VS

Skoda Enyaq vs VW ID. Buzz Cargo comparison

Compare performance (340 HP vs 340 HP), boot space and price (41,900 £ vs 43,600 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Skoda Enyaq or VW ID. Buzz Cargo?

Skoda Enyaq vs VW ID. Buzz Cargo: Key differences

Skoda Enyaq

4.5 (4 Reviews)
rate
  • very slightly cheaper
  • markedly more efficient
  • noticeably more electric range
  • only slightly lighter
details

VW ID. Buzz Cargo

details

All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.

By Achim Sedelmaier

Enyaq

As the automotive industry progresses towards electrification, two standout models from Volkswagen Group have emerged as strong contenders in the electric vehicle market: the Skoda Enyaq and the VW ID. Buzz Transporter. Both vehicles embody the ethos of sustainability while catering to different segments, offering unique features and innovations. This comparison will delve into their specifications and innovations, providing an insightful overview for potential buyers.

ID. Buzz Cargo

Design and Dimensions

The Skoda Enyaq is an all-electric SUV that combines modern aesthetics with functionality. It stands at a length of 4649 mm and a width of 1879 mm, providing ample interior space for passengers and cargo alike. The Enyaq's height measures 1621 mm, giving it a robust stance on the road. In contrast, the VW ID. Buzz Transporter, a cargo van with a nostalgic nod to the classic VW Bus, is slightly longer at 4712 mm but measures wider at 1985 mm and considerably taller at 1932 mm. This design facilitates a spacious cabin, making it ideal for both transport and leisure applications.

Enyaq

Powertrain and Performance

Both vehicles feature electric powertrains that emphasize efficiency and performance. The Skoda Enyaq offers two power outputs, with a maximum of 340 HP and torque reaching 679 Nm. In terms of acceleration, it can sprint from 0-100 km/h in as little as 5.5 seconds, with a top speed of 180 km/h. On the other hand, the VW ID. Buzz Transporter also offers power outputs of up to 340 HP but comes with a lower maximum speed of 160 km/h. With a torque of 679 Nm, the ID. Buzz provides a smooth driving experience. While both vehicles share a similar driving configuration of either rear-wheel or all-wheel drive, the Enyaq promises a more exhilarating ride, particularly with its acceleration capabilities.

ID. Buzz Cargo

Battery Capacity and Electric Range

Battery technology is a critical factor for electric vehicles, and both the Skoda Enyaq and VW ID. Buzz Transporter come equipped with impressive battery capacities. The Enyaq houses a robust 77 kWh battery that delivers a remarkable electric range of up to 573 km on a single charge, depending on driving conditions. This substantial range makes it an excellent option for long-distance travel.

In comparison, the ID. Buzz Transporter features a slightly smaller 79 kWh battery for its higher variant but also offers a lower range of 461 km. However, the ID. Buzz’s larger battery is crucial for its utility as a cargo van, allowing for longer operational hours before needing a recharge. The slower charging rate of up to 19.2 kWh per 100 km, compared to the Enyaq, is something potential users must consider based on their usage scenarios.

Enyaq

Interior and Cargo Capacity

When it comes to interior space, both models are designed with practicality in mind. The Skoda Enyaq comfortably seats five passengers, with trunk capacities ranging from 570 to 585 liters, depending on the configuration. This spaciousness makes it a versatile choice for families and businesses alike.

The ID. Buzz Transporter, designed as a cargo vehicle, seats three and focuses heavily on utility. It offers a commendable payload capacity of 753 kg, making it perfect for commercial use. While its iteration sacrifices some passenger space for cargo, the trade-off caters to an audience prioritizing freight capabilities.

ID. Buzz Cargo

Innovative Technologies

Skoda has equipped the Enyaq with a host of advanced technologies focused on enhancing the driving experience. Features such as an advanced infotainment system integrate seamlessly with mobile devices, supporting connectivity and navigation for an intuitive user experience. Additionally, it offers multiple driver-assistance systems to promote safety and ease of handling.

Conversely, the VW ID. Buzz Transporter embraces a modern yet retro interior aesthetic, adorned with intuitive digital displays and smart interface controls. It also includes safety features such as adaptive cruise control and lane-keeping assist, positioning it as a futuristic vehicle ideal for urban mobility and deliveries.

Enyaq

Conclusion: Which One to Choose?

Ultimately, choosing between the Skoda Enyaq and the VW ID. Buzz Transporter depends on individual needs and preferences. The Enyaq is poised as a well-rounded family SUV, offering excellent range, comfort, and performance. In contrast, the ID. Buzz Transporter serves as an innovative cargo vehicle with ample space and utilitarian capabilities. Both models shine brightly in their respective categories, reflecting the commitment of their manufacturers to a sustainable automotive future.

