Deutschland
France
Nederland
Great Britain
Sverige
Danmark
Suomi
Italia
Polska
Česko
EspañaVS
Alpine A110 vs Ford Puma comparison
Compare performance (345 HP vs 168 HP), boot space and price (55,200 £ vs 23,900 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Alpine A110 or Ford Puma?
Alpine A110 vs Ford Puma: Key differences
All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.
A110
Costs and Efficiency:
Price and efficiency are often the first things buyers look at. Here it becomes clear which model has the long-term edge – whether at the pump, the plug, or in purchase price.
Ford Puma is clearly cheaper – starting at 23,900 £ , while the Alpine A110 costs 55,200 £ . That’s a price difference of around 31,328 £.
Fuel consumption also shows a difference: the Ford Puma uses 5.4 L/100km and is visibly more efficient than the Alpine A110 with 6.7 L/100km. The difference is about 1.3 L/100km.
Puma
Engine and Performance:
Power, torque and acceleration say a lot about how a car feels on the road. This is where you see which model delivers more driving dynamics.
When it comes to engine power, the Alpine A110 offers considerably more power – delivering 345 HP compared to 168 HP. That’s roughly 177 HP more horsepower.
When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Alpine A110 is considerably quicker – completing the sprint in 3.8 s, while the Ford Puma takes 7.4 s. That’s about 3.6 s quicker.
There’s also a difference in torque: the Alpine A110 delivers noticeably more torque with 420 Nm compared to 290 Nm. That’s about 130 Nm more.
A110
Space and Everyday Use:
Cabin size, boot volume and payload all play a role in everyday practicality. Here, comfort and flexibility make the difference.
Seats: Ford Puma offers more seats – 5 vs 2.
In terms of curb weight, Alpine A110 is slightly lighter – 1,150 kg compared to 1,316 kg. The difference is around 166 kg.
Looking at boot space, the Ford Puma offers considerably more boot space – 523 L compared to 96 L. That’s a difference of about 427 L.
When it comes to payload, the Ford Puma carries clearly more – 469 kg compared to 210 kg. That’s a difference of about 259 kg.
Who wins the race in the data check?
The Ford Puma stands well ahead of its rival in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.
from £23,900
Ford Puma
Alpine A110
Ford Puma
Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Alpine A110
The Alpine A110 is a stunning testament to modern automotive design, seamlessly blending performance with elegance. Its lightweight construction contributes to an exhilarating driving experience, making it a true driver's car. With its distinctive styling and agile handling, the A110 captures the spirit of classic sports cars while embracing contemporary technology.
details
Ford Puma
The Ford Puma blends sporty styling with practical everyday usability, making it a smart choice for drivers who want flair without sacrificing versatility. Its engaging driving character and clever interior packaging give it a more dynamic and useful feel than many rivals.
details
Alpine A110
Ford Puma
Costs and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
55,200 - 282,900 £
|
Price
23,900 - 36,300 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
6.7 - 6.9 L/100km
|
Consumption L/100km
5.4 - 5.9 L/100km
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
Consumption kWh/100km
13 - 13.9 kWh/100km
|
|
Electric Range
-
|
Electric Range
404 - 417 km
|
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
|
co2
152 - 157 g/km
|
co2
0 - 135 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
Coupe
|
Body Type
SUV
|
|
Seats
2
|
Seats
5
|
|
Doors
-
|
Doors
-
|
|
Curb weight
1,150 - 1,194 kg
|
Curb weight
1,316 - 1,563 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
96 L
|
Trunk capacity
456 - 523 L
|
|
Length
-
|
Length
-
|
|
Width
1,798 mm
|
Width
1,805 mm
|
|
Height
-
|
Height
-
|
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
|
Payload
166 - 210 kg
|
Payload
367 - 469 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Petrol
|
Engine Type
Petrol MHEV, Electric
|
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
Dual-Clutch Automatic
|
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic, Reduction Gearbox
|
|
Drive Type
Rear-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
252 - 345 HP
|
Power HP
125 - 168 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
3.8 - 4.5 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
7.4 - 9.8 s
|
|
Max Speed
-
|
Max Speed
-
|
|
Torque
320 - 420 Nm
|
Torque
170 - 290 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
4
|
Number of Cylinders
3
|
|
Power kW
185 - 254 kW
|
Power kW
92 - 124 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
1,798 cm3
|
Engine capacity
999 cm3
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2024
|
Model Year
2,025 - 2,026
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
F, E
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
D, A
|
|
Brand
Alpine
|
Brand
Ford
|
DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved.
The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.