VS

Volvo EC40 vs Skoda Enyaq comparison

Compare performance (442 HP vs 340 HP), boot space and price (46,500 £ vs 36,800 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Volvo EC40 or Skoda Enyaq?

Volvo EC40 vs Skoda Enyaq: Key differences

Volvo EC40

4.7 (1 Reviews)
rate
  • markedly more power
  • moderately quicker 0–100 km/h
  • very slightly lighter
details

Skoda Enyaq

4.4 (6 Reviews)
rate
  • noticeably cheaper
  • barely more efficient
  • very slightly more electric range
  • markedly more trunk space
details

All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.

By Achim Sedelmaier

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

EC40

Costs and Efficiency:

When it comes to price and running costs, the biggest differences usually appear. This is often where you see which car fits your budget better in the long run.

Skoda Enyaq is noticeably cheaper – starting at 36,800 £ , while the Volvo EC40 costs 46,500 £ . That’s a price difference of around 9,686 £.

In terms of energy consumption, the Skoda Enyaq is barely more efficient: consuming 14.9 kWh/100km compared to 16.2 kWh/100km for the Volvo EC40. That’s a difference of about 1.3 kWh/100km.

As for electric range, the Skoda Enyaq offers very slightly more range – reaching up to 589 km, about 4 km more than the Volvo EC40.

Enyaq

Engine and Performance:

Power, torque and acceleration are the classic benchmarks for car enthusiasts – and here, some clear differences start to show.

When it comes to engine power, the Volvo EC40 offers markedly more power – delivering 442 HP compared to 340 HP. That’s roughly 102 HP more horsepower.

When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Volvo EC40 is moderately quicker – completing the sprint in 4.6 s, while the Skoda Enyaq takes 5.4 s. That’s about 0.8 s quicker.

There’s also a difference in torque: the Skoda Enyaq delivers marginally more torque with 679 Nm compared to 670 Nm. That’s about 9 Nm more.

Space and Everyday Use:

Cabin size, boot volume and payload all play a role in everyday practicality. Here, comfort and flexibility make the difference.

Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.

In terms of curb weight, Volvo EC40 is very slightly lighter – 2,065 kg compared to 2,074 kg. The difference is around 9 kg.

Looking at boot space, the Skoda Enyaq offers markedly more boot space – 585 L compared to 404 L. That’s a difference of about 181 L.

When it comes to payload, the Skoda Enyaq carries somewhat more – 526 kg compared to 435 kg. That’s a difference of about 91 kg.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The Skoda Enyaq comes out modestly ahead in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

from £36,800
Enyaq

Skoda Enyaq

  • Engine Type Electric
  • Transmission Automatic
  • Drive Type Rear-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP 190 - 340 HP
  • Consumption kWh/100km 14.9 - 15.9 kWh/100km
  • Electric Range 449 - 589 km
Volvo EC40
Skoda Enyaq

Costs and Consumption

View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance

View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body

View detailed analysis

Volvo EC40

The Volvo EC40 feels like a polished slice of Scandinavian calm on wheels, blending minimalist design with a cocoon-like interior that makes everyday driving surprisingly serene. It’s an electric compact that puts safety and comfort front and center, while still injecting enough personality and tech-savvy charm to keep city buyers smiling.

details

Skoda Enyaq

The Skoda Enyaq is a practical and well-appointed electric SUV that blends a roomy interior and everyday usability with clean, understated design. It’s a comfortable, efficient choice for buyers who want a sensible electric family car without flash, backed by solid build quality and clever practicality.

details
Volvo EC40
Skoda Enyaq

Costs and Consumption

Price
46,500 - 56,800 £
Price
36,800 - 52,800 £
Consumption L/100km
-
Consumption L/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
16.2 - 17.3 kWh/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
14.9 - 15.9 kWh/100km
Electric Range
486 - 585 km
Electric Range
449 - 589 km
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
-
co2
0 g/km
co2
0 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
-
Fuel tank capacity
-

Dimensions and Body

Body Type
SUV
Body Type
SUV
Seats
5
Seats
5
Doors
-
Doors
-
Curb weight
2,065 - 2,185 kg
Curb weight
2,074 - 2,284 kg
Trunk capacity
404 L
Trunk capacity
570 - 585 L
Length
-
Length
-
Width
1,873 mm
Width
1,879 mm
Height
-
Height
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Payload
395 - 435 kg
Payload
449 - 526 kg

Engine and Performance

Engine Type
Electric
Engine Type
Electric
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
Drive Type
Rear-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
Rear-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
Power HP
238 - 442 HP
Power HP
190 - 340 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
4.6 - 7.3 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
5.4 - 8.6 s
Max Speed
-
Max Speed
-
Torque
420 - 670 Nm
Torque
350 - 679 Nm
Number of Cylinders
-
Number of Cylinders
-
Power kW
175 - 325 kW
Power kW
140 - 250 kW
Engine capacity
-
Engine capacity
-

General

Model Year
2,024 - 2,026
Model Year
2026
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
Brand
Volvo
Brand
Skoda
DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved. The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.