VS

Volvo EX40 vs Audi Q6 e-tron comparison

Compare performance (442 HP vs 490 HP), boot space and price (42,800 £ vs 54,400 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Volvo EX40 or Audi Q6 e-tron?

Volvo EX40 vs Audi Q6 e-tron: Key differences

Volvo EX40

5 (1 Reviews)
rate
  • noticeably cheaper
  • marginally lighter

Audi Q6 e-tron

4.9 (3 Reviews)
rate
  • only slightly more power
  • only slightly more efficient
  • a bit more electric range
  • marginally quicker 0–100 km/h
  • visibly more trunk space

All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.

EX40

Electrifying Choices: Audi Q6 e-tron vs. Volvo EX40

In the ever-evolving landscape of electric mobility, two heavyweights have emerged as appealing options for those seeking the perfect blend of performance, innovation, and environmental consciousness. The Audi Q6 e-tron and the Volvo EX40 are both formidable contenders in the electric SUV segment. Each offers a unique set of features, power, and design, making the decision between them all the more challenging and exciting.

Q6 e-tron

Performance & Powertrain

The Audi Q6 e-tron comes with a range of power options, boasting between 292 to 516 horsepower, and featuring both rear-wheel and all-wheel drive configurations. Its acceleration prowess is notable, with some models covering the 0-100 km/h sprint in just 4.3 seconds. The Q6 e-tron offers cutting-edge efficiency with consumption rates starting at 15.6 kWh/100 km, and a remarkable electric range that can extend up to 656 km on a single charge, thanks to its sleek 75.8 to 94.9 kWh battery capacity.

On the other hand, the Volvo EX40 offers a compact yet potent punch, with a power range from 238 to 408 horsepower, also accompanied by both rear-wheel and all-wheel drive systems. The EX40 can accelerate from 0-100 km/h in as little as 4.6 seconds. Its efficiency is competitive, with consumption rates beginning at 16.6 kWh/100 km, and the electric range stretches up to 576 km with a battery capacity of 67 to 79 kWh.

EX40

Design & Dimensions

The Audi Q6 e-tron is the larger of the two, with dimensions striking a balance between presence and sleek aerodynamics. At 4771 mm in length, 1939 to 1965 mm in width, and 1665 to 1685 mm in height, the Q6 offers ample interior space for five passengers. The trunk capacity varies between 499 to 526 liters, accommodating most storage needs with ease.

In contrast, the Volvo EX40 embraces a more compact design, measuring 4440 mm in length, 1863 mm in width, and 1647 mm in height. While its trunk capacity of 410 liters is smaller than the Q6, it provides efficient use of space inside, making it particularly suitable for urban environments without compromising on comfort.

Q6 e-tron

Innovations & Technology

Audi has packed the Q6 e-tron with innovative technologies, from advanced driver assistance systems to its cutting-edge infotainment suite. It emphasizes a seamless driving experience through intuitive controls and sophisticated connectivity. The interior tech advocates for convenience, making long journeys as enjoyable as they are sustainable.

Volvo's EX40 is equally impressive with its streamlined technology focus, highlighting safety and user-friendly interfaces. It includes Volvo’s industry-leading safety systems, characterized by predictive algorithms and robust structural integrity, providing a safe and pleasant driving experience in an ever-complex traffic ecosystem.

EX40

Conclusion: A Personal Preference

Choosing between the Audi Q6 e-tron and the Volvo EX40 ultimately comes down to personal preference and usage priorities. If range and raw power top the list, the Audi Q6 e-tron makes an irresistible case. However, if a compact, safety-focused drive with a blend of luxury and practicality is more appealing, then the Volvo EX40 stands strong.

Both SUVs symbolize a future where performance does not have to be sacrificed for sustainability, pushing the boundaries of what electric vehicles can achieve. As the electric market continues to expand, these models highlight just what is possible in the quest for greener mobility solutions.

Frequently compared as well

Audi Q4 e-tron
Volvo EX40
VS
The Audi Q4 e-tron serves up German poise, refined finishes and a composed highway ride that says "premium" without shouting, while the Volvo EX40 counters with Scandinavian simplicity, clever safety tech and a sprightlier city demeanour. Choose the Q4 for serene comfort and perceived luxury, or …
Audi Q6 e-tron
Volvo EX60
VS
The Audi Q6 e‑tron and the Volvo EX60 go head‑to‑head as premium electric SUVs — one serving up sporty German precision, the other offering calm Scandinavian comfort and safety. We'll compare range, tech, driving feel and everyday usability to help you decide which one earns a spot in your garage …

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

EX40

Costs and Efficiency:

When it comes to price and running costs, the biggest differences usually appear. This is often where you see which car fits your budget better in the long run.

