Suzuki S-Cross alternatives & comparisons

Here you can find alternatives to the Suzuki S-Cross, based on existing comparison pages and popular model matchups. We currently show 6 suitable models as a starting point for your buying decision.

Suzuki S-Cross

Alternative models

These models are frequently compared with the Suzuki S-Cross and are good next research steps.

from £23,600
Vitara

Suzuki Vitara

  • Engine Type Petrol MHEV, Electric
  • Transmission Automatic, Manual
  • Drive Type Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP 110 - 184 HP
  • Consumption L/100km 5.3 - 5.8 L/100km
  • Consumption kWh/100km 14.9 - 16.6 kWh/100km
  • Electric Range 344 - 426 km

Suzuki Vitara as a suitable alternative to Suzuki S-Cross

The Suzuki S-Cross and the Suzuki Vitara take different approaches to the compact SUV segment: the S-Cross leans towards comfort, refinement and value, while the Vitara offers a more rugged look and a livelier driving character. I’ll outline their strengths in space, ride, economy and equipment to help you pick the one that best fits your priorities.

The Suzuki Vitara is a practical compact SUV that balances a comfortable, composed ride with easy-to-live-with interior space, making it well suited for daily driving and weekend getaways. It's widely praised for reliable engineering and sensible running costs, offering straightforward value to buyers who want a no-nonsense, economical crossover.

Quick data check: Suzuki Vitara

  • significantly more power
  • marginally lighter
from £23,700
Yaris Cross

Toyota Yaris Cross

  • Engine Type Full Hybrid
  • Transmission Automatic
  • Drive Type Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP 116 - 130 HP
  • Consumption L/100km 4.5 - 4.8 L/100km

Toyota Yaris Cross as a suitable alternative to Suzuki S-Cross

The Suzuki S-Cross and the Toyota Yaris Cross are compact crossovers aimed at buyers who want SUV practicality in a city-friendly package. The S-Cross leans toward space and straightforward value, while the Yaris Cross prioritises hybrid efficiency, urban agility and advanced safety tech—so pick based on whether you need room or fuel economy.

The Toyota Yaris Cross blends the maneuverability of a small hatch with the higher driving position and practicality of a crossover, wrapped in Toyota's dependable build quality. It suits urban buyers who need easy parking, flexible cargo space and a comfortable, economical daily driver.

Quick data check: Toyota Yaris Cross

  • somewhat more power
  • moderately more efficient
  • marginally lighter
from £25,700
CX-30

Mazda CX-30

  • Engine Type Petrol MHEV
  • Transmission Manual, Automatic
  • Drive Type Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP 140 - 186 HP
  • Consumption L/100km 5.7 - 6.6 L/100km

Mazda CX-30 as a suitable alternative to Suzuki S-Cross

If you want a small SUV that actually feels like a car, the Mazda CX‑30 wins hearts with taut handling, upscale interior materials and a sharper, more rewarding drive. The Suzuki S‑Cross is the sensible sibling — roomier, cheaper to run and easier on the wallet, making it the smarter pick for families who prefer practicality over pizzazz.

The Mazda CX-30 blends Mazda’s upscale styling with a compact crossover body, offering a refined interior and engaging driving dynamics. It’s a practical choice for buyers who want a premium feel and agile handling in a city-friendly package.

Quick data check: Mazda CX-30

  • significantly more power
from £16,300
Duster

Dacia Duster

  • Engine Type Petrol MHEV, Full Hybrid, LPG
  • Transmission Manual, Automatic
  • Drive Type Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP 115 - 158 HP
  • Consumption L/100km 4.7 - 7.6 L/100km

Dacia Duster as a suitable alternative to Suzuki S-Cross

Choosing between the Dacia Duster and the Suzuki S-Cross is about whether you want rugged simplicity and great value or a more refined, comfortable compact crossover. This comparison will focus on real-world space, economy, driving feel and running costs to help you decide which suits your needs.

The Dacia Duster is a straightforward, budget-friendly SUV that prioritizes practicality and value over flashy features. Its rugged styling and simple, roomy interior make it a sensible choice for buyers who want capable everyday transport without paying for extras they won’t use.

