Compare performance (340 HP vs 272 HP), boot space and price (36,800 £ vs 41,400 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Skoda Enyaq or CUPRA Terramar?
All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.
In the ever-evolving world of SUVs, the CUPRA Terramar and Skoda Enyaq stand out as compelling options, each bringing innovation and performance to the table. While both models cater to a similar audience, their unique attributes appeal to different preferences. This comparison will delve into the technical aspects and innovations of both cars, showcasing what sets them apart.
The CUPRA Terramar boasts a bold design with sporty aesthetics and striking lines, measuring 4519 mm in length, 1869 mm in width, and standing at a height of 1586 mm. Its aggressive stance and sporty profile are combined with five doors and a well-crafted interior that emphasizes performance and comfort.
In contrast, the Skoda Enyaq offers a more conventional but elegant design, measuring slightly longer at 4649 mm to 4653 mm, and slightly wider at 1879 mm, with a height of 1620 mm to 1621 mm. With five doors, the Enyaq’s design balances modern sophistication with practicality, making it an attractive family SUV.
The CUPRA Terramar offers a versatile range of powertrains, including Plugin Hybrid, Petrol MHEV, and standard petrol engines. Its most powerful configuration delivers an impressive 272 HP, while the entry-level model still boasts a respectable 150 HP. The all-wheel-drive variants are particularly notable, combining performance with stability, with 0-100 km/h speeds of 5.3 seconds for the top model. Fuel consumption also varies, ranging from 0.4 L/100km (in hybrid mode) to a maximum of 8.5 L/100km, making it an efficient choice for both city driving and longer journeys.
On the other hand, the Skoda Enyaq is a full-electric SUV, showcasing an innovative approach to powertrains. Its range tops out at 340 HP with an astounding torque figure that reaches 679 Nm in some variants. 0-100 km/h acceleration is surprisingly snappy, achieving it in as little as 5.5 seconds, while electric consumption averages between 14.6 kWh and 16.4 kWh per 100 km. Offering multiple battery capacities, the Enyaq can achieve an electric range of up to 573 km, appealing to eco-conscious drivers.
Both SUVs come equipped with cutting-edge technology, but they cater to different user experiences. The CUPRA Terramar embraces a sporty digital dashboard and an advanced infotainment system, suitable for enthusiasts who appreciate a performance-oriented interface. Moreover, it features various driving modes that allow drivers to tailor their experience, whether it be in a comfort-oriented or sport setting.
On the other hand, the Skoda Enyaq focuses significantly on sustainable technology and driver assistance systems. With features like adaptive cruise control, lane-keeping assist, and an extensive range of smart connectivity options, the Enyaq ensures a smooth, tech-savvy driving experience for families and city dwellers alike. Additionally, its battery management system maximizes efficiency, enabling longer journeys with greater peace of mind.
Inside, the CUPRA Terramar offers a driver-centric cockpit that combines sportiness with ergonomics. With a trunk capacity of 450 L, it provides ample space for everyday use. The seating arrangement is focused on five passengers, with comfortable, supportive seating ideal for spirited drives.
In comparison, the Skoda Enyaq excels in practicality and passenger comfort, boasting a trunk capacity of up to 585 L. Its interior emphasizes a spacious and airy environment, perfect for families. The Enyaq also provides an extensive array of storage compartments and conveniences, making it an excellent choice for those needing extra space and flexibility.
Choosing between the CUPRA Terramar and Skoda Enyaq ultimately comes down to personal preference and priorities. The Terramar brings exciting performance, a hybrid option, and sporty styling, appealing to driving enthusiasts. Conversely, the Enyaq leads in sustainability, practicality, and technological innovations, making it suitable for eco-conscious families looking for comfort and efficiency.
Both models represent two sides of the modern SUV coin—each delivering exceptional value and technology in their own right. As the automotive landscape continues to evolve, these two models set the standard for what customers can expect from their next vehicle.
