Deutschland
France
Nederland
Great Britain
Sverige
Danmark
Suomi
Italia
Polska
Česko
EspañaVS
Ford Puma vs Cadillac Lyriq comparison
Compare performance (168 HP vs 646 HP), boot space and price (23,900 £ vs 71,100 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Ford Puma or Cadillac Lyriq?
Ford Puma vs Cadillac Lyriq: Key differences
All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.
Puma
Costs and Efficiency:
When it comes to price and running costs, the biggest differences usually appear. This is often where you see which car fits your budget better in the long run.
Ford Puma is considerably cheaper – starting at 23,900 £ , while the Cadillac Lyriq costs 71,100 £ . That’s a price difference of around 47,228 £.
In terms of energy consumption, the Ford Puma is substantially more efficient: consuming 13 kWh/100km compared to 21.8 kWh/100km for the Cadillac Lyriq. That’s a difference of about 8.8 kWh/100km.
As for electric range, the Cadillac Lyriq offers clearly more range – reaching up to 530 km, about 113 km more than the Ford Puma.
Lyriq
Engine and Performance:
Power, torque and acceleration are the classic benchmarks for car enthusiasts – and here, some clear differences start to show.
When it comes to engine power, the Cadillac Lyriq offers substantially more power – delivering 646 HP compared to 168 HP. That’s roughly 478 HP more horsepower.
When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Cadillac Lyriq is significantly quicker – completing the sprint in 3.6 s, while the Ford Puma takes 7.4 s. That’s about 3.8 s quicker.
There’s also a difference in torque: the Cadillac Lyriq delivers clearly more torque with 880 Nm compared to 290 Nm. That’s about 590 Nm more.
Puma
Space and Everyday Use:
Beyond pure performance, interior space and usability matter most in daily life. This is where you see which car is more practical and versatile.
Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.
In terms of curb weight, Ford Puma is clearly lighter – 1,316 kg compared to 2,774 kg. The difference is around 1,458 kg.
Looking at boot space, the Cadillac Lyriq offers moderately more boot space – 588 L compared to 523 L. That’s a difference of about 65 L.
When it comes to payload, the Ford Puma carries marginally more – 469 kg compared to 426 kg. That’s a difference of about 43 kg.
Who wins the race in the data check?
The Ford Puma shows a few small advantages in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.
from £23,900
Ford Puma
Ford Puma
Cadillac Lyriq
Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Ford Puma
The Ford Puma blends sporty styling with practical everyday usability, making it a smart choice for drivers who want flair without sacrificing versatility. Its engaging driving character and clever interior packaging give it a more dynamic and useful feel than many rivals.
details
Cadillac Lyriq
The Cadillac Lyriq arrives with bold, angular styling and a striking light signature that gives it real presence on the road without trying too hard. Inside, the Lyriq serves up a calm, tech-heavy cabin with premium touches and a relaxed driving experience that makes switching to electric feel less like a sacrifice and more like a quiet flex.
details
Ford Puma
Cadillac Lyriq
Costs and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
23,900 - 36,300 £
|
Price
71,100 - 93,300 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
5.4 - 5.9 L/100km
|
Consumption L/100km
-
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
13 - 13.9 kWh/100km
|
Consumption kWh/100km
21.8 - 22.5 kWh/100km
|
|
Electric Range
404 - 417 km
|
Electric Range
471 - 530 km
|
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
|
co2
0 - 135 g/km
|
co2
0 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
SUV
|
Body Type
SUV
|
|
Seats
5
|
Seats
5
|
|
Doors
-
|
Doors
-
|
|
Curb weight
1,316 - 1,563 kg
|
Curb weight
2,774 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
456 - 523 L
|
Trunk capacity
588 L
|
|
Length
-
|
Length
-
|
|
Width
1,805 mm
|
Width
1,977 mm
|
|
Height
-
|
Height
-
|
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
|
Payload
367 - 469 kg
|
Payload
426 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Petrol MHEV, Electric
|
Engine Type
Electric
|
|
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic, Reduction Gearbox
|
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
|
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
125 - 168 HP
|
Power HP
528 - 646 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
7.4 - 9.8 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
3.6 - 5.3 s
|
|
Max Speed
-
|
Max Speed
-
|
|
Torque
170 - 290 Nm
|
Torque
610 - 880 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
3
|
Number of Cylinders
-
|
|
Power kW
92 - 124 kW
|
Power kW
388 - 475 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
999 cm3
|
Engine capacity
-
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2,025 - 2,026
|
Model Year
2,024 - 2,025
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
D, A
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
|
|
Brand
Ford
|
Brand
Cadillac
|
DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved.
The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.