VS

Volvo EX40 vs MG Cyberster comparison

Compare performance (442 HP vs 510 HP), boot space and price (45,200 £ vs 55,700 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Volvo EX40 or MG Cyberster?

Volvo EX40 vs MG Cyberster: Key differences

Volvo EX40

4.5 (2 Reviews)
rate
  • visibly cheaper
  • only slightly more efficient
  • a bit more electric range
  • substantially more trunk space
details

MG Cyberster

  • slightly more power
  • significantly quicker 0–100 km/h
  • barely lighter
details

All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.

By Achim Sedelmaier

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

EX40

Costs and Efficiency:

When it comes to price and running costs, the biggest differences usually appear. This is often where you see which car fits your budget better in the long run.

Volvo EX40 is visibly cheaper – starting at 45,200 £ , while the MG Cyberster costs 55,700 £ . That’s a price difference of around 10,457 £.

In terms of energy consumption, the Volvo EX40 is only slightly more efficient: consuming 16.6 kWh/100km compared to 16.7 kWh/100km for the MG Cyberster. That’s a difference of about 0.1 kWh/100km.

As for electric range, the Volvo EX40 offers a bit more range – reaching up to 576 km, about 69 km more than the MG Cyberster.

Cyberster

Engine and Performance:

Power, torque and acceleration say a lot about how a car feels on the road. This is where you see which model delivers more driving dynamics.

When it comes to engine power, the MG Cyberster offers slightly more power – delivering 510 HP compared to 442 HP. That’s roughly 68 HP more horsepower.

When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the MG Cyberster is significantly quicker – completing the sprint in 3.2 s, while the Volvo EX40 takes 4.6 s. That’s about 1.4 s quicker.

There’s also a difference in torque: the MG Cyberster delivers barely more torque with 725 Nm compared to 670 Nm. That’s about 55 Nm more.

EX40

Space and Everyday Use:

Cabin size, boot volume and payload all play a role in everyday practicality. Here, comfort and flexibility make the difference.

Seats: Volvo EX40 offers more seats – 5 vs 2.

In terms of curb weight, MG Cyberster is barely lighter – 1,960 kg compared to 2,040 kg. The difference is around 80 kg.

Looking at boot space, the Volvo EX40 offers substantially more boot space – 410 L compared to 200 L. That’s a difference of about 210 L.

When it comes to payload, the Volvo EX40 carries clearly more – 480 kg compared to 150 kg. That’s a difference of about 330 kg.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The Volvo EX40 is decisively ahead in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

from £45,200
EX40

Volvo EX40

  • Engine Type Electric
  • Transmission Automatic
  • Drive Type Rear-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP 238 - 442 HP
  • Consumption kWh/100km 16.6 - 17.6 kWh/100km
  • Electric Range 477 - 576 km
details

Frequently compared as well

Audi Q4 e-tron
Volvo EX40
VS
Comparing the Audi Q4 e-tron and the Volvo EX40 pits two compact premium electric SUVs against each other: the Q4 e-tron brings Audi’s refined driving dynamics and a traditionally upscale cabin, while the EX40 focuses on minimalist Scandinavian design, safety, and efficiency. Choose the Q4 for a …
Volvo EX40
Volvo EX60
VS
Volvo’s EX40 and EX60 lock horns in a neatly staged duel: the nimble EX40 is a city-savvy, efficiency-first EV built for tight streets and savvy budgets, while the larger EX60 brings more space, stronger performance and longer range for family life and weekend escapes. Pick this showdown for a …
Volvo EX40
MG Cyberster

Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis

Volvo EX40

The Volvo EX40 is a compact electric SUV that blends Scandinavian minimalism with a comfortable, high-quality interior suited to daily driving and longer trips. It prioritizes safety and intuitive technology, delivering a calm, refined experience that feels mature and easy to live with.

details
311247_XC40_Recharge
311246_XC40_Recharge
308521_Rear-wheel_drive_more_range_and_faster_charging_for_fully_electric_Volvo

Reviews Volvo EX40

4.5 (2 Reviews)
rate
Bent
16 May 2026, 19:14:01

Stable car and generally good build quality — but I hate the Google and infotainment systems, which both seem designed to irritate the user as much as possible.
I'm looking at a Toyota B4ZX AWD when the lease on my EX40 expires. I need to be able to tow 1,500 kg, but without going broke.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Family car
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money

MG Cyberster

The Cyberster is a striking new addition to the electric vehicle landscape, captivating enthusiasts with its sleek design and sporty silhouette. This all-electric convertible combines innovative technology with an exhilarating driving experience, making it a standout choice for those who crave adventure. With its commitment to sustainability and performance, the Cyberster is poised to redefine the way we think about modern roadsters.

details
serpimg_kJiKA7

Reviews MG Cyberster

No reviews yet. Share your experience and help others decide.

