Deutschland
France
Nederland
Great Britain
Sverige
Danmark
Suomi
Italia
Polska
Česko
EspañaVS
Skoda Enyaq vs BYD Atto 3 comparison
Compare performance (340 HP vs 449 HP), boot space and price (36,800 £ vs 38,600 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Skoda Enyaq or BYD Atto 3?
Skoda Enyaq vs BYD Atto 3: Key differences
All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.
Enyaq
Costs and Efficiency:
Price and efficiency are key factors when choosing a car – and this is often where the real differences emerge.
Skoda Enyaq is very slightly cheaper – starting at 36,800 £ , while the BYD Atto 3 costs 38,600 £ . That’s a price difference of around 1,714 £.
In terms of energy consumption, the Skoda Enyaq is somewhat more efficient: consuming 14.9 kWh/100km compared to 16.4 kWh/100km for the BYD Atto 3. That’s a difference of about 1.5 kWh/100km.
As for electric range, the Skoda Enyaq offers slightly more range – reaching up to 589 km, about 79 km more than the BYD Atto 3.
Atto 3
Engine and Performance:
Under the bonnet, it becomes clear which model is tuned for sportiness and which one takes the lead when you hit the accelerator.
When it comes to engine power, the BYD Atto 3 offers noticeably more power – delivering 449 HP compared to 340 HP. That’s roughly 109 HP more horsepower.
When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the BYD Atto 3 is visibly quicker – completing the sprint in 3.9 s, while the Skoda Enyaq takes 5.4 s. That’s about 1.5 s quicker.
There’s also a difference in torque: the Skoda Enyaq delivers moderately more torque with 679 Nm compared to 560 Nm. That’s about 119 Nm more.
Enyaq
Space and Everyday Use:
Beyond pure performance, interior space and usability matter most in daily life. This is where you see which car is more practical and versatile.
Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.
In terms of curb weight, BYD Atto 3 is a bit lighter – 1,880 kg compared to 2,074 kg. The difference is around 194 kg.
Looking at boot space, the Skoda Enyaq offers moderately more boot space – 585 L compared to 490 L. That’s a difference of about 95 L.
When it comes to payload, the BYD Atto 3 carries only slightly more – 530 kg compared to 526 kg. That’s a difference of about 4 kg.
Who wins the race in the data check?
The BYD Atto 3 holds a narrow overall lead in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.
from £38,600
BYD Atto 3
Skoda Enyaq
BYD Atto 3
Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Skoda Enyaq
The Skoda Enyaq is a practical and well-appointed electric SUV that blends a roomy interior and everyday usability with clean, understated design. It’s a comfortable, efficient choice for buyers who want a sensible electric family car without flash, backed by solid build quality and clever practicality.
details
BYD Atto 3
The BYD Atto 3 is an electric crossover that blends a distinctive, modern design with a comfortable, well-equipped cabin suited to everyday family use. It offers a relaxed, smooth driving feel and practical running costs, making it a sensible choice if you want an uncomplicated, value-focused EV.
details
Skoda Enyaq
BYD Atto 3
Costs and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
36,800 - 52,800 £
|
Price
38,600 - 43,700 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
-
|
Consumption L/100km
-
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
14.9 - 15.9 kWh/100km
|
Consumption kWh/100km
16.4 - 17.8 kWh/100km
|
|
Electric Range
449 - 589 km
|
Electric Range
470 - 510 km
|
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
|
co2
0 g/km
|
co2
0 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
SUV
|
Body Type
SUV
|
|
Seats
5
|
Seats
5
|
|
Doors
-
|
Doors
-
|
|
Curb weight
2,074 - 2,284 kg
|
Curb weight
1,880 - 1,990 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
570 - 585 L
|
Trunk capacity
490 L
|
|
Length
-
|
Length
-
|
|
Width
1,879 mm
|
Width
1,875 mm
|
|
Height
-
|
Height
-
|
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
|
Payload
449 - 526 kg
|
Payload
530 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Electric
|
Engine Type
Electric
|
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
|
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
|
|
Drive Type
Rear-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
Rear-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
190 - 340 HP
|
Power HP
313 - 449 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
5.4 - 8.6 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
3.9 - 5.5 s
|
|
Max Speed
-
|
Max Speed
-
|
|
Torque
350 - 679 Nm
|
Torque
380 - 560 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
-
|
Number of Cylinders
-
|
|
Power kW
140 - 250 kW
|
Power kW
230 - 330 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
-
|
Engine capacity
-
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2026
|
Model Year
2026
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
|
|
Brand
Skoda
|
Brand
BYD
|
DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved.
The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.