Deutschland
France
Nederland
Great Britain
Sverige
Danmark
Suomi
Italia
Polska
EspañaVS
Skoda Enyaq vs smart #3 - Differences and prices compared
Compare performance (340 HP vs 428 HP), boot space and price (41900 £ vs 34700 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Skoda Enyaq or smart #3?
Enyaq
Costs and Efficiency:
Looking at overall running costs, both models reveal some interesting differences in everyday economy.
smart #3 has a clearly perceptible advantage in terms of price – it starts at 34700 £ , while the Skoda Enyaq costs 41900 £ . That’s a price difference of around 7209 £.
In terms of energy consumption, the advantage goes to the Skoda Enyaq: with 14.80 kWh per 100 km, it’s to a small extent more efficient than the smart #3 with 16.30 kWh. That’s a difference of about 1.50 kWh.
As for electric range, the Skoda Enyaq performs clearly perceptible better – achieving up to 587 km, about 132 km more than the smart #3.
#3
Engine and Performance:
Power, torque and acceleration are the classic benchmarks for car enthusiasts – and here, some clear differences start to show.
When it comes to engine power, the smart #3 has a clearly perceptible edge – offering 428 HP compared to 340 HP. That’s roughly 88 HP more horsepower.
In acceleration from 0 to 100 km/h, the smart #3 is clearly quicker – completing the sprint in 3.70 s, while the Skoda Enyaq takes 5.40 s. That’s about 1.70 s faster.
There’s no difference in top speed – both reach 180 km/h.
There’s also a difference in torque: Skoda Enyaq pulls slightly stronger with 679 Nm compared to 584 Nm. That’s about 95 Nm difference.
Enyaq
Space and Everyday Use:
Beyond pure performance, interior space and usability matter most in daily life. This is where you see which car is more practical and versatile.
Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.
In curb weight, smart #3 is distinct lighter – 1780 kg compared to 2179 kg. The difference is around 399 kg.
In terms of boot space, the Skoda Enyaq offers clearly perceptible more room – 585 L compared to 370 L. That’s a difference of about 215 L.
In maximum load capacity, the Skoda Enyaq performs clearly perceptible better – up to 1710 L, which is about 550 L more than the smart #3.
When it comes to payload, Skoda Enyaq hardly perceptible takes the win – 489 kg compared to 450 kg. That’s a difference of about 39 kg.
Who wins the race in the data check?
The Skoda Enyaq is narrowly ahead in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.
Skoda Enyaq
smart #3
Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
from about £41,900
Skoda Enyaq
Skoda Enyaq
5 (3 Reviews)
The Skoda Enyaq is a cleverly packaged electric SUV that blends roomy, pragmatic family space with clean, Czech design and sensible value. On the road it’s unshowy but composed, offering serene electric performance and easy-to-use tech — the kind of car that makes daily life smoother without trying too hard.
details
smart #3
5 (1 Reviews)
The Smart #3 turns the brand's cheeky city-car attitude into a grown-up compact SUV, pairing sleek styling with a surprisingly roomy, well-made interior. It's a brilliant pick for buyers who want electric ease without dullness — practical enough for daily life, but still lively enough to make parking and grocery runs feel a little fun.
details
Skoda Enyaq
smart #3
Costs and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
41900 - 52200 £
|
Price
34700 - 45800 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
-
|
Consumption L/100km
-
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
14.8 - 16.2 kWh
|
Consumption kWh/100km
16.3 - 17.6 kWh
|
|
Electric Range
538 - 587 km
|
Electric Range
325 - 455 km
|
|
Battery Capacity
77 kWh
|
Battery Capacity
47 - 62 kWh
|
|
co2
0 g/km
|
co2
0 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
SUV
|
Body Type
SUV
|
|
Seats
5
|
Seats
5
|
|
Doors
5
|
Doors
5
|
|
Curb weight
2179 - 2293 kg
|
Curb weight
1780 - 1910 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
570 - 585 L
|
Trunk capacity
370 L
|
|
Length
4658 mm
|
Length
4400 mm
|
|
Width
1879 mm
|
Width
1844 mm
|
|
Height
1620 - 1621 mm
|
Height
1556 mm
|
|
Max trunk capacity
1610 - 1710 L
|
Max trunk capacity
1160 L
|
|
Payload
443 - 489 kg
|
Payload
419 - 450 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Electric
|
Engine Type
Electric
|
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
|
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
|
|
Drive Type
Rear-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
Rear-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
286 - 340 HP
|
Power HP
272 - 428 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
5.4 - 6.7 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
3.7 - 5.8 s
|
|
Max Speed
180 km/h
|
Max Speed
180 km/h
|
|
Torque
545 - 679 Nm
|
Torque
343 - 584 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
-
|
Number of Cylinders
-
|
|
Power kW
210 - 250 kW
|
Power kW
200 - 315 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
-
|
Engine capacity
-
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2025
|
Model Year
2023 - 2025
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
|
|
Brand
Skoda
|
Brand
smart
|
Is the Skoda Enyaq offered with different drivetrains?
The Skoda Enyaq is available as Rear-Wheel Drive or All-Wheel Drive.
The prices shown are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted for local VAT. Local registration taxes (e.g. NoVA, BPM or CO2 malus) are not included. This information is not legally binding.