Compare performance (340 HP vs 487 HP), boot space and price (41,900 £ vs 37,400 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Skoda Enyaq or XPeng G6?
All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.
In the rapidly evolving landscape of electric vehicles, two models stand out for their combination of performance, technology, and practicality: the Skoda Enyaq and the XPeng G6. Both SUVs bring unique features and innovations to the table, making them strong contenders in the growing EV market. Here, we delve into a comprehensive comparison of these two vehicles, analyzing their technical specifications, innovations, and overall appeal.
The Skoda Enyaq exhibits a modern SUV design, boasting a length of approximately 4649 mm, with a width of 1879 mm and a height of 1621 mm. This design not only emphasizes its sporty appearance but also provides ample room inside for passengers and cargo. The trunk capacity of the Enyaq stands at 585 liters, making it an excellent choice for families and long journeys.
On the other hand, the XPeng G6 is slightly larger, measuring 4753 mm in length, 1920 mm in width, and 1650 mm in height. Although the trunk capacity is slightly less at 571 liters, the G6’s spacious interior still provides comfortable seating for five, accommodating both driver and passengers without compromise.
When it comes to powertrains, both vehicles offer impressive options. The Skoda Enyaq features a choice of rear-wheel and all-wheel drive systems, with power outputs ranging from 204 HP to 340 HP. The Enyaq's acceleration from 0-100 km/h ranges from a respectable 5.5 seconds to 8.1 seconds, depending on the variant.
In contrast, the XPeng G6 takes performance a step further with a top output of 476 HP in its most powerful configuration. This allows the G6 to achieve an astounding acceleration time of just 4.1 seconds, making it one of the quickest electric SUVs on the market. Like the Enyaq, the G6 also offers both rear-wheel and all-wheel drive options, catering to diverse driving preferences.
The Enyaq is equipped with two battery capacities: 59 kWh and 77 kWh, providing an extensive electric range of up to 587 km. This impressive range makes it suitable for daily commutes and longer trips alike.
Meanwhile, the XPeng G6 comes with a larger 87.5 kWh battery option, achieving an electric range of 570 km. The G6 also has an additional 66 kWh battery variant, which, while reducing range, allows for a balance between cost and efficiency. Both vehicles demonstrate remarkable energy efficiency; however, the Enyaq edges it out slightly with lower consumption figures, ranging from 14.6 to 16.4 kWh/100 km compared to the G6's 17.5 to 17.9 kWh/100 km.
In terms of technological innovation, both vehicles are equipped with state-of-the-art features that enhance driving experience and safety. The Skoda Enyaq incorporates advanced driver-assistance systems, ensuring a high level of safety and convenience for drivers. Features like adaptive cruise control, lane assist, and a user-friendly infotainment system make the Enyaq a technologically advanced choice for modern drivers.
The XPeng G6, however, takes a more aggressive approach to technology integration. Known for its software innovations, XPeng offers cutting-edge features like autonomous driving capabilities and a sophisticated voice command system. This means G6 drivers can experience an elevated level of convenience and connectivity, bridging the gap between drivers and their vehicles.
Both the Skoda Enyaq and XPeng G6 present compelling choices for potential electric vehicle buyers. The Enyaq shines with its practical design, efficiency, and value for money. In contrast, the XPeng G6 stands out for its superior performance, advanced technology, and luxurious comfort. Ultimately, the choice between these two models may come down to individual preferences regarding performance versus practicality. As the automotive industry continues to embrace electric mobility, both models set a high standard for what modern electric SUVs can offer.
Looking at overall running costs, both models reveal some interesting differences in everyday economy.
XPeng G6 is somewhat cheaper – starting at 37,400 £ , while the Skoda Enyaq costs 41,900 £ . That’s a price difference of around 4,543 £.
In terms of energy consumption, the Skoda Enyaq is a bit more efficient: consuming 14.8 kWh/100km compared to 17.3 kWh/100km for the XPeng G6. That’s a difference of about 2.5 kWh/100km.
As for electric range, the Skoda Enyaq offers moderately more range – reaching up to 587 km, about 62 km more than the XPeng G6.
Under the bonnet, it becomes clear which model is tuned for sportiness and which one takes the lead when you hit the accelerator.
When it comes to engine power, the XPeng G6 offers markedly more power – delivering 487 HP compared to 340 HP. That’s roughly 147 HP more horsepower.
When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the XPeng G6 is markedly quicker – completing the sprint in 4.1 s, while the Skoda Enyaq takes 5.4 s. That’s about 1.3 s quicker.
There’s also a difference in torque: the Skoda Enyaq delivers marginally more torque with 679 Nm compared to 660 Nm. That’s about 19 Nm more.
Cabin size, boot volume and payload all play a role in everyday practicality. Here, comfort and flexibility make the difference.
Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.
In terms of curb weight, XPeng G6 is only slightly lighter – 2,065 kg compared to 2,179 kg. The difference is around 114 kg.
Looking at boot space, the Skoda Enyaq offers marginally more boot space – 585 L compared to 571 L. That’s a difference of about 14 L.
When it comes to payload, the Skoda Enyaq carries barely more – 489 kg compared to 475 kg. That’s a difference of about 14 kg.
The XPeng G6 is clearly superior overall in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.
The Skoda Enyaq is a reassuring, family‑first electric SUV that trades sporting drama for exceptional quiet, roomy rear seats and a genuinely practical boot. It’s remarkably easy to live with thanks to sensible controls and steady fast charging, though the touchscreen‑led infotainment can be sluggish and driving enthusiasts looking for sharp handling should look elsewhere.
details
The XPeng G6 looks like a sleeker, tech-rich alternative to conventional electric SUVs, with an interior that feels modern, airy and purposefully designed for everyday comfort. On the road it’s composed and surprisingly engaging, giving drivers a smart mix of calm refinement and a playful streak — not bad for a car that quietly challenges the usual premium suspects.
details
Costs and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
41,900 - 52,200 £
|
Price
37,400 - 44,200 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
-
|
Consumption L/100km
-
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
14.8 - 16.2 kWh/100km
|
Consumption kWh/100km
17.3 - 18.4 kWh/100km
|
|
Electric Range
538 - 587 km
|
Electric Range
455 - 525 km
|
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
|
co2
0 g/km
|
co2
0 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
SUV
|
Body Type
SUV
|
|
Seats
5
|
Seats
5
|
|
Doors
-
|
Doors
-
|
|
Curb weight
2,179 - 2,293 kg
|
Curb weight
2,065 - 2,220 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
570 - 585 L
|
Trunk capacity
571 L
|
|
Length
-
|
Length
-
|
|
Width
1,879 mm
|
Width
1,920 mm
|
|
Height
-
|
Height
-
|
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
|
Payload
443 - 489 kg
|
Payload
470 - 475 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Electric
|
Engine Type
Electric
|
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
|
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
|
|
Drive Type
Rear-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
Rear-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
286 - 340 HP
|
Power HP
252 - 487 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
5.4 - 6.7 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
4.1 - 6.9 s
|
|
Max Speed
-
|
Max Speed
-
|
|
Torque
545 - 679 Nm
|
Torque
440 - 660 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
-
|
Number of Cylinders
-
|
|
Power kW
210 - 250 kW
|
Power kW
185 - 358 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
-
|
Engine capacity
-
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2025
|
Model Year
2025
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
|
|
Brand
Skoda
|
Brand
XPeng
|
Deutschland
France
Nederland
Great Britain
Sverige
Danmark
Suomi
Italia
Polska
España