Deutschland
France
Nederland
Great Britain
Sverige
Danmark
Suomi
Italia
Polska
Česko
EspañaVS
Ford Puma vs Mercedes Vito Bus comparison
Compare performance (168 HP vs 237 HP), boot space and price (23,900 £ vs 36,300 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Ford Puma or Mercedes Vito Bus?
Ford Puma vs Mercedes Vito Bus: Key differences
All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.
Puma
Costs and Efficiency:
Looking at overall running costs, both models reveal some interesting differences in everyday economy.
Ford Puma is significantly cheaper – starting at 23,900 £ , while the Mercedes Vito Bus costs 36,300 £ . That’s a price difference of around 12,416 £.
Fuel consumption also shows a difference: the Ford Puma uses 5.4 L/100km and is visibly more efficient than the Mercedes Vito Bus with 6.7 L/100km. The difference is about 1.3 L/100km.
In terms of energy consumption, the Ford Puma is significantly more efficient: consuming 13 kWh/100km compared to 26.7 kWh/100km for the Mercedes Vito Bus. That’s a difference of about 13.7 kWh/100km.
As for electric range, the Ford Puma offers slightly more range – reaching up to 417 km, about 47 km more than the Mercedes Vito Bus.
Vito Bus
Engine and Performance:
Power, torque and acceleration are the classic benchmarks for car enthusiasts – and here, some clear differences start to show.
When it comes to engine power, the Mercedes Vito Bus offers markedly more power – delivering 237 HP compared to 168 HP. That’s roughly 69 HP more horsepower.
There’s also a difference in torque: the Mercedes Vito Bus delivers substantially more torque with 500 Nm compared to 290 Nm. That’s about 210 Nm more.
Puma
Space and Everyday Use:
Beyond pure performance, interior space and usability matter most in daily life. This is where you see which car is more practical and versatile.
Seats: Mercedes Vito Bus offers more seats – 8 vs 5.
In terms of curb weight, Ford Puma is clearly lighter – 1,316 kg compared to 2,023 kg. The difference is around 707 kg.
Looking at boot space, the Mercedes Vito Bus offers substantially more boot space – 1,390 L compared to 523 L. That’s a difference of about 867 L.
When it comes to payload, the Mercedes Vito Bus carries substantially more – 1,077 kg compared to 469 kg. That’s a difference of about 608 kg.
Who wins the race in the data check?
The Mercedes Vito Bus holds a decisive overall lead in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.
from £36,300
Mercedes Vito Bus
Ford Puma
Mercedes Vito Bus
Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Ford Puma
The Ford Puma blends sporty styling with practical everyday usability, making it a smart choice for drivers who want flair without sacrificing versatility. Its engaging driving character and clever interior packaging give it a more dynamic and useful feel than many rivals.
details
Mercedes Vito Bus
The Mercedes Vito is a sturdy, no-nonsense people carrier that blends commercial practicality with a surprisingly civilised cabin, making long shuttles feel less like a chore. If you need a dependable transporter that swallows luggage, forgives hard use and still looks a touch more premium than a plain van, the Vito is an easy, sensible pick.
details
Ford Puma
Mercedes Vito Bus
Costs and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
23,900 - 36,300 £
|
Price
36,300 - 55,900 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
5.4 - 5.9 L/100km
|
Consumption L/100km
6.7 - 10 L/100km
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
13 - 13.9 kWh/100km
|
Consumption kWh/100km
26.7 - 26.9 kWh/100km
|
|
Electric Range
404 - 417 km
|
Electric Range
248 - 370 km
|
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
Battery Capacity
60 - 90 kWh
|
|
co2
0 - 135 g/km
|
co2
0 - 228 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Fuel tank capacity
57 - 70 L
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
SUV
|
Body Type
Bus
|
|
Seats
5
|
Seats
8
|
|
Doors
-
|
Doors
4
|
|
Curb weight
1,316 - 1,563 kg
|
Curb weight
2,023 - 2,739 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
456 - 523 L
|
Trunk capacity
580 - 1,390 L
|
|
Length
-
|
Length
4,895 - 5,370 mm
|
|
Width
1,805 mm
|
Width
1,928 mm
|
|
Height
-
|
Height
1,890 mm
|
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
Max trunk capacity
4,190 - 4,990 L
|
|
Payload
367 - 469 kg
|
Payload
726 - 1,077 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Petrol MHEV, Electric
|
Engine Type
Diesel, Electric, Petrol
|
|
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic, Reduction Gearbox
|
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox, Reduction Gearbox
|
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
Rear-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive, Front-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
125 - 168 HP
|
Power HP
136 - 237 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
7.4 - 9.8 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
-
|
|
Max Speed
-
|
Max Speed
140 km/h
|
|
Torque
170 - 290 Nm
|
Torque
330 - 500 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
3
|
Number of Cylinders
4
|
|
Power kW
92 - 124 kW
|
Power kW
100 - 174 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
999 cm3
|
Engine capacity
1,950 - 1,999 cm3
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2,025 - 2,026
|
Model Year
2024
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
D, A
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
G, A
|
|
Brand
Ford
|
Brand
Mercedes-Benz
|
DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved.
The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.