VS

Ford Puma vs Land Rover Range Rover Evoque – Differences & prices compared

Compare performance, boot capacity, efficiency and price at a glance.
Find out which car is the better choice for you – Ford Puma or Land Rover Range Rover Evoque?

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

Puma @ puma.fordpresskits.com

Costs and Efficiency:

Price and efficiency are often the first things buyers look at. Here it becomes clear which model has the long-term edge – whether at the pump, the plug, or in purchase price.

Ford Puma has a clearly advantage in terms of price – it starts at 24800 £, while the Land Rover Range Rover Evoque costs 43300 £. That’s a price difference of around 18514 £.

Fuel consumption also shows a difference: Land Rover Range Rover Evoque manages with 3.70 L and is therefore significantly more efficient than the Ford Puma with 5.40 L. The difference is about 1.70 L per 100 km.

As for range, the Ford Puma performs significantly better – achieving up to 376 km, about 316 km more than the Land Rover Range Rover Evoque.

Range Rover Evoque @ media.landrover.com

Engine and Performance:

Power, torque and acceleration are the classic benchmarks for car enthusiasts – and here, some clear differences start to show.

When it comes to engine power, the Land Rover Range Rover Evoque has a evident edge – offering 269 HP compared to 168 HP. That’s roughly 101 HP more horsepower.

In acceleration from 0 to 100 km/h, the Land Rover Range Rover Evoque is minimal quicker – completing the sprint in 7.20 s, while the Ford Puma takes 7.40 s. That’s about 0.20 s faster.

In terms of top speed, the Land Rover Range Rover Evoque performs slight better – reaching 213 km/h, while the Ford Puma tops out at 210 km/h. The difference is around 3 km/h.

There’s also a difference in torque: Land Rover Range Rover Evoque pulls decisively stronger with 540 Nm compared to 290 Nm. That’s about 250 Nm difference.

Puma @ puma.fordpresskits.com

Space and Everyday Use:

Beyond pure performance, interior space and usability matter most in daily life. This is where you see which car is more practical and versatile.

Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.

In curb weight, Ford Puma is evident lighter – 1316 kg compared to 1792 kg. The difference is around 476 kg.

In terms of boot space, the Ford Puma offers barely noticeable more room – 523 L compared to 472 L. That’s a difference of about 51 L.

In maximum load capacity, the Ford Puma performs slight better – up to 1283 L, which is about 127 L more than the Land Rover Range Rover Evoque.

When it comes to payload, Land Rover Range Rover Evoque distinct takes the win – 600 kg compared to 469 kg. That’s a difference of about 131 kg.

Who wins the race?

The Land Rover Range Rover Evoque proves to be edges out slightly and therefore becomes our DriveDuel Champion!
Land Rover Range Rover Evoque is the better all-rounder in this comparison.

from about £43,300
RR_EVQ_20MY_Dynamic_ND_221118_02_big

Land Rover Range Rover Evoque

  • Engine Type : Petrol MHEV, Diesel MHEV, Plugin Hybrid
  • Transmission : Manuel, Automatic
  • Drive Type : Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP : 160 - 269 HP
  • Consumption L/100km : 3.7 - 7.8 L
  • Electric Range : 60 km
details

Ford Puma

5 (1)
rate

The Ford Puma presents itself as a stylish compact SUV with a distinctive design that combines practicality with a dynamic driving experience. Its sleek lines and sporty aesthetics make it stand out on the road, while the interior offers a comfortable and tech-savvy environment. With an emphasis on efficiency and a smooth drive, the Ford Puma is well-suited for both urban commutes and countryside adventures.

details
FORD_2020_PUMA_ST_02 @ puma.fordpresskits.com
FORD_2020_PUMA_ST_07 @ puma.fordpresskits.com
FORD_2020_PUMA_ST_11 @ puma.fordpresskits.com
FORD_2020_PUMA_ST_29 @ puma.fordpresskits.com

Land Rover Range Rover Evoque

1 (1)
rate

The Land Rover Range Rover Evoque combines refined luxury with robust off-road capabilities. Its sleek design and high-quality interior materials create an elegant yet comfortable driving experience. Advanced technology features and superior handling make it a versatile choice for both city and countryside adventures.

details
RR_EVQ_20MY_Dynamic_ND_221118_02_big @ media.landrover.com
067rrevq20mysilverdynamic045 @ media.landrover.com
Range Rover Evoque Plug-In Hybrid_MJ20jpg (15) @ media.landrover.com
RR_EVQ_21MY_INTERIOR_260820_S44_03 @ media.landrover.com

Similar Comparisons

Ford Puma
VW ID.3
VS
If you want a cheeky, petrol-powered crossover with nimble handling and clever storage, the Ford Puma punches above its class; if you prefer silent, techy electric motoring with a roomy, refined cabin, the VW ID.3 is the smarter, greener choice. Choose the Puma for personality and everyday practicality, the ID.3 for smooth, emissions-free cruising and lower running costs — your wallet and the planet will thank you differently.
Ford Puma
MG MG4
VS
If you want a cheeky, petrol-powered compact crossover that feels taut and practical — with Ford's lively chassis, a roomy MegaBox boot and mild‑hybrid frugality — the Puma is the small SUV to live with. But if you're ready to go electric without blowing the budget, the MG4 serves up surprising range, a spacious interior and brilliant value, making it the smarter, cleaner pick for everyday running.
Ford Puma
Land Rover Range Rover Evoque
Puma
Range Rover Evoque

