Deutschland
France
Nederland
Great Britain
Sverige
Norge
Danmark
Suomi
Italia
Polska
EspañaVS
Alfa Romeo Tonale vs Ford Puma - Differences and prices compared
Compare performance (268 HP vs 168 HP), boot space and price (35500 £ vs 24800 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Alfa Romeo Tonale or Ford Puma?
Tonale
Costs and Efficiency:
Price and efficiency are often the first things buyers look at. Here it becomes clear which model has the long-term edge – whether at the pump, the plug, or in purchase price.
Ford Puma has a significantly advantage in terms of price – it starts at 24800 £ , while the Alfa Romeo Tonale costs 35500 £ . That’s a price difference of around 10714 £.
Fuel consumption also shows a difference: Alfa Romeo Tonale manages with 3.40 L and is therefore decisively more efficient than the Ford Puma with 5.40 L. The difference is about 2 L per 100 km.
As for electric range, the Ford Puma performs significantly better – achieving up to 376 km, about 314 km more than the Alfa Romeo Tonale.
Puma
Engine and Performance:
Power, torque and acceleration say a lot about how a car feels on the road. This is where you see which model delivers more driving dynamics.
When it comes to engine power, the Alfa Romeo Tonale has a noticeable edge – offering 268 HP compared to 168 HP. That’s roughly 100 HP more horsepower.
In acceleration from 0 to 100 km/h, the Ford Puma is clearly quicker – completing the sprint in 7.40 s, while the Alfa Romeo Tonale takes 10.90 s. That’s about 3.50 s faster.
There’s also a difference in torque: Alfa Romeo Tonale pulls minimal stronger with 320 Nm compared to 290 Nm. That’s about 30 Nm difference.
Ad · Affiliate
As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.
Tonale
Space and Everyday Use:
Cabin size, boot volume and payload all play a role in everyday practicality. Here, comfort and flexibility make the difference.
Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.
In curb weight, Ford Puma is clearly perceptible lighter – 1316 kg compared to 1600 kg. The difference is around 284 kg.
In terms of boot space, the Ford Puma offers slight more room – 523 L compared to 500 L. That’s a difference of about 23 L.
When it comes to payload, Alfa Romeo Tonale slightly takes the win – 535 kg compared to 469 kg. That’s a difference of about 66 kg.
Who wins the race?
The Ford Puma proves to be dominates this comparison and therefore becomes our DriveDuel Champion!
Ford Puma is the better all-rounder in this comparison.
from about £24,800
Ford Puma
Alfa Romeo Tonale
Ford Puma
Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Alfa Romeo Tonale
5 (1 Reviews)
The Alfa Romeo Tonale embodies the brand's timeless elegance and sporty DNA, captivating drivers with its bold design and dynamic presence on the road. Inside, the Tonale impresses with a perfect blend of luxury and cutting-edge technology, offering a sophisticated driving experience that remains true to the Alfa Romeo spirit. With its agile performance and distinctive character, the Tonale stands out in the competitive SUV market, appealing to those who seek both style and substance.
details
Ford Puma
2 (7 Reviews)
The Ford Puma is a cheeky compact crossover that blends sporty styling with city-friendly practicality, giving drivers a surprisingly fun and composed ride. With clever storage tricks and a lively personality, it’s a smart pick for buyers who want enjoyment without fuss.
details
Alfa Romeo Tonale
Ford Puma
Costs and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
35500 - 53200 £
|
Price
24800 - 36300 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
3.4 - 5.6 L
|
Consumption L/100km
5.4 - 5.9 L
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
Consumption kWh/100km
13.1 - 13.9 kWh
|
|
Electric Range
62 km
|
Electric Range
361 - 376 km
|
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
Battery Capacity
43 kWh
|
|
co2
77 - 138 g/km
|
co2
0 - 135 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Fuel tank capacity
42 L
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
SUV
|
Body Type
SUV
|
|
Seats
5
|
Seats
5
|
|
Doors
-
|
Doors
5
|
|
Curb weight
1600 - 1910 kg
|
Curb weight
1316 - 1563 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
385 - 500 L
|
Trunk capacity
456 - 523 L
|
|
Length
-
|
Length
4186 - 4226 mm
|
|
Width
1835 mm
|
Width
1805 mm
|
|
Height
-
|
Height
1550 - 1555 mm
|
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
Max trunk capacity
1216 - 1283 L
|
|
Payload
510 - 535 kg
|
Payload
367 - 469 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Petrol MHEV, Plugin Hybrid, Diesel
|
Engine Type
Electric, Petrol MHEV
|
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
Transmission
Automatic, Manuel
|
|
Transmission Detail
Dual-Clutch Automatic, Automatic Gearbox
|
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox, Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic
|
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
130 - 268 HP
|
Power HP
125 - 168 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
10.90 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
7.4 - 9.8 s
|
|
Max Speed
-
|
Max Speed
160 - 210 km/h
|
|
Torque
320 Nm
|
Torque
170 - 290 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
4
|
Number of Cylinders
3
|
|
Power kW
96 - 197 kW
|
Power kW
92 - 124 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
1332 - 1598 cm3
|
Engine capacity
999 cm3
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2025 - 2026
|
Model Year
2025
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
D, B, E
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
A, D
|
|
Brand
Alfa Romeo
|
Brand
Ford
|
What drivetrain options does the Alfa Romeo Tonale have?
The Alfa Romeo Tonale is offered with Front-Wheel Drive or All-Wheel Drive.
The prices shown are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted for local VAT. Local registration taxes (e.g. NoVA, BPM or CO2 malus) are not included. This information is not legally binding.