VS

Ford Puma vs Kia Niro comparison

Compare performance (168 HP vs 138 HP), boot space and price (24800 £ vs 29100 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Ford Puma or Kia Niro?

Ford Puma vs Kia Niro: Key differences

Ford Puma

2.9 (10 Reviews)
rate
  • somewhat cheaper
  • a bit more power
  • clearly quicker from 0–100 km/h
  • to a small extent lighter

Kia Niro

5 (1 Reviews)
rate
  • noticeable more efficient

All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

Puma

Costs and Efficiency:

Price and efficiency are often the first things buyers look at. Here it becomes clear which model has the long-term edge – whether at the pump, the plug, or in purchase price.

Ford Puma has a somewhat advantage in terms of price – it starts at 24800 £ , while the Kia Niro costs 29100 £ . That’s a price difference of around 4363 £.

Fuel consumption also shows a difference: Kia Niro manages with 4.50 L and is therefore noticeable more efficient than the Ford Puma with 5.40 L. The difference is about 0.90 L per 100 km.

Niro

Engine and Performance:

Power, torque and acceleration say a lot about how a car feels on the road. This is where you see which model delivers more driving dynamics.

When it comes to engine power, the Ford Puma has a a bit edge – offering 168 HP compared to 138 HP. That’s roughly 30 HP more horsepower.

In acceleration from 0 to 100 km/h, the Ford Puma is clearly quicker – completing the sprint in 7.40 s, while the Kia Niro takes 11.10 s. That’s about 3.70 s faster.

There’s also a difference in torque: Ford Puma pulls minimal stronger with 290 Nm compared to 265 Nm. That’s about 25 Nm difference.

Puma

Space and Everyday Use:

Whether family car or daily driver – which one offers more room, flexibility and comfort?

Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.

In curb weight, Ford Puma is to a small extent lighter – 1316 kg compared to 1474 kg. The difference is around 158 kg.

When it comes to payload, Ford Puma barely noticeable takes the win – 469 kg compared to 466 kg. That’s a difference of about 3 kg.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The Ford Puma is clearly superior overall in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

Ford Puma
Kia Niro

Costs and Consumption

View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance

View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body

View detailed analysis
from about £24,800
Puma

Ford Puma

  • Engine Type : Petrol MHEV, Electric
  • Transmission : Manuel, Automatic
  • Drive Type : Front-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP : 125 - 168 HP
  • Consumption L/100km : 5.4 - 5.9 L
  • Consumption kWh/100km : 13 - 13.7 kWh
  • Electric Range : 404 - 417 km

Ford Puma

2.9 (10 Reviews)
rate

The Ford Puma is a cheeky compact crossover that blends sporty styling with city-friendly practicality, giving drivers a surprisingly fun and composed ride. With clever storage tricks and a lively personality, it’s a smart pick for buyers who want enjoyment without fuss.

details

Kia Niro

5 (1 Reviews)
rate

The Kia Niro blends clever packaging and modern styling into a compact crossover that’s refreshingly sensible for daily life. It’s comfortable, economical and packed with user‑friendly tech, so if you want a fuss‑free family car with a touch of green credibility, the Niro is worth a test drive.

details
Ford Puma
Kia Niro

Costs and Consumption

Price
24800 - 36300 £
Price
29100 - 33800 £
Consumption L/100km
5.4 - 5.9 L
Consumption L/100km
4.5 - 4.9 L
Consumption kWh/100km
13 - 13.7 kWh
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Electric Range
404 - 417 km
Electric Range
-
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
-
co2
0 - 135 g/km
co2
102 - 111 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
42 L
Fuel tank capacity
-

Dimensions and Body

Body Type
SUV
Body Type
SUV
Seats
5
Seats
5
Doors
5
Doors
-
Curb weight
1316 - 1563 kg
Curb weight
1474 kg
Trunk capacity
456 L
Trunk capacity
-
Length
4186 - 4226 mm
Length
-
Width
1805 mm
Width
1825 mm
Height
1550 mm
Height
-
Max trunk capacity
1216 L
Max trunk capacity
-
Payload
367 - 469 kg
Payload
466 kg

Engine and Performance

Engine Type
Petrol MHEV, Electric
Engine Type
Full Hybrid
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic, Reduction Gearbox
Transmission Detail
Dual-Clutch Automatic
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
Power HP
125 - 168 HP
Power HP
138 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
7.4 - 9.8 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
11.1 - 11.4 s
Max Speed
190 - 210 km/h
Max Speed
-
Torque
170 - 290 Nm
Torque
265 Nm
Number of Cylinders
3
Number of Cylinders
4
Power kW
92 - 124 kW
Power kW
102 kW
Engine capacity
999 cm3
Engine capacity
1580 cm3

General

Model Year
2025 - 2026
Model Year
2025
CO2 Efficiency Class
D, A
CO2 Efficiency Class
C
Brand
Ford
Brand
Kia
Is the Ford Puma offered with different drivetrains?

The Ford Puma is offered with Front-Wheel Drive.

The prices shown are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted for local VAT. Local registration taxes (e.g. NoVA, BPM or CO2 malus) are not included. This information is not legally binding.