VS

Tesla Model 3 vs Omoda 5 comparison

Compare performance (460 HP vs 224 HP), boot space and price (31,700 £ vs 24,800 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Tesla Model 3 or Omoda 5?

Tesla Model 3 vs Omoda 5: Key differences

Tesla Model 3

4.3 (8 Reviews)
rate
  • considerably more power
  • markedly more efficient
  • significantly more electric range
  • significantly quicker 0–100 km/h
  • substantially more trunk space
details

Omoda 5

4.9 (5 Reviews)
rate
  • markedly cheaper
  • somewhat lighter
details

All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.

By Achim Sedelmaier

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

Model 3

Costs and Efficiency:

Looking at overall running costs, both models reveal some interesting differences in everyday economy.

Omoda 5 is markedly cheaper – starting at 24,800 £ , while the Tesla Model 3 costs 31,700 £ . That’s a price difference of around 6,934 £.

In terms of energy consumption, the Tesla Model 3 is markedly more efficient: consuming 13 kWh/100km compared to 15.9 kWh/100km for the Omoda 5. That’s a difference of about 2.9 kWh/100km.

As for electric range, the Tesla Model 3 offers significantly more range – reaching up to 750 km, about 320 km more than the Omoda 5.

5

Engine and Performance:

Under the bonnet, it becomes clear which model is tuned for sportiness and which one takes the lead when you hit the accelerator.

When it comes to engine power, the Tesla Model 3 offers considerably more power – delivering 460 HP compared to 224 HP. That’s roughly 236 HP more horsepower.

When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Tesla Model 3 is significantly quicker – completing the sprint in 3.1 s, while the Omoda 5 takes 7.6 s. That’s about 4.5 s quicker.

There’s also a difference in torque: the Tesla Model 3 delivers clearly more torque with 660 Nm compared to 340 Nm. That’s about 320 Nm more.

Model 3

Space and Everyday Use:

Cabin size, boot volume and payload all play a role in everyday practicality. Here, comfort and flexibility make the difference.

Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.

In terms of curb weight, Omoda 5 is somewhat lighter – 1,621 kg compared to 1,822 kg. The difference is around 201 kg.

Looking at boot space, the Tesla Model 3 offers substantially more boot space – 594 L compared to 350 L. That’s a difference of about 244 L.

When it comes to payload, the Omoda 5 carries noticeably more – 536 kg compared to 333 kg. That’s a difference of about 203 kg.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The Tesla Model 3 is decisively ahead in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

from £31,700
Model 3

Tesla Model 3

  • Engine Type Electric
  • Transmission Automatic
  • Drive Type All-Wheel Drive, Rear-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP 283 - 460 HP
  • Consumption kWh/100km 13 - 16.5 kWh/100km
  • Electric Range 534 - 750 km
details

Frequently compared as well

MG ZS
Omoda 5
VS
The MG ZS and Omoda 5 are two popular compact SUVs that target value-conscious buyers with generous equipment and modern styling. This comparison cuts through the marketing to show how they differ in interior space, build quality, driving dynamics and running costs so you can pick the one that fits …
Tesla Model 3
Leapmotor B05
VS
The Tesla Model 3 and the Leapmotor B05 take very different approaches to the compact electric sedan market: the Model 3 emphasizes driving dynamics, long range and an advanced tech ecosystem, while the B05 targets affordability and efficient urban use with strong value for money. This comparison …
Tesla Model 3
Omoda 5

Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis

Tesla Model 3

The Tesla Model 3 is a compact electric sedan that pairs brisk, responsive driving with a sleek, minimalist cabin and intuitive, software-led features. It makes a practical, modern choice for daily commutes and long-term ownership while emphasizing simplicity and advanced driver assistance.

details
0x0-Model3_06
0x0-Model3_RHD_03
0x0-Model3_12
0x0-Model3_09

Reviews Tesla Model 3

4.3 (8 Reviews)
rate
Trex
13 May 2026, 14:34:19

Excellent traction, relatively low energy consumption, driver-assist systems that are in a class of their own. On top of that, a very responsive steering system.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Commuter (short/medium distance)
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money
dino999
18 Nov 2025, 08:47:05

I wanted to give 0 stars but you can't — unfortunately, it sucks.

Omoda 5

The Omoda 5 is a stylish compact crossover that catches the eye with a bold, contemporary look and a tech-forward cabin. It offers a comfortable ride and a surprisingly spacious interior, making it a practical yet distinctive choice for buyers who want modern features and solid value.

details
IMG_2691

Reviews Omoda 5

4.9 (5 Reviews)
rate
Pablo
8 May 2026, 07:59:00

Fantastic. It would be great to have a bit more battery capacity and a higher DC charging speed.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Commuter (short/medium distance)
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money
maurizio
22 Nov 2025, 17:34:12

Depending on your needs: better for safety, comfort, boot space, trim and performance — downside: higher fuel consumption.

