VS

Polestar 3 vs Mazda CX-30 comparison

Compare performance (680 HP vs 186 HP), boot space and price (67,600 £ vs 25,700 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Polestar 3 or Mazda CX-30?

Polestar 3 vs Mazda CX-30: Key differences

Polestar 3

4.9 (1 Reviews)
rate
  • significantly more power
  • considerably quicker 0–100 km/h
  • a bit more trunk space
details

Mazda CX-30

4.5 (9 Reviews)
rate
  • clearly cheaper
  • substantially lighter
details

All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.

By Achim Sedelmaier

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

3

Costs and Efficiency:

Looking at overall running costs, both models reveal some interesting differences in everyday economy.

Mazda CX-30 is clearly cheaper – starting at 25,700 £ , while the Polestar 3 costs 67,600 £ . That’s a price difference of around 41,923 £.

CX-30

Engine and Performance:

Power, torque and acceleration say a lot about how a car feels on the road. This is where you see which model delivers more driving dynamics.

When it comes to engine power, the Polestar 3 offers significantly more power – delivering 680 HP compared to 186 HP. That’s roughly 494 HP more horsepower.

When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Polestar 3 is considerably quicker – completing the sprint in 3.9 s, while the Mazda CX-30 takes 8.3 s. That’s about 4.4 s quicker.

There’s also a difference in torque: the Polestar 3 delivers clearly more torque with 870 Nm compared to 240 Nm. That’s about 630 Nm more.

3

Space and Everyday Use:

Beyond pure performance, interior space and usability matter most in daily life. This is where you see which car is more practical and versatile.

Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.

In terms of curb weight, Mazda CX-30 is substantially lighter – 1,455 kg compared to 2,315 kg. The difference is around 860 kg.

Looking at boot space, the Polestar 3 offers a bit more boot space – 484 L compared to 430 L. That’s a difference of about 54 L.

When it comes to payload, the Polestar 3 carries visibly more – 645 kg compared to 496 kg. That’s a difference of about 149 kg.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The Polestar 3 is clearly superior overall in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

from £67,600
3

Polestar 3

  • Engine Type Electric
  • Transmission Automatic
  • Drive Type Rear-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP 333 - 680 HP
  • Consumption kWh/100km 17.7 - 20.5 kWh/100km
  • Electric Range 601 - 647 km
details

Frequently compared as well

Lexus UX
Mazda CX-30
VS
The Lexus UX and Mazda CX-30 are two compact crossovers that target different buyers: the UX prioritizes premium feel and comfort, while the CX-30 focuses on engaging driving dynamics and value. This comparison will highlight how they stack up in design, interior quality, tech, safety and running …
Ford Puma
Mazda CX-30
VS
In the tussle between the cheeky Ford Puma and the stylish Mazda CX-30, the Puma serves up playful handling, clever practicality and sharper value, while the CX-30 rewards you with a more premium cabin and composed, grown-up refinement. Choose the Puma for everyday fun and sensible running costs; …
Polestar 3
Mazda CX-30

Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis

Polestar 3

Polestar 3 arrives as a Scandinavian-styled electric SUV that marries minimalist design with a statuesque presence, looking smarter than most in the car park. Inside, the cabin feels airy and thoughtful, with tech and driving manners that lean toward composed comfort rather than outright drama — perfect for buyers who want electric prestige without shouting about it.

details
660436_20221012_Polestar_3
660426_20221012_Polestar_3
660442_20221012_Polestar_3
660445_20221012_Polestar_3
661749_20221012_Polestar_3
661750_20221012_Polestar_3

Reviews Polestar 3

4.9 (1 Reviews)
rate

No reviews yet. Share your experience and help others decide.

Mazda CX-30

The Mazda CX-30 blends Mazda’s upscale styling with a compact crossover body, offering a refined interior and engaging driving dynamics. It’s a practical choice for buyers who want a premium feel and agile handling in a city-friendly package.

details
2022_mazda_cx-30_src_spain_act_44
2022_mazda_cx-30_src_spain_act_42
2022_mazda_cx-30_src_spain_act_27
2022_mazda_cx-30_src_spain_int_3

Reviews Mazda CX-30

4.5 (9 Reviews)
rate
Jarek
4 Jun 2026, 09:16:53

The pleasure of driving and everything we call premium sensations.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Long-distance driver
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money
Danny
31 May 2026, 17:14:00

Nice luxury car, although I'm not sure I find the oversized rims that attractive. On the other hand, I like the Mazda 3 better.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Leisure / Weekend driver
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money
Paul
27 May 2026, 05:17:55

Better soundproofed, more powerful, and feels more like a continuation of my hands and feet when driving — in other words, you feel like a single unit during the driving experience — but cramped for me at 6 ft 1 in to get in and out…

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Commuter (short/medium distance)
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money
Michele
8 May 2026, 17:46:44

Quiet; well finished, predominantly analog dashboard; excellent value for money

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Family car
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money
Rafa
25 Apr 2026, 12:50:49

I wouldn't pay more than 40,000 for a 1.5 L engine — that's excessive.

