VS

Skoda Enyaq vs VW ID. Buzz Cargo comparison

Compare performance (340 HP vs 340 HP), boot space and price (41900 £ vs 43600 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Skoda Enyaq or VW ID. Buzz Cargo?

Enyaq

As the automotive industry progresses towards electrification, two standout models from Volkswagen Group have emerged as strong contenders in the electric vehicle market: the Skoda Enyaq and the VW ID. Buzz Transporter. Both vehicles embody the ethos of sustainability while catering to different segments, offering unique features and innovations. This comparison will delve into their specifications and innovations, providing an insightful overview for potential buyers.

ID. Buzz Cargo

Design and Dimensions

The Skoda Enyaq is an all-electric SUV that combines modern aesthetics with functionality. It stands at a length of 4649 mm and a width of 1879 mm, providing ample interior space for passengers and cargo alike. The Enyaq's height measures 1621 mm, giving it a robust stance on the road. In contrast, the VW ID. Buzz Transporter, a cargo van with a nostalgic nod to the classic VW Bus, is slightly longer at 4712 mm but measures wider at 1985 mm and considerably taller at 1932 mm. This design facilitates a spacious cabin, making it ideal for both transport and leisure applications.

Enyaq

Powertrain and Performance

Both vehicles feature electric powertrains that emphasize efficiency and performance. The Skoda Enyaq offers two power outputs, with a maximum of 340 HP and torque reaching 679 Nm. In terms of acceleration, it can sprint from 0-100 km/h in as little as 5.5 seconds, with a top speed of 180 km/h. On the other hand, the VW ID. Buzz Transporter also offers power outputs of up to 340 HP but comes with a lower maximum speed of 160 km/h. With a torque of 679 Nm, the ID. Buzz provides a smooth driving experience. While both vehicles share a similar driving configuration of either rear-wheel or all-wheel drive, the Enyaq promises a more exhilarating ride, particularly with its acceleration capabilities.

ID. Buzz Cargo

Battery Capacity and Electric Range

Battery technology is a critical factor for electric vehicles, and both the Skoda Enyaq and VW ID. Buzz Transporter come equipped with impressive battery capacities. The Enyaq houses a robust 77 kWh battery that delivers a remarkable electric range of up to 573 km on a single charge, depending on driving conditions. This substantial range makes it an excellent option for long-distance travel.

In comparison, the ID. Buzz Transporter features a slightly smaller 79 kWh battery for its higher variant but also offers a lower range of 461 km. However, the ID. Buzz’s larger battery is crucial for its utility as a cargo van, allowing for longer operational hours before needing a recharge. The slower charging rate of up to 19.2 kWh per 100 km, compared to the Enyaq, is something potential users must consider based on their usage scenarios.

Enyaq

Interior and Cargo Capacity

When it comes to interior space, both models are designed with practicality in mind. The Skoda Enyaq comfortably seats five passengers, with trunk capacities ranging from 570 to 585 liters, depending on the configuration. This spaciousness makes it a versatile choice for families and businesses alike.

The ID. Buzz Transporter, designed as a cargo vehicle, seats three and focuses heavily on utility. It offers a commendable payload capacity of 753 kg, making it perfect for commercial use. While its iteration sacrifices some passenger space for cargo, the trade-off caters to an audience prioritizing freight capabilities.

ID. Buzz Cargo

Innovative Technologies

Skoda has equipped the Enyaq with a host of advanced technologies focused on enhancing the driving experience. Features such as an advanced infotainment system integrate seamlessly with mobile devices, supporting connectivity and navigation for an intuitive user experience. Additionally, it offers multiple driver-assistance systems to promote safety and ease of handling.

Conversely, the VW ID. Buzz Transporter embraces a modern yet retro interior aesthetic, adorned with intuitive digital displays and smart interface controls. It also includes safety features such as adaptive cruise control and lane-keeping assist, positioning it as a futuristic vehicle ideal for urban mobility and deliveries.

Enyaq

Conclusion: Which One to Choose?

Ultimately, choosing between the Skoda Enyaq and the VW ID. Buzz Transporter depends on individual needs and preferences. The Enyaq is poised as a well-rounded family SUV, offering excellent range, comfort, and performance. In contrast, the ID. Buzz Transporter serves as an innovative cargo vehicle with ample space and utilitarian capabilities. Both models shine brightly in their respective categories, reflecting the commitment of their manufacturers to a sustainable automotive future.

Video - Skoda Enyaq

Skoda Enyaq vs VW ID. Buzz Cargo: Key differences

Skoda Enyaq

4.5 (4 Reviews)
rate
  • barely noticeable cheaper
  • distinct more efficient
  • distinct more electric range
  • slight lighter

VW ID. Buzz Cargo

All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

Costs and Efficiency:

Price and efficiency are often the first things buyers look at. Here it becomes clear which model has the long-term edge – whether at the pump, the plug, or in purchase price.

