VS

Ford Puma vs Mazda MX-30 comparison

Compare performance (168 HP vs 170 HP), boot space and price (23,900 £ vs 30,800 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Ford Puma or Mazda MX-30?

Ford Puma vs Mazda MX-30: Key differences

Ford Puma

3 (11 Reviews)
rate
  • markedly cheaper
  • significantly more efficient
  • clearly more electric range
  • markedly quicker 0–100 km/h
  • substantially lighter

Mazda MX-30

4.6 (1 Reviews)
rate
  • barely more power

All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

Puma

Costs and Efficiency:

Price and efficiency are often the first things buyers look at. Here it becomes clear which model has the long-term edge – whether at the pump, the plug, or in purchase price.

Ford Puma is markedly cheaper – starting at 23,900 £ , while the Mazda MX-30 costs 30,800 £ . That’s a price difference of around 6,934 £.

In terms of energy consumption, the Ford Puma is significantly more efficient: consuming 13 kWh/100km compared to 18.3 kWh/100km for the Mazda MX-30. That’s a difference of about 5.3 kWh/100km.

As for electric range, the Ford Puma offers clearly more range – reaching up to 417 km, about 332 km more than the Mazda MX-30.

MX-30

Engine and Performance:

Power, torque and acceleration say a lot about how a car feels on the road. This is where you see which model delivers more driving dynamics.

When it comes to engine power, the Mazda MX-30 offers barely more power – delivering 170 HP compared to 168 HP. That’s roughly 2 HP more horsepower.

When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Ford Puma is markedly quicker – completing the sprint in 7.4 s, while the Mazda MX-30 takes 9.1 s. That’s about 1.7 s quicker.

Puma

Space and Everyday Use:

Cabin size, boot volume and payload all play a role in everyday practicality. Here, comfort and flexibility make the difference.

Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.

In terms of curb weight, Ford Puma is substantially lighter – 1,316 kg compared to 1,849 kg. The difference is around 533 kg.

When it comes to payload, the Ford Puma carries a bit more – 469 kg compared to 402 kg. That’s a difference of about 67 kg.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The Ford Puma stands well ahead of its rival in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

from £23,900
Puma

Ford Puma

  • Engine Type : Petrol MHEV, Electric
  • Transmission : Manuel, Automatic
  • Drive Type : Front-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP : 125 - 168 HP
  • Consumption L/100km : 5.4 - 5.9 L/100km
  • Consumption kWh/100km : 13 - 13.7 kWh/100km
  • Electric Range : 404 - 417 km
Ford Puma
Mazda MX-30

Costs and Consumption

View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance

View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body

View detailed analysis

Ford Puma

The Ford Puma is a cheeky compact crossover that blends sporty styling with city-friendly practicality, giving drivers a surprisingly fun and composed ride. With clever storage tricks and a lively personality, it’s a smart pick for buyers who want enjoyment without fuss.

details

Mazda MX-30

The Mazda MX-30 trades conventional EV practicality for a boutique vibe, wrapping easy urban agility and a stylish, artisan interior into a compact package that stands out in the crossover crowd. It’s ideal for city-minded buyers who value design and driving feel over long-distance trips, and its quirky details prove Mazda can be playful without losing its driver-focused soul.

details
Ford Puma
Mazda MX-30

Costs and Consumption

Price
23,900 - 36,300 £
Price
30,800 - 37,100 £
Consumption L/100km
5.4 - 5.9 L/100km
Consumption L/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
13 - 13.7 kWh/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
18.3 kWh/100km
Electric Range
404 - 417 km
Electric Range
85 km
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
-
co2
0 - 135 g/km
co2
22 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
-
Fuel tank capacity
-

Dimensions and Body

Body Type
SUV
Body Type
SUV
Seats
5
Seats
5
Doors
-
Doors
5
Curb weight
1,316 - 1,563 kg
Curb weight
1,849 kg
Trunk capacity
-
Trunk capacity
332 - 350 L
Length
-
Length
4,395 mm
Width
1,805 mm
Width
1,848 mm
Height
-
Height
1,555 mm
Max trunk capacity
-
Max trunk capacity
1,137 - 1,155 L
Payload
367 - 469 kg
Payload
402 kg

Engine and Performance

Engine Type
Petrol MHEV, Electric
Engine Type
Plugin Hybrid
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic, Reduction Gearbox
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
Power HP
125 - 168 HP
Power HP
170 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
7.4 - 9.8 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
9.1 s
Max Speed
-
Max Speed
140 km/h
Torque
170 - 290 Nm
Torque
-
Number of Cylinders
3
Number of Cylinders
-
Power kW
92 - 124 kW
Power kW
125 kW
Engine capacity
999 cm3
Engine capacity
830 cm3

General

Model Year
2,025 - 2,026
Model Year
2,025
CO2 Efficiency Class
D, A
CO2 Efficiency Class
B
Brand
Ford
Brand
Mazda
DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved. The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.