Deutschland
France
Nederland
Great Britain
Sverige
Danmark
Suomi
Italia
Polska
Česko
EspañaVS
Ford Puma vs Mitsubishi Grandis comparison
Compare performance (168 HP vs 158 HP), boot space and price (23,900 £ vs 25,200 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Ford Puma or Mitsubishi Grandis?
Ford Puma vs Mitsubishi Grandis: Key differences
All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.
Puma
Costs and Efficiency:
Price and efficiency are key factors when choosing a car – and this is often where the real differences emerge.
Ford Puma is very slightly cheaper – starting at 23,900 £ , while the Mitsubishi Grandis costs 25,200 £ . That’s a price difference of around 1,277 £.
Fuel consumption also shows a difference: the Mitsubishi Grandis uses 4.3 L/100km and is markedly more efficient than the Ford Puma with 5.4 L/100km. The difference is about 1.1 L/100km.
Grandis
Engine and Performance:
Under the bonnet, it becomes clear which model is tuned for sportiness and which one takes the lead when you hit the accelerator.
When it comes to engine power, the Ford Puma offers only slightly more power – delivering 168 HP compared to 158 HP. That’s roughly 10 HP more horsepower.
When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Ford Puma is visibly quicker – completing the sprint in 7.4 s, while the Mitsubishi Grandis takes 9.1 s. That’s about 1.7 s quicker.
There’s also a difference in torque: the Ford Puma delivers only slightly more torque with 290 Nm compared to 265 Nm. That’s about 25 Nm more.
Puma
Space and Everyday Use:
Whether family car or daily driver – which one offers more room, flexibility and comfort?
Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.
In terms of curb weight, Ford Puma is very slightly lighter – 1,316 kg compared to 1,359 kg. The difference is around 43 kg.
Looking at boot space, the Mitsubishi Grandis offers barely more boot space – 576 L compared to 523 L. That’s a difference of about 53 L.
When it comes to payload, the Ford Puma carries marginally more – 469 kg compared to 459 kg. That’s a difference of about 10 kg.
Who wins the race in the data check?
The Ford Puma leads convincingly in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.
from £23,900
Ford Puma
Ford Puma
Mitsubishi Grandis
Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Ford Puma
The Ford Puma blends sporty styling with practical everyday usability, making it a smart choice for drivers who want flair without sacrificing versatility. Its engaging driving character and clever interior packaging give it a more dynamic and useful feel than many rivals.
details
Mitsubishi Grandis
The Mitsubishi Grandis is a no-nonsense MPV that hides a surprisingly sleek profile, making family duty look almost stylish. It’s spacious, easy to drive, and built to shrug off daily chaos, though the cabin feels dated and it prefers a relaxed cruise to any hot-hatch antics.
details
Ford Puma
Mitsubishi Grandis
Costs and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
23,900 - 36,300 £
|
Price
25,200 - 35,300 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
5.4 - 5.9 L/100km
|
Consumption L/100km
4.3 - 6.1 L/100km
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
13 - 13.9 kWh/100km
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
|
Electric Range
404 - 417 km
|
Electric Range
-
|
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
|
co2
0 - 135 g/km
|
co2
98 - 138 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
SUV
|
Body Type
SUV
|
|
Seats
5
|
Seats
5
|
|
Doors
-
|
Doors
-
|
|
Curb weight
1,316 - 1,563 kg
|
Curb weight
1,359 - 1,525 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
456 - 523 L
|
Trunk capacity
492 - 576 L
|
|
Length
-
|
Length
-
|
|
Width
1,805 mm
|
Width
1,797 mm
|
|
Height
-
|
Height
-
|
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
|
Payload
367 - 469 kg
|
Payload
395 - 459 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Petrol MHEV, Electric
|
Engine Type
Petrol MHEV, Full Hybrid
|
|
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
|
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic, Reduction Gearbox
|
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic, Automatic Gearbox
|
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
125 - 168 HP
|
Power HP
140 - 158 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
7.4 - 9.8 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
9.1 - 10.6 s
|
|
Max Speed
-
|
Max Speed
-
|
|
Torque
170 - 290 Nm
|
Torque
245 - 265 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
3
|
Number of Cylinders
4
|
|
Power kW
92 - 124 kW
|
Power kW
104 - 116 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
999 cm3
|
Engine capacity
1,333 - 1,789 cm3
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2,025 - 2,026
|
Model Year
2025
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
D, A
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
D, E, C
|
|
Brand
Ford
|
Brand
Mitsubishi
|
DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved.
The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.