VS

XPeng G6 vs Skoda Enyaq comparison

Compare performance (487 HP vs 340 HP), boot space and price (37,400 £ vs 41,900 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – XPeng G6 or Skoda Enyaq?

XPeng G6 vs Skoda Enyaq: Key differences

XPeng G6

5 (3 Reviews)
rate
  • slightly cheaper
  • clearly more power
  • visibly quicker 0–100 km/h
  • only slightly lighter
details

Skoda Enyaq

4.5 (4 Reviews)
rate
  • slightly more efficient
  • slightly more electric range
  • marginally more trunk space
details

All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.

By Achim Sedelmaier

G6

In the rapidly evolving landscape of electric vehicles, two models stand out for their combination of performance, technology, and practicality: the Skoda Enyaq and the XPeng G6. Both SUVs bring unique features and innovations to the table, making them strong contenders in the growing EV market. Here, we delve into a comprehensive comparison of these two vehicles, analyzing their technical specifications, innovations, and overall appeal.

Enyaq

Design and Dimensions

The Skoda Enyaq exhibits a modern SUV design, boasting a length of approximately 4649 mm, with a width of 1879 mm and a height of 1621 mm. This design not only emphasizes its sporty appearance but also provides ample room inside for passengers and cargo. The trunk capacity of the Enyaq stands at 585 liters, making it an excellent choice for families and long journeys.

On the other hand, the XPeng G6 is slightly larger, measuring 4753 mm in length, 1920 mm in width, and 1650 mm in height. Although the trunk capacity is slightly less at 571 liters, the G6’s spacious interior still provides comfortable seating for five, accommodating both driver and passengers without compromise.

G6

Powertrain and Performance

When it comes to powertrains, both vehicles offer impressive options. The Skoda Enyaq features a choice of rear-wheel and all-wheel drive systems, with power outputs ranging from 204 HP to 340 HP. The Enyaq's acceleration from 0-100 km/h ranges from a respectable 5.5 seconds to 8.1 seconds, depending on the variant.

In contrast, the XPeng G6 takes performance a step further with a top output of 476 HP in its most powerful configuration. This allows the G6 to achieve an astounding acceleration time of just 4.1 seconds, making it one of the quickest electric SUVs on the market. Like the Enyaq, the G6 also offers both rear-wheel and all-wheel drive options, catering to diverse driving preferences.

Enyaq

Battery and Electric Range

The Enyaq is equipped with two battery capacities: 59 kWh and 77 kWh, providing an extensive electric range of up to 587 km. This impressive range makes it suitable for daily commutes and longer trips alike.

Meanwhile, the XPeng G6 comes with a larger 87.5 kWh battery option, achieving an electric range of 570 km. The G6 also has an additional 66 kWh battery variant, which, while reducing range, allows for a balance between cost and efficiency. Both vehicles demonstrate remarkable energy efficiency; however, the Enyaq edges it out slightly with lower consumption figures, ranging from 14.6 to 16.4 kWh/100 km compared to the G6's 17.5 to 17.9 kWh/100 km.

Innovative Technologies

In terms of technological innovation, both vehicles are equipped with state-of-the-art features that enhance driving experience and safety. The Skoda Enyaq incorporates advanced driver-assistance systems, ensuring a high level of safety and convenience for drivers. Features like adaptive cruise control, lane assist, and a user-friendly infotainment system make the Enyaq a technologically advanced choice for modern drivers.

The XPeng G6, however, takes a more aggressive approach to technology integration. Known for its software innovations, XPeng offers cutting-edge features like autonomous driving capabilities and a sophisticated voice command system. This means G6 drivers can experience an elevated level of convenience and connectivity, bridging the gap between drivers and their vehicles.

Conclusion

Both the Skoda Enyaq and XPeng G6 present compelling choices for potential electric vehicle buyers. The Enyaq shines with its practical design, efficiency, and value for money. In contrast, the XPeng G6 stands out for its superior performance, advanced technology, and luxurious comfort. Ultimately, the choice between these two models may come down to individual preferences regarding performance versus practicality. As the automotive industry continues to embrace electric mobility, both models set a high standard for what modern electric SUVs can offer.

Video - Skoda Enyaq

Video Thumbnail

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

G6

Costs and Efficiency:

Price and efficiency are key factors when choosing a car – and this is often where the real differences emerge.