Skoda Enyaq has a barely noticeable advantage in terms of price – it starts at 41900 £ , while the VW ID. Buzz Cargo costs 43600 £ . That’s a price difference of around 1650 £.

In terms of energy consumption, the advantage goes to the Skoda Enyaq: with 14.80 kWh per 100 km, it’s distinct more efficient than the VW ID. Buzz Cargo with 19.20 kWh. That’s a difference of about 4.40 kWh.

As for electric range, the Skoda Enyaq performs distinct better – achieving up to 587 km, about 132 km more than the VW ID. Buzz Cargo.

Engine and Performance:

Under the bonnet, it becomes clear which model is tuned for sportiness and which one takes the lead when you hit the accelerator.

Both models deliver identical power – 340 HP each.

In terms of top speed, the Skoda Enyaq performs a bit better – reaching 180 km/h, while the VW ID. Buzz Cargo tops out at 160 km/h. The difference is around 20 km/h.

Both models offer the same torque – 679 Nm.

Space and Everyday Use:

Cabin size, boot volume and payload all play a role in everyday practicality. Here, comfort and flexibility make the difference.

Seats: Skoda Enyaq offers noticeable more seating capacity – 5 vs 3.

In curb weight, Skoda Enyaq is slight lighter – 2179 kg compared to 2264 kg. The difference is around 85 kg.

In maximum load capacity, the VW ID. Buzz Cargo performs significantly better – up to 3900 L, which is about 2190 L more than the Skoda Enyaq.

When it comes to payload, VW ID. Buzz Cargo clearly perceptible takes the win – 753 kg compared to 489 kg. That’s a difference of about 264 kg.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The Skoda Enyaq is barely ahead in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

Skoda Enyaq
VW ID. Buzz Cargo

Costs and Consumption

View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance

View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body

View detailed analysis
from about £41,900
Enyaq

Skoda Enyaq

  • Engine Type : Electric
  • Transmission : Automatic
  • Drive Type : Rear-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP : 286 - 340 HP
  • Consumption kWh/100km : 14.8 - 16.2 kWh
  • Electric Range : 538 - 587 km

Skoda Enyaq

4.5 (4 Reviews)
rate

The Skoda Enyaq is a cleverly packaged electric SUV that blends roomy, pragmatic family space with clean, Czech design and sensible value. On the road it’s unshowy but composed, offering serene electric performance and easy-to-use tech — the kind of car that makes daily life smoother without trying too hard.

details

VW ID. Buzz Cargo

The VW ID. Buzz Cargo marries retro Volkswagen charm with a thoroughly modern electric work van, offering a surprisingly spacious and practical load area wrapped in friendly, iconic styling. It's a smart pick for urban tradespeople and small businesses who want quiet, effortless driving, lower running costs and easy maneuverability — with a healthy dash of nostalgia on the job.

details
Skoda Enyaq
VW ID. Buzz Cargo

Costs and Consumption

Price
41900 - 52200 £
Price
43600 - 51400 £
Consumption L/100km
-
Consumption L/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
14.8 - 16.2 kWh
Consumption kWh/100km
19.2 - 20.3 kWh
Electric Range
538 - 587 km
Electric Range
330 - 455 km
Battery Capacity
77 kWh
Battery Capacity
59 - 79 kWh
co2
0 g/km
co2
0 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
-
Fuel tank capacity
-

Dimensions and Body

Body Type
SUV
Body Type
Cargo Van
Seats
5
Seats
3
Doors
5
Doors
4
Curb weight
2179 - 2293 kg
Curb weight
2264 - 2510 kg
Trunk capacity
570 - 585 L
Trunk capacity
-
Length
4658 mm
Length
4712 mm
Width
1879 mm
Width
1985 mm
Height
1620 - 1621 mm
Height
1932 mm
Max trunk capacity
1610 - 1710 L
Max trunk capacity
3900 L
Payload
443 - 489 kg
Payload
640 - 753 kg

Engine and Performance

Engine Type
Electric
Engine Type
Electric
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
Transmission Detail
-
Drive Type
Rear-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
Rear-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
Power HP
286 - 340 HP
Power HP
170 - 340 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
5.4 - 6.7 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
-
Max Speed
180 km/h
Max Speed
145 - 160 km/h
Torque
545 - 679 Nm
Torque
310 - 679 Nm
Number of Cylinders
-
Number of Cylinders
-
Power kW
210 - 250 kW
Power kW
125 - 250 kW
Engine capacity
-
Engine capacity
-

General

Model Year
2025
Model Year
2024
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
Brand
Skoda
Brand
VW
Is the Skoda Enyaq offered with different drivetrains?

The Skoda Enyaq is available as Rear-Wheel Drive or All-Wheel Drive.

The prices shown are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted for local VAT. Local registration taxes (e.g. NoVA, BPM or CO2 malus) are not included. This information is not legally binding.