Deutschland
France
Nederland
Great Britain
Sverige
Danmark
Suomi
Italia
Polska
EspañaVS
Renault Arkana vs Toyota C-HR+ comparison
Compare performance (143 HP vs 343 HP), boot space and price (28,500 £ vs 36,000 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Renault Arkana or Toyota C-HR+?
Renault Arkana vs Toyota C-HR+: Key differences
Renault Arkana
3.8 (6 Reviews)
Customer feedback generally presents the Arkana as an economical, stylish and practical family crossover that suits everyday needs. Owners often praise its fuel economy, space and safety, while noting it isn’t a sporty coupe; a few reports of serious mechanical issues and costly repairs also appear. Opinions are mixed enough that broader reliability trends aren’t fully clear from the available comments.
All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.
Arkana
Costs and Efficiency:
Price and efficiency are key factors when choosing a car – and this is often where the real differences emerge.
Renault Arkana is clearly cheaper – starting at 28,500 £ , while the Toyota C-HR+ costs 36,000 £ . That’s a price difference of around 7,534 £.
C-HR+
Engine and Performance:
Power, torque and acceleration are the classic benchmarks for car enthusiasts – and here, some clear differences start to show.
When it comes to engine power, the Toyota C-HR+ offers significantly more power – delivering 343 HP compared to 143 HP. That’s roughly 200 HP more horsepower.
When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Toyota C-HR+ is significantly quicker – completing the sprint in 5.2 s, while the Renault Arkana takes 10.8 s. That’s about 5.6 s quicker.
There’s also a difference in torque: the Toyota C-HR+ delivers clearly more torque with 338 Nm compared to 205 Nm. That’s about 133 Nm more.
Arkana
Space and Everyday Use:
Whether family car or daily driver – which one offers more room, flexibility and comfort?
Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.
In terms of curb weight, Renault Arkana is a bit lighter – 1,510 kg compared to 1,810 kg. The difference is around 300 kg.
When it comes to payload, the Toyota C-HR+ carries clearly more – 655 kg compared to 451 kg. That’s a difference of about 204 kg.
Who wins the race in the data check?
The Toyota C-HR+ holds a decisive overall lead in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.
from £36,000
Toyota C-HR+
Renault Arkana
Toyota C-HR+
Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Renault Arkana
The Arkana stands out with its striking coupe-SUV design, blending sporty aesthetics with practicality. Its bold silhouette and high ride height offer a unique presence on the road, attracting attention wherever it goes. Inside, the Arkana combines modern technology with comfort, making it a versatile choice for both city driving and weekend getaways.
details
Toyota C-HR+
The Toyota C-HR+ mixes sharp, coupe-like styling with comfortable, surprisingly practical packaging, making a bold statement around town and on the weekend run. It’s aimed at drivers who value standout looks and fuss-free ownership over sports-car thrills, so if you want personality and reliability in one tidy package, book a test drive.
details
Renault Arkana
Toyota C-HR+
Costs and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
28,500 - 31,900 £
|
Price
36,000 - 46,300 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
4.7 L/100km
|
Consumption L/100km
-
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
Consumption kWh/100km
13.4 - 15.5 kWh/100km
|
|
Electric Range
-
|
Electric Range
458 - 607 km
|
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
|
co2
106 g/km
|
co2
0 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
SUV
|
Body Type
SUV
|
|
Seats
5
|
Seats
5
|
|
Doors
-
|
Doors
-
|
|
Curb weight
1,510 kg
|
Curb weight
1,810 - 2,010 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
-
|
Trunk capacity
416 L
|
|
Length
-
|
Length
-
|
|
Width
1,821 mm
|
Width
1,870 mm
|
|
Height
-
|
Height
-
|
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
|
Payload
451 kg
|
Payload
550 - 655 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Full Hybrid
|
Engine Type
Electric
|
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox
|
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
|
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
143 HP
|
Power HP
167 - 343 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
10.8 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
5.2 - 8.4 s
|
|
Max Speed
-
|
Max Speed
-
|
|
Torque
205 Nm
|
Torque
268 - 338 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
4
|
Number of Cylinders
-
|
|
Power kW
105 kW
|
Power kW
123 - 252 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
1,598 cm3
|
Engine capacity
-
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2,025
|
Model Year
2,026
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
C
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
|
|
Brand
Renault
|
Brand
Toyota
|
DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved.
The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.