VS

Ford Puma vs Mazda MX-5 Coupe comparison

Compare performance (168 HP vs 132 HP), boot space and price (23,900 £ vs 30,800 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Ford Puma or Mazda MX-5 Coupe?

Ford Puma vs Mazda MX-5 Coupe: Key differences

Ford Puma

3 (11 Reviews)
rate
  • markedly cheaper
  • noticeably more power
  • somewhat more efficient
  • somewhat quicker 0–100 km/h

Mazda MX-5 Coupe

  • somewhat lighter

All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

Puma

Costs and Efficiency:

Price and efficiency are often the first things buyers look at. Here it becomes clear which model has the long-term edge – whether at the pump, the plug, or in purchase price.

Ford Puma is markedly cheaper – starting at 23,900 £ , while the Mazda MX-5 Coupe costs 30,800 £ . That’s a price difference of around 6,934 £.

Fuel consumption also shows a difference: the Ford Puma uses 5.4 L/100km and is somewhat more efficient than the Mazda MX-5 Coupe with 6.2 L/100km. The difference is about 0.8 L/100km.

MX-5 Coupe

Engine and Performance:

Power, torque and acceleration say a lot about how a car feels on the road. This is where you see which model delivers more driving dynamics.

When it comes to engine power, the Ford Puma offers noticeably more power – delivering 168 HP compared to 132 HP. That’s roughly 36 HP more horsepower.

When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Ford Puma is somewhat quicker – completing the sprint in 7.4 s, while the Mazda MX-5 Coupe takes 8.6 s. That’s about 1.2 s quicker.

There’s also a difference in torque: the Ford Puma delivers considerably more torque with 290 Nm compared to 152 Nm. That’s about 138 Nm more.

Puma

Space and Everyday Use:

Whether family car or daily driver – which one offers more room, flexibility and comfort?

Seats: Ford Puma offers more seats – 5 vs 2.

In terms of curb weight, Mazda MX-5 Coupe is somewhat lighter – 1,114 kg compared to 1,316 kg. The difference is around 202 kg.

When it comes to payload, the Ford Puma carries significantly more – 469 kg compared to 166 kg. That’s a difference of about 303 kg.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The Ford Puma is clearly superior overall in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

from £23,900
Puma

Ford Puma

  • Engine Type : Petrol MHEV, Electric
  • Transmission : Manuel, Automatic
  • Drive Type : Front-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP : 125 - 168 HP
  • Consumption L/100km : 5.4 - 5.9 L/100km
  • Consumption kWh/100km : 13 - 13.7 kWh/100km
  • Electric Range : 404 - 417 km
details

Frequently compared as well

Ford Puma
Mazda CX-30
VS
In the tussle between the cheeky Ford Puma and the stylish Mazda CX-30, the Puma serves up playful handling, clever practicality and sharper value, while the CX-30 rewards you with a more premium cabin and composed, grown-up refinement. Choose the Puma for everyday fun and sensible running costs; …
Ford Puma
VW T-Cross
VS
The Ford Puma and VW T‑Cross go head-to-head in the compact crossover class — one flirty and fun, the other sensible and steady — both promising SUV looks without the bulk. We’ll pit the Puma’s lively handling and clever storage tricks against the T‑Cross’s comfort-first setup and family-friendly …
Ford Puma
Mazda MX-5 Coupe

Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis

Ford Puma

The Ford Puma is a cheeky compact crossover that blends sporty styling with city-friendly practicality, giving drivers a surprisingly fun and composed ride. With clever storage tricks and a lively personality, it’s a smart pick for buyers who want enjoyment without fuss.

details
FORD_2020_PUMA_ST_02
FORD_2020_PUMA_ST_07
FORD_2020_PUMA_ST_11
FORD_2020_PUMA_ST_29

Reviews Ford Puma

3 (11 Reviews)
rate
Marco
29 Jan 2026, 11:36:48

Exceptional car — after a year of use, no problems, only pleasant surprises.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Commuter (short/medium distance)
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money
Dino
23 Dec 2025, 21:51:22

76,000 km in 4 years. Two services carried out. Nothing more.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Commuter (short/medium distance)
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money
Nigga nigga long
13 Dec 2025, 19:32:50

For nigga boys

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Commuter (short/medium distance)
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money
Adolf hitler
13 Dec 2025, 19:32:08

Piece of rubbish
Looks gay

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Company car / Business
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money

Mazda MX-5 Coupe

The Mazda MX-5 is a delightfully pure driver's car, wrapped in a compact package and tuned to make steering inputs feel like a conversation rather than a chore. It won’t overwhelm you with gadgetry, but what it delivers—nimble handling, instant feedback and an honest grin every time you drive—makes it a brilliant choice for anyone who values fun over flash.

details
2023_mazda_mx-5_portugal_act_003_highres
2023_mazda_mx-5_portugal_act_001_highres

Reviews Mazda MX-5 Coupe

No reviews yet. Share your experience and help others decide.