Video - Skoda Enyaq

Video Thumbnail

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

Enyaq

Costs and Efficiency:

Price and efficiency are often the first things buyers look at. Here it becomes clear which model has the long-term edge – whether at the pump, the plug, or in purchase price.

Skoda Enyaq is very slightly cheaper – starting at 41,900 £ , while the VW ID. Buzz Cargo costs 43,600 £ . That’s a price difference of around 1,650 £.

In terms of energy consumption, the Skoda Enyaq is markedly more efficient: consuming 14.8 kWh/100km compared to 19.2 kWh/100km for the VW ID. Buzz Cargo. That’s a difference of about 4.4 kWh/100km.

As for electric range, the Skoda Enyaq offers noticeably more range – reaching up to 587 km, about 132 km more than the VW ID. Buzz Cargo.

ID. Buzz Cargo

Engine and Performance:

Under the bonnet, it becomes clear which model is tuned for sportiness and which one takes the lead when you hit the accelerator.

Both models deliver identical power – 340 HP each.

Both models offer the same torque – 679 Nm.

Enyaq

Space and Everyday Use:

Beyond pure performance, interior space and usability matter most in daily life. This is where you see which car is more practical and versatile.

Seats: Skoda Enyaq offers more seats – 5 vs 3.

In terms of curb weight, Skoda Enyaq is only slightly lighter – 2,179 kg compared to 2,264 kg. The difference is around 85 kg.

When it comes to payload, the VW ID. Buzz Cargo carries visibly more – 753 kg compared to 489 kg. That’s a difference of about 264 kg.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The Skoda Enyaq is far ahead overall in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

from £41,900
Enyaq

Skoda Enyaq

  • Engine Type : Electric
  • Transmission : Automatic
  • Drive Type : Rear-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP : 286 - 340 HP
  • Consumption kWh/100km : 14.8 - 16.2 kWh/100km
  • Electric Range : 538 - 587 km
Skoda Enyaq
VW ID. Buzz Cargo

Costs and Consumption

View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance

View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body

View detailed analysis

Skoda Enyaq

The Skoda Enyaq is a reassuring, family‑first electric SUV that trades sporting drama for exceptional quiet, roomy rear seats and a genuinely practical boot. It’s remarkably easy to live with thanks to sensible controls and steady fast charging, though the touchscreen‑led infotainment can be sluggish and driving enthusiasts looking for sharp handling should look elsewhere.

details

VW ID. Buzz Cargo

The VW ID. Buzz Cargo marries retro Volkswagen charm with a thoroughly modern electric work van, offering a surprisingly spacious and practical load area wrapped in friendly, iconic styling. It's a smart pick for urban tradespeople and small businesses who want quiet, effortless driving, lower running costs and easy maneuverability — with a healthy dash of nostalgia on the job.

details
Skoda Enyaq
VW ID. Buzz Cargo

Costs and Consumption

Price
41,900 - 52,200 £
Price
43,600 - 51,400 £
Consumption L/100km
-
Consumption L/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
14.8 - 16.2 kWh/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
19.2 - 20.3 kWh/100km
Electric Range
538 - 587 km
Electric Range
330 - 455 km
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
59 - 79 kWh
co2
0 g/km
co2
0 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
-
Fuel tank capacity
-

Dimensions and Body

Body Type
SUV
Body Type
Cargo Van
Seats
5
Seats
3
Doors
-
Doors
4
Curb weight
2,179 - 2,293 kg
Curb weight
2,264 - 2,510 kg
Trunk capacity
570 - 585 L
Trunk capacity
-
Length
-
Length
4,712 mm
Width
1,879 mm
Width
1,985 mm
Height
-
Height
1,932 mm
Max trunk capacity
-
Max trunk capacity
3,900 L
Payload
443 - 489 kg
Payload
640 - 753 kg

Engine and Performance

Engine Type
Electric
Engine Type
Electric
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
Transmission Detail
-
Drive Type
Rear-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
Rear-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
Power HP
286 - 340 HP
Power HP
170 - 340 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
5.4 - 6.7 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
-
Max Speed
-
Max Speed
145 - 160 km/h
Torque
545 - 679 Nm
Torque
310 - 679 Nm
Number of Cylinders
-
Number of Cylinders
-
Power kW
210 - 250 kW
Power kW
125 - 250 kW
Engine capacity
-
Engine capacity
-

General

Model Year
2025
Model Year
2024
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
Brand
Skoda
Brand
VW
DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved. The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.