Compare performance (280 HP vs 168 HP), boot space and price (36,000 £ vs 23,900 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Abarth 600 or Ford Puma?
All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.
Price and efficiency are often the first things buyers look at. Here it becomes clear which model has the long-term edge – whether at the pump, the plug, or in purchase price.
Ford Puma is clearly cheaper – starting at 23,900 £ , while the Abarth 600 costs 36,000 £ . That’s a price difference of around 12,077 £.
In terms of energy consumption, the Ford Puma is clearly more efficient: consuming 13 kWh/100km compared to 17.5 kWh/100km for the Abarth 600. That’s a difference of about 4.5 kWh/100km.
As for electric range, the Ford Puma offers a bit more range – reaching up to 417 km, about 73 km more than the Abarth 600.
Under the bonnet, it becomes clear which model is tuned for sportiness and which one takes the lead when you hit the accelerator.
When it comes to engine power, the Abarth 600 offers clearly more power – delivering 280 HP compared to 168 HP. That’s roughly 112 HP more horsepower.
When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Abarth 600 is noticeably quicker – completing the sprint in 5.9 s, while the Ford Puma takes 7.4 s. That’s about 1.5 s quicker.
There’s also a difference in torque: the Abarth 600 delivers somewhat more torque with 345 Nm compared to 290 Nm. That’s about 55 Nm more.
Cabin size, boot volume and payload all play a role in everyday practicality. Here, comfort and flexibility make the difference.
Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.
In terms of curb weight, Ford Puma is clearly lighter – 1,316 kg compared to 1,700 kg. The difference is around 384 kg.
Looking at boot space, the Ford Puma offers noticeably more boot space – 523 L compared to 360 L. That’s a difference of about 163 L.
When it comes to payload, the Ford Puma carries clearly more – 469 kg compared to 225 kg. That’s a difference of about 244 kg.
The Ford Puma stands well ahead of its rival in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.
The sleek and stylish 600 has captured the hearts of both casual drivers and automotive enthusiasts alike. With its retro charm and modern features, this model seamlessly blends classic design with contemporary performance. Whether navigating city streets or embarking on a weekend adventure, the 600 offers a driving experience that is both fun and memorable.
details
The Ford Puma blends sporty styling with practical everyday usability, making it a smart choice for drivers who want flair without sacrificing versatility. Its engaging driving character and clever interior packaging give it a more dynamic and useful feel than many rivals.
detailsCosts and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
36,000 - 39,400 £
|
Price
23,900 - 36,300 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
-
|
Consumption L/100km
5.4 - 5.9 L/100km
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
17.5 kWh/100km
|
Consumption kWh/100km
13 - 13.9 kWh/100km
|
|
Electric Range
344 km
|
Electric Range
404 - 417 km
|
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
|
co2
0 g/km
|
co2
0 - 135 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
Hatchback
|
Body Type
SUV
|
|
Seats
5
|
Seats
5
|
|
Doors
-
|
Doors
-
|
|
Curb weight
1,700 kg
|
Curb weight
1,316 - 1,563 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
360 L
|
Trunk capacity
456 - 523 L
|
|
Length
-
|
Length
-
|
|
Width
1,779 mm
|
Width
1,805 mm
|
|
Height
-
|
Height
-
|
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
|
Payload
225 kg
|
Payload
367 - 469 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Electric
|
Engine Type
Petrol MHEV, Electric
|
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
|
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic, Reduction Gearbox
|
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
237 - 280 HP
|
Power HP
125 - 168 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
5.9 - 6.2 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
7.4 - 9.8 s
|
|
Max Speed
-
|
Max Speed
-
|
|
Torque
345 Nm
|
Torque
170 - 290 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
-
|
Number of Cylinders
3
|
|
Power kW
174 - 207 kW
|
Power kW
92 - 124 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
-
|
Engine capacity
999 cm3
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2,024 - 2,025
|
Model Year
2,025 - 2,026
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
D, A
|
|
Brand
Abarth
|
Brand
Ford
|