тарелки из фильма ФАНТОМАС.Где время когда Франция не имела представления ,как должен выглядеть автомобиль.

А вот PEUGEOT RIFTER -Это уже уровень моего представления семейного внедорожника-красовера,и рабочей симпатичной лошадки.Эго и выбрал за это .

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Company car / Business
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money

Skoda Enyaq

The Skoda Enyaq is a practical and well-appointed electric SUV that blends a roomy interior and everyday usability with clean, understated design. It’s a comfortable, efficient choice for buyers who want a sensible electric family car without flash, backed by solid build quality and clever practicality.

details
04_new_skoda_enyaq_68cf74d6-1920x1280
11_new_skoda_enyaq_c2b962a0-1920x1280
12_new_skoda_enyaq_de0afe4c-1920x1280
33_new_skoda_enyaq_833cbb5e-1920x1440
48_new_skoda_enyaq_interior_dad4ad75-1920x1280
49_new_skoda_enyaq_interior_37c35e34-1920x1280
50_new_skoda_enyaq_coupe_f55ae8bb-1920x1858

Reviews Skoda Enyaq

4.4 (6 Reviews)
rate
Delporte
16 May 2026, 16:33:37

More options and more room for discounts and negotiation, just as comfortable, better than a Hyundai Ioniq 5 (which is not comfortable at all), a Toyota bZ4X (feels cramped and has little space), a Tesla Model Y Premium (a bit too high-tech for me but otherwise fine), a Jaecoo 5 (entry-level, comfort impeccable but no options and little tech), and an Omoda (less comfortable and very few options). This is all a personal opinion — we drove the cars mentioned above and the Skoda seems the best value for money with good comfort, a variety of options and reliable after-sales service close to us.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Company car / Business
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money
Alfaknaggen
11 Mar 2026, 18:30:11

Well‑thought-out and practical car (85x MY2024) that unfortunately lets you down because of system bugs and irritating driver‑assist systems that can't cope with ordinary autumn or winter weather without throwing up error messages and warnings.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Commuter (short/medium distance)
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money

Frequently compared as well

Citroen Berlingo
Peugeot Rifter
VS
The Citroën Berlingo and Peugeot Rifter are closely related compact MPVs from Stellantis that focus on practicality, generous interior space and versatile packaging for families and small businesses. Mechanically they’re near-identical, but the Berlingo leans towards comfort and value while the …
Skoda Enyaq
Volvo EX60
VS
Practical Czech engineering goes up against Swedish style in our showdown between the Skoda Enyaq and the Volvo EX60. The Enyaq focuses on roomy practicality and sensible value, while the EX60 answers with sharper design, richer tech and a more premium feel — choose based on whether you want …
Ford Explorer EV
Skoda Enyaq
VS
Here’s a clear comparison between the Ford Explorer EV and the Skoda Enyaq to help determine which electric SUV suits your needs. I’ll focus on driving range, interior space, technology and overall value so you can pick the right balance of practicality and performance.
Skoda Enyaq
Kia EV5
VS
Comparing the Škoda Enyaq and the Kia EV5 pits two spacious, family-friendly electric SUVs against each other: the Enyaq focuses on practicality, value and a straightforward user experience, while the EV5 emphasizes cutting-edge cabin tech, distinctive styling and a more premium feel. This short …
Ford Tourneo Connect
Peugeot Rifter
VS
The Ford Tourneo Connect and the Peugeot Rifter are roomy, practical people-carriers aimed at buyers who need versatile family transport, but they take different approaches: the Tourneo Connect emphasises car-like handling and refined packaging, while the Rifter focuses on rugged styling and highly …
Ford Capri
Skoda Enyaq
VS
Comparing the Capri and the Enyaq is like putting a classic, driver-focused sports coupe head-to-head with a modern electric SUV designed for space, comfort and low running costs. If you’re after character and a sporty drive, the Capri delivers the feel; if you need range, practicality and everyday …
Skoda Enyaq
VW ID.7 Touring
VS
Comparing the Skoda Enyaq and the Volkswagen ID.7 Touring pits a practical, roomy electric SUV against a sleek, long-distance electric estate. Both share VW Group underpinnings, but the Enyaq prioritizes interior space and value while the ID.7 Touring focuses on aerodynamic efficiency, range and …
Skoda Enyaq
Toyota C-HR+
VS
The Škoda Enyaq and the Toyota C‑HR represent very different takes on the modern crossover: the Enyaq is a roomy, all‑electric SUV focused on practicality and range, while the C‑HR is a compact, style‑led crossover available with petrol and hybrid powertrains. Which suits you depends on whether you …
Peugeot Rifter
Skoda Enyaq

Costs and Consumption
Price
22,900 - 30,100 £
Price
36,800 - 52,800 £
Consumption L/100km
5.4 - 6.5 L/100km
Consumption L/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
14.9 - 15.9 kWh/100km
Electric Range
-
Electric Range
449 - 589 km
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
-
co2
142 - 157 g/km
co2
0 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
-
Fuel tank capacity
-

Dimensions and Body
Body Type
High Roof Estate
Body Type
SUV
Seats
5 - 7
Seats
5
Doors
-
Doors
-
Curb weight
1,498 - 1,694 kg
Curb weight
2,074 - 2,284 kg
Trunk capacity
322 - 1,050 L
Trunk capacity
570 - 585 L
Length
-
Length
-
Width
1,848 mm
Width
1,879 mm
Height
-
Height
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Payload
518 - 814 kg
Payload
449 - 526 kg

Engine and Performance
Engine Type
Petrol, Diesel
Engine Type
Electric
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Automatic Gearbox
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
Rear-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
Power HP
102 - 130 HP
Power HP
190 - 340 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
11.3 - 13.5 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
5.4 - 8.6 s
Max Speed
-
Max Speed
-
Torque
205 - 300 Nm
Torque
350 - 679 Nm
Number of Cylinders
3 - 4
Number of Cylinders
-
Power kW
75 - 96 kW
Power kW
140 - 250 kW
Engine capacity
1,199 - 1,499 cm3
Engine capacity
-

General
Model Year
2026
Model Year
2026
CO2 Efficiency Class
E, F
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
Brand
Peugeot
Brand
Skoda
Is the Peugeot Rifter offered with different drivetrains?

Available configurations include Front-Wheel Drive.

DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved. The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.