VS

Toyota C-HR+ vs Skoda Enyaq comparison

Compare performance (343 HP vs 340 HP), boot space and price (36,000 £ vs 36,800 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Toyota C-HR+ or Skoda Enyaq?

Toyota C-HR+ vs Skoda Enyaq: Key differences

Toyota C-HR+

4.4 (1 Reviews)
rate
  • very slightly cheaper
  • only slightly more power
  • moderately more efficient
  • only slightly more electric range
  • marginally quicker 0–100 km/h
  • slightly lighter
details

Skoda Enyaq

4.4 (6 Reviews)
rate
  • visibly more trunk space
details

All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.

By Achim Sedelmaier

C-HR+

Skoda Enyaq VS Toyota C-HR+: quick take

Skoda Enyaq and Toyota C-HR+ sit at different points on the SUV map: one leans into roomy, calm practicality while the other trades interior volume for sharper efficiency and style. The Enyaq feels like a composed family cruiser that prioritises space, noise insulation and straightforward usefulness. The C-HR+ presents itself as a compact, efficiency‑focused crossover with clear urban strengths and a bolder design. This page walks through how those choices matter in everyday life rather than on a spec sheet.

Enyaq

Character and driving feel

The Skoda Enyaq drives like a calm, confident long‑distance companion — composed in a straight line, predictable through corners and never trying to be sporty. The Toyota C‑HR+ is more nimble around town and rewards careful inputs with a lighter, more engaging feel, but it can get vocally busy under strong acceleration. With Enyaq you get mass and mellow tuning that soaks up motorway miles; with C‑HR+ you get a livelier city personality that pays off in traffic and twisty roads, at the cost of some drivetrain noise. Choose based on whether you prefer serenity on motorways (Enyaq) or a brisk, efficient urban driver (C‑HR+).

C-HR+

Comfort and long‑distance behaviour

On long runs the Skoda Enyaq is clearly focused on comfort — excellent noise insulation and chairs that invite relaxed hours behind the wheel make long days less tiring. The Toyota C‑HR+ is comfortable too, but it feels more compact and taut: good for cruising, yet less forgiving over repeated, sharp road imperfections and with a smaller rear cabin for tall passengers. Enyaq’s calmer ride and more spacious rear seats make it the smarter pick for regular family touring. If your weeks include lots of motorway miles with passengers and luggage, the Enyaq’s approach is purposefully more relaxing.

Enyaq

City friendliness and everyday usability

In tight urban environments the Toyota C‑HR+ excels: compact dimensions, light steering and a powertrain that often runs electrically make it a natural for stop‑start commuting and short trips. The Skoda Enyaq is still surprisingly manageable for its size, with good visibility and user‑friendly ergonomics, but its larger footprint and greater kerb weight make parking and rapid manoeuvres more of a consideration. Practical details also split them: the C‑HR+’s hybrid focus helps cut running costs around town, while the Enyaq’s pure‑electric range and charging behaviour matter more if you routinely do longer stretches between plugs. City buyers who prize manoeuvrability and economy will prefer the C‑HR+, whereas those who need occasional long trips from the same car will favour the Enyaq’s strengths.

C-HR+

Cabin feel and perceived quality

The Skoda Enyaq presents an understated, well‑built cabin that leans on sensible storage, neat materials and an airy sense of space — it reads more mature than flashy. The Toyota C‑HR+ places more emphasis on design punch and a tactile cockpit with physical climate controls that users praise for everyday convenience. Infotainment on the Enyaq can feel touch‑centric and sometimes slow, while the C‑HR+ offers a snappier interface and clearer physical buttons, which makes a difference in daily usability. Both cars feel more premium than their segments used to, but Enyaq trades flair for calm quality whereas C‑HR+ trades some space for sharper interior styling and ergonomics.

Enyaq

Practicality and buyer fit — who should choose which

If your priority is passenger comfort, luggage space and low‑stress long journeys, the Skoda Enyaq is the better fit: it’s aimed at families and frequent motorway users who value roomy practicality and a quiet cabin. If you live in the city, want lowest real‑world running costs for short commutes and prefer a compact, attention‑grabbing crossover, the Toyota C‑HR+ is the more logical choice despite its compromises in rear room and boot usability. Both cars make sensible, different compromises — Enyaq leans into comfort and cargo, C‑HR+ into efficiency and urban agility — and the detailed technical comparison that follows will show how those trade‑offs translate into range, weight and payload differences you’ll want to check against your typical use.

