Deutschland
France
Nederland
Great Britain
Sverige
Norge
Danmark
Suomi
Italia
Polska
EspañaVS
Ford Puma vs Mazda MX-30 – Differences & prices compared
Two cars, one duel: Ford Puma meets Mazda MX-30.
Which one wins in performance, efficiency and value for money? Find out now!
Puma
@ Ford Motor Company / Ford Media Center
Costs and Efficiency:
Looking at overall running costs, both models reveal some interesting differences in everyday economy.
Ford Puma has a clearly perceptible advantage in terms of price – it starts at 24800 £, while the Mazda MX-30 costs 30800 £. That’s a price difference of around 6077 £.
In terms of energy consumption, the advantage goes to the Ford Puma: with 13.10 kWh per 100 km, it’s distinct more efficient than the Mazda MX-30 with 18.30 kWh. That’s a difference of about 5.20 kWh.
As for range, the Ford Puma performs clearly better – achieving up to 376 km, about 291 km more than the Mazda MX-30.
MX-30
@ Mazda Motor Corporation
Engine and Performance:
Under the bonnet, it becomes clear which model is tuned for sportiness and which one takes the lead when you hit the accelerator.
When it comes to engine power, the Mazda MX-30 has a barely noticeable edge – offering 170 HP compared to 168 HP. That’s roughly 2 HP more horsepower.
In acceleration from 0 to 100 km/h, the Ford Puma is noticeable quicker – completing the sprint in 7.40 s, while the Mazda MX-30 takes 9.10 s. That’s about 1.70 s faster.
In terms of top speed, the Ford Puma performs noticeable better – reaching 210 km/h, while the Mazda MX-30 tops out at 140 km/h. The difference is around 70 km/h.
Puma
@ Ford Motor Company / Ford Media Center
Space and Everyday Use:
Beyond pure performance, interior space and usability matter most in daily life. This is where you see which car is more practical and versatile.
Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.
In curb weight, Ford Puma is decisively lighter – 1316 kg compared to 1849 kg. The difference is around 533 kg.
In terms of boot space, the Ford Puma offers noticeable more room – 523 L compared to 350 L. That’s a difference of about 173 L.
In maximum load capacity, the Ford Puma performs hardly perceptible better – up to 1283 L, which is about 128 L more than the Mazda MX-30.
When it comes to payload, Ford Puma a bit takes the win – 469 kg compared to 402 kg. That’s a difference of about 67 kg.
Who comes out on top?
Overall, the Ford Puma shows itself to be is largely superior and secures the title of DriveDuel Champion.
It convinces with the more balanced overall package and proves to be the more versatile choice for everyday use.
from about £24,800
@ Ford Motor Company / Ford Media Center
Ford Puma
Ford Puma
The Ford Puma is a cheeky compact crossover that blends sporty styling with city-friendly practicality, giving drivers a surprisingly fun and composed ride. With clever storage tricks and a lively personality, it’s a smart pick for buyers who want enjoyment without fuss.
details
@ Ford Motor Company / Ford Media Center
@ Ford Motor Company / Ford Media Center
@ Ford Motor Company / Ford Media Center
@ Ford Motor Company / Ford Media Center
Mazda MX-30
The Mazda MX-30 is a compact crossover that combines unique design with an environmentally conscious approach. Its distinct exterior features a coupe-like silhouette and freestyle doors that offer practicality and style. Inside, the cabin boasts sustainable materials, creating a harmonious blend of modern aesthetics and eco-friendly innovation.
details
@ Mazda Motor Corporation
@ Mazda Motor Corporation
@ Mazda Motor Corporation
@ Mazda Motor Corporation
Ford Puma
Mazda MX-30
|
@ Ford Motor Company / Ford Media Center
|
@ Mazda Motor Corporation
|
|
|
|
Costs and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
24800 - 36300 £
|
Price
30800 - 37100 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
5.4 - 5.9 L
|
Consumption L/100km
-
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
13.1 - 13.9 kWh
|
Consumption kWh/100km
18.30 kWh
|
|
Electric Range
361 - 376 km
|
Electric Range
85 km
|
|
Battery Capacity
43 kWh
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
|
co2
0 - 135 g/km
|
co2
22 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
42 L
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
SUV
|
Body Type
SUV
|
|
Seats
5
|
Seats
5
|
|
Doors
5
|
Doors
5
|
|
Curb weight
1316 - 1563 kg
|
Curb weight
1849 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
456 - 523 L
|
Trunk capacity
332 - 350 L
|
|
Length
4186 - 4226 mm
|
Length
4395 mm
|
|
Width
1805 mm
|
Width
1848 mm
|
|
Height
1550 - 1555 mm
|
Height
1555 mm
|
|
Max trunk capacity
1216 - 1283 L
|
Max trunk capacity
1137 - 1155 L
|
|
Payload
367 - 469 kg
|
Payload
402 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Electric, Petrol MHEV
|
Engine Type
Plugin Hybrid
|
|
Transmission
Automatic, Manuel
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox, Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic
|
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
|
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
125 - 168 HP
|
Power HP
170 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
7.4 - 9.8 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
9.10 s
|
|
Max Speed
160 - 210 km/h
|
Max Speed
140 km/h
|
|
Torque
170 - 290 Nm
|
Torque
-
|
|
Number of Cylinders
3
|
Number of Cylinders
-
|
|
Power kW
92 - 124 kW
|
Power kW
125 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
999 cm3
|
Engine capacity
830 cm3
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2025
|
Model Year
2025
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
A, D
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
B
|
|
Brand
Ford
|
Brand
Mazda
|
Is the Ford Puma offered with different drivetrains?
The Ford Puma is offered with Front-Wheel Drive.
The prices and data displayed are estimates based on German list prices and may vary by country. This information is not legally binding.