Deutschland
France
Nederland
Great Britain
Sverige
Norge
Danmark
Suomi
Italia
Polska
EspañaVS
Ford Puma vs Land Rover Range Rover Evoque - Differences and prices compared
Compare performance (168 HP vs 269 HP), boot space and price (24800 £ vs 43300 £) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Ford Puma or Land Rover Range Rover Evoque?
Puma
Costs and Efficiency:
Price and efficiency are often the first things buyers look at. Here it becomes clear which model has the long-term edge – whether at the pump, the plug, or in purchase price.
Ford Puma has a clearly advantage in terms of price – it starts at 24800 £, while the Land Rover Range Rover Evoque costs 43300 £. That’s a price difference of around 18514 £.
Fuel consumption also shows a difference: Land Rover Range Rover Evoque manages with 3.70 L and is therefore significantly more efficient than the Ford Puma with 5.40 L. The difference is about 1.70 L per 100 km.
As for range, the Ford Puma performs significantly better – achieving up to 376 km, about 316 km more than the Land Rover Range Rover Evoque.
Range Rover Evoque
Engine and Performance:
Power, torque and acceleration are the classic benchmarks for car enthusiasts – and here, some clear differences start to show.
When it comes to engine power, the Land Rover Range Rover Evoque has a evident edge – offering 269 HP compared to 168 HP. That’s roughly 101 HP more horsepower.
In acceleration from 0 to 100 km/h, the Land Rover Range Rover Evoque is minimal quicker – completing the sprint in 7.20 s, while the Ford Puma takes 7.40 s. That’s about 0.20 s faster.
In terms of top speed, the Land Rover Range Rover Evoque performs slight better – reaching 213 km/h, while the Ford Puma tops out at 210 km/h. The difference is around 3 km/h.
There’s also a difference in torque: Land Rover Range Rover Evoque pulls decisively stronger with 540 Nm compared to 290 Nm. That’s about 250 Nm difference.
Puma
Space and Everyday Use:
Beyond pure performance, interior space and usability matter most in daily life. This is where you see which car is more practical and versatile.
Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.
In curb weight, Ford Puma is evident lighter – 1316 kg compared to 1792 kg. The difference is around 476 kg.
In terms of boot space, the Ford Puma offers barely noticeable more room – 523 L compared to 472 L. That’s a difference of about 51 L.
In maximum load capacity, the Ford Puma performs slight better – up to 1283 L, which is about 127 L more than the Land Rover Range Rover Evoque.
When it comes to payload, Land Rover Range Rover Evoque distinct takes the win – 600 kg compared to 469 kg. That’s a difference of about 131 kg.
Who wins the race?
The Ford Puma proves to be outperforms in nearly all aspects and therefore becomes our DriveDuel Champion!
Ford Puma is the better all-rounder in this comparison.
from about £24,800
Ford Puma
Ford Puma
Land Rover Range Rover Evoque
Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Ford Puma
2 (7 Reviews)
The Ford Puma is a cheeky compact crossover that blends sporty styling with city-friendly practicality, giving drivers a surprisingly fun and composed ride. With clever storage tricks and a lively personality, it’s a smart pick for buyers who want enjoyment without fuss.
details
Land Rover Range Rover Evoque
1 (1 Reviews)
The Range Rover Evoque turns heads with a compact, sculpted silhouette and an interior that feels more boutique hotel than utility vehicle. It delivers composed, playful handling around town while keeping enough ruggedness for weekend escapes — perfect for buyers who want luxury without the ostentation.
details
Ford Puma
Land Rover Range Rover Evoque
|
|
|
|
|
|
Costs and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
24800 - 36300 £
|
Price
43300 - 64800 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
5.4 - 5.9 L
|
Consumption L/100km
3.7 - 7.8 L
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
13.1 - 13.9 kWh
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
|
Electric Range
361 - 376 km
|
Electric Range
60 km
|
|
Battery Capacity
43 kWh
|
Battery Capacity
11.50 kWh
|
|
co2
0 - 135 g/km
|
co2
85 - 177 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
42 L
|
Fuel tank capacity
57 - 67 L
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
SUV
|
Body Type
SUV
|
|
Seats
5
|
Seats
5
|
|
Doors
5
|
Doors
5
|
|
Curb weight
1316 - 1563 kg
|
Curb weight
1792 - 2157 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
456 - 523 L
|
Trunk capacity
472 L
|
|
Length
4186 - 4226 mm
|
Length
4371 mm
|
|
Width
1805 mm
|
Width
1900 mm
|
|
Height
1550 - 1555 mm
|
Height
1649 mm
|
|
Max trunk capacity
1216 - 1283 L
|
Max trunk capacity
1156 L
|
|
Payload
367 - 469 kg
|
Payload
503 - 600 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Electric, Petrol MHEV
|
Engine Type
Petrol MHEV, Diesel MHEV, Plugin Hybrid
|
|
Transmission
Automatic, Manuel
|
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox, Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic
|
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Automatic Gearbox
|
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
125 - 168 HP
|
Power HP
160 - 269 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
7.4 - 9.8 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
7.2 - 10.3 s
|
|
Max Speed
160 - 210 km/h
|
Max Speed
190 - 213 km/h
|
|
Torque
170 - 290 Nm
|
Torque
260 - 540 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
3
|
Number of Cylinders
3 - 4
|
|
Power kW
92 - 124 kW
|
Power kW
118 - 198 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
999 cm3
|
Engine capacity
1498 - 1998 cm3
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2025
|
Model Year
2025
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
A, D
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
G, F, B
|
|
Brand
Ford
|
Brand
Land Rover
|
Is the Ford Puma offered with different drivetrains?
The Ford Puma is offered with Front-Wheel Drive.
The prices and data displayed are estimates based on German list prices and may vary by country. This information is not legally binding.