VS

Volvo EX60 vs BMW iX3 comparison

Compare performance (680 HP vs 469 HP), boot space and price (54,000 £ vs 54,300 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Volvo EX60 or BMW iX3?

Volvo EX60 vs BMW iX3: Key differences

Volvo EX60

4.7 (1 Reviews)
rate
  • only slightly cheaper
  • visibly more power
  • very slightly more electric range
  • visibly quicker 0–100 km/h
  • only slightly lighter
details

BMW iX3

4.6 (4 Reviews)
rate
  • only slightly more efficient
details

All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.

By Achim Sedelmaier

EX60

BMW iX3 vs Volvo EX60: the real‑world matchup

The BMW iX3 and Volvo EX60 take very different routes to the same brief. The BMW iX3 leans into precision and efficiency with a tech‑forward cockpit, while the Volvo EX60 majors on calm comfort, safety and simple clarity. Both are quiet, premium electric SUVs, but they feel distinct the moment you turn a wheel. In thrust the Volvo feels brawnier; in steering and body control the BMW feels keener. This BMW iX3 VS Volvo EX60 matchup is about choosing the character that best fits how and where you drive.

iX3

Driving character and comfort

On a twisty road, the BMW iX3 is the more eager partner, with quicker responses and tighter body control. The Volvo EX60 prefers a relaxed gait, its adaptive damping smoothing edges and encouraging you to flow rather than attack. Noise levels are impressively low in both, but the BMW adds a layer of driver engagement that keen drivers will notice on everyday roundabouts and slip roads. The Volvo counters with a supple ride that stays composed over patchy tarmac, whereas the BMW can feel firm on big wheel options. If you like your SUV to feel planted and alert, the iX3 suits; if you want the miles to melt away in silence, the EX60 plays to that brief.

EX60

Long‑distance ease and charging

For long trips, both plan for short, high‑power stops and settle down quietly at motorway speeds. The iX3’s charging curve and real‑world efficiency mean fewer, shorter pauses on a cross‑country haul. Volvo’s approach is slightly more about serenity than speed between chargers, but its stop times are competitive and easy to live with. BMW’s motorway driver‑assist can even allow brief hands‑off within legal limits to reduce fatigue, while Volvo’s Pilot‑style assistance aims for unobtrusive support. If you chase maximum progress with minimum downtime, the BMW iX3 has the edge; if you value a more cushioned glide, the Volvo EX60 feels made for it.

iX3

Cabin tech and controls

Inside, the BMW iX3 goes futuristic: a panoramic display across the windscreen, a big central screen and powerful voice control take center stage. It looks clean and advanced, but key climate functions live in the screen, which some users will find a step too far. The Volvo EX60 is more conventional‑smart, with Google Built‑in, Gemini voice help, Apple CarPlay and welcome physical buttons on the steering wheel. Its curved central display is bold, though the lower edge of the driver’s cluster can sit just behind the wheel rim for some body types. Choose the BMW if you want cutting‑edge visuals and voice‑first operation; pick the Volvo if you prefer clear menus and familiar tactile shortcuts.

Space and everyday practicality

Family space is a shared strength: both give adults generous rear legroom and a flat floor, so child seats and long‑legged teens are easy. The iX3’s boot is big and there’s a useful front compartment, but the load floor isn’t perfectly level and you can’t drop the rear backs from the cargo area. Volvo matches the storage savvy with its own front compartment and neatly thought‑out cabin details, though published boot figures vary by source. Up front, the EX60 can feel a touch snug by the door for broad‑shouldered drivers, while the BMW is roomier but meaner with small‑item cubbies in the back. If your week is school runs and flat‑pack errands, both oblige, yet the BMW’s loading niggles and the Volvo’s front shoulder width are the trade‑offs to weigh.

City manners, value and buyer fit

In town, they’re both sizeable, but they behave differently. The EX60’s over‑shoulder view is tighter, so you’ll lean on the standard surround cameras; the iX3 gives a clearer forward view and light steering, with driver aids easing parking. On pricing and kit, the Volvo often bundles more driver aids as standard and can shade the BMW at list price, while the BMW trades back with efficiency and road‑trip pace. Drivers who want serene comfort, safety‑first tech and straightforward controls will click with the Volvo EX60. Those who prize precision, charging speed and a more engaging feel will be happier in the BMW iX3—then the detailed specs below will help you lock in the right build.

