Compare performance (340 HP vs 340 HP), boot space and price (34,600 £ vs 41,900 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – VW ID.4 or Skoda Enyaq?
All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.
As the electric vehicle market continues to expand, two names consistently rise to prominence: Skoda Enyaq and VW ID.4. Both belonging to the Volkswagen Group, these electrified SUVs offer enticing blends of performance, efficiency, and innovation. Let's dive into a detailed comparison to see how they stack up against each other.
In terms of design, the Skoda Enyaq and VW ID.4 both embrace the sleek, modern aesthetics characteristic of electric vehicles. The Enyaq measures 4,658 mm in length, 1,879 mm in width, and up to 1,623 mm in height, creating a robust yet refined presence on the road. Meanwhile, the ID.4 holds a slightly more compact stance with a length of up to 4,584 mm, width of 1,852 mm, and height up to 1,634 mm.
Both offer spacious interiors with seating for five passengers, but the Enyaq takes a slight lead in cargo capacity, boasting up to 585 liters compared to the ID.4's 543 liters.
Under the hood, or rather, beneath the chassis, both models offer a choice between rear-wheel drive and all-wheel drive configurations. The Enyaq comes equipped with power outputs ranging from 204 to 286 horsepower, while the ID.4 provides options from 170 to an impressive 340 horsepower, highlighting a more diverse range of performance capabilities.
The acceleration from 0 to 100 km/h also shows competitive prowess. The Enyaq can achieve this in as little as 6.7 seconds, while the ID.4 is slightly more nimble with a range that can dip down to 5.4 seconds in its most powerful variant.
Battery capacity in these electric SUVs is pivotal in determining driving range and efficiency. The Enyaq offers two battery options at 59 kWh and 77 kWh. In contrast, the ID.4 offers a slightly smaller base battery at 52 kWh, alongside a 77 kWh option.
When it comes to electric range, the Enyaq excels with distances up to an impressive 587 km on a single charge. The ID.4 follows closely, delivering up to 572 km, making both vehicles suitable for long-distance travel without frequent charging.
Both the Skoda Enyaq and VW ID.4 demonstrate impressive efficiency. The Enyaq's consumption starts as low as 14.8 kWh/100km, while the ID.4 begins at 15.8 kWh/100km. As expected with electric vehicles, both score an A in CO2 efficiency, delivering zero emissions during operation.
The Enyaq and ID.4 highlight the VW Group's commitment to sustainability and innovation. By utilizing eco-friendly materials and integrating state-of-the-art technology, they elevate the EV experience. Both models support over-the-air updates, ensuring that the software remains cutting-edge without requiring dealership visits.
Choosing between the Skoda Enyaq and the VW ID.4 largely depends on individual preferences and priorities. The Enyaq offers a slightly larger cargo space and impressive range efficiency, whereas the ID.4 provides a greater spectrum of power output and brisker acceleration in its top configurations. Regardless of choice, both models represent the future of sustainable and innovative automotive design.
When it comes to price and running costs, the biggest differences usually appear. This is often where you see which car fits your budget better in the long run.
VW ID.4 is noticeably cheaper – starting at 34,600 £ , while the Skoda Enyaq costs 41,900 £ . That’s a price difference of around 7,342 £.
In terms of energy consumption, the Skoda Enyaq is very slightly more efficient: consuming 14.8 kWh/100km compared to 15.6 kWh/100km for the VW ID.4. That’s a difference of about 0.8 kWh/100km.
As for electric range, the Skoda Enyaq offers very slightly more range – reaching up to 587 km, about 18 km more than the VW ID.4.
Power, torque and acceleration are the classic benchmarks for car enthusiasts – and here, some clear differences start to show.
Both models deliver identical power – 340 HP each.
Both models accelerate almost equally fast – 5.4 s from 0 to 100 km/h.
Both models offer the same torque – 679 Nm.
Cabin size, boot volume and payload all play a role in everyday practicality. Here, comfort and flexibility make the difference.
Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.
In terms of curb weight, VW ID.4 is a bit lighter – 1,975 kg compared to 2,179 kg. The difference is around 204 kg.
Looking at boot space, the Skoda Enyaq offers very slightly more boot space – 585 L compared to 543 L. That’s a difference of about 42 L.
When it comes to payload, the VW ID.4 carries somewhat more – 551 kg compared to 489 kg. That’s a difference of about 62 kg.
The VW ID.4 comes out modestly ahead in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.
The VW ID.4 is a roomy, comfort‑focused electric SUV that makes family life and daily commuting effortless with a practical interior and a calm, efficient powertrain. It’s reassuring and sensible rather than thrilling — well suited to long stretches thanks to a relaxed ride and useful assistance systems, but the touch‑centric controls, restricted rear visibility and muted steering keep it from exciting drivers who want sportier dynamics.
details
The Skoda Enyaq is a reassuring, family‑first electric SUV that trades sporting drama for exceptional quiet, roomy rear seats and a genuinely practical boot. It’s remarkably easy to live with thanks to sensible controls and steady fast charging, though the touchscreen‑led infotainment can be sluggish and driving enthusiasts looking for sharp handling should look elsewhere.
details
Costs and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
34,600 - 47,200 £
|
Price
41,900 - 52,200 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
-
|
Consumption L/100km
-
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
15.6 - 17 kWh/100km
|
Consumption kWh/100km
14.8 - 16.2 kWh/100km
|
|
Electric Range
356 - 569 km
|
Electric Range
538 - 587 km
|
|
Battery Capacity
52 - 77 kWh
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
|
co2
0 g/km
|
co2
0 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
SUV
|
Body Type
SUV
|
|
Seats
5
|
Seats
5
|
|
Doors
5
|
Doors
-
|
|
Curb weight
1,975 - 2,248 kg
|
Curb weight
2,179 - 2,293 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
543 L
|
Trunk capacity
570 - 585 L
|
|
Length
4,582 - 4,584 mm
|
Length
-
|
|
Width
1,852 mm
|
Width
1,879 mm
|
|
Height
1,619 - 1,634 mm
|
Height
-
|
|
Max trunk capacity
1,575 L
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
|
Payload
515 - 551 kg
|
Payload
443 - 489 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Electric
|
Engine Type
Electric
|
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
|
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
|
|
Drive Type
Rear-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
Rear-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
170 - 340 HP
|
Power HP
286 - 340 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
5.4 - 9 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
5.4 - 6.7 s
|
|
Max Speed
160 - 180 km/h
|
Max Speed
-
|
|
Torque
310 - 679 Nm
|
Torque
545 - 679 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
-
|
Number of Cylinders
-
|
|
Power kW
125 - 250 kW
|
Power kW
210 - 250 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
-
|
Engine capacity
-
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2,023 - 2,025
|
Model Year
2025
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
|
|
Brand
VW
|
Brand
Skoda
|
Deutschland
France
Nederland
Great Britain
Sverige
Danmark
Suomi
Italia
Polska
España