Quick data check: Dacia Duster

  • clearly cheaper
  • markedly more power
  • slightly more efficient
  • moderately more trunk space
from £31,300
Tucson

Hyundai Tucson

  • Engine Type Petrol, Full Hybrid, Plug-in Hybrid, Diesel MHEV
  • Transmission Manual, Automatic
  • Drive Type Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP 136 - 288 HP
  • Consumption L/100km 2.7 - 7.6 L/100km
  • Electric Range 63 - 70 km

Hyundai Tucson as a suitable alternative to Suzuki S-Cross

Comparing the Hyundai Tucson and the Suzuki S‑Cross: both are compact SUVs aimed at buyers who want practicality and low running costs, but they take different approaches — the Tucson leans toward space, comfort and technology, while the S‑Cross focuses on affordability, simplicity and efficiency. Below I break down the main differences to help you decide which suits your needs. Size & practicality - Hyundai Tucson: noticeably larger inside and out — more rear legroom and a bigger boot, so it’s the better choice for families, car seats and longer trips with luggage. Higher roofline and wider cabin make it more comfortable for adults in the back. - Suzuki S‑Cross: more compact and easier to park in tight city spaces. Boot and rear seat space are practical for everyday use but won’t match the Tucson if you regularly carry three adults or lots of kit. Engines, performance & drivetrain - Hyundai Tucson: offered with a wider range of powertrains (conventional petrol, mild-hybrid, full hybrid and in some markets plug‑in hybrid). That gives better mid-range performance and lower motorway refinement on the hybrid options. Available AWD on higher trims if you need light off-road/towing capability. - Suzuki S‑Cross: typically uses smaller, simpler petrol engines (often with mild‑hybrid assistance). It’s economical and light on fuel in town, but it’s not as powerful on the motorway or when fully loaded. Usually front‑wheel drive is standard; AWD may be available on some versions. Fuel economy & running costs - Tucson: hybrid variants deliver good real-world economy and lower emissions, but initial purchase price and some servicing/repair costs can be higher. PHEV can cut fuel use dramatically for short daily commutes if you can charge. - S‑Cross: cheaper to buy and generally lower insurance and running costs thanks to smaller engines and simpler tech. Servicing tends to be straightforward and affordable. Comfort, refinement & interior quality - Hyundai Tucson: more upmarket interior materials, larger infotainment screens and more creature comforts (heated/ventilated seats, higher levels of active safety tech). Better NVH (noise, vibration, harshness) control on the motorway. - Suzuki S‑Cross: functional, well-built interior that prioritises usefulness over flair. Controls are simple and intuitive, but materials and tech are more basic compared with the Tucson. Safety & technology - Hyundai Tucson: usually fitted with more advanced ADAS as standard or available (adaptive cruise, lane keep assist, automatic emergency braking, blind spot monitoring). Overall strong on active safety and driver aids. - Suzuki S‑Cross: offers necessary safety equipment but fewer high-end driver assistance systems as standard. Good for buyers who want essentials without extra complexity. Practical ownership points - Depreciation/resale: Tucson’s stronger equipment and brand recognition often help resale, but higher initial price means larger nominal depreciation. Suzuki’s lower purchase price can make it an economical used buy. - Reliability & maintenance: both brands have solid reputations; Suzuki has long been seen as particularly reliable and cheap to maintain, while Hyundai offers good warranty coverage in many markets which reduces ownership risk. Who should pick the Tucson - You need more space, a smoother motorway ride and family-friendly features. - You want modern tech and a wider choice of efficient hybrid or plug‑in options. - You’re willing to pay a bit more for comfort, safety tech and a premium feel. Who should pick the S‑Cross - Your priority is a lower purchase price, easy urban driving and low running/insurance costs. - You don’t need the extra space or advanced hybrid systems — you want a reliable, practical compact SUV. - You value simplicity, economy and easy parking. Bottom line Choose the Hyundai Tucson if you value interior space, refinement, stronger performance options and more advanced safety/tech. Choose the Suzuki S‑Cross if you want a smaller, cheaper-to-buy-and-run SUV that’s practical for everyday city and suburban use. Test-drive both in the trim and engine you'll likely buy — that’s the quickest way to see which fits your driving style, family needs and budget.

The Hyundai Tucson is a well-rounded compact SUV that blends modern styling with a comfortable, thoughtfully laid-out interior, making it appealing for daily driving and family use. It delivers a calm ride, a generous level of equipment for the price, and sensible practicality, so it's a smart choice if you want a straightforward, dependable crossover without fuss.

Quick data check: Hyundai Tucson

  • clearly more power
  • considerably more efficient
  • markedly more trunk space
from £20,600
Bigster

Dacia Bigster

  • Engine Type Petrol MHEV, Full Hybrid, LPG
  • Transmission Manual, Automatic
  • Drive Type Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP 140 - 158 HP
  • Consumption L/100km 4.7 - 7.2 L/100km

Quick data check: Dacia Bigster

  • barely cheaper
  • clearly more power
  • moderately more efficient
  • visibly more trunk space
DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved. The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.