VS

Alfa Romeo Giulia vs Ford Puma comparison

Compare performance (520 HP vs 168 HP), boot space and price (48,000 £ vs 23,900 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Alfa Romeo Giulia or Ford Puma?

Alfa Romeo Giulia vs Ford Puma: Key differences

Alfa Romeo Giulia

4.1 (2 Reviews)
rate
  • substantially more power
  • considerably quicker 0–100 km/h
details

Ford Puma

3 (11 Reviews)
rate
  • clearly cheaper
  • markedly lighter
  • very slightly more trunk space
details

All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.

By Achim Sedelmaier

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

Giulia

Costs and Efficiency:

Price and efficiency are often the first things buyers look at. Here it becomes clear which model has the long-term edge – whether at the pump, the plug, or in purchase price.

Ford Puma is clearly cheaper – starting at 23,900 £ , while the Alfa Romeo Giulia costs 48,000 £ . That’s a price difference of around 24,086 £.

Both cars consume an average of 5.4 L/100km – no difference here.

Puma

Engine and Performance:

Power, torque and acceleration are the classic benchmarks for car enthusiasts – and here, some clear differences start to show.

When it comes to engine power, the Alfa Romeo Giulia offers substantially more power – delivering 520 HP compared to 168 HP. That’s roughly 352 HP more horsepower.

When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Alfa Romeo Giulia is considerably quicker – completing the sprint in 3.9 s, while the Ford Puma takes 7.4 s. That’s about 3.5 s quicker.

There’s also a difference in torque: the Alfa Romeo Giulia delivers clearly more torque with 600 Nm compared to 290 Nm. That’s about 310 Nm more.

Giulia

Space and Everyday Use:

Whether family car or daily driver – which one offers more room, flexibility and comfort?

Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.

In terms of curb weight, Ford Puma is markedly lighter – 1,316 kg compared to 1,640 kg. The difference is around 324 kg.

Looking at boot space, the Ford Puma offers very slightly more boot space – 523 L compared to 480 L. That’s a difference of about 43 L.

When it comes to payload, the Alfa Romeo Giulia carries moderately more – 535 kg compared to 469 kg. That’s a difference of about 66 kg.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The Alfa Romeo Giulia holds a decisive overall lead in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

from £48,000
Giulia

Alfa Romeo Giulia

  • Engine Type Diesel, Petrol
  • Transmission Automatic
  • Drive Type All-Wheel Drive, Rear-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP 210 - 520 HP
  • Consumption L/100km 5.4 - 10.1 L/100km
details

Frequently compared as well

Ford Puma
SEAT Arona
VS
In one corner, the Ford Puma brings sporty flair and sharp handling to the small-SUV ring; in the other, the SEAT Arona sticks to sensible practicality and wallet-friendly charm. Which one wins your city commute, weekend escape and resale cheque comes down to whether you want fun on twisty roads or …
Ford Puma
Opel Corsa
VS
The Ford Puma is the cheeky compact crossover that pairs SUV looks and a surprisingly roomy boot with sprightly turbo punch, while the Opel Corsa is a tidy, affordable city hatch that’s nimbler in traffic and kinder on fuel bills. If you want a higher driving position, more practical load space and …
Alfa Romeo Giulia
Ford Puma

Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis

Alfa Romeo Giulia

The Alfa Romeo Giulia captivates with its stunning Italian design and dynamic performance, representing a perfect blend of elegance and sportiness. Its engaging driving experience, characterised by precise handling and responsive steering, appeals to enthusiasts who crave the thrill of the road. Inside, the Giulia showcases a beautifully crafted interior that combines luxury with cutting-edge technology, making every journey a delight.

details
fca_germany_alfa_romeo_giulia_quadrifoglio_my2020_173-5ed608edc95c9
fca_germany_alfa_romeo_giulia_quadrifoglio_my2020_222-5ed60a3d4d877
fca_germany_alfa_romeo_giulia_quadrifoglio_my2020_127-5ed60851062af
giuliastelvioquadrifogliomy2023-5eb2ca0bb242d_5eb3d66ae7e99
fca_germany_alfa_romeo_giulia_quadrifoglio_my2020_063-5ed6059fd7bec

Reviews Alfa Romeo Giulia

4.1 (2 Reviews)
rate

No reviews yet. Share your experience and help others decide.