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

EX60

Costs and Efficiency:

When it comes to price and running costs, the biggest differences usually appear. This is often where you see which car fits your budget better in the long run.

Volvo EX60 is only slightly cheaper – starting at 54,000 £ , while the BMW iX3 costs 54,300 £ . That’s a price difference of around 351 £.

In terms of energy consumption, the BMW iX3 is only slightly more efficient: consuming 14.6 kWh/100km compared to 14.9 kWh/100km for the Volvo EX60. That’s a difference of about 0.3 kWh/100km.

As for electric range, the Volvo EX60 offers very slightly more range – reaching up to 810 km, about 5 km more than the BMW iX3.

iX3

Engine and Performance:

Power, torque and acceleration say a lot about how a car feels on the road. This is where you see which model delivers more driving dynamics.

When it comes to engine power, the Volvo EX60 offers visibly more power – delivering 680 HP compared to 469 HP. That’s roughly 211 HP more horsepower.

When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Volvo EX60 is visibly quicker – completing the sprint in 3.9 s, while the BMW iX3 takes 4.9 s. That’s about 1 s quicker.

There’s also a difference in torque: the Volvo EX60 delivers a bit more torque with 790 Nm compared to 645 Nm. That’s about 145 Nm more.

EX60

Space and Everyday Use:

Cabin size, boot volume and payload all play a role in everyday practicality. Here, comfort and flexibility make the difference.

Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.

In terms of curb weight, Volvo EX60 is only slightly lighter – 2,189 kg compared to 2,360 kg. The difference is around 171 kg.

When it comes to payload, the BMW iX3 carries barely more – 465 kg compared to 461 kg. That’s a difference of about 4 kg.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The Volvo EX60 stands well ahead of its rival in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

from £54,000
EX60

Volvo EX60

  • Engine Type Electric
  • Transmission Automatic
  • Drive Type Rear-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP 374 - 680 HP
  • Consumption kWh/100km 14.9 - 16.2 kWh/100km
  • Electric Range 611 - 810 km
Volvo EX60
BMW iX3

Costs and Consumption

View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance

View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body

View detailed analysis

Volvo EX60

The Volvo EX60 is a stylish electric SUV that pairs Scandinavian minimalism with a high-quality, comfortable cabin and an intuitive infotainment experience. It delivers a composed, refined ride with advanced safety and driver-assist systems that make daily driving relaxed and confident.

details

BMW iX3

The BMW iX3 is an electric SUV that delivers the composed, premium driving experience BMW buyers expect. With a calm, refined cabin and practical everyday usability, it’s a strong choice for those who want electric motoring without giving up luxury and comfort.

details
Volvo EX60
BMW iX3

Costs and Consumption

Price
54,000 - 67,500 £
Price
54,300 - 66,300 £
Consumption L/100km
-
Consumption L/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
14.9 - 16.2 kWh/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
14.6 - 15.1 kWh/100km
Electric Range
611 - 810 km
Electric Range
635 - 805 km
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
-
co2
0 g/km
co2
0 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
-
Fuel tank capacity
-

Dimensions and Body

Body Type
SUV
Body Type
SUV
Seats
5
Seats
5
Doors
-
Doors
-
Curb weight
2,189 - 2,405 kg
Curb weight
2,360 kg
Trunk capacity
523 L
Trunk capacity
-
Length
-
Length
-
Width
1,899 mm
Width
1,895 mm
Height
-
Height
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Payload
455 - 461 kg
Payload
465 kg

Engine and Performance

Engine Type
Electric
Engine Type
Electric
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
Drive Type
Rear-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive, Rear-Wheel Drive
Power HP
374 - 680 HP
Power HP
320 - 469 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
3.9 - 5.9 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
4.9 - 5.9 s
Max Speed
-
Max Speed
-
Torque
480 - 790 Nm
Torque
500 - 645 Nm
Number of Cylinders
-
Number of Cylinders
-
Power kW
275 - 500 kW
Power kW
235 - 345 kW
Engine capacity
-
Engine capacity
-

General

Model Year
2,026 - 2,027
Model Year
2026
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
Brand
Volvo
Brand
BMW
DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved. The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.