In the ongoing rivalry between Skoda's Enyaq and Volkswagen's ID.5, both electric SUVs offer remarkable performance and impressive range, making them standout choices in the EV market. The Enyaq boasts a spacious interior and thoughtful design features, while the ID.5 impresses with its sleek aesthetics and cutting-edge technology. Ultimately, the choice between these two models may come down to brand preference and specific feature sets, but either option presents a compelling case for sustainable driving.
The automotive landscape is rapidly evolving, and the demand for electric vehicles (EVs) continues to rise. Two notable contenders in the SUV segment are the Skoda Enyaq and the VW ID.5. Both models share a common lineage and innovative technology but bring their unique flavors to the table. In this article, we will closely compare these two electric SUVs, examining their technical aspects, performance metrics, and innovations.
Both the Skoda Enyaq and the VW ID.5 proudly present themselves as modern SUVs with sleek designs. The Enyaq measures 4649 mm in length and is 1879 mm wide, while the ID.5 is slightly shorter at 4599 mm and 1852 mm wide. Despite the size difference, both vehicles highlight a robust presence with contemporary aesthetics that appeal to discerning buyers.
When it comes to powertrains, both models are equipped with electric engines, offering rear-wheel drive and all-wheel drive options. The Skoda Enyaq features power outputs of up to 340 HP, whereas the VW ID.5 matches this with a 340 HP variant but also includes a 170 HP option. This variety allows consumers to choose a model that best fits their driving preferences.
Performance metrics show that both vehicles are impressively quick. The Skoda Enyaq can accelerate from 0 to 100 km/h in a mere 5.5 seconds in its most powerful configuration, matching the ID.5’s sensational 5.4 seconds storm to the same speed. Both SUVs feature a top speed of 180 km/h, presenting a thrilling driving experience.
Range anxiety is a significant concern for potential EV buyers, and both the Enyaq and ID.5 alleviate these worries with impressive electric ranges. The Enyaq boasts a range of up to 573 km, while the ID.5 offers a commendable maximum of 563 km, depending on the configuration. Both vehicles are efficient, with the Enyaq consuming between 14.6 and 16.4 kWh/100 km, whereas the ID.5’s efficiency varies between 15.6 and 16.6 kWh/100 km, providing competitive figures in their class.
Both SUVs seat five and emphasize passenger comfort with spacious interiors. Noteworthy is the Enyaq's trunk capacity, offering 585 liters, slightly more than the ID.5's 549 liters, showcasing Skoda's focus on practicality. Technology-wise, both models feature advanced infotainment systems, driver assistance features, and connectivity options, ensuring a modern driving experience.
The Skoda Enyaq and VW ID.5 come standard with a battery capacity of 77 kWh, providing ample power for daily commutes and long trips. They support rapid charging capabilities, allowing for a quick energy top-up during breaks. Owners can expect both vehicles to return to driving range within short, convenient charging stops.
The Skoda Enyaq and VW ID.5 are exemplary choices for anyone looking to transition to an electric SUV. While the Enyaq offers slightly more space and range, the ID.5 matches its performance and innovation, making it a close competitor. Ultimately, selecting between the two will hinge on personal preferences regarding aesthetics, brand loyalty, and specific feature requirements.
|
|
|
|
Costs and Consumption |
|
---|---|
Price
about 38100 - 54300
£
|
Price
about 36800 - 48400
£
|
Consumption L/100km
-
|
Consumption L/100km
-
|
Consumption kWh/100km
14.6 - 16.4
kWh
|
Consumption kWh/100km
15.6 - 16.6
kWh
|
Electric Range
428 - 587
km
|
Electric Range
365 - 563
km
|
Battery Capacity
59 - 77
kWh
|
Battery Capacity
52 - 79
kWh
|
co2
0
g/km
|
co2
0
g/km
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
Body Type
SUV
|
Body Type
SUV
|
Seats
5
|
Seats
5
|
Doors
5
|
Doors
5
|
Curb weight
2002 - 2258
kg
|
Curb weight
1970 - 2246
kg
|
Trunk capacity
570 - 585
L
|
Trunk capacity
549
L
|
Length
4649 - 4658
mm
|
Length
4582 - 4599
mm
|
Width
1879
mm
|
Width
1852
mm
|
Height
1620 - 1623
mm
|
Height
1601 - 1618
mm
|
Payload
492 - 528
kg
|
Payload
514 - 545
kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
Engine Type
Electric
|
Engine Type
Electric
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
|
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
|
Drive Type
Rear-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
Rear-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
|
Power HP
204 - 340
HP
|
Power HP
170 - 340
HP
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
5.5 - 8.1
s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
5.4 - 8.9
s
|
Max Speed
160 - 180
km/h
|
Max Speed
160 - 180
km/h
|
Torque
310 - 679
Nm
|
Torque
310 - 679
Nm
|
Number of Cylinders
-
|
Number of Cylinders
-
|
Power kW
150 - 250
kW
|
Power kW
125 - 250
kW
|
Engine capacity
-
|
Engine capacity
-
|
Top speed
160 - 180
km/h
|
Top speed
160 - 180
km/h
|
General |
|
Model Year
2023 - 2025
|
Model Year
2023 - 2024
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
|
Brand
Skoda
|
Brand
VW
|
The prices and data displayed are estimates based on German list prices and may vary by country. This information is not legally binding.