Deutschland
France
Nederland
Great Britain
Sverige
Danmark
Suomi
Italia
Polska
EspañaVS
Ford Puma vs Mercedes AMG GT - Differences and prices compared
Compare performance (168 HP vs 816 HP), boot space and price (24800 £ vs 102500 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Ford Puma or Mercedes AMG GT?
Puma
Costs and Efficiency:
Looking at overall running costs, both models reveal some interesting differences in everyday economy.
Ford Puma has a convincingly advantage in terms of price – it starts at 24800 £ , while the Mercedes AMG GT costs 102500 £ . That’s a price difference of around 77733 £.
Fuel consumption also shows a difference: Ford Puma manages with 5.40 L and is therefore decisively more efficient than the Mercedes AMG GT with 10.30 L. The difference is about 4.90 L per 100 km.
As for electric range, the Ford Puma performs significantly better – achieving up to 376 km, about 365 km more than the Mercedes AMG GT.
AMG GT
Engine and Performance:
Power, torque and acceleration say a lot about how a car feels on the road. This is where you see which model delivers more driving dynamics.
When it comes to engine power, the Mercedes AMG GT has a clearly edge – offering 816 HP compared to 168 HP. That’s roughly 648 HP more horsepower.
In acceleration from 0 to 100 km/h, the Mercedes AMG GT is convincingly quicker – completing the sprint in 2.80 s, while the Ford Puma takes 7.40 s. That’s about 4.60 s faster.
In terms of top speed, the Mercedes AMG GT performs noticeable better – reaching 320 km/h, while the Ford Puma tops out at 210 km/h. The difference is around 110 km/h.
There’s also a difference in torque: Mercedes AMG GT pulls significantly stronger with 1420 Nm compared to 290 Nm. That’s about 1130 Nm difference.
Puma
Space and Everyday Use:
Whether family car or daily driver – which one offers more room, flexibility and comfort?
Seats: Ford Puma offers decisively more seating capacity – 5 vs 2.
In curb weight, Ford Puma is noticeable lighter – 1316 kg compared to 1790 kg. The difference is around 474 kg.
In terms of boot space, the Ford Puma offers clearly perceptible more room – 523 L compared to 321 L. That’s a difference of about 202 L.
When it comes to payload, Ford Puma decisively takes the win – 469 kg compared to 215 kg. That’s a difference of about 254 kg.
Who wins the race in the data check?
The Ford Puma is decisively ahead in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.
Ford Puma
Mercedes AMG GT
Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
from about £24,800
Ford Puma
Ford Puma
2.9 (10 Reviews)
The Ford Puma is a cheeky compact crossover that blends sporty styling with city-friendly practicality, giving drivers a surprisingly fun and composed ride. With clever storage tricks and a lively personality, it’s a smart pick for buyers who want enjoyment without fuss.
details
Mercedes AMG GT
The Mercedes-AMG GT is a theatrical sports car with prowling looks and an aggressive exhaust note that announces its intentions the moment it fires up. It pairs ferocious performance with surprising everyday usability — a taut yet forgiving chassis and a cockpit that feels special — making sensible buyers suddenly very good at justifying indulgence.
details
Ford Puma
Mercedes AMG GT
Costs and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
24800 - 36300 £
|
Price
102500 - 194400 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
5.4 - 5.9 L
|
Consumption L/100km
10.3 - 14 L
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
13.1 - 13.9 kWh
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
|
Electric Range
361 - 376 km
|
Electric Range
11 km
|
|
Battery Capacity
43 kWh
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
|
co2
0 - 135 g/km
|
co2
235 - 319 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
42 L
|
Fuel tank capacity
70 L
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
SUV
|
Body Type
Coupe
|
|
Seats
5
|
Seats
2
|
|
Doors
5
|
Doors
2
|
|
Curb weight
1316 - 1563 kg
|
Curb weight
1790 - 2195 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
456 - 523 L
|
Trunk capacity
182 - 321 L
|
|
Length
4186 - 4226 mm
|
Length
4728 mm
|
|
Width
1805 mm
|
Width
1929 mm
|
|
Height
1550 - 1555 mm
|
Height
1354 - 1359 mm
|
|
Max trunk capacity
1216 - 1283 L
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
|
Payload
367 - 469 kg
|
Payload
170 - 215 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Electric, Petrol MHEV
|
Engine Type
Petrol MHEV, Petrol, Plugin Hybrid
|
|
Transmission
Automatic, Manuel
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox, Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic
|
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox
|
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
Rear-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
125 - 168 HP
|
Power HP
435 - 816 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
7.4 - 9.8 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
2.8 - 4.6 s
|
|
Max Speed
160 - 210 km/h
|
Max Speed
280 - 320 km/h
|
|
Torque
170 - 290 Nm
|
Torque
500 - 1420 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
3
|
Number of Cylinders
4 - 8
|
|
Power kW
92 - 124 kW
|
Power kW
320 - 600 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
999 cm3
|
Engine capacity
1991 - 3982 cm3
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2025
|
Model Year
2025
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
A, D
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
G
|
|
Brand
Ford
|
Brand
Mercedes-Benz
|
Is the Ford Puma offered with different drivetrains?
The Ford Puma is offered with Front-Wheel Drive.
The prices shown are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted for local VAT. Local registration taxes (e.g. NoVA, BPM or CO2 malus) are not included. This information is not legally binding.