Deutschland
France
Nederland
Great Britain
Sverige
Danmark
Suomi
Italia
Polska
Česko
EspañaVS
Ford Puma vs KGM Torres EVX comparison
Compare performance (168 HP vs 207 HP), boot space and price (23,900 £ vs 33,400 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Ford Puma or KGM Torres EVX?
Ford Puma vs KGM Torres EVX: Key differences
All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.
Puma
Costs and Efficiency:
When it comes to price and running costs, the biggest differences usually appear. This is often where you see which car fits your budget better in the long run.
Ford Puma is markedly cheaper – starting at 23,900 £ , while the KGM Torres EVX costs 33,400 £ . That’s a price difference of around 9,506 £.
In terms of energy consumption, the Ford Puma is clearly more efficient: consuming 13 kWh/100km compared to 19.3 kWh/100km for the KGM Torres EVX. That’s a difference of about 6.3 kWh/100km.
As for electric range, the KGM Torres EVX offers slightly more range – reaching up to 503 km, about 86 km more than the Ford Puma.
Torres EVX
Engine and Performance:
Power, torque and acceleration say a lot about how a car feels on the road. This is where you see which model delivers more driving dynamics.
When it comes to engine power, the KGM Torres EVX offers slightly more power – delivering 207 HP compared to 168 HP. That’s roughly 39 HP more horsepower.
When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Ford Puma is somewhat quicker – completing the sprint in 7.4 s, while the KGM Torres EVX takes 8.2 s. That’s about 0.8 s quicker.
There’s also a difference in torque: the KGM Torres EVX delivers slightly more torque with 339 Nm compared to 290 Nm. That’s about 49 Nm more.
Puma
Space and Everyday Use:
Beyond pure performance, interior space and usability matter most in daily life. This is where you see which car is more practical and versatile.
Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.
In terms of curb weight, Ford Puma is substantially lighter – 1,316 kg compared to 1,925 kg. The difference is around 609 kg.
Looking at boot space, the KGM Torres EVX offers visibly more boot space – 703 L compared to 523 L. That’s a difference of about 180 L.
When it comes to payload, the KGM Torres EVX carries very slightly more – 510 kg compared to 469 kg. That’s a difference of about 41 kg.
Who wins the race in the data check?
The Ford Puma comes out clearly ahead in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.
from £23,900
Ford Puma
Ford Puma
KGM Torres EVX
Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Ford Puma
The Ford Puma blends sporty styling with practical everyday usability, making it a smart choice for drivers who want flair without sacrificing versatility. Its engaging driving character and clever interior packaging give it a more dynamic and useful feel than many rivals.
details
KGM Torres EVX
The Torres EVX presents itself as a practical and polished electric SUV, pairing a spacious, comfortable interior with a clean, contemporary design. With composed road manners and user-friendly technology, it feels like a sensible choice for drivers seeking an everyday electric family vehicle.
details
Ford Puma
KGM Torres EVX
Costs and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
23,900 - 36,300 £
|
Price
33,400 - 42,000 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
5.4 - 5.9 L/100km
|
Consumption L/100km
-
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
13 - 13.9 kWh/100km
|
Consumption kWh/100km
19.3 - 19.7 kWh/100km
|
|
Electric Range
404 - 417 km
|
Electric Range
498 - 503 km
|
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
|
co2
0 - 135 g/km
|
co2
0 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
SUV
|
Body Type
SUV
|
|
Seats
5
|
Seats
2 - 5
|
|
Doors
-
|
Doors
-
|
|
Curb weight
1,316 - 1,563 kg
|
Curb weight
1,925 - 1,950 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
456 - 523 L
|
Trunk capacity
703 L
|
|
Length
-
|
Length
-
|
|
Width
1,805 mm
|
Width
1,890 mm
|
|
Height
-
|
Height
-
|
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
|
Payload
367 - 469 kg
|
Payload
485 - 510 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Petrol MHEV, Electric
|
Engine Type
Electric
|
|
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic, Reduction Gearbox
|
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
|
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
125 - 168 HP
|
Power HP
207 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
7.4 - 9.8 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
8.2 s
|
|
Max Speed
-
|
Max Speed
-
|
|
Torque
170 - 290 Nm
|
Torque
339 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
3
|
Number of Cylinders
-
|
|
Power kW
92 - 124 kW
|
Power kW
152 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
999 cm3
|
Engine capacity
-
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2,025 - 2,026
|
Model Year
2026
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
D, A
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
|
|
Brand
Ford
|
Brand
KGM
|
DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved.
The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.