Deutschland
France
Nederland
Great Britain
Sverige
Danmark
Suomi
Italia
Polska
EspañaVS
Skoda Enyaq vs NIO ET5 comparison
Compare performance (340 HP vs 490 HP), boot space and price (41900 £ vs 40700 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Skoda Enyaq or NIO ET5?
Enyaq
Costs and Efficiency:
Price and efficiency are often the first things buyers look at. Here it becomes clear which model has the long-term edge – whether at the pump, the plug, or in purchase price.
NIO ET5 has a minimal advantage in terms of price – it starts at 40700 £ , while the Skoda Enyaq costs 41900 £ . That’s a price difference of around 1200 £.
In terms of energy consumption, the advantage goes to the Skoda Enyaq: with 14.80 kWh per 100 km, it’s evident more efficient than the NIO ET5 with 18.60 kWh. That’s a difference of about 3.80 kWh.
As for electric range, the NIO ET5 performs minimal better – achieving up to 590 km, about 3 km more than the Skoda Enyaq.
ET5
Engine and Performance:
Power, torque and acceleration are the classic benchmarks for car enthusiasts – and here, some clear differences start to show.
When it comes to engine power, the NIO ET5 has a noticeable edge – offering 490 HP compared to 340 HP. That’s roughly 150 HP more horsepower.
In acceleration from 0 to 100 km/h, the NIO ET5 is noticeable quicker – completing the sprint in 4 s, while the Skoda Enyaq takes 5.40 s. That’s about 1.40 s faster.
In terms of top speed, the NIO ET5 performs slight better – reaching 200 km/h, while the Skoda Enyaq tops out at 180 km/h. The difference is around 20 km/h.
There’s also a difference in torque: NIO ET5 pulls slight stronger with 700 Nm compared to 679 Nm. That’s about 21 Nm difference.
Enyaq
Space and Everyday Use:
Beyond pure performance, interior space and usability matter most in daily life. This is where you see which car is more practical and versatile.
Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.
In curb weight, Skoda Enyaq is minimal lighter – 2179 kg compared to 2215 kg. The difference is around 36 kg.
In terms of boot space, the Skoda Enyaq offers noticeable more room – 585 L compared to 386 L. That’s a difference of about 199 L.
In maximum load capacity, the Skoda Enyaq performs evident better – up to 1710 L, which is about 575 L more than the NIO ET5.
When it comes to payload, Skoda Enyaq hardly perceptible takes the win – 489 kg compared to 475 kg. That’s a difference of about 14 kg.
Who wins the race in the data check?
The NIO ET5 holds a narrow overall lead in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.
Skoda Enyaq
NIO ET5
Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
from about £40,700
NIO ET5
Skoda Enyaq
4.5 (4 Reviews)
The Skoda Enyaq is a cleverly packaged electric SUV that blends roomy, pragmatic family space with clean, Czech design and sensible value. On the road it’s unshowy but composed, offering serene electric performance and easy-to-use tech — the kind of car that makes daily life smoother without trying too hard.
details
NIO ET5
5 (1 Reviews)
NIO ET5 arrives with sleek, minimalist lines and a cabin that feels more like a calm lounge than a dashboard, delivering a composed drive that keeps motorway monotony at bay. Tech is smart rather than showy, and the brand’s novel ownership options make it an appealing choice for buyers who want electric convenience without the usual headaches — plus it brings enough personality to make charging stops less boring.
details
Skoda Enyaq
NIO ET5
Costs and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
41900 - 52200 £
|
Price
40700 - 58700 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
-
|
Consumption L/100km
-
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
14.8 - 16.2 kWh
|
Consumption kWh/100km
18.6 - 18.9 kWh
|
|
Electric Range
538 - 587 km
|
Electric Range
456 - 590 km
|
|
Battery Capacity
77 kWh
|
Battery Capacity
73.5 - 90 kWh
|
|
co2
0 g/km
|
co2
0 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
SUV
|
Body Type
Hatchback
|
|
Seats
5
|
Seats
5
|
|
Doors
5
|
Doors
5
|
|
Curb weight
2179 - 2293 kg
|
Curb weight
2215 - 2235 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
570 - 585 L
|
Trunk capacity
386 L
|
|
Length
4658 mm
|
Length
4790 mm
|
|
Width
1879 mm
|
Width
1960 mm
|
|
Height
1620 - 1621 mm
|
Height
1499 mm
|
|
Max trunk capacity
1610 - 1710 L
|
Max trunk capacity
1135 L
|
|
Payload
443 - 489 kg
|
Payload
455 - 475 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Electric
|
Engine Type
Electric
|
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
|
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
|
|
Drive Type
Rear-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
286 - 340 HP
|
Power HP
490 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
5.4 - 6.7 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
4 s
|
|
Max Speed
180 km/h
|
Max Speed
200 km/h
|
|
Torque
545 - 679 Nm
|
Torque
700 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
-
|
Number of Cylinders
-
|
|
Power kW
210 - 250 kW
|
Power kW
360 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
-
|
Engine capacity
-
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2025
|
Model Year
2023
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
|
|
Brand
Skoda
|
Brand
NIO
|
Is the Skoda Enyaq offered with different drivetrains?
The Skoda Enyaq is available as Rear-Wheel Drive or All-Wheel Drive.
The prices shown are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted for local VAT. Local registration taxes (e.g. NoVA, BPM or CO2 malus) are not included. This information is not legally binding.