Frequently compared as well

Omoda 5
BYD Atto 2
VS
The Omoda 5 and BYD Atto 2 are eye-catching compact crossovers that compete on modern styling, tech-packed cabins and strong value for money. This quick comparison will show how they differ in space, equipment, driving character and running costs so you can pick the one that fits your priorities.
Tesla Model 3
ZEEKR 7GT
VS
The Tesla Model 3 and Zeekr 7GT take very different approaches to modern EV ownership: the Model 3 is a compact, performance‑leaning sedan known for brisk acceleration, precise handling and Tesla’s ecosystem, while the Zeekr 7GT emphasizes a roomier, more comfort‑oriented experience with premium …
Omoda 5
Leapmotor B10
VS
The Omoda 5 and the Leapmotor B10 both promise modern design and advanced tech, but they take different approaches to powertrain, packaging and driving character. This comparison cuts through the marketing to show where each model wins — in comfort, range/efficiency, equipment and overall value — …
Hyundai Tucson
Omoda 5
VS
The Hyundai Tucson and the Omoda 5 are two compact SUVs that appeal to buyers seeking practicality with distinct personalities — Tucson for proven dependability, Omoda 5 for sharp styling and tech-focused features. This comparison will pinpoint how they differ in space, equipment, driving feel and …
Tesla Model 3
Toyota C-HR+
VS
Tesla Model 3 and Toyota C-HR+ go head-to-head: compare performance, space, features and price in one quick overview to see which model suits your daily driving, budget and lifestyle better. A clear, side-by-side look helps you make the smarter choice. || Unsure whether the Tesla Model 3 or the …
Tesla Model 3
VW ID.Polo
VS
Comparing the Tesla Model 3 and the VW ID.Polo brings together two very different approaches to electric motoring: the Model 3 is a performance‑oriented, long‑range compact sedan that prioritizes tech and brisk acceleration, while the VW ID.Polo focuses on city‑friendly practicality, lower running …
Ford Explorer EV
Tesla Model 3
VS
Ford Explorer EV and Tesla Model 3 go head-to-head: compare performance, space, features and price in one quick overview to see which model suits your daily driving, budget and lifestyle better. A clear, side-by-side look helps you make the smarter choice. || Unsure whether the Ford Explorer EV or …
Omoda 5
VW T-Roc
VS
Choosing between the Omoda 5 and the VW T‑Roc pits a stylish, tech-rich newcomer against a proven, versatile compact SUV from Volkswagen. I’ll compare their design, interiors, driving dynamics, practicality and running costs so you can clearly see which one suits your priorities.
Tesla Model 3
Omoda 5

Costs and Consumption
Price
31,700 - 50,100 £
Price
24,800 - 31,600 £
Consumption L/100km
-
Consumption L/100km
5.3 L/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
13 - 16.5 kWh/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
15.9 kWh/100km
Electric Range
534 - 750 km
Electric Range
430 km
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
-
co2
0 g/km
co2
0 - 120 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
-
Fuel tank capacity
-

Dimensions and Body
Body Type
Sedan
Body Type
SUV
Seats
5
Seats
5
Doors
-
Doors
-
Curb weight
1,822 - 1,929 kg
Curb weight
1,621 - 1,710 kg
Trunk capacity
594 L
Trunk capacity
300 - 350 L
Length
-
Length
-
Width
1,850 mm
Width
1,824 - 1,830 mm
Height
-
Height
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Payload
302 - 333 kg
Payload
431 - 536 kg

Engine and Performance
Engine Type
Electric
Engine Type
Electric, Full Hybrid
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox, Automatic Gearbox
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive, Rear-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
Power HP
283 - 460 HP
Power HP
204 - 224 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
3.1 - 6.2 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
7.6 - 7.9 s
Max Speed
-
Max Speed
-
Torque
420 - 660 Nm
Torque
295 - 340 Nm
Number of Cylinders
-
Number of Cylinders
4
Power kW
208 - 338 kW
Power kW
150 - 165 kW
Engine capacity
-
Engine capacity
1,499 cm3

General
Model Year
2025
Model Year
2026
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
CO2 Efficiency Class
A, D
Brand
Tesla
Brand
Omoda
What drive types are available for the Tesla Model 3?

The Tesla Model 3 is offered with All-Wheel Drive or Rear-Wheel Drive.

DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved. The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.