VS

Alpine A110 vs Ford Puma comparison

Compare performance (345 HP vs 168 HP), boot space and price (55200 £ vs 24800 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Alpine A110 or Ford Puma?

Alpine A110 vs Ford Puma: Key differences

Alpine A110

  • convincingly more power
  • decisively quicker from 0–100 km/h
  • somewhat lighter

Ford Puma

2.9 (10 Reviews)
rate
  • decisively cheaper
  • clearly perceptible more efficient
  • clearly more trunk space

All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

A110

Costs and Efficiency:

Price and efficiency are key factors when choosing a car – and this is often where the real differences emerge.

Ford Puma has a decisively advantage in terms of price – it starts at 24800 £ , while the Alpine A110 costs 55200 £ . That’s a price difference of around 30471 £.

Fuel consumption also shows a difference: Ford Puma manages with 5.40 L and is therefore clearly perceptible more efficient than the Alpine A110 with 6.70 L. The difference is about 1.30 L per 100 km.

Puma

Engine and Performance:

Power, torque and acceleration say a lot about how a car feels on the road. This is where you see which model delivers more driving dynamics.

When it comes to engine power, the Alpine A110 has a convincingly edge – offering 345 HP compared to 168 HP. That’s roughly 177 HP more horsepower.

In acceleration from 0 to 100 km/h, the Alpine A110 is decisively quicker – completing the sprint in 3.80 s, while the Ford Puma takes 7.40 s. That’s about 3.60 s faster.

In terms of top speed, the Alpine A110 performs evident better – reaching 285 km/h, while the Ford Puma tops out at 210 km/h. The difference is around 75 km/h.

There’s also a difference in torque: Alpine A110 pulls clearly perceptible stronger with 420 Nm compared to 290 Nm. That’s about 130 Nm difference.

A110

Space and Everyday Use:

Cabin size, boot volume and payload all play a role in everyday practicality. Here, comfort and flexibility make the difference.

Seats: Ford Puma offers convincingly more seating capacity – 5 vs 2.

In curb weight, Alpine A110 is somewhat lighter – 1150 kg compared to 1316 kg. The difference is around 166 kg.

In terms of boot space, the Ford Puma offers clearly more room – 456 L compared to 96 L. That’s a difference of about 360 L.

When it comes to payload, Ford Puma decisively takes the win – 469 kg compared to 210 kg. That’s a difference of about 259 kg.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The Ford Puma is far ahead overall in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

Frequently compared as well

Ford Puma
Mazda CX-30
VS
In the tussle between the cheeky Ford Puma and the stylish Mazda CX-30, the Puma serves up playful handling, clever practicality and sharper value, while the CX-30 rewards you with a more premium cabin and composed, grown-up refinement. Choose the Puma for everyday fun and sensible running costs; …
Ford Puma
VW ID.3
VS
If you want a cheeky, petrol-powered crossover with nimble handling and clever storage, the Ford Puma punches above its class; if you prefer silent, techy electric motoring with a roomy, refined cabin, the VW ID.3 is the smarter, greener choice. Choose the Puma for personality and everyday …
Alpine A110
Ford Puma

Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis
from about £24,800
Puma

Ford Puma

  • Engine Type : Petrol MHEV, Electric
  • Transmission : Manuel, Automatic
  • Drive Type : Front-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP : 125 - 168 HP
  • Consumption L/100km : 5.4 - 5.9 L
  • Consumption kWh/100km : 13 - 13.7 kWh
  • Electric Range : 404 - 417 km
details

Alpine A110

The Alpine A110 is a stunning testament to modern automotive design, seamlessly blending performance with elegance. Its lightweight construction contributes to an exhilarating driving experience, making it a true driver's car. With its distinctive styling and agile handling, the A110 captures the spirit of classic sports cars while embracing contemporary technology.

details
R-DAM_1367620
R-DAM_1367632 (1)
R-DAM_1367638
R-DAM_1367671
R-DAM_1367179

Ford Puma

2.9 (10 Reviews)
rate

The Ford Puma is a cheeky compact crossover that blends sporty styling with city-friendly practicality, giving drivers a surprisingly fun and composed ride. With clever storage tricks and a lively personality, it’s a smart pick for buyers who want enjoyment without fuss.

details
FORD_2020_PUMA_ST_02
FORD_2020_PUMA_ST_07
FORD_2020_PUMA_ST_11
FORD_2020_PUMA_ST_29

Reviews Alpine A110

Reviews Ford Puma

2.9 (10 Reviews)
rate
Marco
29 Jan 2026, 11:36:48

Exceptional car — after a year of use, no problems, only pleasant surprises.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Commuter (short/medium distance)
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money
Dino
23 Dec 2025, 21:51:22

76,000 km in 4 years. Two services carried out. Nothing more.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Commuter (short/medium distance)
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money
Nigga nigga long
13 Dec 2025, 19:32:50