Frequently compared as well

Skoda Enyaq
Skoda Elroq
VS
Choosing between the Skoda Enyaq and the Skoda Elroq comes down to whether you want a spacious, all-electric family SUV or a more compact, conventionally powered crossover focused on practicality. I’ll highlight the real-world differences — range and running costs, interior space and usability, …
Kia EV3
Toyota C-HR+
VS
The all-electric Kia EV3 feels like the sensible future in a city-friendly SUV shell — roomy, tech-rich and cheaper to run than the Toyota C‑HR+, which still trades on sharp styling and familiar hybrid/petrol simplicity rather than pure EV brilliance. Choose the EV3 for modern gadgets, punchy …

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

C-HR+

Costs and Efficiency:

Price and efficiency are often the first things buyers look at. Here it becomes clear which model has the long-term edge – whether at the pump, the plug, or in purchase price.

Toyota C-HR+ is very slightly cheaper – starting at 36,000 £ , while the Skoda Enyaq costs 36,800 £ . That’s a price difference of around 857 £.

In terms of energy consumption, the Toyota C-HR+ is moderately more efficient: consuming 13.4 kWh/100km compared to 14.9 kWh/100km for the Skoda Enyaq. That’s a difference of about 1.5 kWh/100km.

As for electric range, the Toyota C-HR+ offers only slightly more range – reaching up to 607 km, about 18 km more than the Skoda Enyaq.

Enyaq

Engine and Performance:

Under the bonnet, it becomes clear which model is tuned for sportiness and which one takes the lead when you hit the accelerator.

When it comes to engine power, the Toyota C-HR+ offers only slightly more power – delivering 343 HP compared to 340 HP. That’s roughly 3 HP more horsepower.

When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Toyota C-HR+ is marginally quicker – completing the sprint in 5.2 s, while the Skoda Enyaq takes 5.4 s. That’s about 0.2 s quicker.

There’s also a difference in torque: the Skoda Enyaq delivers clearly more torque with 679 Nm compared to 338 Nm. That’s about 341 Nm more.

C-HR+

Space and Everyday Use:

Whether family car or daily driver – which one offers more room, flexibility and comfort?

Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.

In terms of curb weight, Toyota C-HR+ is slightly lighter – 1,810 kg compared to 2,074 kg. The difference is around 264 kg.

Looking at boot space, the Skoda Enyaq offers visibly more boot space – 585 L compared to 416 L. That’s a difference of about 169 L.

When it comes to payload, the Toyota C-HR+ carries somewhat more – 655 kg compared to 526 kg. That’s a difference of about 129 kg.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The Skoda Enyaq holds a narrow overall lead in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

from £36,800
Enyaq

Skoda Enyaq

  • Engine Type Electric
  • Transmission Automatic
  • Drive Type Rear-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP 190 - 340 HP
  • Consumption kWh/100km 14.9 - 15.9 kWh/100km
  • Electric Range 449 - 589 km
details
Toyota C-HR+
Skoda Enyaq

Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis

Toyota C-HR+

The Toyota C‑HR is a distinctive crossover that pairs bold, coupe‑like styling with a comfortable, composed ride suited to daily city and suburban driving. It appeals to buyers who value standout design, practical cabin packaging and a refined, easy‑to‑use experience rather than outright performance or rugged off‑road ability.

details
20250312_01_01_s
20250312_01_04_s
20250312_01_15_s
20250312_01_12_s
20250312_01_05_s

Reviews Toyota C-HR+

4.4 (1 Reviews)
rate
Krzysztof
17 Jun 2026, 07:19:28

More comfortable
Visually bigger and nicer
Low energy consumption.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): City / Short distance
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money

Skoda Enyaq

The Skoda Enyaq is a practical and well-appointed electric SUV that blends a roomy interior and everyday usability with clean, understated design. It’s a comfortable, efficient choice for buyers who want a sensible electric family car without flash, backed by solid build quality and clever practicality.

details
04_new_skoda_enyaq_68cf74d6-1920x1280
11_new_skoda_enyaq_c2b962a0-1920x1280
12_new_skoda_enyaq_de0afe4c-1920x1280
33_new_skoda_enyaq_833cbb5e-1920x1440
48_new_skoda_enyaq_interior_dad4ad75-1920x1280
49_new_skoda_enyaq_interior_37c35e34-1920x1280
50_new_skoda_enyaq_coupe_f55ae8bb-1920x1858

Reviews Skoda Enyaq

4.4 (6 Reviews)
rate
Delporte
16 May 2026, 16:33:37

More options and more room for discounts and negotiation, just as comfortable, better than a Hyundai Ioniq 5 (which is not comfortable at all), a Toyota bZ4X (feels cramped and has little space), a Tesla Model Y Premium (a bit too high-tech for me but otherwise fine), a Jaecoo 5 (entry-level, comfort impeccable but no options and little tech), and an Omoda (less comfortable and very few options). This is all a personal opinion — we drove the cars mentioned above and the Skoda seems the best value for money with good comfort, a variety of options and reliable after-sales service close to us.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Company car / Business
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money
Alfaknaggen
11 Mar 2026, 18:30:11