Ford Puma

The Ford Puma blends sporty styling with practical everyday usability, making it a smart choice for drivers who want flair without sacrificing versatility. Its engaging driving character and clever interior packaging give it a more dynamic and useful feel than many rivals.

details
FORD_2020_PUMA_ST_02
FORD_2020_PUMA_ST_07
FORD_2020_PUMA_ST_11
FORD_2020_PUMA_ST_29

Reviews Ford Puma

3 (11 Reviews)
rate
Marco
29 Jan 2026, 11:36:48

Exceptional car — after a year of use, no problems, only pleasant surprises.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Commuter (short/medium distance)
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money
Dino
23 Dec 2025, 21:51:22

76,000 km in 4 years. Two services carried out. Nothing more.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Commuter (short/medium distance)
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money
Nigga nigga long
13 Dec 2025, 19:32:50

For nigga boys

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Commuter (short/medium distance)
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money
Adolf hitler
13 Dec 2025, 19:32:08

Piece of rubbish
Looks gay

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Company car / Business
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money

Frequently compared as well

Ford Puma
Hyundai Kona
VS
The Ford Puma and Hyundai Kona are two of the most popular compact crossovers, combining practical interiors, elevated driving positions and city-friendly footprints. Choosing between the Puma’s engaging handling and efficient mild-hybrid options and the Kona’s broader engine range and tech-rich …
Ford Puma
VW ID.3
VS
If you want a cheeky, petrol-powered crossover with nimble handling and clever storage, the Ford Puma punches above its class; if you prefer silent, techy electric motoring with a roomy, refined cabin, the VW ID.3 is the smarter, greener choice. Choose the Puma for personality and everyday …
Ford Puma
CUPRA Raval
VS
Comparing the Ford Puma and the Cupra Raval pits a practical, compact crossover known for clever packaging and everyday efficiency against a bolder, sport-oriented compact that emphasizes sharper handling, tech and aggressive styling. Your choice comes down to whether you prioritise comfort, …
Ford Puma
Lexus LBX
VS
Small crossover clash: the Ford Puma brings cheeky driving dynamics and clever practicality, while the Lexus LBX counters with quiet refinement and premium flair. Pick the Puma if you want fun and value, choose the LBX if you crave comfort and a luxury badge — either way, you’ll be trading up from …
Ford Puma
Opel Frontera
VS
The Ford Puma feels like a sprightly urban fox — compact, efficient and packed with modern tech, perfect if you want lively handling and low running costs for daily driving. The Opel Frontera is all rugged charm and chunky presence, built for dirt tracks and weekend hauls rather than tight city …
Ford Puma
Mazda CX-30
VS
In the tussle between the cheeky Ford Puma and the stylish Mazda CX-30, the Puma serves up playful handling, clever practicality and sharper value, while the CX-30 rewards you with a more premium cabin and composed, grown-up refinement. Choose the Puma for everyday fun and sensible running costs; …
Ford Puma
Nissan Qashqai
VS
In the competitive arena of compact SUVs, the Ford Puma and Nissan Qashqai offer distinct advantages. The Ford Puma stands out with its sporty design and lively handling, making it an exciting choice for city driving. Meanwhile, the Nissan Qashqai provides a versatile and spacious ride, equipped …
Ford Puma
Renault R5
VS
The Ford Puma is a practical, punchy compact crossover — roomy, fun to drive and full of clever storage — while the Renault 5 returns as a cheeky, retro-styled city car (now electric), favouring charm and efficiency over outright versatility. If you need everyday space and a grin on country lanes, …
Alfa Romeo Giulia
Ford Puma

Costs and Consumption
Price
48,000 - 88,300 £
Price
23,900 - 36,300 £
Consumption L/100km
5.4 - 10.1 L/100km
Consumption L/100km
5.4 - 5.9 L/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
13 - 13.9 kWh/100km
Electric Range
-
Electric Range
404 - 417 km
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
-
co2
141 - 229 g/km
co2
0 - 135 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
-
Fuel tank capacity
-

Dimensions and Body
Body Type
Sedan
Body Type
SUV
Seats
4 - 5
Seats
5
Doors
-
Doors
-
Curb weight
1,640 - 1,735 kg
Curb weight
1,316 - 1,563 kg
Trunk capacity
480 L
Trunk capacity
456 - 523 L
Length
-
Length
-
Width
1,860 - 1,874 mm
Width
1,805 mm
Height
-
Height
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Payload
415 - 535 kg
Payload
367 - 469 kg

Engine and Performance
Engine Type
Diesel, Petrol
Engine Type
Petrol MHEV, Electric
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic, Reduction Gearbox
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive, Rear-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
Power HP
210 - 520 HP
Power HP
125 - 168 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
3.9 - 6.8 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
7.4 - 9.8 s
Max Speed
-
Max Speed
-
Torque
470 - 600 Nm
Torque
170 - 290 Nm
Number of Cylinders
4 - 6
Number of Cylinders
3
Power kW
154 - 382 kW
Power kW
92 - 124 kW
Engine capacity
2,143 - 2,891 cm3
Engine capacity
999 cm3

General
Model Year
2,025 - 2,026
Model Year
2,025 - 2,026
CO2 Efficiency Class
E, G
CO2 Efficiency Class
D, A
Brand
Alfa Romeo
Brand
Ford
Is the Alfa Romeo Giulia offered with different drivetrains?

The Alfa Romeo Giulia is offered with All-Wheel Drive or Rear-Wheel Drive.

DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved. The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.