Frequently compared as well

Volvo EX40
Volvo XC40
VS
The Volvo EX40 and Volvo XC40 put two sides of Volvo’s compact-SUV line-up head-to-head: the EX40 is a dedicated electric model focused on efficiency, range and modern tech, while the XC40 is a versatile compact SUV available with petrol, hybrid and electric options that delivers a more traditional …
Volvo EX40
Skoda Elroq
VS
The Volvo EX40 and Skoda Elroq offer contemporary takes on the small SUV segment, but they aim at different buyers — Volvo leans toward premium refinement while Skoda focuses on pragmatic value and space. This comparison will look at driving character, interior practicality, technology and running …
Ford Explorer EV
Volvo EX40
VS
In one corner the burly, tech-heavy Ford Explorer EV tries to translate American SUV swagger into electric range and cargo-flex practicality, while the polished Volvo EX40 delivers Scandinavian poise, efficient packaging and a safety-first, city-friendly footprint. If you crave roomy presence and …
BMW iX1
Volvo EX40
VS
Choosing between the BMW iX1 and the Volvo EX40 comes down to whether you want a compact electric SUV that emphasizes BMW’s sporty, driver-focused dynamics or one that prioritizes Volvo’s calm, safety-minded comfort. Both deliver premium EV credentials, but they differ in ride character, interior …
Volvo EX40
VW ID.4
VS
The Volvo EX40 and the Volkswagen ID.4 represent two different takes on the compact electric SUV: the EX40 leans into Scandinavian design, premium materials and advanced safety, while the ID.4 prioritizes interior space, everyday practicality and value. I’ll compare their range, driving feel, …
Volvo EX30
Volvo EX40
VS
Comparing the Volvo EX30 and Volvo EX40 helps buyers choose between a compact, city-focused electric crossover and a slightly larger, more practical electric SUV. The EX30 prioritises agility, lower cost and urban ease, while the EX40 offers more interior space, range and family-friendly …
Volvo EX40
Kia EV5
VS
Comparing the Volvo EX40 and the Kia EV5 pits two modern compact electric crossovers against each other — the EX40 brings Volvo’s minimalist, safety-first premium feel while the EV5 focuses on spacious practicality and strong value. I’ll walk you through the key differences in range, interior, …
BMW iX2
Volvo EX40
VS
In the clash of the compact electric SUVs, the BMW iX2 delivers dynamic performance with its aggressive styling and technologically advanced interior, catering to the enthusiast driver. On the other hand, the Volvo EX40 emphasizes sustainability and safety, featuring recycled materials and Volvo's …
Volvo EX40
MG Cyberster

Costs and Consumption
Price
45,200 - 56,000 £
Price
55,700 - 60,000 £
Consumption L/100km
-
Consumption L/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
16.6 - 17.6 kWh/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
16.7 - 19.1 kWh/100km
Electric Range
477 - 576 km
Electric Range
443 - 507 km
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
-
co2
0 g/km
co2
0 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
-
Fuel tank capacity
-

Dimensions and Body
Body Type
SUV
Body Type
Roadster
Seats
5
Seats
2
Doors
-
Doors
-
Curb weight
2,040 - 2,170 kg
Curb weight
1,960 - 2,060 kg
Trunk capacity
410 L
Trunk capacity
200 L
Length
-
Length
-
Width
1,863 mm
Width
1,913 mm
Height
-
Height
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Payload
430 - 480 kg
Payload
150 kg

Engine and Performance
Engine Type
Electric
Engine Type
Electric
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
Drive Type
Rear-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
Rear-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
Power HP
238 - 442 HP
Power HP
340 - 510 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
4.6 - 7.3 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
3.2 - 5.2 s
Max Speed
-
Max Speed
-
Torque
420 - 670 Nm
Torque
475 - 725 Nm
Number of Cylinders
-
Number of Cylinders
-
Power kW
175 - 325 kW
Power kW
250 - 375 kW
Engine capacity
-
Engine capacity
-

General
Model Year
2,024 - 2,026
Model Year
2025
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
Brand
Volvo
Brand
MG
What drivetrain options does the Volvo EX40 have?

The Volvo EX40 is available as Rear-Wheel Drive or All-Wheel Drive.

DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved. The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.