Deutschland
France
Nederland
Great Britain
Sverige
Norge
Danmark
Suomi
Italia
Polska
EspañaVS
Skoda Enyaq vs smart #3 – Performance, range & efficiency compared
Enyaq
@ Škoda Auto a.s. / Škoda Storyboard
Costs and Efficiency:
Looking at overall running costs, both models reveal some interesting differences in everyday economy.
smart #3 has a barely noticeable advantage in terms of price – it starts at 34700 £, while the Skoda Enyaq costs 38100 £. That’s a price difference of around 3352 £.
In terms of energy consumption, the advantage goes to the Skoda Enyaq: with 14.80 kWh per 100 km, it’s to a small extent more efficient than the smart #3 with 16.30 kWh. That’s a difference of about 1.50 kWh.
As for range, the Skoda Enyaq performs clearly perceptible better – achieving up to 587 km, about 132 km more than the smart #3.
#3
@ smart Europe GmbH
Engine and Performance:
Power, torque and acceleration are the classic benchmarks for car enthusiasts – and here, some clear differences start to show.
When it comes to engine power, the smart #3 has a clearly perceptible edge – offering 428 HP compared to 340 HP. That’s roughly 88 HP more horsepower.
In acceleration from 0 to 100 km/h, the smart #3 is clearly quicker – completing the sprint in 3.70 s, while the Skoda Enyaq takes 5.40 s. That’s about 1.70 s faster.
There’s no difference in top speed – both reach 180 km/h.
There’s also a difference in torque: Skoda Enyaq pulls slightly stronger with 679 Nm compared to 584 Nm. That’s about 95 Nm difference.
Enyaq
@ Škoda Auto a.s. / Škoda Storyboard
Space and Everyday Use:
Beyond pure performance, interior space and usability matter most in daily life. This is where you see which car is more practical and versatile.
Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.
In curb weight, smart #3 is somewhat lighter – 1780 kg compared to 2002 kg. The difference is around 222 kg.
In terms of boot space, the Skoda Enyaq offers clearly perceptible more room – 585 L compared to 370 L. That’s a difference of about 215 L.
In maximum load capacity, the Skoda Enyaq performs clearly perceptible better – up to 1710 L, which is about 550 L more than the smart #3.
When it comes to payload, Skoda Enyaq a bit takes the win – 509 kg compared to 450 kg. That’s a difference of about 59 kg.
Who comes out on top?
Overall, the Skoda Enyaq shows itself to be slightly ahead and secures the title of DriveDuel Champion.
It convinces with the more balanced overall package and proves to be the more versatile choice for everyday use.
Skoda Enyaq
smart #3
Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
from about £38,100
@ Škoda Auto a.s. / Škoda Storyboard
Skoda Enyaq
Skoda Enyaq
5 (3 Reviews)
The Skoda Enyaq is a cleverly packaged electric SUV that blends roomy, pragmatic family space with clean, Czech design and sensible value. On the road it’s unshowy but composed, offering serene electric performance and easy-to-use tech — the kind of car that makes daily life smoother without trying too hard.
details
@ Škoda Auto a.s. / Škoda Storyboard
@ Škoda Auto a.s. / Škoda Storyboard
@ Škoda Auto a.s. / Škoda Storyboard
@ Škoda Auto a.s. / Škoda Storyboard
@ Škoda Auto a.s. / Škoda Storyboard
smart #3
5 (1 Reviews)
The Smart #3 turns the brand's cheeky city-car attitude into a grown-up compact SUV, pairing sleek styling with a surprisingly roomy, well-made interior. It's a brilliant pick for buyers who want electric ease without dullness — practical enough for daily life, but still lively enough to make parking and grocery runs feel a little fun.
details
@ smart Europe GmbH
@ smart Europe GmbH
@ smart Europe GmbH
@ smart Europe GmbH
@ smart Europe GmbH
@ smart Europe GmbH
Skoda Enyaq
smart #3
|
@ Škoda Auto a.s. / Škoda Storyboard
|
@ smart Europe GmbH
|
|
|
|
Costs and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
38100 - 52200 £
|
Price
34700 - 45800 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
-
|
Consumption L/100km
-
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
14.8 - 16.2 kWh
|
Consumption kWh/100km
16.3 - 17.6 kWh
|
|
Electric Range
428 - 587 km
|
Electric Range
325 - 455 km
|
|
Battery Capacity
59 - 79 kWh
|
Battery Capacity
47 - 62 kWh
|
|
co2
0 g/km
|
co2
0 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
SUV
|
Body Type
SUV
|
|
Seats
5
|
Seats
5
|
|
Doors
5
|
Doors
5
|
|
Curb weight
2002 - 2293 kg
|
Curb weight
1780 - 1910 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
570 - 585 L
|
Trunk capacity
370 L
|
|
Length
4658 - 4660 mm
|
Length
4400 mm
|
|
Width
1879 mm
|
Width
1844 mm
|
|
Height
1605 - 1625 mm
|
Height
1556 mm
|
|
Max trunk capacity
1610 - 1710 L
|
Max trunk capacity
1160 L
|
|
Payload
457 - 509 kg
|
Payload
419 - 450 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Electric
|
Engine Type
Electric
|
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
|
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
|
|
Drive Type
Rear-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
Rear-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
204 - 340 HP
|
Power HP
272 - 428 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
5.4 - 8.1 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
3.7 - 5.8 s
|
|
Max Speed
160 - 180 km/h
|
Max Speed
180 km/h
|
|
Torque
310 - 679 Nm
|
Torque
343 - 584 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
-
|
Number of Cylinders
-
|
|
Power kW
150 - 250 kW
|
Power kW
200 - 315 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
-
|
Engine capacity
-
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2025
|
Model Year
2023 - 2025
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
|
|
Brand
Skoda
|
Brand
smart
|
Is the Skoda Enyaq offered with different drivetrains?
The Skoda Enyaq is available as Rear-Wheel Drive or All-Wheel Drive.
The prices and data displayed are estimates based on German list prices and may vary by country. This information is not legally binding.