Suzuki S-Cross alternatives & comparisons

Here you can find alternatives to the Suzuki S-Cross, based on existing comparison pages and popular model matchups. We currently show 6 suitable models as a starting point for your buying decision.

The Suzuki S-Cross is a neatly packaged crossover that puts everyday practicality ahead of showy theatrics, offering a comfortable cabin and predictable handling that suit family life and weekend errands alike. It’s not a headline-grabber, but its sensible packaging, low-key charm and reputation for reliability make it a shrewd choice for buyers who prefer smart value over flash.

Suzuki S-Cross

Alternative models

These models are frequently compared with the Suzuki S-Cross and are good next research steps.

from £23,600
Vitara

Suzuki Vitara

  • Engine Type : Petrol MHEV, Full Hybrid, Electric
  • Transmission : Manuel, Automatic
  • Drive Type : Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP : 110 - 184 HP
  • Consumption L/100km : 5 - 5.9 L/100km
  • Consumption kWh/100km : 14.9 - 16.6 kWh/100km
  • Electric Range : 344 - 426 km

Suzuki Vitara as a suitable alternative to Suzuki S-Cross

Suzuki’s compact crossover siblings square off: S-Cross vs Vitara. One leans practical and polished, the other flirts with adventure—let’s find out which Suzuki deserves your driveway and your fuel money.

The Vitara is a city-smart SUV with a cheeky streak of off-road promise, perfect for drivers who want practicality without pretense. It’s honest, easy to live with and surprisingly likeable, a sensible companion for everyday adventures and weekend escapes.

Quick data check: Suzuki Vitara

  • marginally cheaper
  • somewhat more trunk space
  • significantly more power
  • marginally more efficient
  • marginally lighter
from £25,200
CX-30

Mazda CX-30

  • Engine Type : Petrol MHEV
  • Transmission : Manuel, Automatic
  • Drive Type : Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP : 140 - 186 HP
  • Consumption L/100km : 5.7 - 6.6 L/100km

Mazda CX-30 as a suitable alternative to Suzuki S-Cross

If you want a small SUV that actually feels like a car, the Mazda CX‑30 wins hearts with taut handling, upscale interior materials and a sharper, more rewarding drive. The Suzuki S‑Cross is the sensible sibling — roomier, cheaper to run and easier on the wallet, making it the smarter pick for families who prefer practicality over pizzazz.

The Mazda CX-30 blends sleek coupe-like lines with the practicality of a compact crossover, feeling more premium than its price tag suggests. It’s a joy to drive for anyone who likes a taut chassis and an interior that treats daily commutes like a small luxury escape.

Quick data check: Mazda CX-30

  • somewhat cheaper
  • very slightly more efficient
  • somewhat lighter
  • significantly more power
from £29,600
Qashqai

Nissan Qashqai

  • Engine Type : Petrol MHEV, Full Hybrid
  • Transmission : Manuel, Automatic
  • Drive Type : Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP : 140 - 205 HP
  • Consumption L/100km : 4.5 - 6.8 L/100km

Nissan Qashqai as a suitable alternative to Suzuki S-Cross

Choosing a compact SUV is more about lifestyle than just luggage space, and in this matchup the Nissan Qashqai brings glossy tech, a classy cabin and composed road manners. The Suzuki S-Cross counters with sensible packaging, economical engines and value that won’t make your wallet faint — which one will earn a spot on your driveway?

The Nissan Qashqai blends practical, family-friendly packaging with SUV styling that refuses to shout, making it a sensible and dependable choice for everyday life. It’s comfortable to live with, economical on the road, and neatly equipped enough to feel modern without ever feeling precious — perfect if you want crossover versatility without the drama.

Quick data check: Nissan Qashqai

  • visibly cheaper
  • a bit lighter
  • significantly more power
  • slightly more efficient
  • a bit more trunk space
from £23,700
Yaris Cross

Toyota Yaris Cross

  • Engine Type : Full Hybrid
  • Transmission : Automatic
  • Drive Type : Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP : 116 - 130 HP
  • Consumption L/100km : 4.5 - 4.8 L/100km

Toyota Yaris Cross as a suitable alternative to Suzuki S-Cross

The Suzuki S-Cross is the sensible family crossover: generous boot, honest equipment and wallet-friendly pricing that make it a practical pick if you prioritise space and value. The Toyota Yaris Cross is the clever city slicker — compact, refined, and available with efficient hybrid power and that reassuring Toyota badge, so if urban agility and low running costs matter more, it’s the smarter buy.

The Toyota Yaris Cross takes the jaunty personality of the Yaris and gives it a taller stance and a bit more practicality, so you get city-friendly agility with added SUV presence. It’s easy to live with, economical on the daily grind, and smartly packaged — a sensible pick for buyers who want fuss-free transport with a touch of character.

Quick data check: Toyota Yaris Cross

  • marginally cheaper
  • marginally more trunk space
  • somewhat more power
  • moderately more efficient
  • marginally lighter
from £31,700
Corolla Cross

Toyota Corolla Cross

  • Engine Type : Full Hybrid
  • Transmission : Automatic
  • Drive Type : Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP : 140 - 180 HP
  • Consumption L/100km : 4.9 - 5.3 L/100km

Toyota Corolla Cross as a suitable alternative to Suzuki S-Cross

The Suzuki S‑Cross is the scrappy, value-packed compact SUV — cheaper to buy, nimbler in town and surprisingly practical, while the Toyota Corolla Cross trades a little driving sparkle for Toyota’s famed refinement, stronger safety kit and an efficient hybrid powertrain. Pick the S‑Cross if you want a wallet-friendly, fun-to-drive runabout; choose the Corolla Cross if you prize space, long-term reliability and the kind of fuel economy that quietly keeps your running costs down.

The Toyota Corolla Cross takes the familiar Corolla recipe, lifts it up and dresses it in SUV clothes — sensible, comfortable and blessedly unflashy. It won’t thrill the enthusiast, but its easy manners, clever packaging and dependable feel make it an ideal everyday car for shoppers who prefer sense over sass.

Quick data check: Toyota Corolla Cross

  • substantially cheaper
  • very slightly lighter
  • marginally more trunk space
  • markedly more power
  • very slightly more efficient
from £23,100
Kona

Hyundai Kona

  • Engine Type : Electric, Petrol, Full Hybrid
  • Transmission : Automatic, Manuel
  • Drive Type : Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP : 115 - 218 HP
  • Consumption L/100km : 4.6 - 7 L/100km
  • Consumption kWh/100km : 14.6 - 16.8 kWh/100km
  • Electric Range : 377 - 514 km

Hyundai Kona as a suitable alternative to Suzuki S-Cross

In the competitive subcompact SUV segment, the Hyundai Kona impresses with its bold design, high-tech features, and engaging driving dynamics, making it a standout choice for those seeking a fun and stylish ride. Meanwhile, the Suzuki S-Cross offers a more practical approach, boasting a spacious interior and commendable fuel efficiency, which appeals to families and budget-conscious buyers alike. Ultimately, the choice between the Kona and S-Cross hinges on personal preferences: whether you prioritize sporty performance or practicality in your daily drives.

The Hyundai Kona wears its personality on the outside with bold styling and sprightly handling that turns city driving into something a little more fun than a commute. It blends practical space, modern tech and sensible running costs into a compact, stylish package — a smart pick if you want flair without paying luxury prices.

Quick data check: Hyundai Kona

  • only slightly cheaper
  • barely lighter
  • considerably more power
  • somewhat more efficient
  • barely more trunk space
DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved. The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.