Is the Skoda Enyaq offered with different drivetrains?

The Skoda Enyaq is available as Rear-Wheel Drive or All-Wheel Drive.

How much power does the Skoda Enyaq deliver on the road?

The Skoda Enyaq reaches a peak output of 340 HP, depending on the model.

What is the Skoda Enyaq’s energy consumption?

Average electricity consumption is 14.80 kWh.

What is the electric driving range of the Skoda Enyaq?

Depending on equipment, the WLTP range reaches up to 587 km.

How many kWh does the Skoda Enyaq’s battery hold?

The battery offers a capacity of 79 kWh.

What are the Skoda Enyaq’s length, width and height?

Overall, the Skoda Enyaq is 4658 mm long, 1879 mm wide and 1622 mm high.

What drivetrain options does the CUPRA Terramar have?

The CUPRA Terramar is available as Front-Wheel Drive or All-Wheel Drive.

What is the maximum horsepower of the CUPRA Terramar?

Up to 265 HP of power – depending on the configuration.

What is the fuel consumption of the CUPRA Terramar according to the manufacturer?

Based on WLTP testing, consumption is around 6.10 L.

What maximum speed does the CUPRA Terramar reach?

The CUPRA Terramar reaches up to 243 km/h.

What is the CUPRA Terramar’s trunk volume?

Depending on configuration, up to 540 L fit inside.

What are the CUPRA Terramar’s length, width and height?

Overall, the CUPRA Terramar is 4519 mm long, 1869 mm wide and 1586 mm high.

Skoda Enyaq vs CUPRA Terramar - Differences and prices compared

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

Enyaq @ Škoda Auto a.s. / Škoda Storyboard

Costs and Efficiency:

Looking at overall running costs, both models reveal some interesting differences in everyday economy.

CUPRA Terramar has a minimal advantage in terms of price – it starts at 36900 £, while the Skoda Enyaq costs 38100 £. That’s a price difference of around 1183 £.

Terramar @ CUPRA / SEAT S.A.

Engine and Performance:

Under the bonnet, it becomes clear which model is tuned for sportiness and which one takes the lead when you hit the accelerator.

When it comes to engine power, the Skoda Enyaq has a evident edge – offering 340 HP compared to 265 HP. That’s roughly 75 HP more horsepower.

In acceleration from 0 to 100 km/h, the Skoda Enyaq is minimal quicker – completing the sprint in 5.40 s, while the CUPRA Terramar takes 5.90 s. That’s about 0.50 s faster.

In terms of top speed, the CUPRA Terramar performs clearly perceptible better – reaching 243 km/h, while the Skoda Enyaq tops out at 180 km/h. The difference is around 63 km/h.

There’s also a difference in torque: Skoda Enyaq pulls clearly stronger with 679 Nm compared to 400 Nm. That’s about 279 Nm difference.

Enyaq @ Škoda Auto a.s. / Škoda Storyboard

Space and Everyday Use:

Whether family car or daily driver – which one offers more room, flexibility and comfort?

Seats: offers more seating capacity – vs .

In curb weight, CUPRA Terramar is distinct lighter – 1638 kg compared to 2002 kg. The difference is around 364 kg.

In terms of boot space, the Skoda Enyaq offers slight more room – 585 L compared to 540 L. That’s a difference of about 45 L.

When it comes to payload, CUPRA Terramar barely noticeable takes the win – 542 kg compared to 509 kg. That’s a difference of about 33 kg.

Who wins the race?

The Skoda Enyaq proves to be outperforms in nearly all aspects and therefore becomes our DriveDuel Champion!
Skoda Enyaq is the better all-rounder in this comparison.

Reviews Skoda Enyaq

5 (3 Reviews)

Reviews CUPRA Terramar

5 (1 Reviews)

Top Car Comparisons

In the dynamic showdown between the CUPRA Formentor and the CUPRA Terramar, enthusiasts are treated to a blend of style and performance that defines the brand. The Formentor, with its striking design and agile handling, appeals to those seeking a sportier SUV experience, while the Terramar offers a …

@ Škoda Auto a.s. / Škoda Storyboard

Skoda Enyaq

@ Škoda Auto a.s. / Škoda Storyboard

Skoda Elroq

VS

In the ever-evolving landscape of electric SUVs, the Skoda Enyaq and Skoda Elroq stand out as formidable contenders. The Enyaq impresses with its spacious interior and advanced tech features, while the Elroq offers a sportier design and a more dynamic driving experience. As both models leverage …

Costs and Consumption
Price 38100 - 52200 £	Price 36900 - 48500 £
Consumption L/100km -	Consumption L/100km 6.1 - 8.4 L
Consumption kWh/100km 14.8 - 16.2 kWh	Consumption kWh/100km -
Electric Range 428 - 587 km	Electric Range -
Battery Capacity 59 - 79 kWh	Battery Capacity -
co2 0 g/km	co2 139 - 191 g/km
Fuel tank capacity -	Fuel tank capacity 55 - 60 L

Dimensions and Body
Body Type SUV	Body Type SUV
Seats 5	Seats 5
Doors 5	Doors 5
Curb weight 2002 - 2293 kg	Curb weight 1638 - 1750 kg
Trunk capacity 570 - 585 L	Trunk capacity 540 L
Length 4658 - 4660 mm	Length 4519 mm
Width 1879 mm	Width 1869 mm
Height 1605 - 1625 mm	Height 1586 mm
Max trunk capacity 1610 - 1710 L	Max trunk capacity -
Payload 457 - 509 kg	Payload 540 - 542 kg

Engine and Performance
Engine Type Electric	Engine Type Petrol MHEV, Petrol
Transmission Automatic	Transmission Automatic
Transmission Detail Reduction Gearbox	Transmission Detail Dual-Clutch Automatic
Drive Type Rear-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive	Drive Type Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
Power HP 204 - 340 HP	Power HP 150 - 265 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h 5.4 - 8.1 s	Acceleration 0-100km/h 5.9 - 9.3 s
Max Speed 160 - 180 km/h	Max Speed 205 - 243 km/h
Torque 310 - 679 Nm	Torque 250 - 400 Nm
Number of Cylinders -	Number of Cylinders 4
Power kW 150 - 250 kW	Power kW 110 - 195 kW
Engine capacity -	Engine capacity 1498 - 1984 cm3