Volvo EX40 is noticeably cheaper – starting at 42,800 £ , while the Audi Q6 e-tron costs 54,400 £ . That’s a price difference of around 11,580 £.

In terms of energy consumption, the Audi Q6 e-tron is only slightly more efficient: consuming 15.6 kWh/100km compared to 16.6 kWh/100km for the Volvo EX40. That’s a difference of about 1 kWh/100km.

As for electric range, the Audi Q6 e-tron offers a bit more range – reaching up to 656 km, about 80 km more than the Volvo EX40.

Q6 e-tron

Engine and Performance:

Power, torque and acceleration are the classic benchmarks for car enthusiasts – and here, some clear differences start to show.

When it comes to engine power, the Audi Q6 e-tron offers only slightly more power – delivering 490 HP compared to 442 HP. That’s roughly 48 HP more horsepower.

When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Audi Q6 e-tron is marginally quicker – completing the sprint in 4.4 s, while the Volvo EX40 takes 4.6 s. That’s about 0.2 s quicker.

Looking at top speed, the Audi Q6 e-tron is noticeably faster – reaching 230 km/h, while the Volvo EX40 tops out at 180 km/h. The difference is around 50 km/h.

There’s also a difference in torque: the Audi Q6 e-tron delivers noticeably more torque with 855 Nm compared to 670 Nm. That’s about 185 Nm more.

EX40

Space and Everyday Use:

Beyond pure performance, interior space and usability matter most in daily life. This is where you see which car is more practical and versatile.

Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.

In terms of curb weight, Volvo EX40 is marginally lighter – 2,040 kg compared to 2,200 kg. The difference is around 160 kg.

Looking at boot space, the Audi Q6 e-tron offers visibly more boot space – 526 L compared to 410 L. That’s a difference of about 116 L.

For maximum load capacity, the Audi Q6 e-tron offers marginally more capacity – up to 1,529 L, about 129 L more than the Volvo EX40.

When it comes to payload, the Audi Q6 e-tron carries somewhat more – 540 kg compared to 480 kg. That’s a difference of about 60 kg.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The Audi Q6 e-tron is clearly superior overall in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

from £54,400
Q6 e-tron

Audi Q6 e-tron

  • Engine Type : Electric
  • Transmission : Automatic
  • Drive Type : Rear-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP : 252 - 490 HP
  • Consumption kWh/100km : 15.6 - 18.4 kWh/100km
  • Electric Range : 529 - 656 km
details
Volvo EX40
Audi Q6 e-tron

Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis

Volvo EX40

The Volvo EX40 wraps Scandinavian calm and clever practicality into a compact electric package that feels both premium and refreshingly uncomplicated. It's the grown-up answer to flashier rivals — a safe, comfy, and city-friendly EV with thoughtful tech that makes everyday driving quietly satisfying.

details
311247_XC40_Recharge
311246_XC40_Recharge
308521_Rear-wheel_drive_more_range_and_faster_charging_for_fully_electric_Volvo

Reviews Volvo EX40

5 (1 Reviews)
rate

No reviews yet. Share your experience and help others decide.

Audi Q6 e-tron

The Audi Q6 e-tron balances sleek, coupe-like styling with a roomy, upscale interior that feels modern without being showy. It delivers refined electric performance and smart tech that make daily driving effortless — the sort of EV that might make petrolheads grudgingly admit they fancy the future.

details
A242848_medium
A242855_medium
A244272_medium

Reviews Audi Q6 e-tron

4.9 (3 Reviews)
rate
Monika
6 Nov 2025, 16:29:37

A slightly inflated price relative to the equipment included in this car.

Bula
11 Oct 2025, 08:59:08

Comfortable, but feels a bit firmer (over small bumps) than the Q5. You can tell the car has some heft!! The electric power — 388 PS / 285 kW BEV — is incredible. The battery drops pretty quickly if you push the beast a little. The advertised 600 km range is generous on paper; expect more like 500, or even 450 in winter. The onboard technology is surprising and pushed to the extreme. After trying it, it's hard to go back to a non-electric model.