Frequently compared as well

Ford Puma
Opel Corsa
VS
The Ford Puma is the cheeky compact crossover that pairs SUV looks and a surprisingly roomy boot with sprightly turbo punch, while the Opel Corsa is a tidy, affordable city hatch that’s nimbler in traffic and kinder on fuel bills. If you want a higher driving position, more practical load space and …
Ford Puma
SEAT Arona
VS
In the competitive subcompact SUV segment, the Ford Puma stands out with its striking design and impressive driving dynamics, making it a popular choice for those seeking a sporty feel. Meanwhile, the SEAT Arona appeals to buyers with its spacious interior and efficient engine options, offering …
Ford Puma
Lexus LBX
VS
Small crossover clash: the Ford Puma brings cheeky driving dynamics and clever practicality, while the Lexus LBX counters with quiet refinement and premium flair. Pick the Puma if you want fun and value, choose the LBX if you crave comfort and a luxury badge — either way, you’ll be trading up from …
Ford Puma
Nissan Qashqai
VS
In the competitive arena of compact SUVs, the Ford Puma and Nissan Qashqai offer distinct advantages. The Ford Puma stands out with its sporty design and lively handling, making it an exciting choice for city driving. Meanwhile, the Nissan Qashqai provides a versatile and spacious ride, equipped …
Ford Puma
Renault R5
VS
The Ford Puma is a practical, punchy compact crossover — roomy, fun to drive and full of clever storage — while the Renault 5 returns as a cheeky, retro-styled city car (now electric), favouring charm and efficiency over outright versatility. If you need everyday space and a grin on country lanes, …
Ford Puma
Hyundai Kona
VS
In this exciting comparison, the Ford Puma takes on the Hyundai Kona, two standout competitors in the crossover segment. The Puma impresses with its engaging driving dynamics and stylish design, while the Kona offers a more tech-savvy interior and a range of efficient powertrains. Ultimately, both …
Ford Puma
VW ID.3
VS
If you want a cheeky, petrol-powered crossover with nimble handling and clever storage, the Ford Puma punches above its class; if you prefer silent, techy electric motoring with a roomy, refined cabin, the VW ID.3 is the smarter, greener choice. Choose the Puma for personality and everyday …
Ford Focus
Ford Puma
VS
The Ford Focus stays the sensible, sharply handling hatchback — roomier and more practical for long miles and family duty — while the Ford Puma trades rear-seat space for a taller stance, cheeky crossover looks and a clever MegaBox for weekend kit. Choose the Focus if you want involvement and …
Ford Puma
Mazda MX-5 Coupe

Costs and Consumption
Price
23,900 - 36,300 £
Price
30,800 - 36,200 £
Consumption L/100km
5.4 - 5.9 L/100km
Consumption L/100km
6.2 L/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
13 - 13.7 kWh/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Electric Range
404 - 417 km
Electric Range
-
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
-
co2
0 - 135 g/km
co2
140 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
-
Fuel tank capacity
-

Dimensions and Body
Body Type
SUV
Body Type
Coupe
Seats
5
Seats
2
Doors
-
Doors
-
Curb weight
1,316 - 1,563 kg
Curb weight
1,114 kg
Trunk capacity
-
Trunk capacity
127 L
Length
-
Length
-
Width
1,805 mm
Width
1,735 mm
Height
-
Height
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Payload
367 - 469 kg
Payload
166 kg

Engine and Performance
Engine Type
Petrol MHEV, Electric
Engine Type
Petrol
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
Transmission
Manuel
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic, Reduction Gearbox
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
Rear-Wheel Drive
Power HP
125 - 168 HP
Power HP
132 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
7.4 - 9.8 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
8.6 s
Max Speed
-
Max Speed
-
Torque
170 - 290 Nm
Torque
152 Nm
Number of Cylinders
3
Number of Cylinders
4
Power kW
92 - 124 kW
Power kW
97 kW
Engine capacity
999 cm3
Engine capacity
1,496 cm3

General
Model Year
2,025 - 2,026
Model Year
2,025
CO2 Efficiency Class
D, A
CO2 Efficiency Class
E
Brand
Ford
Brand
Mazda
What drivetrain options does the Ford Puma have?

The Ford Puma is available as Front-Wheel Drive.

DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved. The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.