XPeng G6 is slightly cheaper – starting at 37,400 £ , while the Skoda Enyaq costs 41,900 £ . That’s a price difference of around 4,543 £.

In terms of energy consumption, the Skoda Enyaq is slightly more efficient: consuming 14.8 kWh/100km compared to 17.3 kWh/100km for the XPeng G6. That’s a difference of about 2.5 kWh/100km.

As for electric range, the Skoda Enyaq offers slightly more range – reaching up to 587 km, about 62 km more than the XPeng G6.

Enyaq

Engine and Performance:

Power, torque and acceleration say a lot about how a car feels on the road. This is where you see which model delivers more driving dynamics.

When it comes to engine power, the XPeng G6 offers clearly more power – delivering 487 HP compared to 340 HP. That’s roughly 147 HP more horsepower.

When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the XPeng G6 is visibly quicker – completing the sprint in 4.1 s, while the Skoda Enyaq takes 5.4 s. That’s about 1.3 s quicker.

There’s also a difference in torque: the Skoda Enyaq delivers marginally more torque with 679 Nm compared to 660 Nm. That’s about 19 Nm more.

G6

Space and Everyday Use:

Whether family car or daily driver – which one offers more room, flexibility and comfort?

Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.

In terms of curb weight, XPeng G6 is only slightly lighter – 2,065 kg compared to 2,179 kg. The difference is around 114 kg.

Looking at boot space, the Skoda Enyaq offers marginally more boot space – 585 L compared to 571 L. That’s a difference of about 14 L.

When it comes to payload, the Skoda Enyaq carries only slightly more – 489 kg compared to 475 kg. That’s a difference of about 14 kg.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The XPeng G6 is far ahead overall in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

from £37,400
G6

XPeng G6

  • Engine Type : Electric
  • Transmission : Automatic
  • Drive Type : Rear-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP : 252 - 487 HP
  • Consumption kWh/100km : 17.3 - 18.4 kWh/100km
  • Electric Range : 455 - 525 km
XPeng G6
Skoda Enyaq

Costs and Consumption

View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance

View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body

View detailed analysis

XPeng G6

The XPeng G6 looks like a sleeker, tech-rich alternative to conventional electric SUVs, with an interior that feels modern, airy and purposefully designed for everyday comfort. On the road it’s composed and surprisingly engaging, giving drivers a smart mix of calm refinement and a playful streak — not bad for a car that quietly challenges the usual premium suspects.

details

Skoda Enyaq

The Skoda Enyaq is a reassuring, family‑first electric SUV that trades sporting drama for exceptional quiet, roomy rear seats and a genuinely practical boot. It’s remarkably easy to live with thanks to sensible controls and steady fast charging, though the touchscreen‑led infotainment can be sluggish and driving enthusiasts looking for sharp handling should look elsewhere.

details
XPeng G6
Skoda Enyaq

Costs and Consumption

Price
37,400 - 44,200 £
Price
41,900 - 52,200 £
Consumption L/100km
-
Consumption L/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
17.3 - 18.4 kWh/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
14.8 - 16.2 kWh/100km
Electric Range
455 - 525 km
Electric Range
538 - 587 km
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
-
co2
0 g/km
co2
0 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
-
Fuel tank capacity
-

Dimensions and Body

Body Type
SUV
Body Type
SUV
Seats
5
Seats
5
Doors
-
Doors
-
Curb weight
2,065 - 2,220 kg
Curb weight
2,179 - 2,293 kg
Trunk capacity
571 L
Trunk capacity
570 - 585 L
Length
-
Length
-
Width
1,920 mm
Width
1,879 mm
Height
-
Height
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Payload
470 - 475 kg
Payload
443 - 489 kg

Engine and Performance

Engine Type
Electric
Engine Type
Electric
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
Drive Type
Rear-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
Rear-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
Power HP
252 - 487 HP
Power HP
286 - 340 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
4.1 - 6.9 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
5.4 - 6.7 s
Max Speed
-
Max Speed
-
Torque
440 - 660 Nm
Torque
545 - 679 Nm
Number of Cylinders
-
Number of Cylinders
-
Power kW
185 - 358 kW
Power kW
210 - 250 kW
Engine capacity
-
Engine capacity
-

General

Model Year
2025
Model Year
2025
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
Brand
XPeng
Brand
Skoda
DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved. The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.