Frequently compared as well

Mazda CX-30
VW T-Roc
VS
The Mazda CX-30 and the VW T‑Roc are compact crossovers that each aim to combine everyday practicality with a touch of style, but they take different routes on ride feel, interior quality and tech. This quick comparison will help you decide whether the CX-30’s near-premium cabin and engaging …
Mazda CX-30
Suzuki S-Cross
VS
If you want a small SUV that actually feels like a car, the Mazda CX‑30 wins hearts with taut handling, upscale interior materials and a sharper, more rewarding drive. The Suzuki S‑Cross is the sensible sibling — roomier, cheaper to run and easier on the wallet, making it the smarter pick for …
Mazda CX-30
Opel Mokka
VS
Mazda CX-30 and Opel Mokka go head-to-head: compare performance, space, features and price in one quick overview to see which model suits your daily driving, budget and lifestyle better. A clear, side-by-side look helps you make the smarter choice. || Unsure whether the Mazda CX-30 or the Opel …
Mazda CX-30
SEAT Arona
VS
In the competitive subcompact SUV segment, the Mazda CX-30 and SEAT Arona stand out with their unique design philosophies and driving dynamics. The CX-30 impresses with its upscale interior and smooth handling, while the Arona offers agile performance and a sporty character. Ultimately, both models …
Mazda CX-30
Nissan Qashqai
VS
The Mazda CX‑30 feels like a premium compact with sharp handling, a beautifully finished interior and a focus on driver enjoyment, while the Nissan Qashqai answers with roomy practicality, comfort and sensible tech for everyday family life. Choose the CX‑30 if you want style and engagement; pick …
Mazda CX-30
Toyota C-HR
VS
In the battle of subcompact SUVs, the Mazda CX-30 showcases a sleek design and spirited driving dynamics that appeal to enthusiasts, while the Toyota C-HR offers a bold aesthetic and a reputation for reliability. The CX-30 impresses with its upscale interior and advanced infotainment features, …
Polestar 3
Volvo EX60
VS
Two Scandinavian siblings square up for the tech‑luxury crown: the razor‑edged, driver‑focused Polestar 3 vs the elegant, safety‑obsessed Volvo EX60. We're lining them up to find which deserves your money—and your garage: the sharp, sporty statement or the cosseting, clever cruiser.
Hyundai Tucson
Mazda CX-30
VS
In the competitive compact SUV segment, the Hyundai Tucson emerges as a versatile contender, boasting a spacious interior and cutting-edge technology features. Meanwhile, the Mazda CX-30 captivates drivers with its engaging driving dynamics and premium interior aesthetics, making it a standout for …
Polestar 3
Mazda CX-30

Costs and Consumption
Price
67,600 - 91,600 £
Price
25,700 - 37,200 £
Consumption L/100km
-
Consumption L/100km
5.7 - 6.6 L/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
17.7 - 20.5 kWh/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Electric Range
601 - 647 km
Electric Range
-
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
-
co2
0 g/km
co2
129 - 148 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
-
Fuel tank capacity
-

Dimensions and Body
Body Type
SUV
Body Type
SUV
Seats
5
Seats
5
Doors
-
Doors
-
Curb weight
2,315 - 2,525 kg
Curb weight
1,455 - 1,587 kg
Trunk capacity
484 L
Trunk capacity
422 - 430 L
Length
-
Length
-
Width
1,935 mm
Width
1,795 mm
Height
-
Height
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Payload
605 - 645 kg
Payload
458 - 496 kg

Engine and Performance
Engine Type
Electric
Engine Type
Petrol MHEV
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Automatic Gearbox
Drive Type
Rear-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
Power HP
333 - 680 HP
Power HP
140 - 186 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
3.9 - 6.5 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
8.3 - 10.3 s
Max Speed
-
Max Speed
-
Torque
480 - 870 Nm
Torque
238 - 240 Nm
Number of Cylinders
-
Number of Cylinders
4
Power kW
245 - 500 kW
Power kW
103 - 137 kW
Engine capacity
-
Engine capacity
1,998 - 2,488 cm3

General
Model Year
2026
Model Year
2025
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
CO2 Efficiency Class
D, E
Brand
Polestar
Brand
Mazda
What drivetrain options does the Polestar 3 have?

The Polestar 3 is available as Rear-Wheel Drive or All-Wheel Drive.

DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved. The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.