Compare performance (460 HP vs 340 HP), boot space and price (34,300 £ vs 41,900 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Tesla Model Y or Skoda Enyaq?
All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.
In the world of electric SUVs, the Skoda Enyaq and Tesla Model Y have emerged as popular contenders, each bringing unique strengths to the table. This article dives into a comprehensive comparison of these two electric vehicles, examining their technical specifications and innovative features.
Both the Skoda Enyaq and Tesla Model Y sport the sleek, modern design expected in today's electric SUV market. The Enyaq measures between 4649 mm and 4658 mm in length, 1879 mm in width, and around 1621 mm in height, offering a balanced stance. In contrast, the Tesla Model Y is slightly longer, measuring 4751 mm to 4790 mm in length, 1921 mm in width, and 1624 mm in height, giving it a more elongated appearance.
Interior space is crucial for SUV buyers, and both vehicles deliver. The Model Y boasts a significant trunk capacity of up to 854 liters, while the Enyaq offers a sizable 570 to 585 liters. Both vehicles provide ample passenger space with seating for up to five people, and the Model Y extends this up to seven seats.
Performance-wise, the Tesla Model Y holds the upper hand with a variety of power options ranging from 299 HP to an exhilarating 534 HP, and 0-100 km/h acceleration times as fast as 3.7 seconds. The Enyaq offers a respectable range of power outputs from 204 HP to 340 HP, with acceleration capabilities between 5.5 seconds and a more leisurely 8.1 seconds to 100 km/h.
Both vehicles employ an automatic transmission with a reduction gearbox, fostering smooth and efficient driving experiences. The Enyaq has a top speed of 180 km/h, while the Model Y can reach up to 250 km/h, further highlighting its performance orientation.
In terms of electric range, the Skoda Enyaq shines with a range extending up to 587 km, depending on the configuration, compared to the Model Y's maximum range of 600 km. This is where battery capacity plays a crucial role; the Enyaq is equipped with either 59 kWh or 77 kWh batteries, while the Model Y offers a 62 kWh to 79 kWh range, affecting their overall efficiency.
Both vehicles reflect their commitment to eco-friendly driving with CO2 emissions rated at a clean 0 g/km and a Class A CO2 efficiency classification.
Tesla is renowned for its cutting-edge technology, and the Model Y is no exception, featuring frequent over-the-air updates and an advanced Autopilot system that remains a benchmark in autonomous driving capabilities. Skoda's Enyaq, while perhaps more conventional in technological offerings, still provides a suite of modern conveniences and safety systems, catering to those who prioritize traditional infotainment and user interface designs.
The Skoda Enyaq and Tesla Model Y each bring distinctive attributes to the electric SUV market. The Enyaq is a strong contender for those who desire excellent electric range and a design that balances elegance with practicality. Meanwhile, the Model Y caters to performance enthusiasts and technology aficionados, presenting a thrilling and futuristic driving experience.
Ultimately, the choice between the Enyaq and Model Y depends on individual priorities—be it the sheer performance and cutting-edge technology of Tesla or the balanced, range-focused offering from Skoda.
Looking at overall running costs, both models reveal some interesting differences in everyday economy.
Tesla Model Y is visibly cheaper – starting at 34,300 £ , while the Skoda Enyaq costs 41,900 £ . That’s a price difference of around 7,637 £.
In terms of energy consumption, the Tesla Model Y is slightly more efficient: consuming 12.7 kWh/100km compared to 14.8 kWh/100km for the Skoda Enyaq. That’s a difference of about 2.1 kWh/100km.
As for electric range, the Tesla Model Y offers slightly more range – reaching up to 657 km, about 70 km more than the Skoda Enyaq.
Power, torque and acceleration say a lot about how a car feels on the road. This is where you see which model delivers more driving dynamics.
When it comes to engine power, the Tesla Model Y offers markedly more power – delivering 460 HP compared to 340 HP. That’s roughly 120 HP more horsepower.
When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Tesla Model Y is substantially quicker – completing the sprint in 3.5 s, while the Skoda Enyaq takes 5.4 s. That’s about 1.9 s quicker.
There’s also a difference in torque: the Skoda Enyaq delivers only slightly more torque with 679 Nm compared to 660 Nm. That’s about 19 Nm more.
Cabin size, boot volume and payload all play a role in everyday practicality. Here, comfort and flexibility make the difference.
Seats: Tesla Model Y offers more seats – 7 vs 5.
In terms of curb weight, Tesla Model Y is a bit lighter – 1,953 kg compared to 2,179 kg. The difference is around 226 kg.
Looking at boot space, the Tesla Model Y offers markedly more boot space – 822 L compared to 585 L. That’s a difference of about 237 L.
When it comes to payload, the Skoda Enyaq carries barely more – 489 kg compared to 472 kg. That’s a difference of about 17 kg.
The Tesla Model Y is clearly superior overall in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.
The Tesla Model Y is a tech‑forward family SUV that marries blistering efficiency with enormous interior space, calm motorway manners and the obvious convenience of Tesla’s charging ecosystem and over‑the‑air updates. Its minimalist, screen‑centric cabin and rather firm ride — plus limited rear visibility and the absence of Apple CarPlay/Android Auto — are trade‑offs that will bother buyers who prioritise comfort or traditional ergonomics.
details
The Skoda Enyaq is a reassuring, family‑first electric SUV that trades sporting drama for exceptional quiet, roomy rear seats and a genuinely practical boot. It’s remarkably easy to live with thanks to sensible controls and steady fast charging, though the touchscreen‑led infotainment can be sluggish and driving enthusiasts looking for sharp handling should look elsewhere.
details
Costs and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
34,300 - 53,100 £
|
Price
41,900 - 52,200 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
-
|
Consumption L/100km
-
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
12.7 - 16.2 kWh/100km
|
Consumption kWh/100km
14.8 - 16.2 kWh/100km
|
|
Electric Range
534 - 657 km
|
Electric Range
538 - 587 km
|
|
Battery Capacity
64.5 - 83 kWh
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
|
co2
0 g/km
|
co2
0 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
SUV
|
Body Type
SUV
|
|
Seats
5 - 7
|
Seats
5
|
|
Doors
5
|
Doors
-
|
|
Curb weight
1,953 - 2,108 kg
|
Curb weight
2,179 - 2,293 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
822 L
|
Trunk capacity
570 - 585 L
|
|
Length
4,790 - 4,797 mm
|
Length
-
|
|
Width
1,920 - 1,921 mm
|
Width
1,879 mm
|
|
Height
1,621 - 1,624 mm
|
Height
-
|
|
Max trunk capacity
2,118 - 2,138 L
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
|
Payload
435 - 472 kg
|
Payload
443 - 489 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Electric
|
Engine Type
Electric
|
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
|
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
|
|
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive, Rear-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
Rear-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
299 - 460 HP
|
Power HP
286 - 340 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
3.5 - 7.2 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
5.4 - 6.7 s
|
|
Max Speed
201 km/h
|
Max Speed
-
|
|
Torque
420 - 660 Nm
|
Torque
545 - 679 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
-
|
Number of Cylinders
-
|
|
Power kW
220 - 338 kW
|
Power kW
210 - 250 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
-
|
Engine capacity
-
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2,025 - 2,026
|
Model Year
2025
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
|
|
Brand
Tesla
|
Brand
Skoda
|
Deutschland
France
Nederland
Great Britain
Sverige
Danmark
Suomi
Italia
Polska
España