Frequently compared as well

Volvo EX40
Volvo XC40
VS
Choosing between the Volvo EX40 and XC40 is basically a choice between new‑school electric chic and old‑school SUV versatility: the EX40 is the fresh, all‑electric, city‑savvy compact with the latest tech and low running costs, while the XC40 is the tougher, more familiar compact that still offers …
Mercedes EQA
Volvo EX40
VS
The Mercedes EQA wraps premium Mercedes poise and MBUX polish into a compact EV that feels cosseting and refined, while the Volvo EX40 trades a bit of showroom gloss for Scandi practicality, airy space and a more efficient, no‑nonsense driving character. If you want badge and cabin glamour, go EQA; …
Volvo EX40
Volvo EX60
VS
Volvo’s EX40 and EX60 lock horns in a neatly staged duel: the nimble EX40 is a city-savvy, efficiency-first EV built for tight streets and savvy budgets, while the larger EX60 brings more space, stronger performance and longer range for family life and weekend escapes. Pick this showdown for a …
Audi Q6 e-tron
BMW iX
VS
The Audi Q6 e-tron feels like a precision-engineered salon on wheels—sleeker, more driver-focused, with crisp handling and an interior that whispers luxury rather than shouts it. The BMW iX is the bigger, bolder statement: cavernous, supremely comfortable and range-minded; pick the Q6 for the …
Kia EV3
Volvo EX40
VS
The cheeky Kia EV3 punches above its class with roomy packaging, lively acceleration and a price that makes city buyers grin, while the Volvo EX40 opts for Scandinavian calm — a cosseting interior, top-tier safety tech and steadier motorway manners. Choose the EV3 for value and zest; pick the EX40 …
Volvo EX40
Skoda Elroq
VS
Think of the Volvo EX40 as the cool, safety-obsessed Swede — minimalist cabin, clever tech and a calm, premium feel — while the Skoda Elroq is all about everyday practicality: roomy, sensible and great value for money. Want Scandinavian refinement and understated luxury? Pick the EX40; want space, …
Ford Explorer EV
Volvo EX40
VS
In one corner the burly, tech-heavy Ford Explorer EV tries to translate American SUV swagger into electric range and cargo-flex practicality, while the polished Volvo EX40 delivers Scandinavian poise, efficient packaging and a safety-first, city-friendly footprint. If you crave roomy presence and …
Audi Q5
Audi Q6 e-tron
VS
The Audi Q5 remains the comfortable, all‑round workhorse — traditional petrol, diesel and mild‑hybrid engines give familiar range, agreeable handling and a practical boot for family life. The Audi Q6 e‑tron, meanwhile, catapults you into Audi’s electric future with sleek looks, a tech‑packed cabin …
Volvo EX40
Audi Q6 e-tron

Costs and Consumption
Price
42,800 - 58,200 £
Price
54,400 - 82,500 £
Consumption L/100km
-
Consumption L/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
16.6 - 17.6 kWh/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
15.6 - 18.4 kWh/100km
Electric Range
480 - 576 km
Electric Range
529 - 656 km
Battery Capacity
67 - 79 kWh
Battery Capacity
75.8 - 94.9 kWh
co2
0 g/km
co2
0 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
-
Fuel tank capacity
-

Dimensions and Body
Body Type
SUV
Body Type
SUV
Seats
5
Seats
5
Doors
5
Doors
5
Curb weight
2,040 - 2,170 kg
Curb weight
2,200 - 2,425 kg
Trunk capacity
410 L
Trunk capacity
499 - 526 L
Length
4,440 mm
Length
4,771 mm
Width
1,863 mm
Width
1,939 - 1,965 mm
Height
1,647 mm
Height
1,665 - 1,685 mm
Max trunk capacity
1,400 L
Max trunk capacity
1,361 - 1,529 L
Payload
430 - 480 kg
Payload
540 kg

Engine and Performance
Engine Type
Electric
Engine Type
Electric
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
Drive Type
Rear-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
Rear-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
Power HP
238 - 442 HP
Power HP
252 - 490 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
4.6 - 7.3 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
4.4 - 7.6 s
Max Speed
180 km/h
Max Speed
210 - 230 km/h
Torque
420 - 670 Nm
Torque
450 - 855 Nm
Number of Cylinders
-
Number of Cylinders
-
Power kW
175 - 325 kW
Power kW
185 - 360 kW
Engine capacity
-
Engine capacity
-

General
Model Year
2,024
Model Year
2,024 - 2,025
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
Brand
Volvo
Brand
Audi
What drivetrain options does the Volvo EX40 have?

The Volvo EX40 is available as Rear-Wheel Drive or All-Wheel Drive.

DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved. The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.