Deutschland
France
Nederland
Great Britain
Sverige
Danmark
Suomi
Italia
Polska
Česko
EspañaVS
Alfa Romeo Tonale vs Ford Puma comparison
Compare performance (268 HP vs 168 HP), boot space and price (35,500 £ vs 23,900 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Alfa Romeo Tonale or Ford Puma?
Alfa Romeo Tonale vs Ford Puma: Key differences
All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.
Tonale
Costs and Efficiency:
When it comes to price and running costs, the biggest differences usually appear. This is often where you see which car fits your budget better in the long run.
Ford Puma is considerably cheaper – starting at 23,900 £ , while the Alfa Romeo Tonale costs 35,500 £ . That’s a price difference of around 11,571 £.
Fuel consumption also shows a difference: the Alfa Romeo Tonale uses 3.4 L/100km and is clearly more efficient than the Ford Puma with 5.4 L/100km. The difference is about 2 L/100km.
As for electric range, the Ford Puma offers clearly more range – reaching up to 417 km, about 355 km more than the Alfa Romeo Tonale.
Puma
Engine and Performance:
Power, torque and acceleration are the classic benchmarks for car enthusiasts – and here, some clear differences start to show.
When it comes to engine power, the Alfa Romeo Tonale offers clearly more power – delivering 268 HP compared to 168 HP. That’s roughly 100 HP more horsepower.
When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Ford Puma is considerably quicker – completing the sprint in 7.4 s, while the Alfa Romeo Tonale takes 10.9 s. That’s about 3.5 s quicker.
There’s also a difference in torque: the Alfa Romeo Tonale delivers marginally more torque with 320 Nm compared to 290 Nm. That’s about 30 Nm more.
Tonale
Space and Everyday Use:
Beyond pure performance, interior space and usability matter most in daily life. This is where you see which car is more practical and versatile.
Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.
In terms of curb weight, Ford Puma is markedly lighter – 1,316 kg compared to 1,600 kg. The difference is around 284 kg.
When it comes to payload, the Alfa Romeo Tonale carries a bit more – 535 kg compared to 469 kg. That’s a difference of about 66 kg.
Who wins the race in the data check?
The Ford Puma holds a decisive overall lead in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.
from £23,900
Ford Puma
Alfa Romeo Tonale
Ford Puma
Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Alfa Romeo Tonale
The Alfa Romeo Tonale embodies the brand's timeless elegance and sporty DNA, captivating drivers with its bold design and dynamic presence on the road. Inside, the Tonale impresses with a perfect blend of luxury and cutting-edge technology, offering a sophisticated driving experience that remains true to the Alfa Romeo spirit. With its agile performance and distinctive character, the Tonale stands out in the competitive SUV market, appealing to those who seek both style and substance.
details
Ford Puma
The Ford Puma is a cheeky compact crossover that blends sporty styling with city-friendly practicality, giving drivers a surprisingly fun and composed ride. With clever storage tricks and a lively personality, it’s a smart pick for buyers who want enjoyment without fuss.
details
Alfa Romeo Tonale
Ford Puma
Costs and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
35,500 - 53,200 £
|
Price
23,900 - 36,300 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
3.4 - 5.6 L/100km
|
Consumption L/100km
5.4 - 5.9 L/100km
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
Consumption kWh/100km
13 - 13.7 kWh/100km
|
|
Electric Range
62 km
|
Electric Range
404 - 417 km
|
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
|
co2
77 - 138 g/km
|
co2
0 - 135 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
SUV
|
Body Type
SUV
|
|
Seats
5
|
Seats
5
|
|
Doors
-
|
Doors
-
|
|
Curb weight
1,600 - 1,910 kg
|
Curb weight
1,316 - 1,563 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
385 - 500 L
|
Trunk capacity
-
|
|
Length
-
|
Length
-
|
|
Width
1,835 mm
|
Width
1,805 mm
|
|
Height
-
|
Height
-
|
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
|
Payload
510 - 535 kg
|
Payload
367 - 469 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Petrol MHEV, Plugin Hybrid, Diesel
|
Engine Type
Petrol MHEV, Electric
|
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
Dual-Clutch Automatic, Automatic Gearbox
|
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic, Reduction Gearbox
|
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
130 - 268 HP
|
Power HP
125 - 168 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
10.9 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
7.4 - 9.8 s
|
|
Max Speed
-
|
Max Speed
-
|
|
Torque
320 Nm
|
Torque
170 - 290 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
4
|
Number of Cylinders
3
|
|
Power kW
96 - 197 kW
|
Power kW
92 - 124 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
1,332 - 1,598 cm3
|
Engine capacity
999 cm3
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2,025 - 2,026
|
Model Year
2,025 - 2,026
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
D, B, E
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
D, A
|
|
Brand
Alfa Romeo
|
Brand
Ford
|
DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved.
The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.