Price and efficiency are often the first things buyers look at. Here it becomes clear which model has the long-term edge – whether at the pump, the plug, or in purchase price.
Skoda Enyaq is a bit cheaper – starting at 36,800 £ , while the CUPRA Terramar costs 41,400 £ . That’s a price difference of around 4,569 £.
As for electric range, the Skoda Enyaq offers clearly more range – reaching up to 589 km, about 471 km more than the CUPRA Terramar.
Power, torque and acceleration say a lot about how a car feels on the road. This is where you see which model delivers more driving dynamics.
When it comes to engine power, the Skoda Enyaq offers a bit more power – delivering 340 HP compared to 272 HP. That’s roughly 68 HP more horsepower.
When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Skoda Enyaq is only slightly quicker – completing the sprint in 5.4 s, while the CUPRA Terramar takes 5.9 s. That’s about 0.5 s quicker.
There’s also a difference in torque: the Skoda Enyaq delivers considerably more torque with 679 Nm compared to 400 Nm. That’s about 279 Nm more.
Beyond pure performance, interior space and usability matter most in daily life. This is where you see which car is more practical and versatile.
Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.
In terms of curb weight, CUPRA Terramar is clearly lighter – 1,638 kg compared to 2,074 kg. The difference is around 436 kg.
Looking at boot space, the Skoda Enyaq offers barely more boot space – 585 L compared to 540 L. That’s a difference of about 45 L.
When it comes to payload, the CUPRA Terramar carries very slightly more – 542 kg compared to 526 kg. That’s a difference of about 16 kg.
The Skoda Enyaq is decisively ahead in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.
The Skoda Enyaq is a practical and well-appointed electric SUV that blends a roomy interior and everyday usability with clean, understated design. It’s a comfortable, efficient choice for buyers who want a sensible electric family car without flash, backed by solid build quality and clever practicality.
details
The CUPRA Terramar blends the brand’s sporty DNA with the practicality of a compact crossover, offering striking design and a driver-focused, premium-feeling cabin. It’s aimed at buyers who want engaging handling and athletic looks without giving up everyday usability and modern connectivity.
details
Costs and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
36,800 - 52,800 £
|
Price
41,400 - 50,600 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
-
|
Consumption L/100km
1.6 - 8.4 L/100km
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
14.9 - 15.9 kWh/100km
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
|
Electric Range
449 - 589 km
|
Electric Range
118 km
|
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
|
co2
0 g/km
|
co2
36 - 191 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
SUV
|
Body Type
SUV
|
|
Seats
5
|
Seats
5
|
|
Doors
-
|
Doors
-
|
|
Curb weight
2,074 - 2,284 kg
|
Curb weight
1,638 - 1,904 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
570 - 585 L
|
Trunk capacity
450 - 540 L
|
|
Length
-
|
Length
-
|
|
Width
1,879 mm
|
Width
1,869 mm
|
|
Height
-
|
Height
-
|
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
|
Payload
449 - 526 kg
|
Payload
512 - 542 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Electric
|
Engine Type
Petrol, Petrol MHEV, Plugin Hybrid
|
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
|
Transmission Detail
Dual-Clutch Automatic
|
|
Drive Type
Rear-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive, Front-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
190 - 340 HP
|
Power HP
150 - 272 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
5.4 - 8.6 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
5.9 - 9.3 s
|
|
Max Speed
-
|
Max Speed
-
|
|
Torque
350 - 679 Nm
|
Torque
250 - 400 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
-
|
Number of Cylinders
4
|
|
Power kW
140 - 250 kW
|
Power kW
110 - 200 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
-
|
Engine capacity
1,498 - 1,984 cm3
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2026
|
Model Year
2,024 - 2,025
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
F, E, B, G
|
|
Brand
Skoda
|
Brand
CUPRA
|
Deutschland
France
Nederland
Great Britain
Sverige
Danmark
Suomi
Italia
Polska
Česko
España