Well‑thought-out and practical car (85x MY2024) that unfortunately lets you down because of system bugs and irritating driver‑assist systems that can't cope with ordinary autumn or winter weather without throwing up error messages and warnings.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Commuter (short/medium distance)
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money

Frequently compared as well

Skoda Enyaq
VW ID.7
VS
The Skoda Enyaq and the VW ID.7 share the VW Group’s MEB electric platform, but they’re aimed at different buyers. The Enyaq is a practical, family-focused SUV that emphasizes interior space, usability and value, while the ID.7 is a sleek, aerodynamic saloon tuned for long-range efficiency and …
Toyota bZ4X
Toyota C-HR+
VS
This comparison looks at the Toyota bZ4X versus the Toyota C‑HR: both are compact crossovers but take very different approaches — the bZ4X is a purpose‑built all‑electric SUV while the C‑HR is Toyota’s stylish, efficient petrol/hybrid crossover. I’ll run through the key differences in driving range …
Skoda Enyaq
Volvo EX60
VS
Practical Czech engineering goes up against Swedish style in our showdown between the Skoda Enyaq and the Volvo EX60. The Enyaq focuses on roomy practicality and sensible value, while the EX60 answers with sharper design, richer tech and a more premium feel — choose based on whether you want …
Skoda Enyaq
Kia EV5
VS
Comparing the Škoda Enyaq and the Kia EV5 pits two spacious, family-friendly electric SUVs against each other: the Enyaq focuses on practicality, value and a straightforward user experience, while the EV5 emphasizes cutting-edge cabin tech, distinctive styling and a more premium feel. This short …
Ford Explorer EV
Skoda Enyaq
VS
Here’s a clear comparison between the Ford Explorer EV and the Skoda Enyaq to help determine which electric SUV suits your needs. I’ll focus on driving range, interior space, technology and overall value so you can pick the right balance of practicality and performance.
Hyundai IONIQ 5
Toyota C-HR+
VS
The Hyundai IONIQ 5 and the Toyota C‑HR represent two very different choices: the IONIQ 5 is a purpose-built electric vehicle offering long range, rapid charging and a spacious, tech-forward cabin, while the Toyota C‑HR is a compact, style-focused crossover prioritizing efficiency and urban …
Ford Capri
Skoda Enyaq
VS
Comparing the Capri and the Enyaq is like putting a classic, driver-focused sports coupe head-to-head with a modern electric SUV designed for space, comfort and low running costs. If you’re after character and a sporty drive, the Capri delivers the feel; if you need range, practicality and everyday …
Toyota Urban Cruiser
Toyota C-HR+
VS
Comparing the Toyota Urban Cruiser and the Toyota C-HR, you’re choosing between a practical, city-focused compact SUV that emphasizes efficiency and easy maneuverability and a more stylized, tech-forward crossover that leans toward a sportier driving feel and premium touches. If your priority is …
Toyota C-HR+
Skoda Enyaq

Costs and Consumption
Price
36,000 - 46,300 £
Price
36,800 - 52,800 £
Consumption L/100km
-
Consumption L/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
13.4 - 15.5 kWh/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
14.9 - 15.9 kWh/100km
Electric Range
458 - 607 km
Electric Range
449 - 589 km
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
-
co2
0 g/km
co2
0 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
-
Fuel tank capacity
-

Dimensions and Body
Body Type
SUV
Body Type
SUV
Seats
5
Seats
5
Doors
-
Doors
-
Curb weight
1,810 - 2,010 kg
Curb weight
2,074 - 2,284 kg
Trunk capacity
416 L
Trunk capacity
570 - 585 L
Length
-
Length
-
Width
1,870 mm
Width
1,879 mm
Height
-
Height
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Payload
550 - 655 kg
Payload
449 - 526 kg

Engine and Performance
Engine Type
Electric
Engine Type
Electric
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
Rear-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
Power HP
167 - 343 HP
Power HP
190 - 340 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
5.2 - 8.4 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
5.4 - 8.6 s
Max Speed
-
Max Speed
-
Torque
268 - 338 Nm
Torque
350 - 679 Nm
Number of Cylinders
-
Number of Cylinders
-
Power kW
123 - 252 kW
Power kW
140 - 250 kW
Engine capacity
-
Engine capacity
-

General
Model Year
2026
Model Year
2026
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
Brand
Toyota
Brand
Skoda
What drivetrain options does the Toyota C-HR+ have?

The Toyota C-HR+ is offered with Front-Wheel Drive or All-Wheel Drive.

DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved. The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.