Deutschland
France
Nederland
Great Britain
Sverige
Norge
Danmark
Suomi
Italia
Polska
EspañaVS
Skoda Enyaq vs XPeng G6 - Differences and prices compared
Compare performance (340 HP vs 487 HP), boot space and price (38100 £ vs 40800 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Skoda Enyaq or XPeng G6?
Enyaq
Costs and Efficiency:
When it comes to price and running costs, the biggest differences usually appear. This is often where you see which car fits your budget better in the long run.
Skoda Enyaq has a slight advantage in terms of price – it starts at 38100 £ , while the XPeng G6 costs 40800 £ . That’s a price difference of around 2743 £.
In terms of energy consumption, the advantage goes to the Skoda Enyaq: with 14.80 kWh per 100 km, it’s slightly more efficient than the XPeng G6 with 17.50 kWh. That’s a difference of about 2.70 kWh.
As for electric range, the Skoda Enyaq performs slightly better – achieving up to 587 km, about 62 km more than the XPeng G6.
G6
Engine and Performance:
Power, torque and acceleration are the classic benchmarks for car enthusiasts – and here, some clear differences start to show.
When it comes to engine power, the XPeng G6 has a clearly perceptible edge – offering 487 HP compared to 340 HP. That’s roughly 147 HP more horsepower.
In acceleration from 0 to 100 km/h, the XPeng G6 is clearly perceptible quicker – completing the sprint in 4.10 s, while the Skoda Enyaq takes 5.40 s. That’s about 1.30 s faster.
In terms of top speed, the XPeng G6 performs barely noticeable better – reaching 200 km/h, while the Skoda Enyaq tops out at 180 km/h. The difference is around 20 km/h.
There’s also a difference in torque: Skoda Enyaq pulls barely noticeable stronger with 679 Nm compared to 660 Nm. That’s about 19 Nm difference.
Ad · Affiliate
As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.
Enyaq
Space and Everyday Use:
Whether family car or daily driver – which one offers more room, flexibility and comfort?
Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.
In curb weight, Skoda Enyaq is barely noticeable lighter – 2002 kg compared to 2115 kg. The difference is around 113 kg.
In terms of boot space, the Skoda Enyaq offers minimal more room – 585 L compared to 571 L. That’s a difference of about 14 L.
In maximum load capacity, the Skoda Enyaq performs a bit better – up to 1710 L, which is about 336 L more than the XPeng G6.
When it comes to payload, Skoda Enyaq hardly perceptible takes the win – 509 kg compared to 475 kg. That’s a difference of about 34 kg.
Who wins the race in the data check?
The XPeng G6 comes out modestly ahead in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.
Skoda Enyaq
XPeng G6
Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
from about £40,800
XPeng G6
Skoda Enyaq
5 (3 Reviews)
The Skoda Enyaq is a cleverly packaged electric SUV that blends roomy, pragmatic family space with clean, Czech design and sensible value. On the road it’s unshowy but composed, offering serene electric performance and easy-to-use tech — the kind of car that makes daily life smoother without trying too hard.
details
XPeng G6
5 (1 Reviews)
The XPeng G6 looks like a sleeker, tech-rich alternative to conventional electric SUVs, with an interior that feels modern, airy and purposefully designed for everyday comfort. On the road it’s composed and surprisingly engaging, giving drivers a smart mix of calm refinement and a playful streak — not bad for a car that quietly challenges the usual premium suspects.
details
Skoda Enyaq
XPeng G6
Costs and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
38100 - 52200 £
|
Price
40800 - 44200 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
-
|
Consumption L/100km
-
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
14.8 - 16.2 kWh
|
Consumption kWh/100km
17.5 - 18.4 kWh
|
|
Electric Range
428 - 587 km
|
Electric Range
510 - 525 km
|
|
Battery Capacity
59 - 77 kWh
|
Battery Capacity
80 kWh
|
|
co2
0 g/km
|
co2
0 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
SUV
|
Body Type
SUV
|
|
Seats
5
|
Seats
5
|
|
Doors
5
|
Doors
5
|
|
Curb weight
2002 - 2293 kg
|
Curb weight
2115 - 2220 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
570 - 585 L
|
Trunk capacity
571 L
|
|
Length
4658 mm
|
Length
4758 mm
|
|
Width
1879 mm
|
Width
1920 mm
|
|
Height
1605 - 1625 mm
|
Height
1650 mm
|
|
Max trunk capacity
1610 - 1710 L
|
Max trunk capacity
1374 L
|
|
Payload
457 - 509 kg
|
Payload
470 - 475 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Electric
|
Engine Type
Electric
|
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
|
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
|
|
Drive Type
Rear-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
Rear-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
204 - 340 HP
|
Power HP
296 - 487 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
5.4 - 8.1 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
4.1 - 6.7 s
|
|
Max Speed
160 - 180 km/h
|
Max Speed
200 km/h
|
|
Torque
310 - 679 Nm
|
Torque
440 - 660 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
-
|
Number of Cylinders
-
|
|
Power kW
150 - 250 kW
|
Power kW
218 - 358 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
-
|
Engine capacity
-
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2025
|
Model Year
2025
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
|
|
Brand
Skoda
|
Brand
XPeng
|
Is the Skoda Enyaq offered with different drivetrains?
The Skoda Enyaq is available as Rear-Wheel Drive or All-Wheel Drive.
The prices shown are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted for local VAT. Local registration taxes (e.g. NoVA, BPM or CO2 malus) are not included. This information is not legally binding.