For nigga boys

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Commuter (short/medium distance)
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money
Adolf hitler
13 Dec 2025, 19:32:08

Piece of rubbish
Looks gay

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Company car / Business
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money
Alpine A110
Ford Puma

Costs and Consumption
Price
55200 - 282900 £
Price
24800 - 36300 £
Consumption L/100km
6.7 - 6.9 L
Consumption L/100km
5.4 - 5.9 L
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
13 - 13.7 kWh
Electric Range
-
Electric Range
404 - 417 km
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
-
co2
152 - 157 g/km
co2
0 - 135 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
45 L
Fuel tank capacity
42 L

Dimensions and Body
Body Type
Coupe
Body Type
SUV
Seats
2
Seats
5
Doors
2
Doors
5
Curb weight
1150 - 1194 kg
Curb weight
1316 - 1563 kg
Trunk capacity
96 L
Trunk capacity
456 L
Length
4181 mm
Length
4186 - 4226 mm
Width
1798 mm
Width
1805 mm
Height
1252 mm
Height
1550 mm
Max trunk capacity
-
Max trunk capacity
1216 L
Payload
166 - 210 kg
Payload
367 - 469 kg

Engine and Performance
Engine Type
Petrol
Engine Type
Petrol MHEV, Electric
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
Transmission Detail
Dual-Clutch Automatic
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic, Reduction Gearbox
Drive Type
Rear-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
Power HP
252 - 345 HP
Power HP
125 - 168 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
3.8 - 4.5 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
7.4 - 9.8 s
Max Speed
285 km/h
Max Speed
190 - 210 km/h
Torque
320 - 420 Nm
Torque
170 - 290 Nm
Number of Cylinders
4
Number of Cylinders
3
Power kW
185 - 254 kW
Power kW
92 - 124 kW
Engine capacity
1798 cm3
Engine capacity
999 cm3

General
Model Year
2024
Model Year
2025 - 2026
CO2 Efficiency Class
F, E
CO2 Efficiency Class
D, A
Brand
Alpine
Brand
Ford

Similar Comparisons

Ford Puma
Lexus LBX
VS
In the dynamic crossover segment, the Ford Puma stands out with its sporty handling and responsive engine lineup, making it a favorite for those seeking a fun driving experience. In contrast, the Lexus LBX brings a touch of luxury and advanced technology, appealing to drivers who prioritize comfort …
Ford Puma
SEAT Arona
VS
In the competitive subcompact SUV segment, the Ford Puma stands out with its striking design and impressive driving dynamics, making it a popular choice for those seeking a sporty feel. Meanwhile, the SEAT Arona appeals to buyers with its spacious interior and efficient engine options, offering …
Ford Focus
Ford Puma
VS
The Ford Focus stays the sensible, sharply handling hatchback — roomier and more practical for long miles and family duty — while the Ford Puma trades rear-seat space for a taller stance, cheeky crossover looks and a clever MegaBox for weekend kit. Choose the Focus if you want involvement and …
Ford Puma
Hyundai Kona
VS
In this exciting comparison, the Ford Puma takes on the Hyundai Kona, two standout competitors in the crossover segment. The Puma impresses with its engaging driving dynamics and stylish design, while the Kona offers a more tech-savvy interior and a range of efficient powertrains. Ultimately, both …
Ford Puma
VW T-Cross
VS
In the battle of compact crossovers, the Ford Puma showcases a sporty design and dynamic handling, appealing to those who crave a fun driving experience. Meanwhile, the VW T-Cross emphasizes practicality and interior space, making it a top choice for families seeking comfort on the road. Both …
Ford Puma
Renault R5
VS
The Ford Puma is a practical, punchy compact crossover — roomy, fun to drive and full of clever storage — while the Renault 5 returns as a cheeky, retro-styled city car (now electric), favouring charm and efficiency over outright versatility. If you need everyday space and a grin on country lanes, …
Ford Puma
Opel Mokka
VS
In the competitive segment of subcompact SUVs, the Ford Puma and Opel Mokka stand out with their distinctive styles and engaging driving dynamics. The Puma impresses with its sporty design and flexible interior, offering practicality without compromising on aesthetics, while the Mokka captivates …
Ford Puma
Nissan Qashqai
VS
In the competitive arena of compact SUVs, the Ford Puma and Nissan Qashqai offer distinct advantages. The Ford Puma stands out with its sporty design and lively handling, making it an exciting choice for city driving. Meanwhile, the Nissan Qashqai provides a versatile and spacious ride, equipped …
What drive types are available for the Alpine A110?

The Alpine A110 is available as Rear-Wheel Drive.

The prices shown are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted for local VAT. Local registration taxes (e.g. NoVA, BPM or CO2 malus) are not included. This information is not legally binding.