Costs and Consumption
Price
24800 - 36300 £
Price
43300 - 64800 £
Consumption L/100km
5.4 - 5.9 L
Consumption L/100km
3.7 - 7.8 L
Consumption kWh/100km
13.1 - 13.9 kWh
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Electric Range
361 - 376 km
Electric Range
60 km
Battery Capacity
43 kWh
Battery Capacity
11.50 kWh
co2
0 - 135 g/km
co2
85 - 177 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
42 L
Fuel tank capacity
57 - 67 L

Dimensions and Body
Body Type
SUV
Body Type
SUV
Seats
5
Seats
5
Doors
5
Doors
5
Curb weight
1316 - 1563 kg
Curb weight
1792 - 2157 kg
Trunk capacity
456 - 523 L
Trunk capacity
472 L
Length
4186 - 4226 mm
Length
4371 mm
Width
1805 mm
Width
1900 mm
Height
1550 - 1555 mm
Height
1649 mm
Max trunk capacity
1216 - 1283 L
Max trunk capacity
1156 L
Payload
367 - 469 kg
Payload
503 - 600 kg

Engine and Performance
Engine Type
Electric, Petrol MHEV
Engine Type
Petrol MHEV, Diesel MHEV, Plugin Hybrid
Transmission
Automatic, Manuel
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox, Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Automatic Gearbox
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
Power HP
125 - 168 HP
Power HP
160 - 269 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
7.4 - 9.8 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
7.2 - 10.3 s
Max Speed
160 - 210 km/h
Max Speed
190 - 213 km/h
Torque
170 - 290 Nm
Torque
260 - 540 Nm
Number of Cylinders
3
Number of Cylinders
3 - 4
Power kW
92 - 124 kW
Power kW
118 - 198 kW
Engine capacity
999 cm3
Engine capacity
1498 - 1998 cm3

General
Model Year
2025
Model Year
2025
CO2 Efficiency Class
A, D
CO2 Efficiency Class
G, F, B
Brand
Ford
Brand
Land Rover

Similar Comparisons

Ford Puma
Vauxhall Corsa
VS
In the highly competitive compact car segment, the Ford Puma stands out with its robust styling and dynamic driving performance, offering a sporty edge perfect for city and country roads alike. In contrast, the Vauxhall Corsa impresses with its practical design and tech-forward interior, appealing to those who prioritize efficiency and comfort in a more streamlined package. Ultimately, the choice between the Puma and Corsa hinges on whether your preference leans towards spirited driving or urban practicality.
Ford Puma
Renault R5
VS
The Ford Puma and the Renault 5 both offer unique appeals in the compact car segment. The Ford Puma stands out with its sporty design and dynamic driving experience, making it an excellent choice for those seeking a blend of style and performance. In contrast, the Renault 5 charms with its iconic retro design and efficient urban mobility, making it a beloved choice for city drivers who appreciate a touch of nostalgia with modern functionality.
Ford Puma
Vauxhall Frontera
VS
In the latest showdown between the Ford Puma and Opel Frontera, performance enthusiasts will find the Puma's sleek design and nimble handling a stark contrast to the Frontera's rugged off-road capabilities. While the Puma excels in urban agility and fuel efficiency, the Frontera stands out for its durability and versatility in challenging terrains. Ultimately, the choice between these two vehicles hinges on personal lifestyle needs, with the Puma appealing more to city drivers and the Frontera capturing the spirit of adventure seekers.
Ford Puma
Mazda CX-30
VS
In the competitive subcompact crossover segment, the Ford Puma and Mazda CX-30 stand out with their distinctive designs and engaging driving dynamics. The Puma impresses with its sporty handling and practicality, making it a favorite for those seeking a fun urban ride. Meanwhile, the CX-30 captivates with its premium interior and refined performance, appealing to buyers looking for a more upscale experience in this class.
Ford Puma
VW T-Cross
VS
In the battle of compact crossovers, the Ford Puma showcases a sporty design and dynamic handling, appealing to those who crave a fun driving experience. Meanwhile, the VW T-Cross emphasizes practicality and interior space, making it a top choice for families seeking comfort on the road. Both vehicles offer impressive tech features, but their differing approaches to style and functionality make this comparison a compelling one for potential buyers.
Alfa Romeo Junior
Ford Puma
VS
The Alfa Romeo Junior offers a stylish blend of Italian design and spirited performance, appealing to enthusiasts looking for a dynamic driving experience. In contrast, the Ford Puma impresses with its practicality and advanced technology features, making it a versatile choice for everyday use. While the Junior captivates with its heritage and sportiness, the Puma excels in comfort and reliability, catering to different segments of the market.
Ford Focus
Ford Puma
VS
In the realm of compact vehicles, the Ford Focus and Ford Puma present two compelling choices, each with its own unique appeal. The Focus is celebrated for its spacious interior and engaging driving dynamics, making it an ideal option for families and enthusiasts alike. On the other hand, the Puma stands out with its stylish design and versatility, offering a sportier feel while maintaining practicality for everyday use.
Ford Puma
Peugeot 208
VS
In the compact crossover segment, the Ford Puma impresses with its dynamic design and agile handling, making it an attractive option for city dwellers seeking both style and practicality. Meanwhile, the Peugeot 208, known for its elegant interior and efficient engine options, offers a compelling blend of technology and comfort that appeals to urban drivers. Ultimately, choosing between the Puma and the 208 comes down to prioritizing either the sporty performance of the Ford or the sophisticated refinement of the Peugeot.
Is the Ford Puma offered with different drivetrains?

The Ford Puma is offered with Front-Wheel Drive.

The prices and data displayed are estimates based on German list prices and may vary by country. This information is not legally binding.