VS

Skoda Enyaq vs KGM Torres EVX comparison

Compare performance (340 HP vs 207 HP), boot space and price (36,800 £ vs 33,400 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Skoda Enyaq or KGM Torres EVX?

Skoda Enyaq vs KGM Torres EVX: Key differences

Skoda Enyaq

4.4 (6 Reviews)
rate
  • visibly more power
  • markedly more efficient
  • a bit more electric range
  • considerably quicker 0–100 km/h
details

KGM Torres EVX

  • slightly cheaper
  • very slightly lighter
  • slightly more trunk space
details

All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.

By Achim Sedelmaier

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

Enyaq

Costs and Efficiency:

Looking at overall running costs, both models reveal some interesting differences in everyday economy.

KGM Torres EVX is slightly cheaper – starting at 33,400 £ , while the Skoda Enyaq costs 36,800 £ . That’s a price difference of around 3,428 £.

In terms of energy consumption, the Skoda Enyaq is markedly more efficient: consuming 14.9 kWh/100km compared to 19.3 kWh/100km for the KGM Torres EVX. That’s a difference of about 4.4 kWh/100km.

As for electric range, the Skoda Enyaq offers a bit more range – reaching up to 589 km, about 86 km more than the KGM Torres EVX.

Torres EVX

Engine and Performance:

Under the bonnet, it becomes clear which model is tuned for sportiness and which one takes the lead when you hit the accelerator.

When it comes to engine power, the Skoda Enyaq offers visibly more power – delivering 340 HP compared to 207 HP. That’s roughly 133 HP more horsepower.

When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Skoda Enyaq is considerably quicker – completing the sprint in 5.4 s, while the KGM Torres EVX takes 8.2 s. That’s about 2.8 s quicker.

There’s also a difference in torque: the Skoda Enyaq delivers substantially more torque with 679 Nm compared to 339 Nm. That’s about 340 Nm more.

Enyaq

Space and Everyday Use:

Whether family car or daily driver – which one offers more room, flexibility and comfort?

Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.

In terms of curb weight, KGM Torres EVX is very slightly lighter – 1,925 kg compared to 2,074 kg. The difference is around 149 kg.

Looking at boot space, the KGM Torres EVX offers slightly more boot space – 703 L compared to 585 L. That’s a difference of about 118 L.

When it comes to payload, the Skoda Enyaq carries barely more – 526 kg compared to 510 kg. That’s a difference of about 16 kg.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The Skoda Enyaq is decisively ahead in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

from £36,800
Enyaq

Skoda Enyaq

  • Engine Type Electric
  • Transmission Automatic
  • Drive Type Rear-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP 190 - 340 HP
  • Consumption kWh/100km 14.9 - 15.9 kWh/100km
  • Electric Range 449 - 589 km
Skoda Enyaq
KGM Torres EVX

Costs and Consumption

View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance

View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body

View detailed analysis

Skoda Enyaq

The Skoda Enyaq is a practical and well-appointed electric SUV that blends a roomy interior and everyday usability with clean, understated design. It’s a comfortable, efficient choice for buyers who want a sensible electric family car without flash, backed by solid build quality and clever practicality.

details

KGM Torres EVX

The Torres EVX presents itself as a practical and polished electric SUV, pairing a spacious, comfortable interior with a clean, contemporary design. With composed road manners and user-friendly technology, it feels like a sensible choice for drivers seeking an everyday electric family vehicle.

details
Skoda Enyaq
KGM Torres EVX

Costs and Consumption

Price
36,800 - 52,800 £
Price
33,400 - 42,000 £
Consumption L/100km
-
Consumption L/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
14.9 - 15.9 kWh/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
19.3 - 19.7 kWh/100km
Electric Range
449 - 589 km
Electric Range
498 - 503 km
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
-
co2
0 g/km
co2
0 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
-
Fuel tank capacity
-

Dimensions and Body

Body Type
SUV
Body Type
SUV
Seats
5
Seats
2 - 5
Doors
-
Doors
-
Curb weight
2,074 - 2,284 kg
Curb weight
1,925 - 1,950 kg
Trunk capacity
570 - 585 L
Trunk capacity
703 L
Length
-
Length
-
Width
1,879 mm
Width
1,890 mm
Height
-
Height
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Payload
449 - 526 kg
Payload
485 - 510 kg

Engine and Performance

Engine Type
Electric
Engine Type
Electric
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
Drive Type
Rear-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
Power HP
190 - 340 HP
Power HP
207 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
5.4 - 8.6 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
8.2 s
Max Speed
-
Max Speed
-
Torque
350 - 679 Nm
Torque
339 Nm
Number of Cylinders
-
Number of Cylinders
-
Power kW
140 - 250 kW
Power kW
152 kW
Engine capacity
-
Engine capacity
-

General

Model Year
2026
Model Year
2026
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
Brand
Skoda
Brand
KGM
DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved. The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.