Deutschland
France
Nederland
Great Britain
Sverige
Danmark
Suomi
Italia
Polska
EspañaVS
Volvo EC40 vs Skoda Enyaq comparison
Compare performance (442 HP vs 340 HP), boot space and price (46,500 £ vs 41,900 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Volvo EC40 or Skoda Enyaq?
Volvo EC40 vs Skoda Enyaq: Key differences
All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.
Video - Skoda Enyaq
EC40
Costs and Efficiency:
When it comes to price and running costs, the biggest differences usually appear. This is often where you see which car fits your budget better in the long run.
Skoda Enyaq is moderately cheaper – starting at 41,900 £ , while the Volvo EC40 costs 46,500 £ . That’s a price difference of around 4,620 £.
In terms of energy consumption, the Skoda Enyaq is barely more efficient: consuming 14.8 kWh/100km compared to 16.2 kWh/100km for the Volvo EC40. That’s a difference of about 1.4 kWh/100km.
As for electric range, the Skoda Enyaq offers very slightly more range – reaching up to 587 km, about 2 km more than the Volvo EC40.
Enyaq
Engine and Performance:
Power, torque and acceleration are the classic benchmarks for car enthusiasts – and here, some clear differences start to show.
When it comes to engine power, the Volvo EC40 offers markedly more power – delivering 442 HP compared to 340 HP. That’s roughly 102 HP more horsepower.
When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Volvo EC40 is moderately quicker – completing the sprint in 4.6 s, while the Skoda Enyaq takes 5.4 s. That’s about 0.8 s quicker.
There’s also a difference in torque: the Skoda Enyaq delivers marginally more torque with 679 Nm compared to 670 Nm. That’s about 9 Nm more.
Space and Everyday Use:
Cabin size, boot volume and payload all play a role in everyday practicality. Here, comfort and flexibility make the difference.
Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.
In terms of curb weight, Volvo EC40 is very slightly lighter – 2,065 kg compared to 2,179 kg. The difference is around 114 kg.
Looking at boot space, the Skoda Enyaq offers markedly more boot space – 585 L compared to 404 L. That’s a difference of about 181 L.
When it comes to payload, the Skoda Enyaq carries somewhat more – 489 kg compared to 435 kg. That’s a difference of about 54 kg.
Who wins the race in the data check?
The Volvo EC40 has only a minor advantage in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.
from £46,500
Volvo EC40
Volvo EC40
Skoda Enyaq
Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Volvo EC40
The Volvo EC40 feels like a polished slice of Scandinavian calm on wheels, blending minimalist design with a cocoon-like interior that makes everyday driving surprisingly serene. It’s an electric compact that puts safety and comfort front and center, while still injecting enough personality and tech-savvy charm to keep city buyers smiling.
details
Skoda Enyaq
The Skoda Enyaq is a reassuring, family‑first electric SUV that trades sporting drama for exceptional quiet, roomy rear seats and a genuinely practical boot. It’s remarkably easy to live with thanks to sensible controls and steady fast charging, though the touchscreen‑led infotainment can be sluggish and driving enthusiasts looking for sharp handling should look elsewhere.
details
Volvo EC40
Skoda Enyaq
Costs and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
46,500 - 59,000 £
|
Price
41,900 - 52,200 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
-
|
Consumption L/100km
-
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
16.2 - 17.3 kWh/100km
|
Consumption kWh/100km
14.8 - 16.2 kWh/100km
|
|
Electric Range
486 - 585 km
|
Electric Range
538 - 587 km
|
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
|
co2
0 g/km
|
co2
0 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
SUV
|
Body Type
SUV
|
|
Seats
5
|
Seats
5
|
|
Doors
-
|
Doors
-
|
|
Curb weight
2,065 - 2,185 kg
|
Curb weight
2,179 - 2,293 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
404 L
|
Trunk capacity
570 - 585 L
|
|
Length
-
|
Length
-
|
|
Width
1,873 mm
|
Width
1,879 mm
|
|
Height
-
|
Height
-
|
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
|
Payload
395 - 435 kg
|
Payload
443 - 489 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Electric
|
Engine Type
Electric
|
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
|
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
|
|
Drive Type
Rear-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
Rear-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
238 - 442 HP
|
Power HP
286 - 340 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
4.6 - 7.3 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
5.4 - 6.7 s
|
|
Max Speed
-
|
Max Speed
-
|
|
Torque
420 - 670 Nm
|
Torque
545 - 679 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
-
|
Number of Cylinders
-
|
|
Power kW
175 - 325 kW
|
Power kW
210 - 250 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
-
|
Engine capacity
-
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2,024 - 2,026
|
Model Year
2025
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
|
|
Brand
Volvo
|
Brand
Skoda
|
DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved.
The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.